進階搜尋


下載電子全文  
系統識別號 U0026-2307202000340400
論文名稱(中文) 都市大型地塊形態分析與演變之研究-以台南舊城區為例
論文名稱(英文) The Research of Morphological Analysis and Evolution in Urban Large Plots:A Case Study of the Historical Area in Tainan
校院名稱 成功大學
系所名稱(中) 都市計劃學系
系所名稱(英) Department of Urban Planning
學年度 108
學期 2
出版年 109
研究生(中文) 謝晏巧
研究生(英文) Yan-Ciao Sie
學號 P26064287
學位類別 碩士
語文別 中文
論文頁數 112頁
口試委員 指導教授-曾憲嫻
口試委員-林漢良
口試委員-張秀慈
口試委員-吳秉聲
中文關鍵字 都市大型地塊  都市平面分析法  地塊平面形態數值 
英文關鍵字 Urban Large Plots  Town-Plan Analysis  Geometric Measure of Plot 
學科別分類
中文摘要 以都市形態學來理解都市,有助於提出基於歷史紋理發展的規劃策略,在臺灣較少從地塊來觀察歷史都市,此外地塊也是土地使用單位和控制單位,影響單位地上物的發展更連帶至都市景觀風貌與都市機能的建立,且面積越大影響程度越廣,故面對發展越來越快的都市,歸納都市大型地塊之特徵有助於提供未來都市景觀管理之基礎資訊,故本研究以都市形態學中的重要元素「地塊」來探討,以台南舊城區作為實證基地,觀察及分析1953年至2016年地塊空間、機能與土地分割演變,以及針對2016年大型地塊進行形態分析。
本研究以空間自相關與面積百分等級分析不同時期整體都市地塊,找出都市大型地塊的空間聚集與分布屬性,再以Conzen的都市平面分析法作為形態分析方法的基礎,計算與視覺化都市大型地塊的形態數值,包括面積、開放度、緊湊度、建築覆蓋度與建物類型、土地使用以及地塊切割模式綜合討論各類都市大型地塊的特徵,梳理出各個分析項目對地塊型態的不同影響程度,與相關的都市景觀及都市發展議題,可以得知哪一種地塊特徵容易被高度開發或是需要長期關注未來發展,初步討論以地塊平面形態數值或是地塊切割模式管理的可能方式,建立以地塊觀點解讀都市結構與都市發展的方式,作為都市設計準則與土地使用管制及開發建議的基礎資訊。
英文摘要 Understanding urban features with urban morphology helps to propose a management of the urban landscape which is based on the development of history. In Taiwan, the historical cities are less observed from the plots. Additionally, a plot are also the unit of land use and control, affecting the development of the surface. It connects to the establishment of the landscape and urban functions. The larger the plot is, the greater it influences. Therefore, in the face of a city that is developing faster and faster, it is helpful to provide a reference for urban landscape management by summarizing the characteristics of urban large plots. Therefore, this study explores the "plot" which is an important element of urban morphology, and taking Tainan which is a historical city of Taiwan as a study area. It observes and analyzes the spatial distribution and morphological evolution of the 1953-2016 plots.

This study analyzes the overall plots in different periods by spatial auto-correlation analysis and percentage rating analysis, to find out the spatial aggregation and distribution of the urban large plots. And based on the town-plan analysis form Conzenian as the basis of the morphological analysis method. Calculate and visualize geometric measure of urban large plots which is including area, openness, compactness, and building coverage. Comprehensively discuss the characteristics of various types of large urban plots with the geometric measure of plot, building types, land use, and division and amalgamation processes mode of plot, find out the different impacts of various analysis items on the plots, and discuss related urban landscape and urban development issues. It can be known which kind of land features are easy to be highly developed or need to pay attention to future development for a long time, and initially discussing the possible ways to manage the city with geometric measure of plot and division and amalgamation processes mode. To establish a way to interpret urban structure and urban development from the perspective of plot, as basic information for urban design guidelines and land use control and development recommendations.
