進階搜尋


   電子論文尚未授權公開,紙本請查館藏目錄
(※如查詢不到或館藏狀況顯示「閉架不公開」,表示該本論文不在書庫,無法取用。)
系統識別號 U0026-1902201611571000
論文名稱(中文) 行動應用設計之探究以增進中年族群之主觀幸福感
論文名稱(英文) Identifying Mobile Application Design for Enhancing the Subjective Wellbeing of Middle-Aged Adults.
校院名稱 成功大學
系所名稱(中) 工業設計學系
系所名稱(英) Department of Industrial Design
學年度 104
學期 1
出版年 105
研究生(中文) 李姝醇
研究生(英文) Shu-Chun Lee
學號 P36011113
學位類別 碩士
語文別 英文
論文頁數 128頁
口試委員 指導教授-洪郁修
口試委員-鄧怡莘
口試委員-吳豐光
口試委員-李穎杰
中文關鍵字 主觀幸福感  快樂  行動裝置應用  中年族群 
英文關鍵字 Subjective Well-being  Well-being  Mobile Application  Middle-aged adults  Well-being factor, 
學科別分類
中文摘要 隨著科技的發達與社會之發展,幸福已經成為一項人們所追求的新指標。幸福感最低落的族群為中年人,為解決此問題本研究探索主觀(內在)幸福感之構成與持久(外在)幸福感之構成與定義,並設計出一個能增進中年族群幸福感的APP。研究方法共有四個實驗, 分別為:實驗一、253份問卷來探索中年族群之幸福核心與因素,實驗二、市面上幸福APP之測試與APP優缺點,實驗三、幸福訪談深入了解中年族群深層幸福核心,實驗四、中年族群幸福畫面意涵與解讀。
實驗一問卷結果經因素分析發現有14項因素,14項因素分別為內心滿足與豐盛、正面情緒、負面情緒、生活滿意程度、感覺自我實現、積極投入自己覺得有意義的事情/活動、健康與經濟資產、有目標地過生活、享受從事的事情/活動(以表達自我)、清楚了解自己/自我、積極投入適合自己的事情/活動、知道自己應該做什麼、自己與家庭、朋友的關係、樂觀期待未來,並繪製出幸福雷達圖計算出中年族群最缺乏的幸福因素,並與內在幸福感與外在幸福感做探討。實驗二發現目前市面上幸福相關APP共分成五種類型,但增進中年族群幸福感上成效相當有限。實驗三之以質性研究的編碼方式產生結果,其結果又分為組間與組內做探討,組間結果顯示幸福核心前三名依序為: 維持身體健康、家庭關係與達成自我成就。另外,中年族群的興趣與幸福感上無相關,而教育程度和年收入和幸福感呈現中度正相關。實驗四26張了解到中年族群的幸福畫面以和家人樂團聚在一起占最大宗。

最後,本研究提出幸福APP之設計準則與設計範例,使用本研究之幸福APP後預期可以滿足中年族群十項幸福因素,此研究作為往後設計幸福相關產品參考之依據。
英文摘要 As the technology advances and social development, well-being has already become a new indicator that people pursue for. Feeling of well-being the lowest of group is the middle-aged people. To solve the problem, this study explored subjective (internal) feeling of well-being the composition of and enduring (external) feeling of well-being the composition of and definitions, and designed an app which can enhance the middle-aged people’s feeling of well-being. The research methodology has a total of four experiments, which are respectively: Experiment 1. 253 copies of questionnaire to explore middle-aged people’s well-being core and factor. Experiment 2. Testing well-being apps on the market and apps’ pros and cons. Experiment 3. well-being interview in-depth understand middle-aged people profound well-being core. Experiment 4. The middle-aged people pictures of well-being implication and interpretation.
