進階搜尋


 
系統識別號 U0026-0812200914225776
論文名稱(中文) 子公司經理人特質與自主權之配適對子公司績效的影響-以大陸台商為例
論文名稱(英文) The effect of the fit between subsidiary managers' characteristics and autonomy on subsidiary performance- An empirical study of Taiwanese firms in China
校院名稱 成功大學
系所名稱(中) 國際企業研究所碩博士班
系所名稱(英) Institute of International Business
學年度 96
學期 2
出版年 97
研究生(中文) 張玉璽
研究生(英文) Yu-Hsi Chang
學號 R6695121
學位類別 碩士
語文別 中文
論文頁數 83頁
口試委員 指導教授-杜富燕
口試委員-史習安
口試委員-蔡東峻
中文關鍵字 子公司自主權  母公司策略  經理人特質  代理理論 
英文關鍵字 managers’ characteristics  subsidiary autonomy  agency theory  parent strategy 
學科別分類
中文摘要 隨著時代的演進,多國籍企業對於海外子公司的管理,不再只是考量母公司的觀點,子公司的功能益趨重要,甚至成為積極主導海外市場的角色。對於以中小企業為主的台灣企業而言,大陸市場逐漸成為世界重心,因地利人和之便,大量的資金挹注在大陸市場,使得大陸子公司成為許多台商最重要的子公司,而子公司的管理與績效表現良窳對台商有絕對的影響。故本研究的焦點放在子公司經理人特質與母公司策略特性對母公司授權傾向的探討上,並以代理理論來解釋其對子公司績效的關係。
研究變數資料的取得主要來自電子問卷與實地問卷訪談,母體來源為中華國貨推廣中心與外銷企業協進會所編的「2007年大陸台商名錄」與返台台商,所調查的產業為製造業,共得有效問卷91份。本研究將利用相關的統計分析,包括:集群分析、交叉分析、卡方檢定及變異數分析來驗證本研究所提出之假設。
研究結果顯示;
1.經理人成就動機越高,母公司會授予較高的決策自主權,且此情況對子公司績效有明顯的提升
2.母子公司整合程度越低,母公司會授予較高的決策自主權,且此情況對子公司績效有明顯的提升
英文摘要 As time goes by, multi-national enterprises (MNEs) manage their overseas subsidiaries but not focus on the viewpoint of parent companies only. The subsidiaries’ function is getting important; today they even achieve the role, which actively lead the foreign markets. As now Mainland China market is a beaming star for the whole world, it’s undoubtedly a good opportunity for Taiwanese enterprises that have excellent location close to the market. The investment in China market has increased ever more than before, and evidently the performance of subsidiaries in China has significant influence on Taiwanese enterprisers. The emphasis this research put on is how subsidiary managers’ characteristics and parent strategy affect parent delegation trend. We’ll use the agency theory to explain the relationship between above-mentioned delegation fit and subsidiaries’ performance.
The data source of this research is electronic and paper questionnaires; the samples are collected from “Taiwan Investments in Mainland China 2007 edition” issued by Chinese Products Promotion Center and Chinese National Export Enterprises Association (CNEEA) and Taiwanese enterprisers returned from China. Totally, 91 valid questionnaires are got for our investigated target- manufacturing industry. Multivariate statistical analysis, such as cluster, chi-square, and ANOVA are adopted to prove research hypotheses.
The results show that:
(1) The higher achievement motive subsidiaries’ managers have, the more autonomy parent companies grant. Subsidiaries’ performance will be apparently enhanced a lot with autonomy fit.
(2) The less parent companies and subsidiaries integrate, the more autonomy parent companies grant. Subsidiaries’ performance will be apparently enhanced a lot with
autonomy fit.
論文目次 目錄

