進階搜尋


   電子論文尚未授權公開,紙本請查館藏目錄
(※如查詢不到或館藏狀況顯示「閉架不公開」,表示該本論文不在書庫,無法取用。)
系統識別號 U0026-2608201613523200
論文名稱(中文) 概念形成的處理容量與創造力之間的關係
論文名稱(英文) Relationship between Processing Capacity of Concept Formation and Creativity
校院名稱 成功大學
系所名稱(中) 心理學系
系所名稱(英) Department of Psychology
學年度 104
學期 2
出版年 105
研究生(中文) 尚林霖
研究生(英文) Linlin Shang
學號 U76023016
學位類別 碩士
語文別 英文
論文頁數 57頁
口試委員 指導教授-楊政達
口試委員-趙軒甫
口試委員-曾元琦
中文關鍵字 概念形成  創造力  信息處理容量  系統性多因子技術 
英文關鍵字 concept formation  creativity  processing capacity  systems factorial technology 
學科別分類
中文摘要 人們如何整合特征信息形成概念?在現實生活中,我們無時不刻不在處理概念信息。因此,理清這一機制對我們尤為重要。為解決這一問題,我們使用系統性多因子技術 (systems factorial technology) 設計一個概念形成實驗 (a concept formation task),來獲取不同任務條件下概念形成的信息處理容量 (information processing capacity)。之後,受試者將進行包括中文遠距聯想測試 (A version of Chinese Remote Associates Test) 和問題解決測試 (Test of Problem Solving) 在內的兩個創造力測驗。其結果將被用於和概念形成的處理容量做相關分析。實驗結果表明,容量係數的Z分數和兩個版本的創造力得分之間分別存在負相關。說明,在概念形成過程中,創造力亦可能被捲入其中,起到重要作用。
英文摘要 How do individuals integrate attribute information to form a concept? In real life, we have to process such information all the time. Thus, clarifying the processing mechanism is significant, which provides an effective approach for us to understand how human beings interact with the external world. In order to solve this problem, we would adopt systems factorial technology (SFT) to design a concept formation task to explore the processing mechanism of concept formation under two different conditions (under the exhaustive rule: AND condition, under the self-stopping rule: OR condition), especially the processing capacity of concept formation. Then we would require participants to perform a remote associates test (Chinese version) and a problem solving test to verify the whether there was a relationship between the Z-scores of the capacity coefficient and the scores of the creativity tests. The results displayed that there was a negative correlation between capacity and creativity, suggesting during the process of concept formation, creativity could be involved in.
論文目次 中文摘要 I
Abstract II
誌謝 III
LIST OF TABLES V
LIST OF FIGURES VI
Introduction 1
The processing capacity of concept formation 1
Creativity in the process of concept formation 6
The selective filter and resource distribution of concept formation 9
Experiment 1 10
Method 11
Result 17
Experiment 2 34
Method 34
Result 35
Discussion 43
Conclusion 46
References 47
Appendix A – Word List 53
Appendix B – The List of the Number of Correct Answers (AND Condition) 54
Appendix C – Capacity in AND Condition 55
Appendix D – The List of the Number of Correct Answers (OR Condition) 56
Appendix E – Capacity in OR Condition 57
參考文獻 Altieri, N., Fific, M, Little, D. R., & Yang C-T. (2016). Historical foundations and a tutorial introduction to systems factorial technology. In. D. R. Little, N. Altieri, M. Fific, & C-T. Yang (Eds.) Systems Factorial Technology: A Theory-Driven Methodology for Identifying Perceptual & Cognitive Mechanisms (pp. 1-46).Mechanisms: Elsevier.
Ashby, F. G., & Townsend, J. T. (1986). Varieties of perceptual independence. Psychological Review, 93, 154-179.
Bamunusinghe, J., & Alahakoon, D. (2007). Concept Learning from Visual Experiences using Unsupervised Neural Networks. In H. C. Watson, T. Nanayakkara, D. Alahakoon, & L. Udawatta (Eds.), Third International Conference on Information and Automation for Sustainability (ICIAfS) (pp. 46-51). Melbourne, Australia: IEEE Explorer. doi: 10.1109/ICIAFS.2007.4544779
Broadbent, D. (1958). Perception and Communication. London: Pergamon Press.