The questionnaire result of Experiment 1 after factor analysis discover have 14 factor, 14 factor respectively “Satisfaction and richness inside the heart”, positive affects, negative affect, life satisfaction degree, feeling self-realization, “ Actively devoted to meaningful events/activities ”, “Health and economic assets”, Living a life with a goal, “Enjoy events/activities that I am undertaking”(to express myself), clearly understand myself/ego, optimistic devotion suitable your own events/activities, “Being aware of what I should do”, “The relationship between myself, family, and friends”, “Optimistically expecting the future”, and drew well-being radar chart calculated middle-aged people most deficiency of well-being factor, and internal feeling of well-being and external feeling of well-being for investigation. Experiment 2 discover at the moment on the market well-being related app were divided into five types of type, but enhance middle-aged people’s feeling of well-being effects are rather limited. Experiment 3 used qualitative study the encoding of manner generation result, results of which also scores are between-group and within group for investigation, between-group result demonstrate well-being core the top three in sequence are as follows: remain body health, family relationship and achieve self-fulfillment. Besides, middle-aged people’s interest and feeling of well-being on nothing related. While education background and annual revenue and feeling of well-being present degrees positively correlated. Experiment 4 with 26 images for understanding the middle-aged people’s pictures of well-being and families harmony and gathering together accounted for the largest portion.

Finally, this study proposed design guidelines and design examples for the well-being app. It is anticipated that using this study’s well-being app can satisfy middle-aged people ten well-being factors, the study serving as the basis for follow-up design well-being related product for reference.
論文目次 摘要 ii
SUMMARY iii
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS v
TABLE OF CONTENTS vi
LIST OF TABLES ix
LIST OF FIGURES x
CHAPTER 1 INTRODUCTION 1
1.1 Research background 1
1.2 Research motivation 3
1.3 Purpose of the research 4
1.4 Scope of research and limitation 5
1.5 Research framework 6
CHAPTER 2 Literature review and retrospective study 7
2.1 Constituents of well-being types 7
2.2 Subjective well-being 8
2.3 Psychological well-being 11
2.4 Hedonic Well-being 13
2.5 Enduring Well-being 13
2.6 Happiness 15
2.7 Eudaimonic well-being 16
2.8 Brief summary of well-being 16
CHAPTER 3 Research Method 19
3.1 Experiment 1. Global feeling of well-being for middle-aged people 20
3.2 Experiment 2 - Tests and comparison of the well-being related apps on the market. 24
3.3 Experiments 3. Semistructured well-being interviews. 26
3.4 Experiment 4. Interviews for the pictures of happiness 29
CHAPTER 4 Result 31
4.1 Results of the well-being questionnaire in Experiment 1 32
4.1.1 Most favorite apps for middle-aged people 33
4.1.2 Current general situation of the middle-aged people’s well-being 37
4.1.3 Analysis results of 14 factors 40
4.1.4 Ranking of importance for well-being factors 47
4.1.5 Factors of the well-being equation 47
4.1.6 Well-being scores and radar charts 52
4.2 Experiment 2 Selection and evaluation results of related well-being apps on the market 58
4.2.1 Selection result of well-being apps on the market 58
4.2.2 Middle-aged people’s feedback on using the well-being apps on the market 60
4.2.3 Relationship between the well-being apps on the market and the 14 quadrants of well-being 63
4.2.4 Brief summary 63
4.3 Experiments 3 Results of well-being interviews 65
4.3.1 Results of middle-aged people’s global well-being interviews 65
4.4 Results of participants’ pictures of well-being 68
4.5 Brief summary 81
CHAPTER 5 Discussion 83
5.1 Overview well-being of middle-aged adult 83
5.1.1 The overall feeling of well-being for the middle-aged people only just at the above average degree 83
5.1.2 The relationship between interests and the feeling of well-being 83
5.1.3 Both financial income and education background affect the middle-aged people’s feeling of well-being 84
5.1.4 14 well-being factors that affect the middle-aged people 85
5.2 The apps on the market have a limited effect on the concrete help for people to enhance the well-being 87
5.3 The investigation of well-being interviews and pictures of well-being 88
5.3.1 The definition of well-being 88
5.3.2 Well-being factors and well-being equations 88
5.3.3 Health is a type of well-being 89
5.3.4 “Family” accounts for the largest proportion for the interviews and pictures of happiness 90
5.3.5 Matching problem of interview encoding and well-being equations 92
CHAPTER 6 Conclusion and recommendations 97
6.1 The middle-aged people’s performance on the feeling of global well-being 97
6.1.1 Results of investigations on the well-being related apps on the market 98
6.1.2 Highlights within group after the qualitative analysis 99
6.1.3 Within-group conclusions of the qualitative analysis 101
6.2 Reflections on the qualitative analysis and study of the well-being cores 102
6.3 Expected benefits of the well-being app 103
6.4 The possibility of follow-up research 103
6.4.1 The app design requires the consideration of users’ capability of absorbing the test information 103
6.4.2 The app design is required to consider the immediate feedback 104
6.5 The possibility of follow-up research 104
6.5.1 From the aspect of well-being interactive display patterns 104
6.5.2 From the aspect of different feelings of happiness for different groups 105
6.5.3 From the aspect of the husband-wife relationship for the middle-aged people in the future 105
6.5.4 From the aspect of family interactions/parent-child relationships 106
Reference 107
Appendix A Experiment 1 Well-being Questionnaire 113
Appendix B Experiment 2-4 interview 122
參考文獻 Andrews, F. M., & Withey, S. B. (1976). Social indicators of well-being: Americans' perceptions of life quality.
