進階搜尋


   電子論文尚未授權公開,紙本請查館藏目錄
(※如查詢不到或館藏狀況顯示「閉架不公開」,表示該本論文不在書庫,無法取用。)
系統識別號 U0026-2308201821460200
論文名稱(中文) 以資源調和觀點探討中小企業之發展歷程-以成大華司為例
論文名稱(英文) A Study of Small and Medium Enterprises Development Process from a Resource Orchestration Perspective - The Case of Cheng Da Washer Company
校院名稱 成功大學
系所名稱(中) 經營管理碩士學位學程(AMBA)
系所名稱(英) Advanced Master of Business Administration (AMBA)
學年度 106
學期 2
出版年 107
研究生(中文) 李品靜
研究生(英文) Ping-Ching Lee
學號 rd6044039
學位類別 碩士
語文別 中文
論文頁數 79頁
口試委員 指導教授-周信輝
口試委員-方世杰
口試委員-蔡依倫
口試委員-蔡馥陞
中文關鍵字 中小企業  資源  調和  質性研究 
英文關鍵字 Smaill and Medium Enterprises (SME)  Resource  Orchestration  Qualitative Perspective 
學科別分類
中文摘要 台灣中小企業佔全台灣總企業家數97.73%,提供78.19%的就業機會,由此可見中小企業對於台灣之重要性,然而透過台灣中小企業處2016年的統計,中小企業銷售額僅占全部企業銷售額比重約30.71%,這顯示出台灣中小企業在經濟貢獻上還有很大的成長空間,然而要如何協助中小企業成長便是本研究之重點。
學術界中探討企業資源與其競爭優勢之間關連性的文獻很多,但大多為靜態的資源分析。直到Sirmon(2011)提出資源調和理論,才真正重視起管理者在資源間所做的調和行為。然而,雖然在資源調和理論中談及資源調和的方式是透過架構資源、組織資源、再利用資源來為企業贏得競爭優勢,但卻鮮少有完整的實證足以支持此理論。因此,本研究希望透過選取單一具代表性之個案公司,藉由個案分析方法來深度探討台灣中小企業在各發展階段中如何去調和資源、進而逐漸往大型企業發展,來為中小企業提供參考,為台灣經濟提供貢獻,也同時為資源調和理論提供實證。
英文摘要 Abstract
The small and medium enterprises (SMEs) take 97% of the total enterprises in Taiwan, and provide 78.19% of employments opportunities. This shows that the SMEs are highly important to Taiwan. However, according to the statistics of the Taiwan SEMs department in 2016, the total revenue of SMEs only takes 30.71% of the total enterprises. This shows that the Taiwanese SMEs still have a lot of room for economic growth, and this is the focus of this research.
There are many literatures in the academic community that discuss about the relationship between corporate resources and their competitive advantages, but most of them are static resource analysis. Until Sirmon (2011) proposed the theory of resource orchestration, scholars start paying attention on the orchestration behavior between managers and the resources. However, although the theory of resource orchestration talks about the process to win competitive advantages for the company is to work through structuring, bundling, and leveraging the resource, there is rarely complete empirical evidence to support this theory. Therefore, this research hopes to discuss how SMEs in Taiwan orchestrate the resources among different stages by case analysis to both provide a reference for SMEs and empirical sample for the theory of resource orchestration.
論文目次 目錄
第一章 緒論
第一節 研究背景與動機..........1
第二節 研究目的與問題..........2
第三節 研究架構............2
第二章 文獻回顧
第一節 中小企業............4
第二節 資源調和……..........16
第三節 小結……..........29
第三章 研究方法
第一節 質性研究方法..........30
第二節 個案研究法..........31
第三節 資料蒐集..........33
第四節 資料分析..........37
第五節 個案背景介紹..........38
第四章 個案分析
第一節 草創期:資源整合(1986~1997)......44
第二節 成長期:標準化與自動化(1998~2015)....50
第三節 成熟期:組織自主運作( 2016~今)......57
第五章 討論、意涵與結論
第一節 討論............62
第二節 理論與實務意涵..........66
第三節 研究結論..........72
第四節 研究限制與未來研究方向........76
參考文獻 Adner, R., & Helfat, C. E. (2003). Corporate Effects and Dynamic Managerial Capabilities. Strategic Management Journal, 24: 1011-1025.
