進階搜尋


下載電子全文  
系統識別號 U0026-1608201622144000
論文名稱(中文) 社區參與於河內老城區街道景觀改善之適用性研究 - 以Hang Buom街道為例
論文名稱(英文) Study on the applicability of Community Participation in Street Landscape Improvement of Hanoi Ancient Area - In the case of Hang Buom Street
校院名稱 成功大學
系所名稱(中) 都市計劃學系
系所名稱(英) Department of Urban Planning
學年度 104
學期 2
出版年 105
研究生(中文) 阮孟越
研究生(英文) Nguyen Manh Viet
電子信箱 mviet_arch@yahoo.com
學號 P26017036
學位類別 碩士
語文別 英文
論文頁數 109頁
口試委員 召集委員-孔憲法
口試委員-陳啟仁
口試委員-張秀慈
口試委員-黃偉茹
指導教授-曾憲嫻
中文關鍵字 社區參與  街道景觀改善  都市設計準則  河內老城區  Hang Buom街道道 
英文關鍵字 Community participation  Street landscape improvement  Urban design guidelines  Hanoi Ancient Area  Hang Buom Street 
學科別分類
中文摘要 本研究主要的目的是在探討社區參與河內老城區街道景觀改善之適用性研究,以保存全區的價值(透過訪談、問卷、拍照和記錄、草圖繪製等方法)。
具體而言,本研究目的為了瞭解與分析民眾參與在各國現實狀況的應用程序(根據文獻回顧與案例分析),以確定在越南區域現實狀況程序的應用(依據越南個案、越南法規跟社區參與有關的文件),並進而確定建立符合該區之都市設計準則,以提出改善河內老城區的街道景觀建議(基於樣本收集,從實地調查和相關參與式分析)。
本研究成果對未來在河內老城區的街道景觀改善、社區參與方式,期待會有相當的影響與幫助,進而將這些成果經驗提供出來,應有助於解決在越南城市規劃更大問題。
英文摘要 Based on data collection from field research (interviews, survey questionnaires, take pictures, records, layout-based sketches) of the pilot street (Hang Buom), the main aim of this study is to identify the applicability of community participation method in street landscape improvement of Hanoi Ancient Area, towards preservation the values of whole area.
In addition, the purposes of this study are also to understand and identify the reality situation of the application method (based on literature review and case studies in the world which relates to method of community participation); to identify the reality situation of the application method in Vietnam up to date (based on case studies and legal bases for community participation in Vietnam); and to identify the appropriate urban design guidelines to improve street landscape of Hanoi Ancient Area (based on data collection from field research and participatory appraisal).
The work presented here has profound implications for the future studies of community participation in street landscape improvement of Hanoi Ancient Area, and may one day these results will help solve the larger problems of urban planning in Vietnam.
論文目次 ABSTRACT I
中文摘要 II
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS III
TABLE OF CONTENTS V
LIST OF TABLES IX
LIST OF FIGURES X
CHAPTER ONE INTRODUCTION 1
1.1 Research Background. 1
1.2 Research Motivation. 2
1.3 Research Purposes. 3
1.4 Research Objective. 4
1.5 Research Scope. 4
1.6 Research Methods. 4
1.7 Research Structure. 5
CHAPTER TWO OVERVIEW OF COMMUNITY PARTICIPATION METHOD 7
2.1 Literature review. 7
2.1.1 Definitions of Community Participation in the World and Vietnam. 7
2.1.2 Study of Content Community Participation Method. 13
2.2 The reality situation of the application method in the world. 22
2.2.1 In America. 22
2.2.2 In Taiwan. 31
2.3 Conclusion. 38
CHAPTER THREE COMMUNITY PARTICIPATION IN VIETNAM 39
3.1 Legal Bases for Community Participation in Vietnam. 39
3.1.1 Ordinance on Exercise of Democracy in Communes, Wards and Townships, No.34/2007/PL-UBTVQH11. 41
3.1.2 Circular on Guiding the Elaboration, Evaluation, Approval and Management of Construction Planning, No.07/2008/TT-BXD. 42
3.1.3 Decree on Management of Urban Space, Architecture and Landscapes, No.38/2010/ND-CP. 42
3.1.4 Law on Construction 2014, No.50/2014/QH13. 43
3.1.5 Decree on Detailed Regulations on Construction Planning, No.44/2015/ND-CP. 43
3.1.6 Consolidated document on Consolidation of Law on Urban Planning, No.01/VBHN-VPQH 2015. 43