Argyle, M. (1987). The psychology of Well-being. London: Methuen.
American Psychological Association. (2000). PsychINFO database. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
Albrecht, S. C. (2012). The Game of Well-being–.
Bradburn, N. M. (1969). The structure of psychological well-being.
Björk, S., & Holopainen, J. (2003). Describing games: An interaction-centric structural framework. Digital Games Research Conference (DIGRA).
Bennett, J., & Warnock, M. (2007). Instructional game characteristics. Retrieved January 5, 2007,from http://iit.bloomu.edu/Spring2006_eBook_files/index.htm
B.J. Babin,W.R. Darden,M. Griffin,Work and/or fun:measuring hedonic and utilitarian shopping value, Journal of Consumer Research (1994) 644–656.
Casey, P.R., Dunn, G., Kelly, B.D., Birkbeck, G., Dalgard, O.S.,& Lehtinen, V. (2006). Factors associated with suicidal ideation in the general population. British Journal of Psychiatry, 189,410–415.
Cousins, N. (1976). Anatomy of an illness (as perceived by the patient). The New England journal of medicine, 295(26), 1458.
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC. (2013). Suicide among adults aged 35-64 years-United States, 1999-2010. MMWR. Morbidity and mortality weekly report, 62(17), 321.
Csikszentmihalyi, M., & Csikszentmihalyi, I.S. (1988).Optimal experience: psychological studies of flow in consciousness.New York: Cambridge University Press.
Csikszentmihalyi, M. (1990). Flow: the psychology of optimal experience. New York: HarperCollins.
Caprara, G. V., Steca, P., Gerbino, M., Paciello, M., & Vecchio, G. M. (2006). Looking for adolescents' well-being: Self-efficacy beliefs as determinants of positive thinking and Well-being. Epidemiologia e psichiatria sociale, 15(01), 30-43.
Choi, D., & Kim, J. (2004). Why people continue to play online games: In search of critical design factors to increase customer loyalty to online contents. CyberPsychology & behavior, 7(1), 11-24.
Chmiel, M., Brunner, M., Martin, R., & Schalke, D. (2012). Revisiting the structure of subjective well-being in middle-aged adults. Social indicators research, 106(1), 109-116.
Diener, Ed (1984). "Subjective well-being". Psychological Bulletin 95 (3): 542–575.
Diener, E., & Emmons, R. A. (1984). The independence of positive and negative affect. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 47, 1105-1117
Diener, E., Scollon, C. N., & Lucas, R. E. (2009). The evolving concept of subjective well-being: The multifaceted nature of Well-being. In Assessing well-being (pp. 67-100). Springer Netherlands.
Diener, E., & Diener, M. (1995). Cross-cultural correlates of life satisfaction and self-esteem. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology,68, 653-663.
Diener, E., Lucas, R. E., & Oishi, S. (2002). Subjective well-being: The science of Well-being and life satisfaction. In C. R. Snyder & S. J. Lopez (Eds.), Handbook of positive psychology (pp. 463–473).New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
Diener, E., Suh, E. M., Lucas, R. E., & Smith, H. L. (1999). Subjective well-being: Three decades of progress. Psychological bulletin, 125(2), 276.
Diener, E. (2000). Subjective well-being: The science of Well-being and a proposal for a national index. American psychologist, 55 (1), 34.
Diener, Ed., Sandvik, Ed., Pavot, W., 1991. Well-being is the frequency, not the intensity,of positive versus negative affect. In: Strack, F., Argyle, M., Schwarz, N. (Eds.),Subjective Well-Being: An Interdisciplinary Perspective. Pergamon Press, NewYork, pp. 119–139.
