進階搜尋


下載電子全文  
系統識別號 U0026-1612201919312400
論文名稱(中文) 立體幾何形態之材質視觸覺感性意象
論文名稱(英文) The Kansei Images of the Texture of Three-dimensional Geometric Forms through Visual and Tactile Perception
校院名稱 成功大學
系所名稱(中) 工業設計學系
系所名稱(英) Department of Industrial Design
學年度 107
學期 2
出版年 108
研究生(中文) 陳亭潔
研究生(英文) Ting-Chieh Chen
學號 P36074145
學位類別 碩士
語文別 英文
論文頁數 152頁
口試委員 指導教授-何俊亨
口試委員-馬敏元
口試委員-陳璽任
口試委員-翁千惠
口試委員-丘增平
中文關鍵字 材質  形態  立體幾何  感性意象  視觸感知 
英文關鍵字 Kansei Engineering  geometric form  material  texture  perception 
學科別分類
中文摘要 材質種類與應用方式隨著科技進步逐漸變得豐富多元,設計師能夠透過材質展現的產品意象將有更多可能性,因此材質運用之知識將為不可或缺的能力。而近年來生活品質提升,消費者對於產品的需求,逐漸由功能取向轉為心靈層面之需求性,透過產品傳達感性意象給使用者的設計模式成為主流,亦為感性工學(Kansei Engineering)所致力探討的目標。在設計符合消費者期望之感性意象產品時,身為產品外觀三要素中的材質與形態,扮演著決定消費者感受與產品互動時的重要角色。產品形態特徵的不同,將改變使用者接觸產品的方式,進而造成使用者可能透過不同知覺感受產品,亦改變了其所傳達的感性意象。與產品外觀互動之知覺以視覺及觸覺為主,故了解材質在不同形態所呈現之觸覺、視覺以及其視觸聯覺意象,可提供設計師在搭配材質與材質時的參考資訊。
本研究針對由5種基礎幾何形態與3種產品設計常見材質:塑膠、金屬及木頭,製作為15種不同之形態與材質組合樣品進行實驗,觀察與探討 (1) 不同材質形態組合之感性意象;(2) 不同感官知覺下對於材質形態組合之感性意象程度差異;(3) 材質所產生之感性意象差異;(4) 形態所產生之感性意象差異;(5) 材質與形態交互作用所產生之感性意象差異。並將研究結果圖像化,以提供產品設計時之材質形態應用參考。
研究結果顯示,在知覺間,視覺與觸覺間具有一定程度的落差,故在傳達感性意象時,須考慮使用者使用不同知覺時所產生之感性意象差異。且在材質與形態之交互作用下,會產生感性意象上之程度差異,亦即在傳達感性意象時,可能會因為材質與形態之搭配組合不同,而產生相反的效果,尤其於「滑順細緻」感性語彙下,金屬圓錐得分雖高於金屬立方,然而木頭立方卻高於木頭圓錐。若設計師欲傳達此感性意象時,材質與形態的搭配上,須考慮兩者相互作用所產生的感性意象效果。
關鍵字:材質、形態、立體幾何、感性意象、視觸感知。
英文摘要 Due to improvements in the quality of living of living quality, peoples’ demand for products has gradually changed from functional to psychological. Therefore, understanding their people’s feelings and expectations, as well as finding out the emotional design elements that appeal to them, have become important issues for product designers. In order to design a product meeting the emotional needs of consumers, it is necessary to learn how humans perceived a product through his/hertheir senses. Using the characteristics of the five senses to create more attractive design results is the goal of Kansei Engineering, a consumer-oriented technology methods to develop new products. This design method can transform consumer's feelings and expectations into data which can be used in the creation of design elements. The value of a product value can be improved depending on the different materials selected by a designer for its construction. Materials can be applied to different product forms, which will not only affect the presentational effect of the materialform, but also the way users interacts with the product. In general, changes in form itself affect the stimuli received through vision, touch, and their synesthesisa, as well as the user's feelings. Therefore, in addition to considering a material’s physical characteristics, form is also an important factor in Kansei Engineered design. Understanding the Kansei images of materials in different forms can be used as reference information for designers. To sum up, the purpose of this study is to discuss the relationship between Kansei images and the way in which theperceptions of materials and forms represented in those images affect perception. , and their Kansei images. 
Three materials commonly used in products, i.e. plastic, wood and metal, were selected to createfive fifteen basic three-dimensional geometric forms, five different forms in each material. These formswhich are the basics forms of all products. These The15 samples used in this study were made to explore: (1) Kansei images of different material-form combinations, (2) Kansei image differences in material-from combination under different fields of perceptions, (3) Kansei images of differences in materials, (4) Kansei image differences of forms, (5) the difference in Kansei images produced by the interaction between materials and forms. The results of the study are visualized to provide a reference for the use in material-form application in product design.
The results of the study show that there is a difference between the Kansei images created by visual and tactile perceptions. Therefore, when conveying Kansei images, it is necessary to consider thise difference when appealing to different fields of user perception.s by users. And in the interaction between material and form, tThere will is also be a difference in Kansei images depending on the interaction between material and form. It is possible, for instance, for different combinations of material and form to result in opposite effects from one another.. This is especially evident in the "smooth and delicate" Kansei images, where, for instance, a metal cone score is higher than that of a metal cube, whereasthe a wooden cube’s score is higher than that of a wooden cone. If a designer wants to convey this Kansei images effectively, the interactions between material and form must be considered.

