進階搜尋


下載電子全文  
系統識別號 U0026-2807201115425000
論文名稱(中文) 研發專案評選之複合式多準則決策方法:以軟性電子設備開發為案例
論文名稱(英文) Hybrid Multiple Criteria Decision-Making Approach to R&D Project Selection: A Case in Flexible Electronic Equipment Development
校院名稱 成功大學
系所名稱(中) 國際經營管理研究所碩士在職專班
系所名稱(英) Institute of International Management (IIMBA--Master)(on the job class)
學年度 99
學期 2
出版年 100
研究生(中文) 黃國興
研究生(英文) Story Huang
學號 RA797110
學位類別 碩士
語文別 英文
論文頁數 154頁
口試委員 指導教授-鄭至甫
口試委員-吳萬益
口試委員-林清河
口試委員-方世杰
中文關鍵字 研發管理  計畫管理  風險分析  多準則決策方法 (MCDM)  修正式德菲法(MDM)  網路層級分析法(ANP)  決策實驗室法(DEMATEL) 
英文關鍵字 Management of R & D  Project management  Risk analysis  Multiple criteria decision-making (MCDM)  Modified Delphi Method (MDM)  Analytic Network Process (ANP)  Decision Making Trial and Evaluation Laboratory (DEMATEL) 
學科別分類
中文摘要 受到全球化的衝擊,企業必須投入大量資源進行研發作業以強化其競爭能力,然而投入資金進行研發並不一定保證成功,因之選擇有價值的研發方案成為組織營運一項重要的課題;在研發提案的評選上,研究者多著重於數量化經濟價值的評估或以複雜的評選準則來評判研發提案的良莠。本篇論文使用一特定模式,在提案初期即予以評估以減少資源的浪費。此模式乃架構於產品或服務的差異化上,其為管理大師波特(Porter)所提之三項組織競爭策略之一。此架構乃針對市場的需求,以與競爭對手具差異化的解決方法,來追求最大化組織效益。此論文運用系統化的多準則決策方法,包括修正式德菲法(Modified Delphi Method, MDM)、決策實驗室法(Decision making trial and evaluation laboratory, DEMATEL)與網路層級分析法(Analytic Network Process, ANP)等,整合NSDB架構,建構一系統化研發提案評選的模式。其分析了研發提案者對組織管理階層所訂定之評選準則的認知程度,從對準則的權重分析結果來看,本案例之非營利事業組織研發提案者能高度的認知管理階層所訂定之評選準則。運用前述多準則評估方法,本論文就需求(Need)、解決方法(Solution)、差異化(Differentiation)、效益(Benefit)等構面,釐訂了16項評選準則及其各自的權重數據,並據以評估一項有關軟性電子設備開發整合計畫的五項研發提案,其分析結果與由評審委員所評選的結果一致。
英文摘要 As global competition continues to intensify, significant numbers of organizations are investing large amounts of resources into R & D as they seek to gain competitive advantage. Yet, spending money on R&D does not guarantee success. Choosing valuable project(s) is very important for an organization to be sustainable operation. Regarding project selection, researchers focus on either numerically economic benefit or complicated criteria to challenge proposed project(s). This paper uses a model to evaluate proposed project at early stage based on the idea of product/service differentiation which is one of the three winning competitive positioning strategies for an organization suggested by Porter (1980). A framework based on the differentiation of competitive strategy is created by providing a solution (S) to market need (N), and by maximizing its benefits (B) through differentiating (D) with competitors. A systematic MCDM approach, including MDM, DEMATEL, and ANP was held and accompanied with NSDB framework to form a systematic project(s) selection model. This model could enhance the efficiency of selecting R&D project(s) and access the consistency between manager’s and planner’s view of point regarding the selection criteria of R&D project(s). A case study regarding equipment development about an emerging industry of flexible electronics has been carried out to exam the above mentioned MCDM model.
By way of the method combined ANP with DEMATEL, verifying the awareness to the R&D selection rule for those planners who want to shoot for the resource from stakeholders has been proved significantly. In accordance with the result, the priority/weights shows little bias between NPM and NPP that implies a planner working in a non-profit organization has highly awareness to the R&D selection rule.
