1. Pellegrini, M., et al., Assigning protein functions by comparative genome analysis protein phylogenetic profiles. 2003, Google Patents.
2. Aloy, P. and R.B. Russell, InterPreTS: protein Interaction Prediction through Tertiary Structure. 2003, Oxford Univ Press. p. 161-162.
3. Aloy, P. and R.B. Russell, Interrogating protein interaction networks through structural biology. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 2002. 99(9): p. 5896.
4. Ogmen, U., et al., PRISM: protein interactions by structural matching. Nucleic acids research, 2005. 33(Web Server Issue): p. W331.
5. Marcotte, E.M., et al., Detecting protein function and protein-protein interactions from genome sequences. Science, 1999. 285(5428): p. 751.
6. Soong, T., K.O. Wrzeszczynski, and B. Rost, Physical protein-protein interactions predicted from microarrays. Bioinformatics, 2008. 24(22): p. 2608.
7. Enright, A.J., et al., Protein interaction maps for complete genomes based on gene fusion events. Nature, 1999. 402: p. 86-90.
8. Guo, Y., et al., Using support vector machine combined with auto covariance to predict protein-protein interactions from protein sequences. Nucleic acids research, 2008.
9. Chen, X.W. and M. Liu, Prediction of protein-protein interactions using random decision forest framework. Bioinformatics, 2005. 21(24): p. 4394-4400.
10. Martin, S., D. Roe, and J.L. Faulon, Predicting protein-protein interactions using signature products. Bioinformatics, 2005. 21(2): p. 218-226.
11. Chou, K.C. and Y.D. Cai, Predicting protein-protein interactions from sequences in a hybridization space. Journal of proteome research, 2006. 5(2): p. 316-322.
12. Bock, J.R. and D.A. Gough, Predicting protein-protein interactions from primary structure. 2001, Oxford Univ Press. p. 455-460.
13. Shen, J., et al., Predicting protein–protein interactions based only on sequences information. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 2007. 104(11): p. 4337.
14. Pitre, S., et al., PIPE: a protein-protein interaction prediction engine based on the re-occurring short polypeptide sequences between known interacting protein pairs. BMC bioinformatics, 2006. 7(1): p. 365.
15. Ben-Hur, A. and W.S. Noble, Kernel methods for predicting protein-protein interactions. Bioinformatics, 2005. 21(Suppl 1): p. i38-i46.
16. Lo, S.L., et al., Effect of training datasets on support vector machine prediction of protein-protein interactions. Proteomics, 2005. 5(4).
17. Oyang, Y.J., et al., Data classification with radial basis function networks based on a novel kernel density estimation algorithm. IEEE transactions on neural networks, 2005. 16(1): p. 225-236.
18. Bourne, P.E. and H. Weissig, Structural bioinformatics. 2003: Wiley-liss Hoboken, NJ.
19. Jacob, E. and R. Unger, A tale of two tails: why are terminal residues of proteins exposed? Bioinformatics, 2007. 23(2): p. e225.
20. Petsko, G.A. and D. Ringe, Potein Structure and function: New Sceince Press in association with BioMed Central 2008.
21. Shrake, A. and J.A. Rupley, Environment and exposure to solvent of protein atoms. Lysozyme and insulin. Journal of Molecular Biology, 1973. 79(2): p. 351.
22. Bruce, A., et al., Molecular biology of the cell. New York: Garland Science, 2002.
23. Braig, K., et al., The crystal structure of the bacterial chaperonln GroEL at 2.8. 1994.
24. Yusupov, M.M., et al., Crystal structure of the ribosome at 5.5 A resolution. Science, 2001. 292(5518): p. 883-896.
25. Zuiderweg, E.R.P., Mapping Protein Protein Interactions in Solution by NMR Spectroscopy. Biochemistry, 2002. 41(1): p. 1-7.
26. Gaasterland, T. and M.A. Ragan, Microbial genescapes: phyletic and functional patterns of ORF distribution among prokaryotes. Microbial and Comparative Genomics, 1998. 3(4): p. 199-217.
27. Dandekar, T., et al., Conservation of gene order: a fingerprint of proteins that physically interact. Trends in biochemical sciences, 1998. 23(9): p. 324-328.
28. Overbeek, R., et al., The use of gene clusters to infer functional coupling. 1999, National Acad Sciences. p. 2896-2901.
29. Tsoka, S. and C.A. Ouzounis, Prediction of protein interactions: metabolic enzymes are frequently involved in gene fusion. Nature genetics, 2000. 26(2): p. 141-141.
30. Pellegrini, M., et al., Assigning protein functions by comparative genome analysis: protein phylogeneticprofiles. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 1999. 96(8): p. 4285-8.
31. Pazos, F. and A. Valencia, Similarity of phylogenetic trees as indicator of protein-protein interaction. 2001, Oxford Univ Press. p. 609-614.
32. Gobel, U., et al., Correlated mutations and residue contacts in proteins. Proteins: Structure, Function, and Genetics, 1994. 18(4): p. 309-317.
33. Olmea, O. and A. Valencia, Improving contact predictions by the combination of correlated mutations and other sources of sequence information. Folding and Design, 1997. 2: p. 25-32.
34. Pazos, F., et al., Correlated mutations contain information about protein-protein interaction. Journal of Molecular Biology, 1997. 271(4): p. 511-523.
35. Pazos, F. and A. Valencia, In silico two-hybrid system for the selection of physically interacting protein pairs. PROTEINS-NEW YORK-, 2002. 47(2): p. 219-227.
36. Nielsen, J. and S. Oliver, The next wave in metabolome analysis. TRENDS in Biotechnology, 2005. 23(11): p. 544-546.
37. Rajagopalan, D. and P. Agarwal, Inferring pathways from gene lists using a literature-derived network of biological relationships. Bioinformatics, 2005. 21(6): p. 788-793.
38. Zhu, J., et al., Integrating large-scale functional genomic data to dissect the complexity of yeast regulatory networks. 2008.
39. Cherry, J.M., et al., SGD: Saccharomyces genome database. Nucleic acids research, 1998. 26(1): p. 73.
40. Zhu, J. and M.Q. Zhang, SCPD: a promoter database of the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Bioinformatics, 1999. 15(7): p. 607-611.
41. Wingender, E., et al., TRANSFAC: an integrated system for gene expression regulation. Nucleic acids research, 2000. 28(1): p. 316.
42. Mewes, H.W., et al., MIPS: a database for genomes and protein sequences. Nucleic acids research, 1999. 27(1): p. 44.
43. Bairoch, A., et al., The universal protein resource (UniProt). Nucleic acids research, 2005. 33(Database Issue): p. D154.
44. Artin, E., The gamma function. 1964: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.
45. Kabsch, W. and C. Sander, Dictionary of protein secondary structure: pattern recognition of hydrogen-bonded and geometrical features. Biopolymers, 1983. 22(12).
46. Kim, W.K. and J.C. Ison, Survey of the geometric association of domain-domain interfaces. Proteins: Structure, Function, and Bioinformatics, 2005. 61(4).
47. Kim, W.K., et al., The many faces of protein-protein interactions: a compendium of interface geometry. PLoS Comput Biol, 2006. 2(9): p. e124.
48. Lise, S., A. Walker-Taylor, and D.T. Jones, Docking protein domains in contact space. BMC bioinformatics, 2006. 7(1): p. 310.
49. Jones, S. and J.M. Thornton, Principles of protein-protein interactions. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 1996. 93(1): p. 13-20.