進階搜尋


   電子論文尚未授權公開,紙本請查館藏目錄
(※如查詢不到或館藏狀況顯示「閉架不公開」,表示該本論文不在書庫,無法取用。)
系統識別號 U0026-0906201923325300
論文名稱(中文) 台灣電影產業的創意人才網路之分析-核心與邊緣網路的觀點
論文名稱(英文) The Analysis of Creative Individuals Networks in the Taiwan Movie Industry-The Perspective Of Core and Peripheral Network
校院名稱 成功大學
系所名稱(中) 企業管理學系碩士在職專班
系所名稱(英) Department of Business Administration (on the job class)
學年度 107
學期 2
出版年 108
研究生(中文) 王子謙
研究生(英文) Tzu-Chien Wang
學號 R47061068
學位類別 碩士
語文別 中文
論文頁數 41頁
口試委員 指導教授-許經明
口試委員-詹昭能
口試委員-林維國
中文關鍵字 創意表現  人際網絡  台灣電影產業  核心與邊緣網絡 
英文關鍵字 Creative Performance  Social Network  Taiwan Film Industry  Core and Periphery Network 
學科別分類
中文摘要 人才是企業的競爭力,也是其它競爭對手無法在短時間內模仿的重要資產。基本上,在電影、音樂、遊戲等創意產業中,許多創意人才會因為志同道合等價值觀的相近而來相聚結合,進而形成專屬於創意人才的人際網絡。本研究分析了台灣電影產業蓬勃發展的1970年至1989年之間,參與發行製作1,190部電影所形成的人際網絡。我們發現當創意發想者(導演)與創意管理者(製作人)位於人際網絡中越屬於「中間位置」,該部電影的獲獎與提名數目就會變得越多。本研究主張,比起創意人才本身的個人特質之外,創意人才鑲坎於人際網絡中的「位置」意味著有更高的創作能力之意義。企業應該更注重該人才的人際網絡之結構,才能有效地獲取人才來提高產品開發的表現。
英文摘要 Talents are the competitiveness of firms and also important assets that other competitors cannot imitate immediately. Basically, in the creative industries such as the film, music, and gaming industry, many creative talents will come together because of their similar values, and form a network of creative talents. This study analyzes the network of creative talents who participated in 1,190 films from the booming Taiwanese film industry between 1970 and 1989. We find that the more creative developer (director) and creative manager (producer) are in the intermediate of the network of creative talents, the more the number of awards and nominations the film has. This study argues that in addition to the personal qualities of creative talents, the “position” of creative talents embedded in a network means a higher level of creative competence. Hence, firms should pay more attention to the structure of a network of creative talents in order to effectively acquire talented personnel to improve the performance of creative product development.
論文目次 摘要 I
誌謝 VI
目錄 VII
表目錄 VIII
圖目錄 IX
第一章 研究動機和背景 1
第二章 本研究的研究意義 3
第三章 分析框架 7
第四章 分析方法 12
第一節 資料庫介紹 12
第二節 一維及二維網絡的轉換 15
第三節 創意人才網絡分析方法 17
第四節 創意發想者與管理者 18
第五章 分析結果 22
第六章 討論 32
第七章 結論與未來研究 35
參考文獻 37
參考文獻 Ahuja, G. (2000). Collaboration networks, structural holes, and innovation: A longitudinal study. Administrative Science Quarterly, 45(3), 425-455.
Baker, W. E., & Faulkner, R. R. (1991). Role as resource in the Hollywood film industry. American Journal of Sociology, 97(2), 279-309.
Baldwin, C. Y., & Clark, K. B. (2000). Design rules: The power of modularity. MIT press.
Baldwin, C. Y. & Woodward, C. J. (2009). The architecture of platforms: A unified view. In Gawer, A. (Ed.). Platforms, markets and innovation (pp. 19-44). Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar Publishing.
Barabasi, A. L. (2002). Linked: The New Science of Networks. Cambridge, MA: Perseus.
Barney, J. (1991). Firm resources and sustained competitive advantage. Journal of Management, 17(1), 99-120.
Bechky, B. A. (2006). Gaffers, gofers, and grips: Role-based coordination in temporary organizations. Organization Science, 17(1), 3-21.