Diener, E., & Biswas-Diener, R. (2011). Well-being: Unlocking the mysteries of psychological wealth. Wiley. com.
Dockray, S., & Steptoe, A. (2010). Positive affect and psychobiological processes. Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews, 35(1), 69-75.
Diener, E., Lucas, R., Schimmack, U., & Helliwell, J. (2009). Wellbeing for public policy. New York: Oxford University Press.doi:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195334074.001.0001
David, S., Boniwell, I., & Ayers, A. C. (Eds.). (2013). Oxford handbook of Well-being. Oxford University Press.
Diener, E. (1994). Assessing subjective well-being: Progress and opportunities. Social Indicators Research,31, 103–157.
Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (2000). The “what” and “why” of goal pursuits: Human needs and the self-determination of behavior. Psychological Inquiry, 11, 227–268.
Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (1980). The Empirical exploration of intrinsic motivational processes. In L. Berkowitz (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (vol. 13, pp. 39–80). New York: Academic Press.
Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (1985). Intrinsic motivation and selfdetermination in human behavior. New York: Plenum.
de Vries, P. (2006). Social presence as a conduit to the social dimensions of online trust. In Persuasive technology (pp. 55-59). Springer Berlin Heidelberg.
Eid, M., and E. Diener. (2004). “Global Judgements of Subjective Well-being: Situational Variability and Long-Term Stability.”Social Indicators Research, 65 (3): 245-77.
Electronic Arts: The Sims 2. Developed by Maxis for PC (2004)
Gotsis, M. (2009). Games, virtual reality, and the pursuit of Well-being.Computer Graphics and Applications, IEEE, 29(5), 14-19.
Emmons, R. A., & McCullough, M. E. (2003). Counting blessings versus burdens: an experimental investigation of gratitude and subjective well-being in daily life. Journal of personality and social psychology, 84(2), 377.
Eid, M., & Larsen, R. J. (Eds.). (2008). The science of subjective well-being. Guilford Press.
Eid, M., & Larsen, R. J. (Eds.). (2008). The science of subjective well-being. Guilford Press.
Frijters, P., & Beatton, T. (2012). The mystery of the U-shaped relationship between Well-being and age. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 82(2), 525-542.
Fingerman, K. L., Cheng, Y. P., Birditt, K., & Zarit, S. (2012). Only as Happy as the Least Happy Child: Multiple Grown Children's Problems and Successes and Middle-aged Parents’ Well-being. The Journals of Gerontology Series B: Psychological Sciences and Social Sciences, 67(2), 184-193.
Fairman, N., Knapp, P., & Martin, A. (2005). Flourishing: Positive Psychology and the Life Well-Lived.
Freedman, J. (1978). Happy people: What Well-being is, who has it, and why. New York: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich.
Franklin, S. S. (2010). The psychology of Well-being: A good human life. Cambridge University Press.
Fabricatore, C. (1999), Playability in Action Videogames: a Theoretical Design Reference, Ph. D. Catholic University of Chile.
Fabricatore, C., Nussbaum, M. and Rosas, R. (2002), “Playability in Action Videogames: A Qualitative Design Model”, Human-Computer Interaction, 17 (4).
Fabricatore, C. (2007). Gameplay and game mechanics design: a key to quality in videogames. In Proceedings of OECD-CERI Expert Meeting on Videogames and Education.
Fredrickson, B. L., & Losada, M. F. (2005). Positive affect and the complex dynamics of human flourishing. American Psychologist, 60(7), 678.
Gomez, V., Krings, F., Bangerter, A., & Grob, A. (2009). The influence of personality and life events on subjective well-being from a life span perspective. Journal of Research in Personality, 43(3), 345-354.
Gotsis, M. (2009). Games, virtual reality, and the pursuit of Well-being. Computer Graphics and applications, IEEE, 29(5), 14-19.
Gonyea, J. G. (1995). Middle age. In D. Levison (Ed.), Encyclopedia of marriage and the family (pp.495-500). New York: Simon & Schuster Macmillan.
G. Kearsley, B. Shneiderman, Engagement theory: a framework for technologybased teaching and learning, Educational Technology 38 (5) (1998) 20–23.
Goldstein, E. D. (2007). Sacred moments: Implications on well‐being and stress. Journal of clinical psychology, 63(10), 1001-1019.
