進階搜尋


   電子論文尚未授權公開,紙本請查館藏目錄
(※如查詢不到或館藏狀況顯示「閉架不公開」,表示該本論文不在書庫,無法取用。)
系統識別號 U0026-1706201619205900
論文名稱(中文) 以CVM法評價使用者對創造性文化計畫之非市場效益-以集集火車站周邊地區為例-
論文名稱(英文) Using Contingent Valuation Method to Assess the Non-Market Benefits of Creative Cultural Projects from User Perspectives:A Case Study of the Jiji Station Area
校院名稱 成功大學
系所名稱(中) 都市計劃學系
系所名稱(英) Department of Urban Planning
學年度 104
學期 2
出版年 105
研究生(中文) 廖崇堯
研究生(英文) Chung-Yao Liao
學號 p28981011
學位類別 博士
語文別 中文
論文頁數 171頁
口試委員 口試委員-石豐宇
口試委員-賴美蓉
口試委員-張秀慈
口試委員-陳啟仁
口試委員-楊佳翰
指導教授-曾憲嫻
中文關鍵字 文化計畫  條件評估法  非市場效益  文化經濟學  新觀光 
英文關鍵字 cultural projects  contingent valuation method  non-market value  cultural economics  new tourism 
學科別分類
中文摘要 90年代後亞洲都市比歐美都市經歷更多震災等嚴重災害,災害復興也受到更多當代都市議題影響。有別於過去都市再開發的復興方式,具備創造力地活用文化藝術的文化計畫和其非市場效益在震災地區的復興和都市再生中漸受重視。但過去在評價文化計畫時往往並未對文化的非市場效益進行評價,另一方面隨著經濟效益外的非市場效益的作用在震災地區中備受期待,很明顯的當前的文化計畫評價方法已明顯不足。故本研究嘗試以文化經濟學的角度,輔助觀光學的新理論趨勢,探討震災復興中文化計畫之非市場效益對居民和遊客等使用者的重要性和價值,並嘗試以條件評估法(CVM法)為基礎提出一套能夠評價文化計畫的非市場效益並數據化的流程,並以台灣集集鎮的文化計畫為案例進行實證,以驗證本研究所提出的CVM法流程在文化計畫之非市場效益評估上的可行性。本研究提出震災復興中文化之非市場效益的重要性和價值,所擬定的評價方法流程將有助建立以使用者意見和需求為基礎的計畫推動方式,並彌補目前評價方式的不足。藉由CVM法將非市場效益數據化,也讓後續研究或政策擬定者可更客觀評價計畫,有利於在有限的預算中選擇或修正更符合震災地需求的計畫。
英文摘要 Distinct from the past urban redevelopment approach for revitalizing a post-quake region, cultural projects of creative revitalization involving the use of culture and their non-market benefits have garnered increased attention worldwide. However, in the past, when cultural projects are valuated, the non-market benefits (culture, arts, creativity) of these projects were not considered. By adopting the perspectives of cultural economics and novel concepts of tourism, this study attempted to explore the importance and value that the non-market benefits of cultural projects pose to users, such as residents and tourists. In addition, a process by which the non-market benefits of cultural projects can be evaluated and digitized was proposed using the contingent valuation method. This research is a case study on the creative cultural projects of Jiji Township in Taiwan. CVM was employed to assess non-market benefits. This study determined the importance and value of the non-market benefits of creative cultural projects in post-quake revitalization, and proposed a valuation process that helps establish a method for promoting creative cultural projects that are based on user’s opinions and needs. This method can compensate for the deficiencies in extant valuations approaches. In this study, CVM was used to digitize non-market benefits. Moreover, future researchers or policy makers can use the proposed approach to objectively valuate projects. Under limited financial resources, this method can be used to effectively select or modify projects into one that fulfills the requirements of post-quake regions.

