進階搜尋


   電子論文尚未授權公開,紙本請查館藏目錄
(※如查詢不到或館藏狀況顯示「閉架不公開」,表示該本論文不在書庫,無法取用。)
系統識別號 U0026-2006201122255500
論文名稱(中文) 影響台灣銀行業經營績效之公司治理因素探討
論文名稱(英文) Factors of Corporate Governance Affecting Business Performance in the Taiwan Banking Industry
校院名稱 成功大學
系所名稱(中) 企業管理學系碩博士班
系所名稱(英) Department of Business Administration
學年度 99
學期 2
出版年 100
研究生(中文) 陸仁堯
研究生(英文) Jen-Yao Lu
學號 r46981257
學位類別 碩士
語文別 英文
論文頁數 44頁
口試委員 指導教授-康信鴻
口試委員-張紹基
口試委員-莊雙喜
口試委員-許永明
口試委員-傅英芬
中文關鍵字 迴歸分析  績效評估  公司治理 
英文關鍵字 Regression analysis  Performance evaluation  Corporate governance 
學科別分類
中文摘要 本研究分析2006年到2010年,台灣境內之20間本土銀行的經營效率,利用DEA模型繪製出這五年間20家銀行的效率前緣,給不同時期的不同銀行在這效率前緣的相對效率,並利用迴歸分析,探討此20家銀行的公司治理因素是否影響公司的相對經營效率。並利用董監席次、董監事持股比例、獨立董監席次、經理人持股比例、董事兼占經理人比率,以及政府是否持股做為研究變數。

本研究發現,董監席次、董監事持股比例,以及政府持股對於經營績效有顯著正相關,董事兼占經理人比率與經營績效為負相關。且2006年到2010年,此20家樣本銀行經營績效皆有提升。
英文摘要 This research will analyze the operating efficiency in 20 different banks in Taiwan during the period 2006 to 2010, using a DEA model to compare the relative efficiencies of each samples. Regression analysis will be used to analyze whether corporate governance factors affect the relative efficiencies or not. This research selects the number of supervisors and directors, number of independent supervisors and directors, the proportion of holding share in supervisors and directors, the proportion of holding share in manager, the proportion of directors being managers ; and whether government have shares or not, will be examined with dummy variables

This research finds that: the number of supervisors and directors, the proportion of holding share in supervisors and directors, and government have share has positive effect on business performance. The proportion of directors being managers has negative effect on business performance. Also, these 20 banks’ performance have been improved from 2006 to 2010.
論文目次 Chapter 1 Introduction 1
1.1 Research Background and Motivation 1
1.2 Research Objective and Contribution 2
1.3 Research Procedure 3
Chapter 2 Literature Review 4
2.1 Performance Evaluation 4
2.2 Corporate Governance 8
2.3 Corporate governance and performance 11
2.4 Research Contribution 14
Chapter 3 Research Design and Methodology 16
3.1 DEA Model 17
3.2 Hypothesis 20
3.3 Source of Data Collection 23
3.4 Multiple Regression Model 24
Chapter 4 Research Results 25
4.1 Summary of the Data 25
4.2 Mulitcollinearity Test 26
4.3 White’s General Heteroscedasticity Test 28
4.4 Autocorrelation Test 29
4.5 Test of Ordinary Least Square 31
Chapter 5 Conclusion and Recommendation 33
5.1 Research Conclusion 33
5.2 Comparison with Previous Research 37
5.3 Limitation and Future Research 39
Reference 41

參考文獻 Alkhafaij, A. F., 1990, “effective board of directors: an overview.” Industrial Management and Data System, 90, 18-26.

Bacon, J., 1973, “Corporate directorship practices: Membership and committees of the board” New York: the Conference Board.

Cadbary, J. J., 1992, “Corporate governance and disclosure quality.” Accounting and Business Research, 9, 111-124.

Hermalin, B. E. and Weisbach, M. S., 2003,” Board of directors as endogenously determined institutions: A survey of the economic literature.” Economic Policy Review, 9(1), 7-26.

James H. Stock, Mark W. Watson, 2007, Introduction to Econometrics, second edition, Pearson International.

Jensen, M. C., 1993,” The modern industrial revolution, exit, and the failure of internal control systems.” Journal of Finance, 48(2), 831-880.

Jensen,M. C. and R. S. Ruback, 1983,“Market for Corporate Control: Empirical Evidence.” Journal of Financial Economics, 1, 5-50.

Jensen, M. C. and W. H. Meckling, 1976, “Theory of the Firm : Managerial Behavior, Agency Costs and Ownership Structure.” Journal of Financial Economics, 3, 305-360.

