||The Effect of Employees’ Self-monitoring Personality and Tie Strength on Tacit Knowledge Sharing
||Department of Business Administration
This study aims to bridge the gap of relationship between self-monitoring inclination of employees and social tie strength, and tends to find out further influence on tacit knowledge sharing in organization. By taking tie strength into account in the relationship between self-monitoring trait and tacit knowledge sharing in organization, this study offers microfoundation for future knowledge management and human resource management.
Based on the questionnaire survey of 90 employees working in R&D, MIS department or engaging specific projects, the result shows there’s positive relationship between self-monitoring trait and tie strength, but there’s no direct significant relationship between self-monitoring and tacit knowledge sharing unless the impact of social tie strength is controlled. In the end, this study offers related discussion and points out the research limitation, the implication for practice and future research as well.
CHAPTER ONE INTRODUCTION 1
1.1 Background to the problem 1
1.2 Problem statement 3
1.3 Purpose of study 5
CHAPETER TWO LITERATURE REVIEW AND RESEARCH HYPOTHESIS 6
2.1 Self-monitoring 6
2.2 Tie strength 7
2.3 The relationship between self-monitoring and tie strength 8
2.4 Tacit Knowledge 11
2.5 The relationship between tie strength and tacit knowledge sharing 14
CHAPTER THREE METHOD 16
3.1 Research design 16
3.2.1 Tacit knowledge sharing 16
3.2.2 Self-monitoring trait 17
3.2.3 Tie strength 19
3.3 Research sample 19
3.4 Data collection procedure 20
3.5 Data analysis 21
3.5.1 Reliability 21
3.5.2 Validity 21
3.5.3 Regression Analysis 21
CHAPETER FOUR RESULTS 23
4.1 Psychometric properties of the instrument 23
4.2 Demographics of Participants 25
4.3 Test of Hypothesis 27
4.3.1 Correlation analysis 27
4.3.2 Regression analysis 29
184.108.40.206 The relationship between self-monitoring and tie strength 29
220.127.116.11 The relationship between tie strength and tacit knowledge sharing 30
18.104.22.168 The relationship between self-monitoring and tacit knowledge sharing 31
4.4 Summary of Hypothesis Testing 32
CHAPTER FIVE CONCLUSION 33
5.1 Summary 33
5.2 Discussion with Relevant Literature and Conclusion 34
5.2.1 Relationship between self-monitoring and tie strength 34
5.2.2 Relationship between tie strength and tacit knowledge sharing 35
5.2.3 Relationship between self-monitoring and tacit knowledge sharing 35
5.2.4 Significance of this study 36
5.3 Implication for Practice 38
5.4 Limitation 39
5.5 Recommendation for Future Research 40
Figure 1 Research model 15
Table 1 Items and Source of Tacit Knowledge Sharing 17
Table 2 Items and Source of Self-monitoring 18
Table 3 Items and Source of Tie Strength 19
Table 4 Factor Loading and Cronbach's α of the Constructs and Items 24
Table 5 Demographic Characteristics of the Sample (n=90) 26
Table 6 Correlation Analysis of Variables 28
Table 7 Relationship between Self-monitoring and Tie strength 30
Table 8 Relationship between Tie strength and Tacit Knowledge Sharing 30
Table 9 Relationship between Self-monitoring and Tacit Knowledge Sharing- Tie Strength as the Mediator 31
Table 10 Summary of Hypothesis Testing 32
Table 11 Comparisons between Past Research and the Findings of Current Study 37
Bock, G.W. ＆ Kim, Y.G. (2002), Breaking the Myths of Rewards: An Exploratory Study ofAttitudes About Knowledge Sharing, Information Resources Management Journal, 15(2), 14-21.
Bock, G. W., Zmud, R. W., Kim, Y. G., & Lee, J. N. (2005). Behavior intention formation in knowledge sharing: examining the roles of extrinsic motivators, social-psychological forces, and organizational climate. MIS Quarterly, 29(1), 87-111.
Brown, J. S., & Duguid, P. (1991). Organizational learning and communities-of-practice: toward a unified view of working, learing, and innovating. Organization Science, 2(1), 40-57.
Burt, R.S. (1992). Structural Holes: The Social Structure of Competition. Cambridge, MA : Harvard University Press.
Cabrera, Á., Collins, W. C., & Salgado, J. F. (2006). Determinants of individual engagement in knowledge sharing. International Journal of Human Resource Management, 17(2), 245-264.
Chow, W. S., & Chan, L. S. (2008). Social network, social trust and shared goals in organizational knowledge sharing. Information & Management, 45(7), 458-465.
Damodaran, L., & Olphert, W. (2000). Barriers and facilitators to the use of knowledge management systems. Behaviour & Information Technology, 19(6), 405-413.
Davidsson, P., & Honig, B. (2003). The role of social and human capital among nascent entrepreneurs. Journal of Business Venturing, 18(3), 301.