Borgatti, S. P., & Everett, M. G. (1997). Network analysis of 2-mode data. Social Networks, 19(3), 243-269.
Borgatti, S. P., & Everett, M. G. (1999). Models of core/periphery structures. Social Networks, 21(4), 375-395.
Burt, R. S. (1992). Structure holes. The Social Structure of Competition, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Burt, R. S. (2004). Structural holes and good ideas. American Journal of Sociology, 110(2), 349-399.
Cattani, G., & Ferriani, S. (2008). A Core/Periphery Perspective on Individual Creative Performance: Social Networks and Cinematic Achievements in the Hollywood Film Industry. Organization Science, 19(6), 824-844.
Clark, K. B., Fujimoto, T., & Cook, A. (1991). Product development performance: Strategy, organization, and management in the world auto industry. Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press.
Coleman, J. S. (1988). Social capital in the creation of human capital. American Journal of Sociology, 94, 95-120.
Collis, D. J., & Montgomery, C. A. (1995). Competing on Resources: Strategy in the 1990s. Knowledge and Strategy, 25-40.
Conner, K. R. (1991). A historical comparison of resource-based theory and five schools of thought within industrial organization economics: do we have a new theory of the firm? Journal of Management, 17(1), 121-154.
Cornwell, B., & Harrison, J. A. (2004). Union members and voluntary associations: Membership overlap as a case of organizational embeddedness. American Sociological Review, 69(6), 862-881.
Miller, D., & Shamsie, J. (1996). The resource-based view of the firm in two environments: The Hollywood film studios from 1936 to 1965. Academy of Management Journal, 39(3), 519-543.
Davis, G. F., & Greve, H. R. (1997). Corporate elite networks and governance changes in the 1980s. American Journal of Sociology, 103(1), 1-37.
DeFillippi, R. J., & Arthur, M. B. (1998). Paradox in project-based enterprise: The case of film making. California Management Review, 40(2), 125-139.
Dyer, J. H. (1996). Specialized supplier networks as a source of competitive advantage: Evidence from the auto industry. Strategic Management Journal, 17(4), 271-291.
Dyer, J. H., & Nobeoka, K. (2000). Creating and managing a high‐performance knowledge‐sharing network: the Toyota case. Strategic Management Journal, 21(3), 345-367.
Faulkner, R. R., & Anderson, A. B. (1987). Short-term projects and emergent careers: Evidence from Hollywood. American Journal of Sociology, 92(4), 879-909.
Ferriani, S., Cattani, G., & Baden-Fuller, C. (2009). The relational antecedents of project-entrepreneurship: Network centrality, team composition and project performance. Research Policy, 38(10), 1545-1558.
Ferriani, S., Corrado, R., & Boschetti, C. (2005). Organizational learning under organizational impermanence: Collaborative ties in film project firms. Journal of Management & Governance, 9(3-4), 257-285.
Fine, J. P., & Gray, R. J. (1999). A proportional hazards model for the subdistribution of a competing risk. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 94(446), 496-509.
Fiol, C. M. (1991). Managing culture as a competitive resource: An identity-based view of sustainable competitive advantage. Journal of Management, 17(1), 191-211.
Gawer, A., & Cusumano, M. A. (2002). Platform leadership: How Intel, Microsoft, and Cisco drive industry innovation. Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press.
Goldman, W. (1983). Adventures in the Screen Trade: A Personal View of Hollywood and Screenwriting. New York: Warner Books.
Grant, R. M. (1991). The resource-based theory of competitive advantage: implications for strategy formulation. California Management Review, 33(3), 114-135.
Hall, P. A. (1993). Policy paradigms, social learning, and the state: the case of economic policymaking in Britain. Comparative Politics, 275-296.
Hargadon, A., & Sutton, R. I. (1997). Technology brokering and innovation in a product development firm. Administrative Science Quarterly, 716-749.
Hesmondhalgh, D. (2002). The cultural industries. London: Sage.
Hsu, G. (2006). Jacks of all trades and masters of none: Audiences' reactions to spanning genres in feature film production. Administrative Science Quarterly, 51(3), 420-450.