Sixteen weighted criteria accompanied with four corresponding aspects, need, solution, differentiation and benefit, including (1)new market potential (NMP), (2)the potential size of market (PSM), (3)time to market (TTM), (4)urgent customer requirement (UCR), (5)ability to meet likely future regulations (MFR), (6)technical resource availability (TRA), (7)opportunity of technical success (OTS), (8)contents of technical plan (CTP), (9)advancement of technology (AOT), (10)innovation of technology (IOT), (11)key of technology (KOT), (12)patent Portfolios (PP), (13)potential return on investment (PROI), (14)aid the organization in competing in the market (AOC), (15)improvement on QESIS (QESIS), and (16)opportunity of market success (OMS) has been selected and weighted by MDM and ANP combined with DEMATEL, and also applied to evaluate a new program, including five R&D proposals in the field of flexible electronic (FE) industry equipments. The analyzed result is consistent to the real case conducted by evaluation committee.
論文目次 TABLE OF CONTENTS
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS I
ABSTRACT II
TABLE OF CONTENTS V
LIST OF TABLES VIII
LIST OF FIGURES X
CHAPTER ONE INTRODUCTION 1
1.1 Research Background. 1
1.2 Research Motivation. 2
1.3 Research Objectives. 4
1.4 Research Significance. 4
1.5 Research Procedure. 7
CHAPTER TWO LITERATURE REVIEW 9
2.1 Research & Development (R&D). 9
2.2 Flexible Electronic Equipment. 11
2.3 Selection Criteria of R&D 14
2.4 Pre-Selected Criteria for NSDB. 23
CHAPTER THREE RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODOLOGY 27
3.1 Modified Delphi Method (MDM). 28
3.2 Decision Making Trial and Evaluation Laboratory (DEMATEL). 32
3.3 Analytic Network Process (ANP). 36
3.3.1 Paired Comparisons. 38
3.3.2 Networks, Dependence and Feedback. 41
3.4 A Hybrid MCDM Model. 45
3.5 Case Study: R&D project for Equipments of Flexible Electronic Industry. 48
3.5.1 Project. 48
3.4.2 Pre-Selected Criteria. 49
3.4.3 ANP Structure. 51
3.4.4 Selection of Respondents. 54
3.4.5 Questionnaire Design. 58
CHAPTER FOUR RESEARCH RESULTS 59
4.1 Modified Delphi Method (MDM)- Criteria Selection.. 59
4.2 DEMATEL- Data for the Influence of Element Relationship. 64
4.3 ANP combined with DEMATEL- Data collection and Analysis. 75
4.4 Proposal Evaluation. 89
CHAPTER FIVE CONCLUSION AND SUGGESTIONS 92
5.1 Conclusion. 92
5.2 Academic Implication. 94
5.3 Managerial Implication. 96
5.4 Research limitation. 97
5.5 Future research recommendation. 97
REFERENCES 99
APPENDICES 104
Appendix 1: Criteria of Reviewed Literature 104
Appendix 2: Pre-selected Criteria Combined with Proposed Criteria by Experts 109
Appendix 3: DEMATEL Survey- Influence Matrix 113
Appendix 4: ANP- Pairwise Comparison: Aspect & Criteria 121
Appendix 5: ANP- Pairwise Comparison: Alternatives 137
Appendix 6: Limited supermatrix 141
Appendix 7: Questionnaire 144
參考文獻 Arping, S., & Lóránth, G. (2006). Corporate leverage and product differentiation strategy. The Journal of Business, 79(6), 3175-3206.
Bosworth, D., Wilson, R., & Young, A. (1995). Research and development (M.C Fleming ed. Vol. 27). London: Chapman & Hall.
Brown, B. B. (1968). Delphi process: A methodology used for the elicitation of opinions of experts. Santa Monica, CA. (R. Corporation o. Document Number)
Burke, R. (1999). Project Management. New York: John Wiley & Sons Ltd.
Carlsson, C., Fullér, R., Heikkilä, M., & Majlender, P. (2007). A fuzzy approach to R&D project portfolio selection. International Journal of Approximate Reasoning, 44(2), 93-105.
Chang, F. (2010). A program of research and development for flexible electronics equipment and module technology. Tainan: Industrial Technology Research Instituteo. Document Number)
Chin, Y.-H. (2008). Flexible electronic market outlook. Industrial Material Magazine, 263, 65-68.
Chiu, Y.-J., Chen, H.-C., Tzeng, G.-H., & Shyu, J. Z. (2006). Marketing strategy based on customer behaviour for the LCD-TV. International Journal of Management and Decision Making, 7(2-3), 143-165.
Coffin, M. A., & Taylor, B. W. (1996). Multiple criteria R&D project selection and scheduling using fuzzy logic. Computers & Operations Research, 23(3), 207-220.
Custer, R. L., Scarcella, J. A., & Stewart, B. R. (1999). The Modified Delphi Technique - A Rotational Modification. Journal of Vocational and Technical Education, Volume 15, Number 2.