Kesner, I. F., 1987,” Directors’ stock ownership and organizational performance: An investigation of fortune 500 companies.” Journal of Management, 13, 499-507.

Kiel, G.C. and Nicholson, G.J., 2003,” Boards that work: A new guide for directors.”McGraw Hill, Sydney.



Mayers, D., Shivdasani, A., and Smith, C., 1997, “Board composition and corporate control: Evidence from the insurance industry.” Journal of Business, 70(1), 33-62.

Megginson, W. L., Nash R. C. and Randenborgh M. V., 1994, “The financial and operating performance of newly privatized firms: an international empirical analysis,” Journal of Finance, 49, 403-452.

Morck, R., A. Shleifer and R. W. Vishny, 1998, “Management Ownership and Market Valuation: An Empirical Analysis “Journal of Financial Economics, 20, 293-315.

OECD Principles of Corporate Governance, 1999, OECD.

Paul, Newbold, William L. Carlson, and Betty Thorne, 2007, Statistics for Businessman and Economics, sixth edition, Pearson International.

Shepherd, William G, 1986,” Tobin's q and the Structure-Performance Relationship: Comment.” The American Economic Review , 76(5), 1205 - 10.

Stulz, René M., 1988, “Managerial control of voting rights: Financing policies and the market for corporate control.”, Journal of Financial Economics 20, 25-54.

Sun, Q., Tong W. and Tong J., 2002, “How does government ownership affect firm performance? Evidence from China’s privatization experience.” Journal of Business Finance and Accounting, 29, 1-27.

Weir, C., Laing, D., and Mcknight, P. J., 2003,” Internal and external governance mechanisms: Their impact on the performance of large UK public companies.” Journal of business finance and accounting, 29, 579-612

Yue Piyu, 1992,“Data Envelopment Analysis and Commercial Bank Performance: A Primer with Applications to Missouri Banks”, Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis, 31-45.




末吉俊幸(2006)。經營效率分析法─DEA。鼎茂圖書。

王繼和(2004)。公司治理機制與經營績效之關係研究:以台灣上市櫃電子公司為例 。國立雲林科技大學碩士論文。

李佳珍(1999)。台灣地區銀行經營績效平等之分析─以本國銀行與外商銀行為例。嘉義技術學院學報,67, 79-96。

何里仁(2003)。公司治理之資訊透明度與績效評核關聯性之研究。逢甲大學會計與財稅研究所碩士論文。

吳佳惠(2006)。金融機構之股權結構、董監事會特性與經營績效關聯性,成功大學會計學研究所碩士論文。

吳美穎(2004)。內在公司治理機制之探討--股東組成與股權集中度對公司治理績. 效之影響。輔仁大學管理學研究所碩士論文。

林江亮、鄭菽萱(2006)。政府持股與公司價值之關聯性研究。當代會計,第7卷第2期,,237-260。

林淑棻(2003)。公司股權結構、董事會組成結構以及財務政策與公司經營績效關係之研究。國立政治大學碩士論文。



周麗真,1989。以財務比率建立銀行經營績效評鑑模型之研究。淡江大學管理科學研究所碩士論文。

陳志賢(1999)。商業銀行購併績效之實證研究。朝陽大學財務金融所碩士論文。

張旭玲(1998)。我國股票上市公司股權結暨經營績效之研究。國立成功大. 學會計學系碩士論文。

張訓華(1991)。股權結構、董事會組成與企業當年度財務績效-以77年度會計報酬率為準。國立東吳大學管理學研究所碩士論文。

葉桂珍、陳昱志(1995)。銀行經營績效分析-資料包絡分析法(DEA). 與財務比率法之比較。企銀季刊,第19卷第2期,30-39。

葉銀華、柯承恩、李存修(2002)。公司治理與評等系統。商智文化事業公司。

歐陽豪、許溪南、遲銘俊、陳美鳳和陳淑雅(2004)。董事會組成與股權結構對價值衡量與高階主管更迭之實證分析─以金融業及電子業為例。「管理思維與實務」學術研討會論文集。

詹凱玲(2006)。股權結構、董事會組成與公司績效之關係-以家族與非家族企業之角度。銘傳大學會計學系研究所碩士論文。

嚴月玲(2003),資本結構、股權結構與股利政策對公司價值之影響。朝陽科技大學財務金融所碩士論文。
論文全文使用權限
  • 同意授權校內瀏覽/列印電子全文服務,於2016-07-06起公開。


  • 如您有疑問,請聯絡圖書館
    聯絡電話:(06)2757575#65773
    聯絡E-mail:etds@email.ncku.edu.tw