進階搜尋


   電子論文尚未授權公開,紙本請查館藏目錄
(※如查詢不到或館藏狀況顯示「閉架不公開」,表示該本論文不在書庫,無法取用。)
系統識別號 U0026-2806201120493500
論文名稱(中文) 員工自我監控性及社會關係聯結強度對組織內隱性知識分享的影響
論文名稱(英文) The Effect of Employees’ Self-monitoring Personality and Tie Strength on Tacit Knowledge Sharing
校院名稱 成功大學
系所名稱(中) 企業管理學系碩博士班
系所名稱(英) Department of Business Administration
學年度 99
學期 2
出版年 100
研究生(中文) 陳靖騏
研究生(英文) Ching-Chi Chen
學號 r46984158
學位類別 碩士
語文別 英文
論文頁數 50頁
口試委員 指導教授-王瑜琳
口試委員-陳寶蓮
口試委員-葉桂珍
中文關鍵字 員工自我監控性  社會關係聯結強度  知識分享 
英文關鍵字 self-monitoring  tie strength  knowledge sharing 
學科別分類
中文摘要 本研究旨在探討員工自我監控性及社會關係聯結強度之關係,進而探討其如何影響到組織內隱性知識分享,並藉由加入社會關係聯結強度以討論員工自我監控性是否影響組織內隱性知識分享,期以提供後續相關知識管理及人力資源管理相關基礎。
本研究針對90位目前服務於研發、MIS部門或有參與特定專案的在職員工進行問卷調查。分析結果顯示,員工自我監控性正向影響社會關係聯結強度,但並沒有顯著影響組織內隱性知識分享行為,但控制住社會聯結強度後,員工自我監控性與組織內隱性知識分享行為有顯著負向影響。此外,員工間之社會關係聯結強度與組織內隱性知識分享行為有顯著正向影響。最後,文末也提供本研究相關討論及研究限制,並對管理實務及未來研究上提供建議。
英文摘要 This study aims to bridge the gap of relationship between self-monitoring inclination of employees and social tie strength, and tends to find out further influence on tacit knowledge sharing in organization. By taking tie strength into account in the relationship between self-monitoring trait and tacit knowledge sharing in organization, this study offers microfoundation for future knowledge management and human resource management.
Based on the questionnaire survey of 90 employees working in R&D, MIS department or engaging specific projects, the result shows there’s positive relationship between self-monitoring trait and tie strength, but there’s no direct significant relationship between self-monitoring and tacit knowledge sharing unless the impact of social tie strength is controlled. In the end, this study offers related discussion and points out the research limitation, the implication for practice and future research as well.
論文目次 Contents
CHAPTER ONE INTRODUCTION 1
1.1 Background to the problem 1
1.2 Problem statement 3
1.3 Purpose of study 5
CHAPETER TWO LITERATURE REVIEW AND RESEARCH HYPOTHESIS 6
2.1 Self-monitoring 6
2.2 Tie strength 7
2.3 The relationship between self-monitoring and tie strength 8
2.4 Tacit Knowledge 11
2.5 The relationship between tie strength and tacit knowledge sharing 14
CHAPTER THREE METHOD 16
3.1 Research design 16
3.2Instrumentation 16
3.2.1 Tacit knowledge sharing 16
3.2.2 Self-monitoring trait 17
3.2.3 Tie strength 19
3.3 Research sample 19
3.4 Data collection procedure 20
3.5 Data analysis 21
3.5.1 Reliability 21
3.5.2 Validity 21
3.5.3 Regression Analysis 21
CHAPETER FOUR RESULTS 23
4.1 Psychometric properties of the instrument 23
4.2 Demographics of Participants 25
4.3 Test of Hypothesis 27
4.3.1 Correlation analysis 27
4.3.2 Regression analysis 29
4.3.2.1 The relationship between self-monitoring and tie strength 29
4.3.2.2 The relationship between tie strength and tacit knowledge sharing 30
4.3.2.3 The relationship between self-monitoring and tacit knowledge sharing 31
4.4 Summary of Hypothesis Testing 32
CHAPTER FIVE CONCLUSION 33
5.1 Summary 33
5.2 Discussion with Relevant Literature and Conclusion 34
5.2.1 Relationship between self-monitoring and tie strength 34
5.2.2 Relationship between tie strength and tacit knowledge sharing 35
5.2.3 Relationship between self-monitoring and tacit knowledge sharing 35
5.2.4 Significance of this study 36
