進階搜尋


   電子論文尚未授權公開,紙本請查館藏目錄
(※如查詢不到或館藏狀況顯示「閉架不公開」,表示該本論文不在書庫,無法取用。)
系統識別號 U0026-1806201513360300
論文名稱(中文) 使用者願意在社群論壇分享知識或心得的動機因素-以UrCosme為例
論文名稱(英文) The Motivation of Online Communities Users to Share Knowledge or Comments- Using UrCosme as an Example
校院名稱 成功大學
系所名稱(中) 企業管理學系
系所名稱(英) Department of Business Administration
學年度 103
學期 2
出版年 104
研究生(中文) 郭怡萍
研究生(英文) Yi-Ping Guo
學號 R46024055
學位類別 碩士
語文別 中文
論文頁數 55頁
口試委員 指導教授-蔡燿全
口試委員-陳淑惠
口試委員-劉佳玲
口試委員-吳慶壽
中文關鍵字 美妝網站  動機因素  知識分享意願  涉入程度 
英文關鍵字 Cosmetic Website  Motivation Factors  Knowledge sharing willingness  Involvement 
學科別分類
中文摘要 近年來台灣美妝保養品市場成長穩定,而且男性保養意識崛起,美妝市場的未來的發展潛力不容小覷,經過調查,消費者最能獲取美妝產品資訊的管道為美妝社群網站。伴隨著網際網路的快速發展,資訊的取得越來越容易,但對於網路社群而言,若要長期經營就必須要有足夠的成員以及討論度,社群內的資訊來源往往必須依靠成員提供,因此本研究欲探討什麼因素會影響社群成員分享的意願?本論文研究以美妝網站UrCosme為例,進行分析與探討。
本研究的目的為針對以下三個因素,探討其是否會對美妝社群網站的使用者資訊分享意願造成影響。
1.社群網站的介面使用難易度
2.各項動機因素
3.使用者對社群的涉入程度
研究發現社群網站的介面使用難易度及期望動機並不會對分享意願造成影響,但是社群成員會因為想要其他成員建立關係、對自己的分享很有信心,或是為了品質控管、地位等因素,甚至是因為常常使用社群網站,產生了黏著度,而願意提供資訊給與其他成員。
最後依據UrCosme網站現有狀況結合研究發現,提供幾點建議,望UrCosme未來除了能增加成員外,使用者分享也能與日俱增。
英文摘要 Recent year, cosmetic and body care market in Taiwan is growing smoothly, and more and more male start to care about facial care. The potential market is promising. According to the survey, people usually get cosmetic information through online communities. Therefore, the objective of my study is to analyze what factors would affect the willingness to share knowledge or comments. And I take Urcosme as object of study. This study adopt descriptive statistics, factor analysis, reliability analysis, regression analysis and ANOVA.
The results showed that ease of communication and expectancy motivation would not influence share willingness. But in order to build relationship with other members, have confidence in what his/ her shares, quality control or status in community. Even because of the attachment of communities. Members would be willing to share. According to the results, the most important factors are instrumental, efficacy, quality control, status motivation and involvement.
論文目次 摘要 I
Extended Abstract II
誌謝 VIII
目錄 IX
表目錄 XI
圖目錄 XIV
第一章 緒論1
第一節 研究背景與動機1
第二節 研究目的3
第三節 研究流程4
第二章 文獻探討5
第一節 虛擬社群5
第二節 動機8
第三節 網站介面操作簡易度10
第四節 涉入程度10
第五節 貢獻性11
第三章 研究方法12
第一節 研究架構與研究假設12
第二節 研究變項之操作型定義與衡量14
第三節 問卷設計與抽樣對象18
第四節 資料分析方法18
第四章 研究結果與分析20
第一節 描述性統計分析20
第二節 因素分析與信度分析25
第三節 迴歸分析36
第四節 變異數分析41
第五章 研究結論與建議45
第一節 研究結論45
第二節 研究限制及未來研究47
第三節 管理意涵47
參考文獻49
附錄 正式問卷53
參考文獻 中文文獻
李郁菁(2000),影響虛擬社群成員忠誠度產生之因素探討,國立中山大學資訊管理研究所碩士論文
鄧勝利、胡吉明(2010),Web 2. 0環境下網路社群理論研究綜述,中國圖書館學報
Kantar world panel (2014).”從頭到腳”的台灣男士,www.kantarworldpanel.com
英文文獻
Adler and Christopher (1998). Internet Community Primer – overview and business opportunity. Digiplaces
Armstrong, A. G. and Hagel III, J. (1997). Net gain: Expanding Markets Through Virtual Communities. Boston: Harvard Business School Press.