Giannopoulos, V. L., & Vella-Brodrick, D. A. (2011). Effects of positive interventions and orientations to Well-being on subjective well-being. The Journal of Positive Psychology, 6(2), 95-105.
Huppert, F. A., Baylis, N., & Keverne, B. (Eds.). (2005). The science of well-being. Oxford University Press.
Huppert, F. A. (2009). A new approach to reducing disorder and improving well-being. Perspectives on psychological science, 4(1), 108-111.
Hermans, H. J. M., & Oles, P. K. (1999). Midlife crisis in men: affective organization of personal meanings. Human relations, 52(11), 1403-1426.
Helliwell, J. F., Layard, R., & Sachs, J. (Eds.). (2013). World Well-being report 2013. Sustainable Development Solutions Network.
H.L. O'Brien, E.G. Toms, What is user engagement? A conceptual framework for defining user engagement with technology, Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology 59 (6) (2008) 938–955.
Hsu, C. L., & Lu, H. P. (2004). Why do people play on-line games? An extended TAM with social influences and flow experience. Information & Management, 41(7), 853-868.
Isaacs, E., Konrad, A., Walendowski, A., Lennig, T., Hollis, V., & Whittaker, S. (2013, April). Echoes from the past: how technology mediated reflection improves well-being. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (pp. 1071-1080). ACM
Jaques, E. (1965). Death and the mid-life crisis. The international journal of psychoanalysis, 46, 502-514.
King, L. A. (2001). The health benefits of writing about life goals. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 27(7), 798-807.
Keyes, C. L. (2002). The mental health continuum: From languishing to flourishing in life. Journal of Health and Social Behavior, 207-222.
Keyes, C. L. (2007). Promoting and protecting mental health as flourishing: a complementary strategy for improving national mental health. American Psychologist, 62(2), 95.
Kim, Y. H., Kim, D. J., & Wachter, K. (2013). A study of mobile user engagement (MoEN):
Engagement motivations, perceived value, satisfaction, and continued engagement intention. Decision Support Systems, 56, 361-370.
Kahneman, D., Diener, E., & Schwarz, N. (Eds.). (2003). Well-being: Foundations of hedonic psychology. Russell Sage Foundation.
K. Varnali, A. Toker, Mobile marketing research: the-state-of-the-art, International Journal of Information Management 30 (2) (2010) 144–151.
Lyubomirsky, Sonja (2001). "Why are some happier than others? The role of cognitive and motivational processes in well-being". American Psychologist 56 (3): 239–324.
Lachman, M. E., Lewkowicz, C., Marcus, A., & Peng, Y. (1994). Images of midlife development among young, middle-aged, and older adults.Journal of adult development, 1(4), 201-211.
Layard, R. (2005). Well-being: Lessons from a new science. New York:Penguin.
Lent, R. W. (2004). Toward a unifying theoretical and practical perspective on well-being and psychosocial adjustment. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 51, 482–509.
Lazzaro, N. (2004). Why We Play Games: Four Keys to More Emotion in Player Experiences, Proceedings of the Game Developers Conference, pp. 22-16.
Lyubomirsky, S. (2008). The how of Well-being: A scientific approach to getting the life you want. Penguin.
Lyubomirsky, S., Sheldon, K. M., & Schkade, D. (2005). Pursuing Well-being: The architecture of sustainable change. Review of General Psychology, 9, 111 – 131.
Mroczek, D. K., & Almeida, D. M. (2004). The effect of daily stress, personality, and age on daily negative affect. Journal of personality, 72(2), 355-378.
Microsoft Game Studios: Fable. Developed by Big Blue Box Studios for X-Box(2004)
Pinquart, M. (2001). Age differences in perceived positive affect, negative affect, and affect balance in middle and old age. Journal of Well-being Studies, 2(4), 375-405.
Polk, D. E., Cohen, S., Doyle, W. J., Skoner, D. P., & Kirschbaum, C. (2005). State and trait affect as predictors of salivary cortisol in healthy adults. Psychoneuroendocrinology, 30(3), 261-272.
P. Chapman, S. Selvarajah, J. Webster, Engagement in multimedia training systems, in: J.R.H. Sprague (Ed.), The 32nd Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, IEEE Computer Society Press, Los Alamitos, CA, 1999.