Key words: Kansei Engineering, geometric form, material, texture, perception
論文目次 摘要 i
SUMMARY ii
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS iv
TABLE OF CONTENTS v
LIST OF TABLES vii
LIST OF FIGURES viii

CHAPTER 1 INTRODUCTION 1
1.1 Research Background 1
1.2 Research Purpose 4
1.3 Research Scope 5

CHAPTER 2 Methodology 7
2.1 Experimental Process and Structure 7
2.2 Experiment Steps and Purpose 8
2.2.1 Making Experimental Samples 8
2.2.2 Kansei Vocabulary Selection 10
2.2.3 The Kansei Image Experiment 12
2.2.4 Analysis of Experimental Results 15

CHAPTER 3 Analysis 17
3.1 The Average Score of the Kansei Image of Each Sample 17
3.2 Differences Between Perceptions 20
3.2.1 Analysis of Perceptual Significance of Samples in the Kansei Vocabulary 20
3.2.2 Analysis of Significance of The Samples to Different Perceptions in relation to Kansei Vocabulary 21
3.3 Analysis of the Influence of Materials and Forms Under Various Categories of Perception 24
3.3.1 Interaction of Materials and Form 25
3.3.2 The Main Effect of Material 26
3.3.3 The Main Effect of Form 29
3.3.4 The Effect of Material-form Interaction 33

CHAPTER 4 Disscusion 37
4.1 The Kansei Image Difference Between Perceptions 37
4.2 Kansei Image of Material 38
4.3 Kansei Image of Forms 39
4.4 Interaction Between Material and Form 41
4.5 Kansei Image of Material Form Combination 41

CHAPTER 5 Conclusion 43
5.1 Research Conclusions 43
5.2 Research Contribution 44
5.3 Research Limitations and Recommendation 45