Bagnall R. G.(1989). Researching Participation in Adult Education: A Case of Quantified Distortion. International Journal of Lifelong Education, 8(3), 251-260.
Bandura, A. (1986) Social Foundations of Thought and Action: A Social Cognitive Theory, Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
Bandura, A. (1992). Self-efficacy mechanism in psychobiologic functioning. In R. Schwarzer (Ed.), Self-efficacy: Thought control of action (pp. 355-394). Washington, D.C.: Hemisphere
Bandura, A. (1995) Self-Efficacy in Changing Societies, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Beach, L. R. and Mitchell, T. R. (1990) ‘Image Theory: A Behavioral Theory of Decision Making in Organizations’, In B. Staw and L. L. Cummings (eds), Research in Organizational Behavior, JAI Press, Inc.
Bourdieu, Pierre(1980) Le capital social. Actes de la Recherche en Sciences Sociales 31, 2-3
Bruckman, A. and Resnick, M. (1995) ‘The MediaMOO Project: Constructionism and Professional Community’, Convergence 1(1), 94–109.
Burt, R. S. (1992) Structural Holes: The Social Structure of Competition, Cambridge, MA: The Harvard University Press.
Celsi, R. L. and Olson, J. C. (1988) ‘The Role of Involvement in Attention and Comprehension Processes’, Journal of Consumer Research 15(September), 210–24.
Compeau, D. R., and Higgins, C. A. (1995) ‘Computer Self-Efficacy: Development of a Measure and Initial Test’, MIS Quarterly June, 189–211.
Davis, F. D., Bagozzi, R. P. and Warshaw, P. R. (1989)‘User Acceptance of Computer Technology: A Comparison of Two Theoretical Models’, Management Science 35, 982–1003.
De Graaf, N. D. and Flap, H. D. (1988) ‘With a Little Help From My Friends: Social Resources as An Explanation of Occupational Status and Income in West Germany, the Netherlands, and the United States’, Social Forces 67, 453–72.
Ekeh, P. (1974) Social Exchange Theory: The Two Traditions, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Euromonitor (2012) ,Skin Care in Taiwan
Greenwald, A. A. and Leavitt, C. (1984) ‘Audience Involvement in Advertising: Four Levels’, Journal of Consumer Research 11(June), 581–92.
H. Rheingold. (1993). The Virtual Community: Homesteading on the Electronic Frontier. Reading, Massachusetts: Addison-Wesley. ISBN 0-201-60870-7
Houston, M. J. and Rothschild, M. L. (1978) ‘Conceptual and Methodological Perspectives in Involvement’, in S. Jain (ed.) Research Frontiers in Marketing: Dialogues and Directions, Chicago, IL: American Marketing Association, 184–7.
Kankanhalli, Atreyi; Tan, Bernard C. Y.; and Wei, Kwok-Kee. (2005). Contributing Knowledge to Electronic Repositories: An Empirical Investigation, MIS Quarterly, Vol. 29, No.1, pp. 113-143.
Kaufman, H. F. (1959). Toward an international conception of community. Social Forces, 38(1), 8-17.
King L. (2007) It’s About the Community. The One-Person Library 24, pp. 8.
Kollock, P. (1999) ‘The Economics of Online Cooperation: Gifts and Public Goods in Cyberspace’, in M. Smithand P. Kollock (eds), Communities in Cyberspace, London: Routledge.
Komito, L.H. (1998) 'The Net as a Foraging Society: flexible communities, special issue: Virtual Societies'. The Information Society, 14 (2):97-106.