5.3 Implication for Practice 38
5.4 Limitation 39
5.5 Recommendation for Future Research 40
References 41


Figures Content
Figure 1 Research model 15
Table Content
Table 1 Items and Source of Tacit Knowledge Sharing 17
Table 2 Items and Source of Self-monitoring 18
Table 3 Items and Source of Tie Strength 19
Table 4 Factor Loading and Cronbach's α of the Constructs and Items 24
Table 5 Demographic Characteristics of the Sample (n=90) 26
Table 6 Correlation Analysis of Variables 28
Table 7 Relationship between Self-monitoring and Tie strength 30
Table 8 Relationship between Tie strength and Tacit Knowledge Sharing 30
Table 9 Relationship between Self-monitoring and Tacit Knowledge Sharing- Tie Strength as the Mediator 31
Table 10 Summary of Hypothesis Testing 32
Table 11 Comparisons between Past Research and the Findings of Current Study 37
參考文獻 References
Bock, G.W. & Kim, Y.G. (2002), Breaking the Myths of Rewards: An Exploratory Study ofAttitudes About Knowledge Sharing, Information Resources Management Journal, 15(2), 14-21.
Bock, G. W., Zmud, R. W., Kim, Y. G., & Lee, J. N. (2005). Behavior intention formation in knowledge sharing: examining the roles of extrinsic motivators, social-psychological forces, and organizational climate. MIS Quarterly, 29(1), 87-111.
Brown, J. S., & Duguid, P. (1991). Organizational learning and communities-of-practice: toward a unified view of working, learing, and innovating. Organization Science, 2(1), 40-57.
Burt, R.S. (1992). Structural Holes: The Social Structure of Competition. Cambridge, MA : Harvard University Press.
Cabrera, Á., Collins, W. C., & Salgado, J. F. (2006). Determinants of individual engagement in knowledge sharing. International Journal of Human Resource Management, 17(2), 245-264.
Chow, W. S., & Chan, L. S. (2008). Social network, social trust and shared goals in organizational knowledge sharing. Information & Management, 45(7), 458-465.
Damodaran, L., & Olphert, W. (2000). Barriers and facilitators to the use of knowledge management systems. Behaviour & Information Technology, 19(6), 405-413.
Davidsson, P., & Honig, B. (2003). The role of social and human capital among nascent entrepreneurs. Journal of Business Venturing, 18(3), 301.
Day D.V. & Kilduff M. (2003). Self-monitoring personality and work relationships: Individual differences in social networks. In: M.R. Barrick and A.M. Ryan, Editors, Personality and work: Reconsidering the role of personality in organizations, Jossey-Bass, San Francisco, CA (2003), 205–228.
Granovetter, Mark. (1973). The Strength of Weak Ties. American Journal of Sociology, 78(6), 1360-1380.
Granovetter, M. (1985). Economic action and social structure: The problem of embeddedness, American Journal of Sociology, 91(3), 481.
Hansen, M. T. (1999). The Search-Transfer Problem: The Role of Weak Ties in Sharing Knowledge across Organization Subunits. Administrative Science Quarterly, 44(1), 82-111.
Hsu, I.-C. (2006). Enhancing employee tendencies to share knowledge – Case studies of nine companies in Taiwan. International Journal of information management, 26, 326-338.
Kalling, T. (2003). Organization-internal transfer of knowledge and the role of motivation: a qualitative case study. Knowledge & Process Management, 10(2), 115-126.