Keywords:cultural projects; contingent valuation method; non-market value; cultural
論文目次 第一章、緒論 1
第一節、研究背景與目的 1
第二節、研究方法 4
第三節、研究範圍與研究流程 7
第四節、研究議題 9
第五節、研究重要性與研究限制 13
第六節、研究成果與研究貢獻 15
第二章、文獻回顧 17
第一節、創造性復興與創造性文化計畫 17
第二節、新觀光的興起與震災復興 29
第三節、創造性復興中文化計畫的非市場效益 40
第四節、條件評估法 51
第三章、研究基地 63
第一節、研究基地背景 63
第二節、研究基地之創造性文化計畫 75
第四章、研究方法與研究設計 86
第一節、CVM評價流程對象之分類 86
第二節、CVM法之基礎操作方法與概念 88
第三節、CVM法調查方法之設定 94
第四節、CVM法評價非市場效益流程之設計 108
第五章、研究結果分析 117
第一節、CVM調查敘述性分析結果 117
第二節、CVM調查計量分析結果 123
第六章、結論與建議 152
參考文獻 157

圖目錄
圖1-1居民問卷調查範圍、遊客問卷調查範圍………………………………… 8
圖2-1 觀光型態的轉變…………………………………………………………… 32
圖2-2 文化資本的社會性價值…………………………………………………… 41
圖2-3 文化資本的總經濟價值…………………………………………………… 44
圖3-1 集集鎮地理位置圖………………………………………………………… 65
圖3-2 集集鎮土地使用分區圖…………………………………………………… 65
圖3-3 集集火車站與站前裝置藝術……………………………………………… 79
圖3-4 以創意文化作品活化社區空間…………………………………………… 79
圖3-5 活用閒置空間舉辦老照片展……………………………………………… 79
圖3-6 活用閒置空間為木工創意工坊…………………………………………… 79
圖3-7 火車站前工藝創作商店…………………………………………………… 80
圖3-8 火車站前各種創意商家…………………………………………………… 80
圖3-9 活用樟腦出張所為創作展演場1…………………………………………..82
圖3-10活用樟腦出張所為創作展演場2………………………………………… 82
圖3-11 火車好多節創意火車…………………………………………………… 83
圖3-12 火車好多節積木藝術展演……………………………………………… 83
圖3-13 集集火車站周邊地區創造性文化計畫分布圖……………………………84
圖4-1 條件評估法一般操作步驟流程圖………………………………………… 91
圖4-2 CVM調查設計與操作流程圖……………………………………………… 115
圖5-1居民樣本出起價金額與支付意願關係圖………………………………… 124
圖5-2 遊客樣本出起價金額與支付意願關係圖………………………………… 127
圖5-3 遊客願付雙界二元贊成率曲線圖………………………………………… 141
圖5-4 居民雙界二元願付贊成率曲線圖………………………………………… 141
圖5-5居民個人屬性之各非市場效益meanWTP分布圖………………………… 149
圖5-6遊客個人屬性之各非市場效益meanWTP分布圖………………………… 149
圖5-7以CVM法評價創造性文化計畫的非市場效益之操作流程圖…………… 150

表目錄
表2-1過去震災復興形式的分類…………………………………………………19
表2-2 非市場財之評價適用方法…………………………………………………53
表2-3 公共財的評價方法…………………………………………………………54
表3-1 集集鎮震災復興計畫集其內涵……………………………………………74
表4-1集集鎮創造性文化計畫分類與其非市場效益…………………………… 88
表4-2 CVM調查偏誤修正表………………………………………………………114
表4-3 拒絕捐款理由及其有效性判別表…………………………………………113
表5-1居民樣本個人基礎分布…………………………………………………… 118
表5-2 遊客個人基礎屬性分布……………………………………………………119
表5-3 居民樣本內在個人屬性分布………………………………………………121
表5-4 遊客樣本內在個人屬性分布………………………………………………122
表5-5居民樣本詢價結果………………………………………………………… 124
表5-6居民樣本願付者支付理由分布…………………………………………… 125
表5-7遊客樣本詢價結果………………………………………………………… 126
表5-8遊客樣本願付者支付理由分布…………………………………………… 128
表5-9變數對照表………………………………………………………………… .129
表5-10居民個人基礎屬性單界二元模型估計結果………………………………131
表5-11 居民內在個人屬性單界二元模型估計結果………………………………131
表 5-12 居民非市場效益單界二元模型估計結果……………………………… 132
表 5-13居民個人基礎屬性雙界二元模型估計結果………………………………133
表5-14 居民內在個人屬性雙界二元模型估計結果…………………………… 133
表5-15居民非市場效益雙界二元模型估計結果………………………………… 134
表5-16最終居民雙界二元模型估計結果………………………………………… 135
表5-17 遊客個人基礎屬性單界二元模型估計結果………………………………136
表5-18 遊客內在個人屬性單界二元模型估計結果………………………………137
表5-19 遊客非市場效益單界二元模型估計結果…………………………………137
表5-20 遊客個人基礎屬性雙界二元模型估計結果………………………………138