Pagulayan, R.J., Keeker, K., Wixon, D., Romero, R.L. & Fuller, T. (2003).User-centered design in games, In: Jacko, J.A. & Sears, A.E. eds. The human-computer interaction handbook: Fundamentals, evolving technologies and emerging applications. Hillsale, NJ, Lawrence Erlbaum Associate, Inc., pp.883-906.
Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2001). On Well-being and human potentials: A review of research on hedonic and eudaimonic well-being. Annual review of psychology, 52(1), 141-166.
Ryan, R. M., Rigby, C. S., & Przybylski, A. (2006). The motivational pull of video games: A self-determination theory approach. Motivation and emotion, 30(4), 344-360.
Rockstar Games: Grand Theft Auto: San Andreas. Developed by Rockstar North for PlayStation 2 (2004)
Seligman, M. E. (2012). Flourish: A visionary new understanding of Well-being and well-being. Simon and Schuster.
Seligman, M. E., Steen, T. A., Park, N., & Peterson, C. (2005). Positive psychology progress: empirical validation of interventions. American psychologist, 60(5), 410.
Seligman, M. E. (2002). Authentic Well-being: Using the new positive psychology to realize your potential for lasting fulfillment. Simon and Schuster.
Seligman, M. E. (2012). Flourish: A visionary new understanding of Well-being and well-being. Simon and Schuster.
Steel, P., Schmidt, J., & Shultz, J. (2008). Refining the relationship between personality and subjective well-being. Psychological bulletin, 134(1), 138.
Sheldon, K., & Hoon, T. (2007). The multiple determination of well-being: Independent effects of positive traits, needs, goals, selves, social supports, and cultural contexts. Journal of Well-being Studies, 8,565–592.
Sheldon, K. M. & Lyubomirsky, S. (2004). Achieving sustainable new Well-being: Prospects, practices, and prescriptions. In P. A. Linley & S. Joseph (Eds.), Positive Psychology in Practice. Hoboken, New Jersey: John Wiley & Sons.
Sagiv, L., Roccas, S., & Hazan, O. (2004). Value pathways to well-being: Healthy values, valued goal attainment, and environmental congruence. In P. A. Linley & S. Joseph (Eds.), Positive Psychology in Practice. Hoboken, New Jersey: John Wiley & Sons.
Stutz, J. (2006). The role of well-being in a great transition. GTI Paper Series No. 10, Tellus Institute.
Tellegen, A., Lykken, D. T., Bouchard, T. J., Wilcox, K. J., Segal, N. L., & Rich, S. (1988). Personality similarity in twins reared apart and together. Journal of personality and social psychology, 54(6), 1031.
Trevino, L.K., & Webster, J. (1992). Flow in computermediated communication: electronic mail and voice mail evaluation and impacts. Communication research 19(5), pp. 539–573.
V. Venkatesh, S.A. Brown, A longitudinal investigation of personal computers in homes: adoption determinants and emerging challenges, MIS Quarterly 25 (1) (2001) 71–102.
V. Venkatesh, J. Thong, X. Xu, Consumer acceptance and use of information technology:extending the unified theory of acceptance and use of technology,MIS Quarterly 36 (1)(2012) 157–178.
Vivendi Universal: Half-Life 2. Developed by Valve for PC (2004)
Webster, J., Trevino, K. L., & Ryan, L. (1993). The dimensionality and correlates of flow in human-computer interactions. Computers in Human Behavior, 9,411–426.
Waterman AS. 1993. Two conceptions of Well-being: contrasts of personal expressiveness(eudaimonia) and hedonic enjoyment. J.Pers. Soc. Psychol. 64:678–91
Waterman, A. S. (2007). Doing well: The relationship of identity status to three conceptions of well-being. Identity: An International Journal of Theory and Research, 7, 289-307.
W.B. Schaufeli, M. Salanova, V. González-Romá, A.B. Bakker, The measurement of engagement and burnout: a two sample confirmatory factor analytic approach, Journal of Well-being Studies 3 (1) (2002) 71–92.
Warner, R., & Vroman, K. (2011). Well-being inducing behaviors in everyday life: An empirical assessment of ‘‘the how of Well-being’’. Journal of Well-being Studies, 12, 1063–1082.
論文全文使用權限
  • 同意授權校內瀏覽/列印電子全文服務,於2021-02-19起公開。


  • 如您有疑問,請聯絡圖書館
    聯絡電話:(06)2757575#65773
    聯絡E-mail:etds@email.ncku.edu.tw