Kavak, B., Gürel, E., Eryiğit, C., & Tektaş, Ö. (2009). Examining the Effects of Moral Development Level, Self-Concept, and Self-Monitoring on Consumers’ Ethical Attitudes. Journal of Business Ethics, 88(1), 115-135.
Kim S.-K. & Kim M.-J. (2007), Mentoring network and self-monitoring personality,
Management Revue, 18(1), 42-54.
Krackhardt, D., & Stern, R. (1988). Informal networks and organizational crises: An experimental simulation. Social Psychology Quarterly, 51(2), 123-140.
Levin, D. Z., & Cross, R. (2004). The Strength of Weak Ties You Can Trust: The Mediating Role of Trust in Effective Knowledge Transfer. Management Science, 50(11), 1477-1490.
Lin, C.-P. (2007). To Share or Not to Share: Modeling Tacit Knowledge Sharing, Its Mediators and Antecedents. Journal of Business Ethics, 70(4), 411-428.
Lin, H.-F. (2007). Knowledge sharing and firm innovation capability: an empirical study. International Journal of Manpower, 28(3), 315-332.
Marsden, P. V., & Campbell, K. E. (1984). Measuring Tie Strength. Social Forces, 63(2), 482-501.
Minbaeva, D., Foss, N., & Snell, S. (2009). Bringing the knowledge perspective into HRM. Human Resource Management, 48(4), 477-483.
Nahapiet, J., & Ghoshal, S. (1998). Social capital, intellectual capital ,and the organizational advantage. Academy of Management Review, 23(2), 242-266.
Nonaka, I. (1994). A dynamic theory of organizational knowledge creation. Organizational Science, 5(1), 14-37.
Oh, H., & Kilduff, M. (2008). The ripple effect of personality on social structure: Self-monitoring origins of network brokerage. Journal of Applied Psychology, 93(5), 1155-1164.
Osterloh, M., & Frey, B. S. (2000). Motivation, Knowledge Transfer, and Organizational Forms. Organization Science, 11(5), 538-550.
Polanyi, M. (1966). The Tacit Dimension. Routledge and Kegan Paul, London, UK.
Prusak, L., & Cohen, D. (2001). How to Invest in Social Capital. Harvard Business Review, 79(6), 86-93.
Reychav, I., & Weisberg, J. (2009). Good for workers, good for companies: How knowledge sharing benefits individual employees. Knowledge & Process Management, 16(4), 186-197.
Sosa, M. E. (2011). Where Do Creative Interactions Come From? The Role of Tie Content and Social Networks. Organization Science, 22(1), 1-21.
Snyder, M. (1974). Self-monitoring of expressive behavior. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 30, 526-537.
Snyder, M. & Gangestad, S. (1982). Choosing social situations: two investigations of self-monitoring processes. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 43(1), 123-135.
Snyder, M. and Gangestad, S. (1986). On the nature of self-monitoring: Matters of assessment, matters of validity. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51(1), 125-139.
Starbuck, W. H. (1992). Learning by Knowledge-intensive Firms. Journal of Management Studies, 29(6), 713-740.
Wang, C.-C. (2004). The Influence of Ethical and Self-interest Concerns on Knowledge Sharing Intentions among Managers: An Empirical Study. International Journal of Management, 21(3), 370-381.
Wang, S., & Noe, R. A. (2010). Knowledge sharing: A review and directions for future research. Human Resource Management Review, 20(2), 115-131.
Yang, S.-C., & Farn, C.-K. (2009). Social capital, behavioural control, and tacit knowledge sharing—A multi-informant design. International Journal of Information Management, 29(3), 210-218.
Zupan, N., & Kase, R. (2007). The Role of HR Actors in Knowledge Networks. International Journal of Manpower, 28(3-4), 243-259.
論文全文使用權限
  • 同意授權校內瀏覽/列印電子全文服務,於2021-12-31起公開。
  • 同意授權校外瀏覽/列印電子全文服務,於2021-12-31起公開。


  • 如您有疑問,請聯絡圖書館
    聯絡電話:(06)2757575#65773
    聯絡E-mail:etds@email.ncku.edu.tw