表5-21遊客內在個人屬性雙界二元模型估計結果……………………………… 138
表5-22 遊客非市場效益雙界二元模型估計結果…………………………………139
表5-23最終遊客雙界二元模型估計結果………………………………………… 140
表5-24 遊客與居民樣本願付價格推估……………………………………………142
表5-25 遊客與居民母體TWTP推估……………………………………………… 144
表5-26 遊客與居民母體各非市場效益分配……………………………………… 145
表5-27 居民個人屬性別之雙界二元模型………………………………………… 147
表5-28 遊客個人屬性別之雙界二元模型………………………………………… 148
參考文獻 Ackernmann, K. Disaster Tourism. Hokusei Report, 10:43-49. (2012)
Ahmed, S.U. and Gotoh, K.Cost-benefit Analysis of Environmental Goods by Applying the Contingent Valuation Method: Some Japanese Case Studies. Tokyo: Japan Springer. (2006)
Andy, C.P..Creative cities Tensions within and between social, cultural and economic development,A critical reading of the UK experience. City, Culture and Society, 1,13-20. (2010)
Arrow, K., Paul, S., Paul R.P., Edward E.L., Roy, R. and Howard, S.Report of the NOAA Panel on Contingent Valuation. Federal Register.58:46004614. (1993)
Bassett, K., Smith, I., Banks, M., and Connor, J.O. Urban dilemmas of competition and cohesion in cultural policy. Changing cities: rethinking urban competitiveness, cohesion and governance. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan. (2005)
Bardot, H. Expressing the inexpressible: The resilient healing of client and art therapist. Art Therapy, 25(4), 183-186. (2008)
Baumol,W.J. and Bowen,W.G.Performing Arts-The Economic Dilemma: A Study of Problems common to Theater, Opera, Music and Dance. New York: Twentieth Century Fund. (1966)
Brooke, B. and Metzl, E.S. Creative Soups for the Soul: Stories of Community Recovery in Talca, Chile, After the 2010 Earthquake. PSYKHE,24(1) : 1-13. (2015)
Brown,K. and Moran,D. Valuing Biodiversity: The Scope and Limitations of Economic Analysis. London: Center for Social and Economic Research on the Global Environment. (1993)
Buck, N. and Gordon, I.R.. Cities, competitiveness, cohesion and governance- a sketch of the ‘new conventional wisdom’. Changing cities: rethinking urban competitiveness, cohesion and governance. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan. (2005)
Chen, W.Y. and Jim, C.Y. Cost–benefit analysis of the leisure value of urban greening in the new Chinese city of Zhuhai. Cities,25,298-309. (2008)
Chiueh, Y.W. Natural Resource Economic Value and the Contingent Valuation Method: A Review. The Journal of Regional Studies in Humanity and Social Sciences,8,105-126. (2005).
DEGUCHI, M. review of ‘’H.TAKASHIMA, Powers in Cultural and Economic Development of Regions-Measures for the Japanese System of Philanthropy, JDC,1999’’. Cultural Economics, 4, 103-104. (1999).