論文目次 第一章 緒論1
第一節 研究緣起1
壹、研究動機1
貳、研究問題與目的2
第二節 研究方法與架構3
壹、研究方法3
貳、研究架構4
第三節 研究範圍6
壹、空間範圍6
貳、時間範圍7
參、名詞解釋7
第二章 文獻回顧10
第一節 都市形態學(Urban Morphology)發展脈絡10
第二節 英國地理學派/康曾學派(Conzenian)11
壹、城鎮風貌(townscape)與都市景觀(urban landscape)的觀點11
貳、都市平面分析(Town-Plan Analysis)12
參、地塊觀點16
第三節 義大利建築類型學派(Typology)21
壹、都市層級系統(Hierarchical System)21
貳、類型過程(Typological Process)22
第四節 地塊相關特徵25
壹、都市形態中的獨特地理實體25
貳、地塊的歧義26
參、地塊細分與合併27
肆、地塊與都市管理28
第五節 地塊定量形態分析方法28
壹、定量形態分析發展28
貳、定量分析基礎29
參、地塊平面形態數值29
肆、形態分類31
伍、大地塊空間聚集分析33
第三章 研究設計35
第一節 研究流程35
第二節 研究設計37
壹、大型地塊選取方式37
貳、形態分析的方法與項目38
參、府城舊城區大型地塊形態特徵分析與分類39
第四章 實證分析55
第一節 府城舊城區大型地塊概述55
壹、舊城區大型地塊空間分布變化55
貳、舊城區大型地塊形成56
第二節 大地塊形態分析62
壹、公有大地塊62
貳、私有大地塊77
第三節 總結與發現 93
壹、形態複合體之間的影響93
貳、地塊平面形態的影響93
參、相關議題94
第五章 結論與建議 98
第一節 結論98
第二節 後續研究建議99
參考文獻 100
附錄104
參考文獻 中文文獻
田銀生、穀凱、 陶偉(2014)。城市形態學建築類型學與轉型中的城市。中國:科學出版社。
李正森(2012)。探討都市計畫通盤檢討對都市紋理之影響-以台南市中西區為例。成功大學都市計劃學系碩士論文。
李俊緯(2012)。近代都市規劃對晚清台南府署周邊市區的衝擊。成功大學建築學系碩士論文。
李振綱(2012)。大學周邊的產業群聚現象。成功大學都市計劃學系碩士論文。
林栢年(2015)。城市生態的足跡-重探臺灣傳統城市空間的歷史特徵。文資學報(9), 47-83。
許銘峰(2008)。台灣地區都市型態特徵之比較研究。成功大學都市計劃學系學位論文。
陳文川(2008)。日治時期臺南社會救助事業的軌跡—以臺南慈惠院為例。成功大學歷史學系碩士論文。
陳毓正(2008)。台南交易市集在不同歷史時空下之功能與任務1611-2008。國立台南大學台灣文化研究所碩士論文。
張蕾(2010)。國外城市形態學研究及其啟示。人文地理, 25(3), 90-95。
梅宗毓(2011)。府城 (台南) 西門城外的歷史變遷。國立台南大學台灣文化研究所碩士論文。
陳錦棠、姚聖(2017)。形態類型學理論以及本土化的探明。國際城市規劃, 32(2), 57-64。
傅朝卿(2015)。台灣建築的式樣脈絡。臺北:五南。
葉至誠、葉立誠(2011)。研究方法與論文寫作。臺北:千華。
劉克智、董安琪(2003)。台灣都市發展的演進―歷史的回顧與展望。人口學刊, 26, 1-25。
劉為光、盧紀邦、陳世明 (2013)。台南市舊城邊緣帶空間型態在當代都市生活中的文化意涵。建築學報(85), 227-244。
劉為光(2016)。臺南市舊城歷史區域街廓與巷弄紋理保存再生之探討。都市與計劃, 43(2), 143-155。
楊珮鬱(2013)。府城臺南從城牆都市至現代都市之發展歷程。國立臺南大學文化與自然資源學系碩士論文。
鄭安佑、徐明福、吳秉聲(2013)。日治時期臺南市 (1920-1941)[都市空間-社會經濟]變遷-指向經濟的都市現代化過程。建築學報(85), 17-37。
蔣正良(2015)。義大利學派城市形態學的先驅穆拉托裡。國際城市規劃,30(4)。
蕭紋安(2013)。近代都市計畫對臺南府城道署南側市區的影響。國立成功大學建築碩士論文。

英文文獻
Asabere, P. K., & Harvey, B. (1985). Factors influencing the value of urban land: evidence from Halifax‐Dartmouth, Canada. Real Estate Economics, 13(4), 361-377.