REFERENCES 47
Appendix A Traditional Chinese version 51
參考文獻 【中文文獻】
王明堂. (2016). 感性工學到感性設計:感性工學研究的基礎與應用: 全華圖書股份有限公司.
王嘉明. (1995). 探究視覺宇宙的脈搏─ 視覺語言. 臺北: 藝術家.
丘永福. (2002). 造形原理: 艺风堂出版社.
仲谷正史, 筧康明, 三原聡一郎, & 南澤孝太. (2017). 觸覺不思議 : 從觸感遊戲、感官實驗及最新研究,探索你從不知道的觸覺世界 (劉格安, Trans.): 臉譜.
何俊亨, & 陳乃鳯. (2013). 以榨汁機的使用來探討前期產品經驗中感官之重要度/A User Experience Case Study on the Sensory Importance at the Early Stage of Using Juice Squeezer. 感性學報 Journal of Kansei, 1(1), 46-63.
呂明泉. (2002). 觸覺與視覺對意象差異研究-以塑膠材質咬花為例. 成功大學工業設計學系學位論文, 1-108.
呂清夫. (2007). 造形原理: 雄獅圖書股份有限公司.
李江山. (2002). 視覺與認知: 視覺知覺與視覺運動系統: 遠流.
周君瑞, & 陳國祥. (2009). 感性化產品造形之塑造-以造形特徵為基礎. 設計學報 (Journal of Design), 8(2).
林加雯. (1998). 材質質感之視覺意象類型與構成基礎初探. Paper presented at the 第三屆設計學術研究成果研討會, 國立雲林科技大學.
林東龍, & 張文裕. (2005). 混合材質在視觸覺上之差異性研究. 高雄師大學報: 自然科學與科技類(19), 1-15.
林振陽, & 黃世輝. (1997). 設計材料, 六合出版社, 台北.
林崇宏. (1999). 造型發展方法之研究. Paper presented at the 中華民國設計學會第四屆學術研討會.
長町三生. (1995). 感性工学のおはなし: 日本規格協会.
施正茵. (2011). 探討材質感性意象對產品知覺之影響. 成功大學工業設計學系學位論文, 1-107.
洪志成, & 廖梅花. (2003). 焦點團體訪談. 嘉義: 濤石.
張育銘, 陳國祥, 管倖生, 鄧怡莘, 邵承珍, 陳俊中, & 童鼎鈞. (2000). 行動電話產品造型與消費者感性關聯之建立. Paper presented at the 2000 年技術與教育研討會論文集.
張春興. (1995). 普通心理學. 台北: 東華.
張春興. (2003). 心理學原理: 東華書局股份有限公司.
張格禎. (2017). 發泡橡膠感性意象研究.
莊青遠. (2010). 不同握持動作對橡膠紋路造形之觸覺意象研究.
莊盈祺. (2002). 複合式感性意象下產品造形的建構. 成功大學工業設計學系學位論文, 1-108.
陳又甄. (2012). 視覺引起之誘觸性研究. 成功大學工業設計學系學位論文, 1-71.
陳仰賢. (2018). 生活科技: 新文京.
陳安君. (2010). 產品視觸覺複合之感性意象研究. 成功大學工業設計學系學位論文, 1-68.
陳志堯. (2012). 塑膠質感在視觸覺上之感性研究.
陳采青. (2001). 質感之象徵意象在視覺傳達設計創作之研究. (碩士), 國立臺灣師範大學, 台北市.
陳俊宏. (1988). 色彩嗜好與色彩意象之調查分析:為商業設計之色彩計劃而做的研究: 藝風堂.
陳勇廷, & 莊明振. (2015). 視覺與觸覺意象評估差異之探討/The Difference of Image Evaluation between Visual and Tactile Sensation. 感性學報 Journal of Kansei, 2(2), 04-27.
陳達昌. (2008). 材質表面處理之質感意象探討─ 以筆記型電腦為例.
陳鴻源, 張育銘, & 許有麟. (2014). 產品材質觸感意象研究. 2014 視覺藝術 [中介] 研討會暨文化創意動畫產業產學論壇論文集, 135-148.
彭聃齡, & 張必隱. (2000). 認知心理學: 臺灣東華.
彭麟婷, 陳國祥, & 王明堂. (2009). 色彩與形態對產品意象之交互影響-以手機為例. 工業設計(121), 175-181.
朝倉直已. (1985). 藝術設計的平面構成. 台北, 梵谷圖書.
賀松林. (2014). 產品設計材料與工藝: 電子工業出版社.
黃啟三. (2001). 新產品設計, 全華, 台北.
廖珮君, 涂永祥, & 鄭翔耀. (2012). 單一材質與複合材質的質感差異研究. Paper presented at the 2012 International Conference of Innovation & Design.
劉又升, & 程東奕. (1999). 運用基本幾何造形組合從事產品造形創新之方法初探,中華民國設計學會第四屆學術研討會論文集. Paper presented at the 中華民國設計學會第四屆學術研討會.
鄧成連, 張文德, 詹淑美, 賴艾如, & 楊嘉倫. (2003). 市場形設計風格之塑造研究. 行政院國家科學委員會補助專題研究計畫成果報告 (報告編號: NSC91-2411-H-130-005-SSS), 未出版.
羅致遠, 曹永慶, & 朱達信. (1999). 不同材質之基本立方體在倒角、圓角、曲面造形操作條件下之意象研究,中華民國設計學會第四屆學術研討會論文集. Paper presented at the 中華民國設計學會第四屆學術研討會.

【英文文獻】
Blijlevens, J., Creusen, M. E., & Schoormans, J. P. (2009). How consumers perceive product appearance: The identification of three product appearance attributes. International Journal of design, 3(3).
Choi, K., & Jun, C. (2007). A systematic approach to the Kansei factors of tactile sense regarding the surface roughness. Applied Ergonomics, 38(1), 53-63.
Cytowic, R. E. (2002). Synesthesia: A union of the senses: MIT press.
Dawes, J. (2008). Do data characteristics change according to the number of scale points used? An experiment using 5-point, 7-point and 10-point scales. International journal of market research, 50(1), 61-104.
Eissen, K., & Steur, R. (2007). Sketching: drawing techniques for product designers: Bis.
Hinckley, K., & Sinclair, M. (1999). Touch-sensing input devices. Paper presented at the Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems.
Kosslyn, S. M. (1996). Image and brain: The resolution of the imagery debate: MIT press.
Lederman, S. J., & Klatzky, R. L. (1987). Hand movements: A window into haptic object recognition. Cognitive psychology, 19(3), 342-368.
Lévy, P., Nakamori, S., & Yamanaka, T. (2008). Explaining Kansei Design Studies. Paper presented at the Design and Emotion Conference 2008.
Likert, R. (1932). A technique for the measurement of attitudes. Archives of psychology.
Morgan, D. L. (1996). Focus groups as qualitative research (Vol. 16): Sage publications.
Révész, G. (1950). Psychology and art of the blind.
Schifferstein, H. N., & Cleiren, M. P. (2005). Capturing product experiences: a split-modality approach. Acta psychologica, 118(3), 293-318.
論文全文使用權限
  • 同意授權校內瀏覽/列印電子全文服務,於2020-01-30起公開。
  • 同意授權校外瀏覽/列印電子全文服務,於2020-01-30起公開。


  • 如您有疑問,請聯絡圖書館
    聯絡電話:(06)2757575#65773
    聯絡E-mail:etds@email.ncku.edu.tw