3.2 The reality situation of the application method in Vietnam. 44
3.2.1 General situation. 44
3.2.2 In Hanoi. 46
3.2.3 In Hanoi Ancient Area. 47
3.3 Conclusion. 49
CHAPTER FOUR STUDY ON HANOI ANCIENT AREA AND HANG BUOM STREET 50
4.1 Context of Hanoi Ancient Area. 50
4.1.1 Brief History of Hanoi Ancient Area. 50
4.1.2 Cultural values. 55
4.2 Context of Hang Buom Street. 61
4.2.1 Brief History of Hang Buom Street. 61
4.2.2 Cultural Values. 64
4.2.3 Basic Information of Hang Buom Street. 68
4.3 Field Survey and Descriptive Analysis of Respondents. 74
4.3.1 Layout-based sketches and take pictures. 75
4.3.2 Rapid assessment current condition of street. 79
4.3.3 Interviews. 84
4.3.4 Survey Questionnaires and Descriptive Analysis of Respondents. 93
4.3.5 Conclusion. 99
4.4 Proposed Urban design guidelines to improve street landscape and Assessment of Stakeholders. 100
4.4.1 Building Height. 100
4.4.2 Preservation of Street Facade. 102
4.4.3 Materials and Colors of Buildings. 102
4.4.4 Bill Boards. 103
4.4.5 Sanitary Condition, Sidewalk, and Electrical Lines. 104
4.4.5 Conclusion. 104
CHAPTER FIVE CONCLUSIONS AND SUGGESTIONS 106
5.1 Conclusions. 106
5.1.1 Advantages and Limitations. 107
5.1.2 Lessons learned. 108
5.2 Suggestions. 108
5.2.1 Local Government. 108
5.2.2 Stakeholders. 109
REFERENCES 110
APPENDICES 115
Appendix 1: Questionnaires. 115
Appendix 2: The legal bases in Vietnam (the latest updated versions) 117
Appendix 3: Discussion and Research Process 124
參考文獻 1. Arnstein, S. R. (1969). A ladder of citizen participation. Journal of the American Institute of planners, 35(4), 216-224.
2. AUSAID. (1994). Project: Planning Management and Development of Hanoi - Detail Planning of the Ancient Quarter. Hanoi, Vietnam.
3. Bank, W. (2004). World Development Report: Making Services Work for Poor People. Washington DC: World Bank.
4. Brooks, N., Donaghy, K., & Knaap, G.-J. (2012). The Oxford handbook of urban economics and planning: Oxford University Press.
5. CECR. (2013). Program: Promoting community participation in protection lakes of Hanoi, Center for Environment and Community Research. Retrieved from http://cecr.vn/cecr/linh-vuc-hoat-dong/463.html
6. Chambers, R. (1983). Rural development: Putting the last first: Longman Scientific Technology.
7. Chang, M., Cheng, H.-H., & Chen, S.-M. (2010). Project: Tainan Kong Miao District Urban Renewal Planning. Bureau of Urban Development, Tainan City Government.
8. Chavis, D. M., & Newbrough, J. (1986). The meaning of “community” in community psychology. Journal of Community Psychology, 14(4), 335-340.
9. Choguill, M. B. G. (1996). A ladder of community participation for underdeveloped countries. Habitat international, 20(3), 431-444.
10. Cornwall, A. (2000). Beneficiary, consumer, citizen: perspectives on participation for poverty reduction: Sida Stockholm.
11. Crofton, F. S. (2001). Sustainable Community Planning and Development: Participation Tools & Practices: Final Report: The Division.
12. Cuong, N. (2015, November 27). Hanoi: Residents have been living in frozen planning zone for 45 years languishing wait to be "rescued". Dantri. Retrieved from http://dantri.com.vn/ban-doc/ha-noi-dan-cu-vung-quy-hoach-treo-45-nam-moi-mon-cho-giai-cuu-20151124091435652.htm
13. Davis, D., Meyer, J., Wright, M., & Zykofsky, P. (2013). Participation Tools for Better Community Planning. Local Government Commission, Sacramento, California.