Bobkova, E., Berghauser Pont, M., & Marcus, L. (2019). Towards analytical typologies of plot systems: Quantitative profile of five European cities. Environment and Planning B: Urban Analytics and City Science, doi: 2399808319880902.
Bobkova, E., Marcus, L., & Berghauser Pont, M. (2017). Multivariable Measures of Plot Systems: Describing the potential link between urban diversity and spatial form based on the spatial capacity concept. Paper presented at the Proceedings of the 11th International Space Syntax Symposium, Lisboa, Portugal.
Bobkova, E., Marcus, L., & Berghauser Pont, M. (2018). Plot systems and property rights: morphological, juridical and economic aspects. Paper presented at the 24th ISUF International Conference. Book of Papers (pp. 177-185). Editorial Universitat Politècnica de València.
Caniggia, G., & Maffei, G. L. (1979). Composizione architettonica e tipologia edilizia. Marsilio:Venezia.
Caniggia, G., & Maffei, G. L. (2001). Architectural composition and building typology: interpreting basic building (Vol. 176). Italien: Alinea Editrice.
Cataldi, G. (2003). From Muratori to Caniggia: The Origins and Development of the. Urban Morphology, 7(1), 19-34.
Cliff, A. D., & Ord, K. (1970). Spatial autocorrelation: a review of existing and new measures with applications. Economic Geography, 46(sup1), 269-292.
Conzen, M. R. G. (1960). Alnwick, Northumberland: a study in town-plan analysis. Transactions and Papers (Institute of British Geographers), (27), iii-122.
Conzen, M. R. G. (1975). Geography and townscape conservation. Paper presented at the Anglo-German Symposium in Applied Geography. Gießen-WürzburgMünchen, Germany.
Conzen, M. P., Gu, K., & Whitehand, J. (2012). Comparing traditional urban form in China and Europe: A fringe-belt approach. Urban Geography, 33(1), 22-45.
Dibble, J., Prelorendjos, A., Romice, O., Zanella, M., Strano, E., Pagel, M., & Porta, S. (2017). On the origin of spaces: Morphometric foundations of urban form evolution. Environment and Planning B: Urban Analytics and City Science, 46(4), 707-730.
Ducom, E. (2008). Fringe-belt analysis in France: A Conzenian approach to urban renewal. Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design.
Erin, I., Fusco, G., Cubukcu, E., & Araldi, A. (2018). Quantitative methods of urban morphology in urban design and environmental psychology. Paper presented at the 24th ISUF International Conference. Editorial Universitat Politècnica de València.
Griffith, D. A. (1992). What is spatial autocorrelation? Reflections on the past 25 years of spatial statistics. L'Espace géographique, 265-280.
Gu, K. (2010). Urban morphological regions and urban landscape management: the case of central Auckland, New Zealand. Urban Design International, 15(3), 148-164.
Jocobs, J. (1961). The death and life of great American cities. NY: Random House.
Kantarek, A. A., Kwiatkowski, K., & Samuels, I. (2018). From rural plots to urban superblocks. Urban Morphology, 22, 155–163.
Kropf, K. (1997). When is a plot not a plot: problems in representation and interpretation. Paper presented at the 4th International Seminar on Urban Form, Birmingham.
Kropf, K. (2009). Aspects of urban form. Urban Morphology, 13(2), 105.
Kropf, K. (2014). Ambiguity in the definition of built form. Urban Morphology, 18(1), 41-57.
Kropf, K. (2018). Plots, property and behaviour. Urban Morphology, 22(1), 01-10.
Kropf, K. (2019). Plots, formalism and the limits of the minimal. Urban Morphology, 23(1), 2-4.
Lafrenz, J. (1988). The metrological analysis of early modern planned towns. Paper presented at the Urban historical geography: recent progress in Britain and Germany. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
Love, T., & Crawford, C. (2011). Plot Logic: Character‐Building Through Creative Parcelisation. Urban design in the real estate development process, 92-113.
Marcus, G. E., Neuman, W. R., & MacKuen, M. (2000). Affective intelligence and political judgment. University of Chicago Press.