Frey, B.S. and Pommerehne, W.W. Muses and Markets: Exploration in the Economics of the Arts. Oxford: Basil Blackwell. (1989).
Fulvio, P. and Nicola,A. Earthquake damages to cultural heritage constructions and simplified assessment of artworks. Engineering Failure Analysis ,34: 735–760. (2013).
Garrod, G.D., Willis,K.G., Bjarnadottir,H. and Cockbain, P. The non-priced benefits of renovating historic buildings. Cities, 13(6),423-430. (1996).
GOTO,K. Cultural Policy: the law, economics and management. Tokyo: Yuhikaku. (2001).
GOTO, K. Public Policy for Culture and City: Making Space for Creativity and Creative Industries. Tokyo: Yuhikaku. (2005).
Goulder, L.H. and Kennedy, D. Valuing ecosystem services: philosophical bases and empirical methods. In Nature’s Services: Societal Dependence on Natural Ecosystems. Washington,DC: Island Press. (1997).
HAMADA, K. A study of town revitalization by sight-seeing with the area brand, Journal of the University of Marketing and Distribution Sciences. Distribution sciences & business administration 22(2), 75-91. (2010).
Hanemann, W. M. Willingness to pay and willingness to accept: How much can they differ?. American Economic Review,81,635-647. (1991).
Hanse,T.B. An Evaluation of Danish Cultural Policy,(Paper to be Prepared at the 8th International Congress on Cultural Economics). (1994).
HAYASHI, T. Industrial reconstruction of Kobe after Great Hanshin Earthquake. Issues of the industrial reconstruction entering into the third year. KOBE INSTITUTE OF URBAN RESEARCH-Urban Policy 87: 3-13. (1997).
Heberlein, Thomas A. and Richard C. Bishop Assessing the Validity of Contingent Valuation: Three Field Experiments, paper presented at the International Conference on Man’s Role in Changing the Global Environment, Venice, Italy. (1985).
HONJO, Y. Implementation of the Kobe City Recovery Plan. Japan Social Innovation Journal, 1(1), 11. (2011).
Hospers Gert Jane. Creative cities: Breeding places in the knowledge economy. New York: springer Netherlands. (2003)
Hutchinson,WG., Chilton,S.M. and Davis, J. Measuring Non-use Value of Environmental Goods Using the Contingent Valuation Method. Journal of Agricultural Economics, 46(1),97-12. (1995).
IDE, A. Categorization and Future Direction of Recoveries by Tourism. The International Journal of Tourism Science,2,31-38. (2009).
IKEDA, K. Case Study of City Rehabilitation in Big Disaster. Public finance and public policy,42,60-72. (2007).
IKEGAMI, J. Economics of Culture and Intrinsic Value. Cultural Economics, 2(4),1-14. (2001).
ISHIMORI, S. The Potentialities of Autonomous Tourism in the Twenty-first Century. Senri ethnological reports,23,5-14. (2001).
IWAMOTO, H., KAKIUCHI, E., UJJIE, K. Quantitative Evaluation of Cultural Townscape using the CVM-The Case of Takayama Important Preservation Districts for Groups of Historic Buildings. Papers on city planning,41(2),18-24. (2006).
Kakiuchi, E. Quantitative Evaluation of Cultural Capital using the CVM. The Case of the World Heritage Villages of Gokayama. Toyama. Tokyo: SUIYOSHA. (2005).
Kadushin, A. The Social Work Interview: A Guide for Human Service Professionals. New York,Columbia University Press, 3rd. ed. (1990).
Kobayashi, M. The new current of regional activation. The potentialities of culture and art and creative city. Legislation and Research,314,133-143. (2011).
Klamer, A. The Value of Culture. Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press.