Day D.V. & Kilduff M. (2003). Self-monitoring personality and work relationships: Individual differences in social networks. In: M.R. Barrick and A.M. Ryan, Editors, Personality and work: Reconsidering the role of personality in organizations, Jossey-Bass, San Francisco, CA (2003), 205–228.
Granovetter, Mark. (1973). The Strength of Weak Ties. American Journal of Sociology, 78(6), 1360-1380.
Granovetter, M. (1985). Economic action and social structure: The problem of embeddedness, American Journal of Sociology, 91(3), 481.
Hansen, M. T. (1999). The Search-Transfer Problem: The Role of Weak Ties in Sharing Knowledge across Organization Subunits. Administrative Science Quarterly, 44(1), 82-111.
Hsu, I.-C. (2006). Enhancing employee tendencies to share knowledge – Case studies of nine companies in Taiwan. International Journal of information management, 26, 326-338.
Kalling, T. (2003). Organization-internal transfer of knowledge and the role of motivation: a qualitative case study. Knowledge & Process Management, 10(2), 115-126.
Kavak, B., Gürel, E., Eryiğit, C., & Tektaş, Ö. (2009). Examining the Effects of Moral Development Level, Self-Concept, and Self-Monitoring on Consumers’ Ethical Attitudes. Journal of Business Ethics, 88(1), 115-135.
Kim S.-K. & Kim M.-J. (2007), Mentoring network and self-monitoring personality,
Management Revue, 18(1), 42-54.
Krackhardt, D., & Stern, R. (1988). Informal networks and organizational crises: An experimental simulation. Social Psychology Quarterly, 51(2), 123-140.
Levin, D. Z., & Cross, R. (2004). The Strength of Weak Ties You Can Trust: The Mediating Role of Trust in Effective Knowledge Transfer. Management Science, 50(11), 1477-1490.
Lin, C.-P. (2007). To Share or Not to Share: Modeling Tacit Knowledge Sharing, Its Mediators and Antecedents. Journal of Business Ethics, 70(4), 411-428.
Lin, H.-F. (2007). Knowledge sharing and firm innovation capability: an empirical study. International Journal of Manpower, 28(3), 315-332.
Marsden, P. V., & Campbell, K. E. (1984). Measuring Tie Strength. Social Forces, 63(2), 482-501.
Minbaeva, D., Foss, N., & Snell, S. (2009). Bringing the knowledge perspective into HRM. Human Resource Management, 48(4), 477-483.
Nahapiet, J., & Ghoshal, S. (1998). Social capital, intellectual capital ,and the organizational advantage. Academy of Management Review, 23(2), 242-266.
Nonaka, I. (1994). A dynamic theory of organizational knowledge creation. Organizational Science, 5(1), 14-37.
Oh, H., & Kilduff, M. (2008). The ripple effect of personality on social structure: Self-monitoring origins of network brokerage. Journal of Applied Psychology, 93(5), 1155-1164.
Osterloh, M., & Frey, B. S. (2000). Motivation, Knowledge Transfer, and Organizational Forms. Organization Science, 11(5), 538-550.
Polanyi, M. (1966). The Tacit Dimension. Routledge and Kegan Paul, London, UK.
Prusak, L., & Cohen, D. (2001). How to Invest in Social Capital. Harvard Business Review, 79(6), 86-93.
Reychav, I., & Weisberg, J. (2009). Good for workers, good for companies: How knowledge sharing benefits individual employees. Knowledge & Process Management, 16(4), 186-197.
Sosa, M. E. (2011). Where Do Creative Interactions Come From? The Role of Tie Content and Social Networks. Organization Science, 22(1), 1-21.
Snyder, M. (1974). Self-monitoring of expressive behavior. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 30, 526-537.
Snyder, M. & Gangestad, S. (1982). Choosing social situations: two investigations of self-monitoring processes. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 43(1), 123-135.
Snyder, M. and Gangestad, S. (1986). On the nature of self-monitoring: Matters of assessment, matters of validity. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51(1), 125-139.
Starbuck, W. H. (1992). Learning by Knowledge-intensive Firms. Journal of Management Studies, 29(6), 713-740.
Wang, C.-C. (2004). The Influence of Ethical and Self-interest Concerns on Knowledge Sharing Intentions among Managers: An Empirical Study. International Journal of Management, 21(3), 370-381.
Wang, S., & Noe, R. A. (2010). Knowledge sharing: A review and directions for future research. Human Resource Management Review, 20(2), 115-131.
Yang, S.-C., & Farn, C.-K. (2009). Social capital, behavioural control, and tacit knowledge sharing—A multi-informant design. International Journal of Information Management, 29(3), 210-218.
Zupan, N., & Kase, R. (2007). The Role of HR Actors in Knowledge Networks. International Journal of Manpower, 28(3-4), 243-259.