Bink, M. L., and Marsh, R.L. (2002). Cognitive regularities in creative activity. Review of General Psychology, 1, 59-78.
Burns, D., Houpt, J., Townsend, J., & Endres, M. (2013). Functional principal components analysis of workload capacity functions. Behav Res Methods, 45(4), 1048-1057.
Bower, G., & Trabasso, T. (1964). Concept identification. In R. C. Atkinson, (Ed.), Studies in Mathematical Psychology. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
Bruner, J. S., Goodnow, J. J., & Austin, G. A. (1956). A Study of Thinking. New York: Wiley.
Collins, A.M. and Loftus, E.F. (1975) A spreading-activation theory of semantic processing. Psychological Review, 82, 407- 428.
Collins, A. M., and Quillian, M. R. (1969). Retrieval time from semantic memory. Journal of Learning and Verbal Behavior, 8, 240-247.
Donders, F. C. (1969). On the speed of mental processes. In W. G. Koster, (Ed. and trans.), Attention and performance II. Amsterdam: North-Holland
Finke, R. A., Ward, T. B. & Smith, S. M. (1992). Creative cognition: Theory, research, and applications. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
Fisher, Pazzani, & Langley. (1991). Concept formation: knowledge and experience in unsupervised learning. San Mateo, CA: Morgan Kaufmann.
Friedman, N.P., & Miyake, A. (2004). The relations among inhibition and interference cognitive functions: A latent variable analysis. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 133, 101–135.
Houpt, J. W., & Townsend, J. T. (2012). Statistical measures for workload capacity analysis. Journal of Mathematical Psychology, 56: 341–355.
Guilford, J. P. (1967). The Nature of Human Intelligence. New York: McGraw-Hill
Harding, B., Goulet, M-A., Jolin, S., Tremblay, C., Villeneuve, S-P., & Durand, G. (2016). Systems factorial technology explained to humans. The Quantitative Methods for Psychology, 12(1), 39-56.
Huang, Po-Sheng & Chen, Hsueh-Chih. (2012). A Version of Chinese Remote Associates Test. Taipei: Chinese Behavioural Science Corporation.
Hull, C. L. (1920). Quantitative aspects of the evolution of concepts. Psychological Monographs, XVIII, 1.123, 1–86.
Ju, Gin-Fon. (2005). Test of Problem Solving. Taipei: Psychological Publishing.
Kahneman, D. (1973). Attention and Effort. New Jersey: Prentice-Hal.
Kneller, G. F. (1971). Introduction to the philosophy of education. New York, N.Y.: John Wiley and Sons.
Kim, K. H., & Pierce, R. A. (2013). Convergent Versus Divergent Thinking. In E. G. Carayannis (Ed.), Encyclopedia of Creativity, Invention, Innovation and Entrepreneurship (pp. 245-250).
Koestler, A. (1964). The Act of Creation. London: Hutchinson & Co.
Kris, E. (1952). Notes on the development and on some current problems of psychoanalytic child psychology. The Psychoanalytic Study of the Child, 26, 24-46.
Levine, M. (1966). Hypothesis behavior by humans during discrimination learning. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 71, 331-338.
Levine, M. (1975). A cognitive theory of learning: Research on hypothesis testing. Oxford: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Margolis, E., & Laurence, S. Concepts, The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Spring 2014 Edition), Edward N. Zalta (ed.), URL =
Marsh, R. L., Landau, L. D., and Hicks, J. L. (1996). How examples may (and may not) constrain creativity. Memory & Cognition, 24, 669-680.
Mednick, S. A. (1962). The associative basis of the creative process. Psychological Review, 69, 220-232.
Mumford, M. D. (2003). Where have we been, where are we going? Taking stock in creativity research. Creativity Research Journal, 15, 107–120.
Nielsen, B., Pickett, C., & Simonton, D. (2008). Conceptual versus experimental creativity: which works best on convergent and divergent thinking tasks?. Psychology of Awsthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 2(3), 131–138.