KURAHARA,M.(2013).A Study on ‘New Public commons’ in Post-Earthquake Reconstruction Activities. AIJJ Technol,19(41), 309-314. (2003)
Landry,C. The creative city: A Toolkit for Urban Innovators. Taylor & Francis. (2000).
Margaret C. & Melissa A. Data Collection Methods-Semi-Structured Interviews and Focus Groups.U.S. Govermment. (2009).
MASUDA, T. Cultural economics of tourism. TOKYO: FUYOSHOBO. (2000) .
MATOBA, Y. To make culture and art as a power of reconstruction. Life design report,205 ,38-40. (2013).
Mishler, E. G. Research Interviewing: Context and Narrative. MA, Cambridge, Harvard University Press. (1986).
Mitchell, R.C. and Richard, C. Using Surveys to Value Public Goods :The Contingent Valuation Method. Washington,DC:RFF Press. (1989).
MORIKURI, S. The Sightless Heritage in Our Life-A Case Study of Japanese School Excursion in Kobe: The Disaster Area of the Earthquake in 1995. Senri Ethnological Reports, 51,125-150. (2004).
Moutinho, L Strategic Management in Tourism. London: CABI Publishing. (2000).
MUROSAKI, Y. For the way of reconstruction of post-disaster. Studies in disaster recovery and revitalization,5:5-62. (2013).
NAOI,T., Airey,D., IIJIMA, S., NIININEN, O. Visitors’ evaluation of an historical district: Repertory Grid Analysis and Laddering Analysis with photographs. Tourism Management,27,420-436. (2006).
Nathan H. S. Earthquakes and art preservation: A view from the San Andreas fault. Science of The Total Environment 56: 401-410. (1986).
OBA, T., AOYAMA, Y., NAKAGAWA, D. An Economic Study on Various Values of Traditional Wooden Houses in Kyoto City. Proceedings of JSCE, 779, 11-23. (2005).
OIE, T. The tourism theory related to community- based townscape conservation movement. Policy science, 15(3),27-37. (2008).
OIE, T. The New Tourism and Local Tourism Industry. Bulletin of Osaka University of Tourism,10,2-37. (2010).
OKADA, T. Issues and Challenges of Local Revitalization and Reconstruction Work after the Earthquake Disaster. Trend in the sciences,18(10),9-13. (2013).
OKADA, Y. Way of "reconstruction" to think from lessons learned during the past of the earthquake. Mizuho Souken ronshuu,2011-3,11-46. (2011).
Osada Susumu. A note for the concept of " creative city". Keio Associated Repository of Academic resources, social sciences,21,93-104. (2010).
Phaedra, C. P. This is the only tour that sells: tourism, disaster, and national identity in New Orleans. Journal of Tourism and Cultural Change, 7(2), 99-114. (2009).
Randall,A. Theoretical Bases for Non-Market Estimation, Valuation of Wildland of Resource Benefit. Boulder: Westview Press. (1984).
Richards, R. Everyday creativity and new views of human nature: Psychological, social and spiritual perspectives. Washington, DC: APA Books. (2007).
Robert W.K, Charles F.R. and Karin, S. Estimating the public good value of preserving a local historic landmark. Urban Studies,41(10),2025-2041. (2004).
Sasaki Masayuki. Urban regeneration through cultural creativity and social inclusion Rethinking creative city theory through a Japanese case study. Cities, 27,53-59. (2010).
SHIRAI, K. Process management of local tourism policy with community development in Sawara, Chiba. SOCIOTECHNICA, l ,93-106. (2009).
Silvia E. Rabionet. How I Learned to Design and Conduct Semi-structured Interviews: An Ongoing and Continuous Journey. The Qualitative Report,16(2),563-566. (2011).
Smith, V.K. Nonmarket Valuation of Environmental Resources: An Interpretive Appraisal. Land Economics 69(1) :1-26. (1993).
Smith, M. K. Issues in Global Cultural Tourism. London: Routledge. (2009).
SUZUKI, K. Geoparks as Sites for Dark Tourism. E-journal GEO, 9(1),73-83. (2014).