14. Delanty, G. (2003). Community. Key Ideas: London: Routledge.
15. DELGOSEA. (2010). Community participation in upgrading the old collective housing areas in Vinh city. Phnom Penh, Cambodia.
16. Dzung, D. T. (2012, January 1). Renovating old urban areas with community participation, Dothivietnam. Retrieved from https://dothivietnam.org/2012/01/08/qh-cộng-dồng/
17. Habraken, N. J. (1986). Towards a new professional role. Design Studies, 7(3), 139-143.
18. Hacker, K. (2013). Community-based participatory research: Sage.
19. Hallman, H. (1999). Hanoi-an ancient city in transition: a minor field study in conservation management. Royal Institute of Technology, Sweden.
20. Hamdi, N. (1995). Housing without houses: participation, flexibility, enablement: Intermediate Technology Publications Ltd (ITP).
21. Hamdi, N., & Goethert, R. (1997). Action planning for cities: a guide to community practice: John Wiley Chichester, UK.
22. Hataya, N. (2007). The illusion of community participation: experience in the irregular settlements of Bogotá. University of London.
23. Hillery, G. A. (1955). Definitions of community: Areas of agreement. Rural sociology, 20, 111-123.
24. Hussein, A. A. (2013). Determinants of community participation in the implementation of development projects: A case of Garissa sewerage project. University of Nairobi.
25. Irvin, R. A., & Stansbury, J. (2004). Citizen participation in decision making: is it worth the effort? Public administration review, 64(1), 55-65.
26. JICA, & Hanoi, P. s. C. (2007). Project: The Comprehensive Urban Development Programme in Hanoi Capital City (HAIDEP) (Vol. Pilot Project A: Sustainable Development and Preservation for the Ancient Quarter). Hanoi, Vietnam.
27. Keller, S. (2003). Community: Pursuing the dream, living the reality: Princeton University Press.
28. Kojima, L., & Magaribuchi, L. (2003). Project: Design Proposal of Modern Tube House. Hanoi, Vietnam.
29. Laquian, A. A. (2007). United Nations expert group meeting on population distribution, urbanization, internal migration and development.
30. Le, T. M. L. (2014, 30/6/2014). Mobilizing and combining resources to build a new countryside - The issues raised, Tapchitaichinh. Retrieved from http://tapchitaichinh.vn/nghien-cuu--trao-doi/trao-doi-binh-luan/huy-dong-va-gan-ket-cac-nguon-luc-xay-dung-nong-thon-moi-nhung-van-de-dat-ra-50881.html
31. MacQueen, K. M., McLellan, E., Metzger, D. S., Kegeles, S., Strauss, R. P., Scotti, R., . . . Trotter, R. T. (2001). What is community? An evidence-based definition for participatory public health. American journal of public health, 91(12), 1929-1938.
32. Marcuss, M. (2005). Reviving Main Street: two New England case studies. Communities and Banking(Win), 3-9.
33. Mathbor, G. M. (2008). Effective community participation in coastal development: Lyceum Books.
34. McKeown, C. T., Rubinstein, R. A., & Kelly, J. G. (1987). Chapter 3: Anthropology, the Meaning of Community, and Prevention. Prevention in Human Services, 5(2), 35-64.
35. MfE (New Zealand Ministry for the Environment) (2006). Urban Design Toolkit. Wellington.
36. Midgley, J., Hall, A., Hardiman, M., & Narine, D. (1986). Community participation, social development and the state: Methuen.
37. Minh, H. (2005, May 21). Lessons from Da Nang, Saigongiaiphong. Retrieved from http://www.sggp.org.vn/moitruongdothi/nam2005/thang5/51417/
38. Morse, S. W. (2009). Smart communities: How citizens and local leaders can use strategic thinking to build a brighter future: John Wiley & Sons.