Ibert, O. (2004). Projects and firms as discordant complements: Organizational learning in the Munich software ecology. Research Policy, 33(10), 1529-1546.
Itami, H., & Roehl, T. W. (1987). Mobilizing invisible assets. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
King, A. W., & Zeithaml, C. P. (2001). Competencies and firm performance: Examining the causal ambiguity paradox. Strategic Management Journal, 22(1), 75-99.
Lado, A. A., & Wilson, M. C. (1994). Human resource systems and sustained competitive advantage: A competency-based perspective. Academy of Management Review, 19(4), 699-727.
Lampel, J., Lant, T., & Shamsie, J. (2000). Balancing act: Learning from organizing practices in cultural industries. Organization Science, 11(3), 263-269.
Langlois, R., Yu, F.-L. T., & Robertson, P. (2002). Alternative theories of the firm: Edward Elgar Publishing.
Langlois, R. N. (2003). The vanishing hand: the changing dynamics of industrial capitalism. Industrial and Corporate Change, 12(2), 351-385.
Langlois, R. N., & Robertson, P. L. (1992). Networks and innovation in a modular system: Lessons from the microcomputer and stereo component industries. Research Policy, 21(4), 297-313.
Mahoney, J. T., & Pandian, J. R. (1992). The resource‐based view within the conversation of strategic management. Strategic Management Journal, 13(5), 363-380.
Manning, S. (2005). Managing project networks as dynamic organizational forms: Learning from the TV movie industry. International Journal of Project Management, 23(5), 410-414.
Mowery, D. C., Oxley, J. E., & Silverman, B. S. (1998). Technological overlap and interfirm cooperation: implications for the resource-based view of the firm. Research Policy, 27(5), 507-523.
Newman, M. E. (2001). Scientific collaboration networks. II. Shortest paths, weighted networks, and centrality. Physical Review E, 64(1), 1-7.
Nonaka, I., & Takeuchi, H. (1995). The knowledge-creating company: How Japanese companies create the dynamics of innovation. Oxford University Press.
Perry-Smith, J. E., & Shalley, C. E. (2003). The social side of creativity: A static and dynamic social network perspective. Academy of Management Review, 28(1), 89-106.
Peterson, R. A., & Berger, D. G. (1971). Entrepreneurship in organizations: Evidence from the popular music industry. Administrative Science Quarterly, 97-106.
Pfeffer, J., & Jeffrey, P. (1998). The human equation: Building profits by putting people first. Harvard Business Press.
Prahalad, C. H., & Hamel, G. (1990). The Core Competence of the Corporation. Harvard Business Review, 68(3), 295-336.
Shalley, C. E., Zhou, J., & Oldham, G. R. (2004). The effects of personal and contextual characteristics on creativity: Where should we go from here? Journal of Management, 30(6), 933-958.
Simonton, D. K. (2000). Creative development as acquired expertise: Theoretical issues and an empirical test. Developmental Review, 20(2), 283-318.
Simsek, Z. (2007). CEO tenure and organizational performance: An intervening model. Strategic Management Journal, 28(6), 653-662.
Sorenson, O., & Waguespack, D. (2005). Social networks and exchange: Self-confirming dynamics in Hollywood. Mimeograph, University of California at Los Angeles.
Uzzi, B., & Spiro, J. (2005). Collaboration and creativity: The small world problem. American Journal of Sociology, 111(2), 447-504.
Wernerfelt, B. (1984). A resource‐based view of the firm. Strategic Management Journal, 5(2), 171-180.
Windeler, A., & Sydow, J. (2001). Project networks and changing industry practices collaborative content production in the German television industry. Organization Studies, 22(6), 1035-1060.
郭東益(2004)。以製片角度談電影產製:從好萊塢製片人與美國商業電影談起」,傳播與管理研究,第四卷第一期,頁85-111。
葉月瑜、戴樂為(2016)。台灣電影百年漂流:楊德昌、侯孝賢、李安、蔡明亮,台北:書林出版有限公司。
論文全文使用權限
  • 同意授權校內瀏覽/列印電子全文服務,於2024-06-01起公開。


  • 如您有疑問,請聯絡圖書館
    聯絡電話:(06)2757575#65773
    聯絡E-mail:etds@email.ncku.edu.tw