SUZUKI, S. Creation of the Industry-culture Cities. Tokyo: Daimei-Do. (1998).
Swaffield, S. Place Culture and Landscape After the Christchurch Earthquake. In Sykes H Space Place and Culture, Future Leaders Australia, 144-172. (2013).
TAKATA, Y., MIYASHIGE, T., MONNAI, T. Concept of Creative City and Analysis of Cultural Urban Policy : Analysis of Creative Industrial Clusters and Cultural City Policies in the Creative City. Journal of Architecture and Planning ,51,421-424. (2011).
TAKASHIMA, H. Powers in Cultural and Economic Development of Regions-Measures for the Japanese System of Philanthropy. JDC. (1999).
TAKEDA, S., Chen, N. and IKADO, T. The Current State and View of New Tourism. Kansai University of International Studies, 2,117-129. (2011).
Tavares,S., Swaffield, S. and Stewart, E. Sustainability, microclimate and culture in post-earthquake Christchurch. In Davies R & Menzies D (eds) IFLA50 Shared Wisdom in an Age of Change: Proceedings of the 50th IFLA World Congress, Sky City Convention Centre, Auckland New Zealand 10-12th April 2013, 347-354. (2013).
Throsby, D. Economics and Culture. Emgland: Cambridge University Press. (2001) .
TOMOOKA, K. Cultural Resources for City Development-Regional Cultural Policy as an Antithesis of Cultural Globalization. Japanese Sociological Review, 60(3),379-395. (2010).
TORII,T. The Power of Individual and Community in the Disaster Restoration. Trends in the sciences,18(12), 22-26. (2013).
Treiman, T. and Gartner, J. Are residents willing to pay for their community forests. Urban Studies,43(9),1537-1547. (2006).
UENO,M. and SUZUKI, N. A research on traversing policy region in creative city policy. Journal of the City Planning Institute of Japan, 48(3),471-476. (2013).
Wall, G. Tourism and Development: Towards Sustainable Outcomes. Cultural Tourism and Sustainable Local Dvelopment, 31-46. (2009).
WATANABE,K. Regional creation by culture and art after the earthquake. Fukushima University Repository, 24(2),22-28. (2013).
Wu, C., Funck, C. and HAYASHI, Y. The Impact of Host Community on Destination (re)branding: A Case Study of Hiroshima. International Journal of Tourism Research,16,546-555. (2014).
YAMASHITA, S..3.11 and Tourism, The 46th Annual Meeting of the Japanese Society of Cultural Anthropology. Japanese Society of Cultural Anthropology. (2010)
YASUMURA,K. ENDO,H. and TERAOKA, S. Tourism and social culture lecture.TOKYO:KUNPURU. (2006).
Yeh Chin-Chia. A comparative study on cross-national creative city indicators system. City Development,9,111-144. (2010).


