進階搜尋


   電子論文尚未授權公開,紙本請查館藏目錄
(※如查詢不到或館藏狀況顯示「閉架不公開」,表示該本論文不在書庫,無法取用。)
系統識別號 U0026-2806201301412100
論文名稱(中文) 公私部門合作關係之價值創造探討-以文化創意產業為例
論文名稱(英文) Exploring Value Creation of Public-Private Partnerships: A Case Study of Creative Industry
校院名稱 成功大學
系所名稱(中) 國際企業研究所碩博士班
系所名稱(英) Institute of International Business
學年度 101
學期 2
出版年 102
研究生(中文) 黃柏賢
研究生(英文) Bo-Shian Huang
學號 r66001035
學位類別 碩士
語文別 中文
論文頁數 77頁
口試委員 指導教授-方世杰
口試委員-曾瓊慧
口試委員-馮國豪
中文關鍵字 公私部門合作關係  價值創造  治理機制 
英文關鍵字 public-private partnership  value creation  governance mechanism 
學科別分類
中文摘要 公部門與私部門因正外部性、獨特資源、不確定性和治理成本等動機共同合作,稱為公私部門合作關係。依據不同的考量因素如環境不確定性程度、市場正外部性程度及專屬性資產歸屬,導致不同的治理機制模式,亦即自主型與整合型之合作模式。而價值創造在公私部門合作關係中是一項重要之議題,根據外部性、資源互補或資源結合及獨特成本優勢等價值創造來源,使公私部門能截長補短產生綜效的成果。
本研究以公私部門合作關係之觀點,探討文化創意產業之價值創造,透過質性研究法之深度訪談方法,訪談兩個案的企業負責人,具體勾勒出文化創意產業的價值創造與公私部門互動關係。並試圖研究出價值的創造來源以及治理機制如何影響價值創造。
研究結果發現在文化創意產業上,價值創造之來源確實符合理論的描述,亦即理論能與實務結合;另一方面,從公私部門合作關係之互動程度及聯繫頻繁度,就可以深刻了解到治理機制的類異點,也間接影響價值創造的差異性。最後根據研究發現與結果,針對公部門與私部門提出適合的建議。
英文摘要 Public sector and private sector may proceed cooperation with each other due to positive externalities, industry-specific competencies, and governance costs, which is public-private partnerships. Different factors, like environment uncertainty, market externalities and specific resource, will contribute to various governance mechanisms, such as independent and integrated cooperation. Value creation is an important issue in public-private relationship. Value resource, externalities, differential cost advantages and resource complementarity or recombination, may cause the competitive effect between public sector and private sector.
This research adopts the public-private partnership perspective to discuss the value creation of creative industry, through qualitative method. By interviewing with two responsible people, this research captures the public-private partnership and value creation process of creative industries. The purpose of this research is to study how value resource and governance mechanism affect value creation.
This research finds that value resource indeed corresponds with theories, which means theory can be matched with reality. On the other hand, from interacting degree and frequency between public sector and private sector, we can understand the similarity and difference of governance mechanism may affect the differentiation of value creation. Above all, this research provides appropriate suggestions with public sector and private sector.
論文目次 表目錄 V
圖目錄 VI
第一章 導論 1
第一節 研究背景 1
第二節 文獻缺口 4
第三節 研究目的與研究問題 5
第二章 文獻回顧 8
第一節 價值創造 8
第二節 公私部門合作關係 12
第三節 文化創意產業 18
第四節 文創業之公私部門關係與共價值創造 21
第三章 研究方法 23
第一節 量化研究與質性研究 23
第二節 個案研究方法 26
第三節 資料蒐集方法與分析 28
第四章 產業概況描述 31
第一節 台灣文化創意產業發展現況 31
第二節 台灣文化創意產業發展趨勢與分析 35
第三節 藝文類產業現況與展望 39
第四節 研究個案介紹 44
第五章 公私部門合作關係之價值創造探討 51
第一節 文化創意產業之價值創造來源 51
第二節 文化創意產業之公私部門關係 58
第三節 治理機制與價值創造的關係 63
第六章 結論與建議 70
第一節 研究發現 70
第二節 管理意涵 72
第三節 研究限制與後續建議 74
參考文獻 75
參考文獻 Amabile, T. M. (1996). Creativity in context: Update to" the social psychology of creativity.": Westview Press.
Bonardi, J. P. (2008). The internal limits to firms' nonmarket activities. European Management Review, 5(3), 165-174.
Bowman, C., & Ambrosini, V. (2002). Value creation versus value capture: towards a coherent definition of value in strategy. British Journal of Management, 11(1), 1-15.
Brinkerhoff, D. W., & Brinkerhoff, J. M. (2011). Public–private partnerships: Perspectives on purposes, publicness, and good governance. Public Administration and Development, 31(1), 2-14.
Coase, R. H. (1937). The nature of the firm. Economica, 4(16), 386-405.