Barney, J. B., Ketchen Jr, D. J., Wright, M., Sirmon, D. G., Hitt, M. A., Ireland, R. D., & Gilbert, B. A. (2011). Resource Orchestration to Create Competitive Advantage: Breadth, Depth, and Life Cycle Effects. Journal of Management, 37(5), 1390-1412.
Ciesielski, A. (1999). An Introduction to Rubber Technology: iSmithers Rapra Publishing.
Combs, J. G., Ketchen, D. J., Jr., Ireland, R. D., & Webb, J. W. (2011). The Role of Resource Flexibility in Leveraging Strategic Resources. Journal of Management Studies, 48: 1098-1125.
Creswell, J. W. (2013). Research Design: Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed Methods Approaches: Sage Publications.
Crook, T. R., Ketchen, D. J., Combs, J. G., & Todd, S. Y. (2008). Strategic Resources and Performance: A Metaanalysis. Strategic Management Journal, 29: 1141-1154.
Deming, W. E. (1950). Elementary Principles of The Statistical Control of Quality: A Series of Lectures: Nippon Kagaku Gijutsu Remmei.
Floyd, S. W., & Lane, P. J. (2000). Strategizing Throughout The Organization: Managing Role Conflict in Strategic Renewal. Academy of Management Review, 25: 154-177.
Galenson, W.(1979), The Labor Force, Wages, and Living Standards. Economic Growth and Structural Change in Taiwan: the Postwar Experience of The Repulic of China, Ithaca: Cornell University Press, pp.384-447.
Grant, P.(1991), The Resource-Based Theory of Competitive Advantage: Implications for Strategy Formulation, California Management Review, Spring 1991
Giaoutzi, M., P. Nijkamp, and D.J. Storey,(1988). Small and Medium Size Enterprises and Regional Development, Lonton: Routledge.
Helfat, C. E., Finkelstein, S., Mitchell, W., Peteraf, M., Singh, H., Teece, D., & Winter, S. G. (2007). Dynamic Capabilities: Understanding Strategic Change in Organizations. Malden, MA: Blackwell.
Hill, C. W. L., Hitt, M. A., & Hoskisson, R. E. (1992). Cooperative Versus Competitive Structures in Related and Unrelated Diversified Firms. Organization Science, 3: 501-521.
Hitt, M. A., Bierman, L., Uhlenbruck, K., & Shimizu, K. (2006). The Importance of Resources in The Internationalization of Professional Service Firms: The Good, The Bad and The Ugly. Academy of Management Journal, 49: 1137-1157.
Ireland, R. D., Hitt, M. A., Bettis, R. A., & de Porras, D. A. (1987). Strategy Formulation Processes: Differences in The Perceptions of Strength and Weakness Indicators and Environmental Uncertainty by Managerial Level. Strategic Management Journal, 8: 469-485.
Kraaijenbrink, J., Spender J.-C., & Groen, A. J. (2010). The Resource-Based View: A Review and Assessment of Its Critiques. Journal of Management, 36: 349-372.
Lei, D., Hitt, M. A., & Bettis, R. (1996). Dynamic Core Competences Through Meta-learning and Strategic Context. Journal of Management, 22: 547-567.
Miller, D., & Friesen, P. H. (1984). A Longitudinal Study of The Corporate Life Cycle. Management Science, 30: 1161-1183.
Morton, M. (2013). Rubber Technology: Springer Science & Business Media.
Myers, M. D. (2013). Qualitative Research in Business and Management: Sage.
Nelson, R. R., & Winter, S. G. (1982). An evolutionary Theory of Economic Change. Cambridge, MA: Belknap.