日文文獻
青山吉隆・中川大・松中亮治・大場哲治:〈京都市民の意識に基づく古都保存法の経済評価〉, 《第35回白本都市計画学会学術研究論文集》,35: 169-174。(2000)。
有馬昌宏:〈文化経済学における実証研究の動向と課題〉, 《文化経済学,3(1) : 11。(2008)。
井出明:〈観光による災害復興の類型化と目指すべき方向性〉, 《観光科学研究》,2:31-38。(2009)。
大橋昭一:〈観光分野における文化の意義をめぐる諸論調〉, 《大阪観光大学紀要》,10:39-58。(2010)。
大井優子:〈文化芸術による震災復興事業〉, 《文化芸術による復興推進コンソーシアム調査研究報告書》,48-51。(2012)。
大庭哲志、青山吉隆、中川大、松中亮治:〈京町家に対する価値意識の構造に関する研究〉, 《土木學會論文集》,779:11-23。(2005)。
奧山忠裕:〈文化施設の社会的便益評価 : りゅーとぴあ(新潟市民芸術文化会館)を事例として〉,《都市計畫論文集》,42(2):30-41。(2007)。
村尾修:〈1999年台湾集集地震後の集集鎮における災後重建綱要計画と 空間復興モデルを用いた公共空間の復興過程〉,《日本建築学会計画系論文集》,586:97-104。(2004)。
関美菜子:〈東日本大震災と「災害ツーリズム」の人類学的研究〉, 《東北人類学論壇》,13:83-104。(2014)。
竹村真一:〈創造性復興とは〉,復興構想会議:復興理念コミュニケーションツール提案。(2011)。
谷知子:〈町家に対する価値意識と保存再生手法の評価に関する研究--奈良町を対象として〉,《都市計畫論文集》,46:223-228。(2011)。
兒玉剛史:〈文化資本の価値に関する経済分析 : 広島県宮島を事例として〉, 《都市計畫論文集》,42(1) :93-99。(2007)。
垣內惠美子:〈滋賀県長浜市黒壁スクエアにおける観光消費の経済波及効果と政策的インプリケーション〉,《都市計畫論文集》,40:30-39。(2005)。
鳴海邦碩:〈伝えたい故郷の景観―阪神・淡路大震災からの復興の経験から〉, 《觀光文化》, 35(4) :6-10。(2011)。
村中亮夫:〈CVMによる災害発生後における歴史的景観復興の経済評価〉, 《歴史都市防災論文集》,3:245-252。(2009)。
西村幸夫:〈震災復興とツーリズムの役割〉, 《觀光文化》,35(4) :2-5。(2011)。
尾家建生:〈ニューツーリズムと地域の観光産業〉,《大阪観光大学紀要》,10:25-37。(2010)。
若林朋子:〈芸術・文化を通じた東日本大震災復興支援の現状〉, 《公益社団法人企業メセナ協議会》,20-22。(2011)。

中文文獻
王雲東:《社會研究方法:量化與質性取向及其應用》。台北:威式曼。(2007)。
王文科:《教育研究法》。台北:五南出版。(2002)。
林欽榮:〈創新區域與創意城市—產業創新與文化創意做為城市再生的動能〉, 《研考雙月刊》,34(6) :64-74。(2010)。
林金定,嚴嘉楓,陳美花:〈質性研究方法:訪談模式與實施步驟分析〉, 《身心障礙研究》,3(2) :122-136。(2005)。
周志龍,辛晚教:〈都市文化與空間規劃芻議〉,《都市與計畫》,40(4) :305-323。(2013)。
吳連賞,李億勳,陳振杰,黃瓊慧,蔡漢生,黃茱珺:高雄市推動文化創意產業策略之研究〉,高雄市政府研究發展考核委員會委託研究案,高雄師大地理系執行。(2008)。
陳凱俐、林亞立:〈文化資產之價值評估—以台北市古蹟為例〉, 《宜蘭技術學報》,9:169-174。(2002)。
陳宛君、廖學誠:〈宜蘭海岸遊憩效益之經濟評估—以外澳海灘為例〉, 《工程環境會刊》,27:19-38。(2011)。
陳宗玄、陸地:〈遊客對導覽解說人員需求與付費意願之研究:以國立自然科學博物館植物原為例〉, 《博物館學季刊》,20(4):7-26。(2006)。
陳曉宜:《報社記者抵抗資源之研究》。政治大學傳播學院碩士論文。(2004)。
李柏儒:《以條件評估法探討杉林溪休閒遊憩效益及其經濟價值》。國立雲林科技大學休閒運動研究所碩士論文。(2007)。
李俊鴻、黃錦煌:〈節慶活動遊客擁擠知覺降低之經濟效益評估〉,《農業經濟叢刊》, 15(1) : 81-113。(2009)。
吳珮瑛:《國家公園資源經濟效益評估:以墾丁國家公園為例》。台北:內政部營建署出版。(2000)。