Lin, H.F. (2007). Effects of extrinsic and intrinsic motivation on employee knowledge sharing intentions. Journal of Information Science, Vol. 33, No. 2, pp. 1–16.
Newman, M. and Landay, J., 2000, Sitemaps, Storyboards, and Specifications: A Sketch of Web Site Design Practice, DIS 00, pp. 263-274. New York: ACM.
Petty, R. E. and Cacioppo, J. T. (1981) ‘Issue Involvement as Moderator of the Effects on Attitude of Advertising Content and Context’, in K. B. Monroe (ed.), Advances in Consumer Research, 8, Ann Arbor, MI: Association for Consumer Research, 20–4.
Portes, A. (1998) ‘Social Capital: Its Origins and Applications in Modern Sociology’, Annual Review of Sociology, 24, 1–24.
Putnam, R. D. (1993) Making Democracy Work: Civic Traditions in Modern Italy, Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Quentin, J. (1997). Virtual-Community, Virtual Settlements and Cyber-Archaeology: A Theoretical Outline. Journal of Computer Mediated
Rheingold, H. (1993) The Virtual Community :Homesteading on the Electronic Frontier, Reading, MA :Addison-Wesley.
Rheingold, H. (1993). The virtual community: Homesteading on the electronic frontier. New York: Haper Perennial.
Rogers, E. (1995) The Diffusion of Innovation, New York: The Free Press.
Sangwan, S. (2005). Virtual community success: A use and gratifications perspective. System Sciences, 2005. HICSS '05. Proceedings of the 38th Annual Hawaii International Conference, 193.
Sanna Talja and Preben Hansen (2006).Information Sharing. In: A. Spink and C. Cole (Eds.) New Directions in Human Information Behavior. Information Science and Knowledge Management Series no. 8. pp. 113-134. Dordrecht: Springer Verlag.
Schlenker, B. R. (1985) ‘Identity and Self-identification’, in B. R. Schlenker (ed.), The Self and Social Life, New York: McGraw Hill.
Stryker, S. (1980) Symbolic Interactionism: A Social Structural Version, Menlo Park, CA: Benjamin/Cummings.
Stryker, S. (1986) ‘Identity Theory: Development and Extensions’, in K. Yardley and T. Honess (eds), Self and Identity, New York: Wiley.
Tajfel, H. and Turner, J. C. (1985) ‘The Social Identity Theory of Intergroup Behavior’, in S. Worchel and W.G. Austin (eds), Psychology of Intergroup Relations, Chicago: Nelson-Hall, 7–24.
Teresa, L. R. (1998), Are Newsgroups Virtual Communities? Addison-Wesley Publishing Co., New York, NY.F
Tim O'Reilly (2005). What Is Web 2.0, Design Patterns and Business Models for the Next Generation of Software, http://www.oreilly.com/pub/a/web2/archive/what-is-web-20.html
Wang, Y., Hila, R. and Williams, Q. (2002) ‘Technology Adoption by Organization: The Effects of Organizational Capacity and Strategic Orientation’, Proceedings of the Annual CBIM/ISBM Atlanta Conference, 8–10 February 2002, Atlanta, Georgia, USA.
Williams, R. L. and Cothrel, J. (2000). Four smart ways to run online communities. Sloan Management Review, 41(4), 81-91.
Wilson, J. P. and Petruska, R. (1984) ‘Motivation, Model Attributes, and Prosocial Behavior’, Journal of Persuasive Social Psychology 46, 458–68.
Youcheng Wang and d. R. Fesenmaier (2003). Assessing Motivation of Contribution in Online Communities: An Empirical Investigation of an Online Travel Community. 2003 Electronic Markets Volume 13 (1): 33–45.
論文全文使用權限
  • 同意授權校內瀏覽/列印電子全文服務,於2020-06-01起公開。
  • 同意授權校外瀏覽/列印電子全文服務,於2025-06-01起公開。


  • 如您有疑問,請聯絡圖書館
    聯絡電話:(06)2757575#65773
    聯絡E-mail:etds@email.ncku.edu.tw