Novak, J., and Cañas, A. (2008). The theory underlying concept maps and how to construct and use them. Technical Report IHMC CmapTools 2006-01 Rev 01-2008, Florida Institute for Human and Machine Cognition, available at: http://cmap.ihmc.us/Publications/ResearchPapers/TheoryUnderlyingConceptMaps.pdf.
Peterson, C., Maier, S. F., & Seligman, M. E. P. (1993). Learned helplessness: A theory for the age of personal control. New York: Oxford University Press. Riaz, M. N., and Ali, N. N. (2002). Structural cognition: A comparison of creative and non-creative adults. Joural of Personality and Clinical Studies, 18(1-2), 1-8.
Riaz, M. N., & Ali, N. N. (2002). Structural cognition: A comparison of creative and non-creative adults. Journal of Personality and Clinical Studies, 18(1-2), 1-8.
Roeckelein, J. E. (1998). Dictionary of Theories, Laws, and Concepts in Psychology. Santa Barbara, CA: Greenwood Publishing Group
Seel, N. M. (2012). Concept formation: Characteristics and functions. In N. M. Seel (Ed.), Encyclopedia of the Sciences of Learning (pp. 723-728). New York, NY: Springer.
Sio, U. N., & Ormerod, T. C. (2009). Does incubation enhance problem solving? A meta-analytic review. Psychological Bulletin, 135, 94-120
Sternberg, R. J. & Sternberg, K. (2011). Cognitive Psychology (6th ed.). CA: Cengage Learning.
Sternberg, S. (1969). The discovery of processing stages: Extensions of Donder’s method. In W. G. Koster (ed.), Attention and performance II. Amsterdam: North-Holland.
Townsend, J. T. (1990). Serial vs. parallel processing: Sometimes they look like Tweedledum and Tweedledee but they can (and should) be distinguished. Psychological Science, 1(1), 46–54.
Townsend, J. T., & Ashby, F. G. (1983). Stochastic modeling of elementary psychological processes. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
Townsend, J. T., & Nozawa G. (1995). Spatio-temporal properties of elementary perception: An investigation of parallel, serial, and coactive theories. Journal of Mathematical Psychology, 39, 321–359.
Trabasso, T., & Bower, G. H. (1968). Attention in Learning. New York: John Wiley & Sons
Vartanian, O. (2002). Cognitive disinhibition and creativity. Unpublished doctorial dissertation, The University of Maine, Orono, The United States of America.
Vygotskil, L. S. (2012). Thought and Language (E. Hanfmann, G. Vakar, & A. Kozulin, Trans.). Massachusetts: The MIT Press. (Original work published 1934).
Wakefield, J. F. (1992). Creative thinking: Problem-solving skills and the art orientation. NJ: Norwood.
Wallas, G. (1926). The art of thought. New York: Harcourt Brace.
Ward, T. B. (1994). Structured imagination: The role of conceptual structure in exemplar generation. Cognitive Psychology, 27, 1-40.
Ward, T. B., Smith, S., & Vaid, J. (1997). Conceptual structures and processes in creative thought. In T. B. Ward, S. M. Smith, & J. Valid (Eds.), Creative Thought: An Investigation of Conceptual Structures and Processes (pp. 1-27). Washington, D. C.: American Psychological Association.
Wenger, M. J., & Townsend, J. T. (2001). Computational, Geometric, and Process Issues in Facial Cognition: Progress and Challenges. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
Wetherick, N. E. (1969). Bruner's Concept of Strategy: An experiment and a critique. The Journal of General Psychology. 81(1), 53-58.
Whitehurst, G. J., & Zimmerman, B. J. (1979). Concepts and Classification. The Functions of Language and Cognition (pp. 57-81). New York: Academic Press.
Yang, C.-T. (2011). Relative saliency in change signals affects perceptual comparison and decision processes in change detection. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 37(6),1708-1728.
Yoo, S. A. (2008). An analysis of incubation effects in problem solving using a computer-administered assessment tool. Unpublished doctorial dissertation, Texas A&M University, Texas, The United States of America.
論文全文使用權限
  • 同意授權校內瀏覽/列印電子全文服務,於2021-08-26起公開。


  • 如您有疑問,請聯絡圖書館
    聯絡電話:(06)2757575#65773
    聯絡E-mail:etds@email.ncku.edu.tw