Nixon, R. D., Hitt, M. A., Lee, H., & Jeong, E. (2004). Market Reactions to Announcements of Corporate Downsizing Actions and Implementation Strategies. Strategic Management Journal, 25: 1121-1129.
Osterwalder, A., Pigneur, Y., & Smith, A. (2010). Business Model Generation. Self Published. Retrieved from
OECD, (1997). Globalisation and Small and Medium Enterprises. OECD Publishing
Reiche, B. S., Harzing, A. W. K., & Kraimer, M. L. (2009). The Role of International Assignees’ Social Capital in Creating Inter-Unit Intellectual Capital: A Cross-Level Model. Journal of International Business Studies, 40: 509-526.
Schwandt, T. A., Lincoln, Y. S., & Guba, E. G. (2007). Judging Interpretations: But is It Rigorous? Trustworthiness and Authenticity in Naturalistic Evaluation. New Directions for Evaluation, 2007(114), 11-25.
Sirmon, D. G., Gove, S., & Hitt, M. A. (2008). Resource Management in Dyadic Competitive Rivalry: The Effects of Resource Bundling and Deployment. Academy of Management Journal, 51: 919-935.
Sirmon, D. G., & Hitt, M. A. (2003). Managing Resources: Linking Unique Resources, Management and Wealth Creation in Family Firms. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 27: 339-358.
Sirmon, D. G., Hitt, M. A. & Ireland, R. D. (2007). Managing Firm Resources in Dynamic Environments to Create Value: Looking Inside The Black Box. Academy of Management Review, 32: 273-292.
Sirmon, D., Hitt, M. A., Ireland, R. D., Gilbert, B. A. (2011). Resource Orchestration to Create Competitive Advantage: Breadth, Depth, and Life Cycle Effects. Journal of Management, 37: 1390-1412.
Storey, D.J. (1982), Entrepreneurship and The New Firm, London, Croom Helm.
Suri, R. (1988), RMT Puts Manufacturing at The Helm, Manufacturing Engineering, February 1988, pp. 41-44.
Woolridge, B., Schmid, T., & Floyd, S. W. (2008). The Middle Management Perspective on Strategy Process: Contributions, Synthesis, and Future Research. Journal of Management, 34: 1190-1221.
Zahra, S. A., Ireland, R. D., & Hitt, M. A. (2000). International Expansion by New Venture Firms: International Diversity, Mode of Market Entry, Technological Learning and Performance. Academy of Management Journal, 43: 925-950.
王素彎, 連文榮, 黃啟宏, 劉必凱 & 張巧穎(2006). 中小企業對台灣經濟貢獻之評估 https://www.moeasmea.gov.tw/public/Attachment/7112910323071.pdf [網路2018/2/25]
台灣綜合研究院(2008). 中小企業基本知識 http://www.tri.org.tw/ceo/index.html [網路2018/2/24]
林茂昌譯(2008), Taleb N.N., 黑天鵝效應, 大塊文化
經濟部中小企業處(2015), 中小企業認定標準 http://www.moeasmea.gov.tw/ct.asp?xItem=672&ctNode=214 [網路2017/5/2]
經濟部中小企業處(2017), 2017年中小企業白皮書 http://book.moeasmea.gov.tw/book/doc_detail.jsp?pub_SerialNo=2017A01295&click=2017A01295# [網路2018/2/24]
戴肇洋(1999),《區域性小企業發展及政府相關支援策略之研究》, 經濟部中小企業處委託研究。
戴肇洋(2006), 台灣經濟成長與中小企業扮演角色之研究 http://www.tri.org.tw/research/impdf/677.pdf [網路2018/2/25]
論文全文使用權限
  • 同意授權校內瀏覽/列印電子全文服務,於2022-02-20起公開。
  • 同意授權校外瀏覽/列印電子全文服務,於2022-02-20起公開。


  • 如您有疑問,請聯絡圖書館
    聯絡電話:(06)2757575#65773
    聯絡E-mail:etds@email.ncku.edu.tw