Domberger, S., & Fernandez, P. (2003). Public‐Private Partnerships for Service Delivery. Business Strategy Review, 10(4), 29-39.
Dyer, J. H., & Singh, H. (1998). The relational view: Cooperative strategy and sources of interorganizational competitive advantage. Academy of Management Review, 23(4), 660-679.
Eisenhardt, K. M. (1989). Building theories from case study research. Academy of Management Review, 532-550.
Frynas, J. G., Mellahi, K., & Pigman, G. A. (2006). First mover advantages in international business and firm‐specific political resources. Strategic Management Journal, 27(4), 321-345.
Harris, S. G., & Sutton, R. I. (1986). Functions of parting ceremonies in dying organizations. Academy of Management journal, 29(1), 5-30.
Kidder, T. (1982). The Soul of a New Machine. New York: Avon.
Kivleniece, I., & Quelin, B. V. (2012). Creating and capturing value in public-private ties: A private actor's perspective. Academy of Management Review, 37(2), 272-299.
Lepak, D. P., Smith, K. G., & Taylor, M. S. (2007). VALUE CREATION AND VALUE CAPTURE: A MULTILEVEL PERSPECTIVE. Academy of Management Review, 32(1), 180-194.
Mahoney, J. T., McGahan, A. M., & Pitelis, C. N. (2009). Perspective—the interdependence of private and public interests. Organization Science, 20(6), 1034-1052.
Minichiello, V., Aroni, R., Timewell, E., & Alexander, L. (1995). In-Depth interviewing, Second Edition. South Melbourne: Longman.
Oliver, C., & Holzinger, I. (2008). The effectiveness of strategic political management: A dynamic capabilities framework. Academy of Management Review, 33(2), 496-520.
Pinfield, L. T. (1986). A field evaluation of perspectives on organizational decision making. Administrative Science Quarterly, 365-388.
Porter, M. E. (1985). Competitive Advantage: creating and sustaining competitive advantage: The Free Press, division of McMillan, Inc. New York.
Porter, M. E. (1990). Competitive advantage of nations: Free press.
Provan, K. G., & Kenis, P. (2008). Modes of network governance: Structure, management, and effectiveness. Journal of public administration research and theory, 18(2), 229-252.
Rangan, S., Samii, R., & Van Wassenhove, L. N. (2006). CONSTRUCTIVE PARTNERSHIPS: WHEN ALLIANCES BETWEEN PRIVATE FIRMS AND PUBLIC ACTORS CAN ENABLE CREATIVE STRATEGIES. Academy of Management Review, 31(3), 738-751.
Rein, M., & Stott, L. (2009). Working together: Critical perspectives on six cross-sector partnerships in Southern Africa. Journal of business ethics, 90, 79-89.
Seitanidi, M. M., & Crane, A. (2009). Implementing CSR through partnerships: Understanding the selection, design and institutionalisation of nonprofit-business partnerships. Journal of business ethics, 85, 413-429.
Sobel, R. S., & Rothenberg, A. (1980). Artistic creation as stimulated by superimposed versus separated visual images. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 39(5), 953.
Teece, D. J., Pisano, G., & Shuen, A. (1997). Strategic management and dynamic capabilities. Resources, Firms, and Strategies: A Reader in the Resource-Based Perspective, Oxford University Press, Oxford.
Yin, R. K. (1981). The case study as a serious research strategy. Science Communication, 3(1), 97-114.
Yin, R. K. (1984). Case study research.: Beverly Hills, CA: Sage Publications.
Yin, R. K. (2003). Case study research: Design and methods (Vol. 5): Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
文化部. (2011). 台灣文化創意產業發展年報.
台南企業官方網站。2013年5月5日,http://www.tai-nan.com/about.aspx?ID=8。
台南企業電子報. (2009). 台南企業文化藝術基金會 紮根府城 成效斐然
行政院文化建設委員會. (2009). 文化創意產業發展方案 行動計畫.
行政院文化建設委員會. (2011). 文化創意產業.
皇尚企業官方網站。2013年5月1日,http://www.sio-house.com.tw/hes.php。
張心穎. (2008). 推動文創產業的火車頭-電影產業.
黃惠穗. (2006). 促進我國文化創意產業發展之研究—夥伴關係理論之應用. 文化創意產業與地方發展策略研究生學術論文研討會論文集, 頁, 83-109.
楊燕枝與吳思華. (2005). 文化創意產業的價值創造形塑之初探. 行銷評論, 2(3), 313-338.
謝明瑞. (2012). 台灣從OTOP計畫、家有產業到文創產業的兌變
論文全文使用權限
  • 同意授權校內瀏覽/列印電子全文服務,於2018-07-11起公開。


  • 如您有疑問,請聯絡圖書館
    聯絡電話:(06)2757575#65773
    聯絡E-mail:etds@email.ncku.edu.tw