吳珮瑛,蘇明達:《六十億元的由來:墾丁國家公園資源經濟價值評估》。台北:前衛出版。(2001)
吳珮瑛、劉哲良、蘇明達:〈受訪金額在開放選擇條件評估支付模式的作用—引導或是誤導〉, 《農業經濟半年刊》,77:1-43。(2005)。
管倖生:《設計研究方法》。台北:全華圖書。(2010)。
孫義雄:〈深度訪談法與犯罪成因之探索〉, 《警學叢刊》,38(3) :37-55。(2007)。
董志明、郭孟軒、陳佳欣、黃戊田:〈應用條件評估法評估台南市一級古蹟之遊憩效益〉, 《嘉南學報》,38:457-468。(2012)。
楊國樑、趙家民、謝佩諭:〈環保標章品牌效應與產品價差之探究〉, 《台北海洋技術學院學報》,2(1):109-126。(2009)。
劉以德:〈運動賽會經濟分析:條件評估法之運用〉, 《福爾摩沙體育學刊》,2:45-52。(2008)。
黃躍雯:《地方永續觀光發展與社區觀光培力》。台北:時英出版社。(2012)。
黃朱麗:《由實際趨避支出看條件評估資料之準確性--實際支付與願付價格之差異》。國立台灣大學農業經濟學系碩士論文。(1996)。
羅凱安、羅紹麟:〈環境規劃管理上保育野生動物資源效益之評估方法與實例〉, 《台灣土地金融季刊》,34(1):115-134。(1997)。
郭苔馥:《文化公共財願付價格之探討-以國立傳統藝術中心為例》。國立政治大學行政管理碩士學程碩士論文。(2010)。
傅祖壇、楊文山、葉寶文:〈921大地震災後重建經費之民眾捐款意願—CVM法之應用,《經濟研究》,42(1) :57-74。(2006)。
陸雲:〈環境資源估價之研究-非市場估價方法〉,經濟論文,18(1) :93-135。(1990)。
劉錦添:〈淡水河水質改善的經濟效益評估-封閉式假設評估法之應用〉, 《經濟論文叢刊》,18(2) :99-128。(1990)。
蕭代基,鄭蕙燕,吳珮瑛,錢玉蘭,溫麗琪:《環境保護之成本效益分析-理論、方法與應用》。台北:俊傑書局。(2003)。
傅祖壇,楊文山,葉寶文:〈921大地震災後重建經費之民眾捐款意願〉, 《經濟研究》,42(1) :57-74。(2006)。
闕雅文:〈自然資源之經濟效益評估法及條件評估法:文獻回顧〉, 《區域人文社會學報》,8:105-126。(2005)。

網站資料
921震災重建基金會: http://www.taiwan921.lib.ntu.edu.tw/index.html
USGS(U.S. Geological Survey): http://www.usgs.gov/
日本文化廳: http://www.bunka.go.jp/
日本復興廳: http://www.reconstruction.go.jp/
Arts and Culture Consortium for Reconstruction(ACCR):http://bgfsc.jp/en/
集集亮點計畫: http://travel.chi-chi.gov.tw/
集集鎮公所: http://www.chi-chi.gov.tw/
神戶市主要計畫:http://www.city.kobe.lg.jp/information/project/masterplan/jikikihonkeikaku02.html
神戶市:http://www.city.kobe.lg.jp/
新長田鐵人計畫: http://www.kobe-tetsujin.com/
NOAA. Available at: http://www.noaa.gov/
the Declaration of Kobe Cultural Creative City. Available at: http://www.city.kobe.lg.jp/safety/hanshinawaji/data/keyword/50/k-10.html
南投市政府:: http://www.nantou.gov.tw/
新長田藝術造街: http://www.kobe-biennale.jp/pre_event/project_nagata/
論文全文使用權限
  • 同意授權校內瀏覽/列印電子全文服務,於2016-07-25起公開。


  • 如您有疑問,請聯絡圖書館
    聯絡電話:(06)2757575#65773
    聯絡E-mail:etds@email.ncku.edu.tw