Dalkey, N., & Helmer, O. (1963). An experimental application of the Delphi Method to the use of experts. Management Science, 9(3), 458-467.
Delbecq, A. L. (1975). Group techniques for program planning : a guide to nominal group and Delphi processes / Andre L. Delbecq, Andrew H. Van de Ven, David H. Gustafson. Glenview, Ill. :: Scott, Foresman.
Dey, P. K. (2006). Integrated project evaluation and selection using multiple attribute decision making technique. International Journal of Production Economics, 103(1), 90-103.
Directorate General of Budget Accounting and Statistics of Executive Yuan [DGBAS]. (2010). General information of central government general budget proposal for Republic of China. Retrieved. from.
Doctor, R. N., Newton, D. P., & Pearson, A. (2001). Managing uncertainty in research and development. Technovation, 21(2), 79-90.
Dutta, P., Lach, S., & Rustichini, A. (1990). Innovation and product differentiation. Unpublished Discussion Paper 894. Northwestern University, Center for Mathematical Studies in Economics and Management Science
Fenwick, D., Daim, T. U., & Gerdsri, N. (2009). Value Driven Technology Road Mapping (VTRM) process integrating decision making and marketing tools: Case of Internet security technologies. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 76(8), 1055-1077.
Fontela, E., & Gabus, A. (1976). The DEMATEL observer. Unpublished Report. Battelle Geneva Research Center.
Fox, E., Baker, N., & Bryant, J. (1984). Economic models for R&D project selection in the presence of project Interactions. Management Science, 30(7), 890-902.
Goodman, C. (1987). The Delphi technique: A critique. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 12(6), 729-734.
Gulbrandsen, M., & Kyvik, S. (2010). Are the concepts basic research, applied research and experimental development still useful? An empirical investigation among Norwegian academics. Science & Public Policy (SPP), 37(5), 343-353.
Hall, D., & Nauda, A. (1990). An interactive approach for selecting IR&D projects. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, 37(2), 126-133.
Hanulakova, E. (1998). The nature and peculiarities of marketing in nonprofit organizations. Ekonomicky Casopis, 46(5), 715-729.
Hori, S., & Shimizu, Y. (1999). Designing methods of human interface for supervisory control systems. Control Engineering Practice, 7(11), 1413-1419.
Hsu, C., & Sandford, B. (2007). The delphi technique: Making sense of consensus. Practical Assessment, Research & Evaluation, 12(10), 1-8.
Hsu, Y.-G., Tzeng, G.-H., & Shy, J. Z. (2003). Fuzzy multiple criteria selection of government-sponsored frontier technology R&D projects. R&D Management, 33(5), 539-551.
Huang, C.-C., Chu, P.-Y., & Chiang, Y.-H. (2008). A fuzzy AHP application in government-sponsored R&D project selection. The International Journal of Management Science, 36(6), 1038-1052.
Jerry Ho, W.-R., Tsai, C.-L., Tzeng, G.-H., & Fang, S.-K. (2011). Combined DEMATEL technique with a novel MCDM model for exploring portfolio selection based on CAPM. Expert Systems with Applications, 38(1), 16-25.
Jiang, J. J., & Klein, G. (1999). Project selection criteria by strategic orientation. Information & Management, 36(2), 63-75.
Kerzner, H. (2009). Project management: A systems approach to planning, scheduling, and controlling. New Jersey, United States of America and Canada: John Wiley & Sons Inc., Hoboken.
Kotler, P., Armstrong, G., Ang, S. H., Leong, S. M., Tan, C. T., & Hon-Ming, O. Y. (2009). Principles of marketing: A global perspective. Cincinnati, Ohio: Pearson Education Inc.
Lawson, C., Longhurst, P., & Ivey, P. (2006). The application of a new research and development project selection model in SMEs. Technovation, 26, 242-250.
Lawson, C. P., Longhurst, P. J., & Ivey, P. C. (2006). The application of a new research and development project selection model in SMEs. technovation, 26, 242-250.
Lee, J., Veloso, F. M., Hounshell, D. A., & Rubin, E. S. (2010). Forcing technological change: A case of automobile emissions control technology development in the US. Technovation, 30(4), 249-264.
Liberatore, M. J. (1988). Applications of the AHP. Paper presented at the Proc. 6th Int. Conf. on Mathematical Modelling.
Lin, C.-L., & Tzeng, G.-H. (2009). A value-created system of science (technology) park by using DEMATEL. Expert Systems with Applications: An International Journal, 36(6), 9683-9697.