Mohamed, S. A., Harun, N. Z., & Abdullah, A. (2017). TYPO-MORPHOLOGY AS AN APPROACH FOR THE CONSERVATION OF THE EARLY MALAY TOWNS. ASIAN JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENT, HISTORY AND HERITAGE, 1(2).
Mohamed, S. A., Harun, N. Z., & Abdullah, A. (2018). Urban morphological analysis framework for conservation planning and management. PLANNING MALAYSIA JOURNAL, 16(5).
Moudon, A. V. (1986). Built for change: neighborhood architecture in San Francisco. Cambridge, Massachusetts/London: The MITPress.
Moudon, A. V. (1997). Urban morphology as an emerging interdisciplinary field. Urban Morphology, 1(1), 3-10.
Oliveira, V. (2013). Morpho: a methodology for assessing urban form. Urban Morphology, 17(1), 21-33.
Oliveria, V. (2016). An introduction to the study of the physical form of cities. Sl: Springer.
Pinho, P., & Oliveira, V. (2009). Different approaches in the study of urban form. Journal of Urbanism, 2(2), 103-125.
Porta, S., & Romice, O. (2010). Plot-based urbanism: towards time-consciousness in place-making. Working paper. University of Strathclyde, Glasgow.
Raith, E. (2000). Stadtmorphologie: Annäherungen, Umsetzungen, Aussichten. Wien:Springer.
Relph, E. C. (1987). The modern urban landscape: 1880 to the present. JHU Press.
Rodwell, D. (2009). Urban morphology, historic urban landscapes and the management of historic cities. Urban Morphology, 13(1), 78.
Scrase, A. J. (1989). Development and change in burgage plots: the example of Wells. Journal of Historical Geography, 15(4), 349-365.
Siksna, A. (1997). The effects of block size and form in North American and Australian city centres. Urban Morphology, 1(1), 19-33.
Sokal, R. R., & Oden, N. L. (1978). Spatial autocorrelation in biology: 1. Methodology. Biological journal of the Linnean Society, 10(2), 199-228.
Ünlü, T., & Baş, Y. (2017). Morphological processes and the making of residential forms: morphogenetic types in Turkish cities. Urban Morphol, 21(2), 105-122.
Vialard, A. (2012). Measures of the fit between street network, urban blocks and building footprints. Paper presented at the Proceedings of Eighth international space syntax symposium. Santiago de Chile at the Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile.
Vialard, A., & Carpenter, A. (2015). Building density of parcels and block-faces from a syntactical, morphological and planning perspective. Paper presented at the Proceedings of the 10th international space syntax symposium. UCL, London.
Whitehand, J. (1972). Urban-rent theory, time series and morphogenesis: an example of eclecticism in geographical research. Area, 215-222.
Whitehand, J. (2005). Urban morphology, urban landscape management and fringe belts. Urban Design, 93(1), 19-21.
Whitehand, J., Gu, K., & Whitehand, S. M. (2011). Fringe belts and socioeconomic change in China. Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design, 38(1), 41-60.
Whitehand, J. W. (2001). British urban morphology: the Conzenion tradition. Urban Morphology, 5(2), 103-109.
Whitehand, J. W. (2007). Conzenian urban morphology and urban landscapes. Paper presented at the Proceedings of the 6th International Space Syntax Symposium. Istanbul, Turkey.
Whitehand, J. (2010). Urban morphology and historic urban landscapes. World Heritage Papers, 27, 35-44.
Whitehand, J. W., & Morton, N. J. (2004). Urban morphology and planning: the case of fringe belts. Cities, 21(4), 275-289.
Whitehand, J. W., & Morton, N. J. (2006). The fringe-belt phenomenon and socioeconomic change. Urban Studies, 43(11), 2047-2066.
Ye, Y., Yeh, A., Zhuang, Y., Van Nes, A., & Liu, J. (2017). “Form Syntax” as a contribution to geodesign: A morphological tool for urbanity-making in urban design. Urban Design International, 22(1), 73-90.
論文全文使用權限
  • 同意授權校內瀏覽/列印電子全文服務,於2020-08-24起公開。
  • 同意授權校外瀏覽/列印電子全文服務,於2020-08-24起公開。


  • 如您有疑問,請聯絡圖書館
    聯絡電話:(06)2757575#65773
    聯絡E-mail:etds@email.ncku.edu.tw