39. Patrick, D. L., & Wickizer, T. M. (1995). Community and health. Society and health, 46-92.
40. Paul, S. (1987). Community participation in development projects: World Bank Washington, DC.
41. Reddy, G. N. (2002). Empowering Communities through Participatory Methods: Manak Publications.
42. SENA, C., & IUTP. (1994). Project: Ancient quarter of Hanoi. Hanoi, Vietnam.
43. Sheng, Y. K. (1990). Community participation in low-income housing projects: problems and prospects. Community Development Journal, 25(1), 56-65.
44. SIDA. (1998). Pilot project: Upgrade and develop the blocks. Hanoi, Vietnam.
45. SRV (Socialist Republic of Vietnam) (1995). Decision on Approving the Planning for Protection, Embellishment, and Development in Hanoi Old Quarter. No.70/BXD/KT-QH. Ministry of Construction, Hanoi.
46. SRV (Socialist Republic of Vietnam) (1999). Decision on Temporary Regulations for Construction Management, Conservation, and Embellishment in Hanoi Old Quarter. No.45/1999/QD-UB. Hanoi People's Committee, Hanoi.
47. SRV (Socialist Republic of Vietnam) (2007). Ordinance on Exercise of Democracy in Communes, Wards and Townships. No. 34/2007/PL-UBTVQH11. The Standing Committee of the National Assembly, Hanoi.
48. SRV (Socialist Republic of Vietnam) (2008). Circular on Guiding the Elaboration, Evaluation, Approval and Management of Construction Planning. No. 07/2008/TT-BXD. The Ministry of Construction, Hanoi.
49. SRV (Socialist Republic of Vietnam) (2010). Decree on Management of Urban Space, Architecture and Landscapes. No.38/2010/ND-CP. The Government, Hanoi.
50. SRV (Socialist Republic of Vietnam) (2013). Decision on Regulations for Planning and Architect Management in the Old Quarter. No. 6398/QD-UBND. Ha Noi People's Committee, Hanoi.
51. SRV (Socialist Republic of Vietnam) (2014). Law on Construction 2014. No. 50/2014/QH13. The National Assembly, Hanoi.
52. SRV (Socialist Republic of Vietnam) (2015a). Decree on Detailed Regulations on Construction Planning. No. 44/2015/ND-CP. The Government, Hanoi.
53. SRV (Socialist Republic of Vietnam) (2015b). Consolidated document on Consolidation of Law on Urban Planning. No. 01/VBHN-VPQH 2015. The Office of National Assembly, Hanoi.
54. Tönnies, F. (1988). Community and society (Gemeinschaft und Gesellschaft). New Brunswick: NJ: Transaction Books.
55. Tönnies, F., & Harris, J. (2001). Tönnies: Community and civil society: Cambridge University Press.
56. Toulouse, C., & Hanoi, P. s. C. (2010). Pilot Project: Housing Renovation of No.87 Ma May, No.38 Hang Dao, and No.51 Hang Bac Street. Hanoi, Vietnam.
57. Toulouse, C., & Hoan Kiem District, P. s. C. (2011). Project: Renovation of Ta Hien Street Facade. Hanoi, Vietnam.
58. Tran, D. (2016, July 6). Ho Chi Minh City wants to delete three frozen planning of industrial park, clearing 675 hectares of land., Vnexpress. Retrieved from http://vnexpress.net/tin-tuc/thoi-su/tp-hcm-muon-xoa-treo-3-khu-cong-nghiep-giai-phong-675-ha-dat-3431520.html
59. Tran, H. (2010). Promoting the role of community in urban planning and management of urban development in Hanoi.
60. Tung, P. H. (2010). Community: concept, approach, and classification in research. Social Science Information, 21-29.
61. Wates, N. (2014). The Community Planning Handbook: How people can shape their cities, towns & villages in any part of the world: Routledge.
62. Wellman, B., & Wortley, S. (1990). Different strokes from different folks: Community ties and social support. American journal of Sociology, 558-588.
63. Wulz, F. (1986). The concept of participation. Design studies, 7(3), 153-162.
論文全文使用權限
  • 同意授權校內瀏覽/列印電子全文服務,於2018-06-23起公開。
  • 同意授權校外瀏覽/列印電子全文服務,於2018-06-24起公開。


  • 如您有疑問,請聯絡圖書館
    聯絡電話:(06)2757575#65773
    聯絡E-mail:etds@email.ncku.edu.tw