Lin, C., & Hsieh, P.-J. (2004). A fuzzy decision support system for strategic portfolio management. Decision Support Systems, 38(3), 383-398.
Linstone, H. A., & Turoff, M. (2002). The Delphi method: Techniques and applications. Computer and Information Science, 18(3), 363.
Liou, J. J. H., Tzeng, G.-H., & Chang, H.-C. (2007). Airline safety measurement using a hybrid model. Journal of Air Transport Management, 13(4), 243-249.
Matsubayashi, N. (2007). Price and quality competition: The effect of differentiation and vertical integration. European Journal of Operational Research, 180(2), 907-921.
Meade, L., & Presley, A. (2002). R&D project selection using the analytic network process. Transactions on Engineering Management, 49(1), 59-66.
Meade, L., & Presley, A. (2005). R&D project selection using ANP the analytic network process. Potentials, IEEE, 21(2), 22-28.
Miller, D. (1992). The generic strategy trap. Journal of Business Strategy, 13(1), 37-41.
Okoli, C., & Pawlowski, S. D. (2004). The Delphi method as a research tool: an example, design considerations and applications. Information & Management, 42(1), 15-29.
Organic Electronics Association [OE-A], & Verband Deutscher Maschinen und Anlagenbau German Engineering Federationhe [VDMA]. (2010). Organic and Printed Electronics. Paper presented at the International Conference and Exhibition for the Organic and Printed Electronics Industry.
Porter, M. E. (1980). Competitive strategy: Techniques for analyzing industries and competitors (Vol. Chapter 2). New York: The Free Press.
Raz, T., Shenhar, A. J., & Dvir, D. (2002). Risk management, project success, and technological uncertainty. R&D Management, 32(2), 101.
Richardson, G. (2010). Project management. Theory and practice. Miami: Auerbach Publications.
Rowe, G., & Wright, G. (1999). The Delphi technique as a forecasting tool: Issues and analysis. International Journal of Forecasting, 15(4), 353-375.
Saaty, T. (2004). Fundamentals of the analytic network process — multiple networks with benefits, costs, opportunities and risks. Journal of Systems Science and Systems Engineering, 13(3), 348-379.
Saaty, T. (2006). The Analytic Network Process. University of Pittsburgh.
Saaty, T. L. (1999). Fundamentals of the analytic network process. Paper presented at the International Symposium in Analytical Hierarchichal Process, Japan.
Saaty, T. L. (2008). The analytic network process. Iranian Journal of Operations Research, 1(1), 1-27.
Sankır, N. D. (2005). Flexible electronics: Materials and device fabrication. Virginia Tech University, Blacksburg, Virginia.
Skulmosky, G., Hartman, F., & Krahn, J. (2007). The Delphi method for graduate research. Journal of Information Technology Education, 6, 2-22.
Souder, W. E. (1986). Achieving organizational consensus with respect to R&D project selection. Management Science, 21(6), 669-681.
Stewart, T. J. (1991). A multi-criteria decision support system for R&D project selection. Journal of the Operational Research Society, 42(1), 17-26.
Teece, D. (1986). Profiting from technological innovation: Implications for integration, collaboration, licensing and public policy. Research Policy, 15(6), 285-305.
Tzeng, G.-H., Chiang, C.-H., & Li, C.-W. (2007). Evaluating intertwined effects in e-learning programs: A novel hybrid MCDM model based on factor analysis and DEMATEL. Expert Systems with Applications, 32(4), 1028-1044.
Vinderskov, K. (2006). The NABC method. Education and Culture, from www.plan09.dk
Wang, J., Lin, W., & Huang, Y.-H. (2010). A performance-oriented risk management framework for innovative R&D projects. Technovation, 30(11-12), 601-611.
Yang, Y.-P. O., Shieh, H.-M., Leu, J.-D., & Tzeng, G.-H. (2008). A Novel Hybrid MCDM Model Combined with DEMATEL and ANP with Applications. International Journal of Operations Research, 5(3), 160-168.
Zopounidis, C., & Pardalos, P. (Eds.). (2006). Handbook of multicriteria analysis. London: Springer.
Zopounidis, C., & Pardalos, P. (Eds.). (2010). Handbook of multicriteria analysis (1 ed.). London: Springer.
論文全文使用權限
  • 同意授權校內瀏覽/列印電子全文服務,於2013-08-10起公開。
  • 同意授權校外瀏覽/列印電子全文服務,於2013-08-10起公開。


  • 如您有疑問,請聯絡圖書館
    聯絡電話:(06)2757575#65773
    聯絡E-mail:etds@email.ncku.edu.tw