第一章 緒論 1
第一節 研究背景與動機 1
第二節 研究目的 3
第三節 論文架構 3
第二章 文獻探討 5
第一節 代理理論 5
第二節 子公司自主權 7
第三節 子公司經理人特質與決策自主權之關係 10
第四節 母公司策略特性與決策自主權之關係 14
第五節 子公司績效之探討 15
第三章 研究方法 24
第一節 研究架構 24
第二節 研究假設 25
第三節 研究變數之操作型定義與衡量 27
第四節 研究對象 31
第五節 資料分析方法 31
第四章 實證分析 33
第一節 問卷回收狀況 33
第二節 基本資料分析 33
第三節 因素與信度分析分析 35
第四節 公司特性、經理人特質、子公司自主權之集群分析 39
第五節 經理人成就動機與子公司自主權 43
第六節 經理人內控特質與子公司自主權 45
第七節 經理人國際經驗與子公司自主權 48
第八節 母子公司整合程度與子公司自主權 50
第九節 母子公司相對規模與子公司自主權 53
第十節 經理人特質與子公司自主權配適對子公司績效的影響 55
第十一節 母公司特性與子公司自主權配適對子公司績效的影響 60
第十二節 研究假設檢定結果 63
第五章 結論與建議 65
第一節 研究結果與討論 65
第二節 研究貢獻 69
第三節 研究限制 69
第四節 研究建議 70
參考文獻 72
附錄: 問卷 80
參考文獻 參考文獻
中文部分
中華國貨推廣中心與外銷企業協進會(2007),「2007年大陸台商名錄」
余明助(1999),「多國籍企業組織、策略與控制關係之研究-以台商海外子公司為例」,國立成功大學企業管理學系未出版博士論文
徐佳銘(1993),「多國籍企業之特徵與績效評估方式關係之研究---台灣地區實證」,私立文化大學國際企業管理研究所未出版碩士論文
陳明哲(1997),「全球競爭與多國管理的最新趨勢:對華人全球化企業的意函」,海峽兩岸之組織與管理,頁81-131
陳克名(2000),「在台外商子公司決策自主權影響因素之研究」,國立臺灣大學商學研究所碩士論文
陳勁初(2000),「大陸台商幹部本土化與組織績效相關之研究-以蘇州、廈門地區為例」,國立中山大學人力資源管理研究所碩士論文
曾志弘(2001),「多國籍企業子公司自主權與主導行為影響因素之研究—以多國籍企業在台子公司為例」,國立中山大學企業管理學未出版博士論文
廖明坤(2002),「台商大陸子公司決策自主權影響因素之研究」,國立政治大學企業管理學系未出版博士論文
魏朝權(2001),「集團企業跨國控管策略與制度之研究:以福懋興業公司為例」,國立雲林科技大學/企業管理系碩士論文
蘇迺惠(1992),「多國籍企業績效評估方式之研究---台灣地區之實證」,國立政治大學未出版碩士論文



英文部分
Adler, N. J. & S. Bartholomew, 1992, Managing globally competent people, Academy of Management Executive, 6(3), pp. 52-65
Anderson, E., 1990, Two Firms, one Frontier: On Assessing Joint Venture Performance, Sloan Management Review, pp.19-30
Andersson, U. & M. Forsgren, 2000, In search of centre of excellence: Network embeddedness and subsidiary roles in multinational corporations, Management International Review, 40(4), pp.329-350
Atkinson, J. W., 1964, Motives in Fantasy, Action and Society, Van-Nostrand, Princeton, NJ
Atkinson, J. W. & J. D. Raynor, 1974, Motivation and Achievement, Winston & Sons, Washington
Baliga, B. R. & A. M. Jaeger, 1984, Multinational corporations: Control systems and delegation issues, Journal of International Business Studies, 15(2), pp.25-39
Bartlett, C. A. & S. Ghoshal , 1989, Managing across borders: The transnational solution, Boston, MA.: Harvard Business School Press
Bartlett, C. A. & S. Ghoshal , 1992, What is a global manager? Harvard Business Review, 70(5), pp.124-132
Bergen, M., S. Dutta, & O. Walker, 1992, Agency Relationships in Marketing: A Review of the Implications and Applications of Agency and Related Theories, Journal of Marketing, 56(3), pp. 1-24
Birkinshaw, J., 1995, Is the country manager an endanger species? Journal of Business Strategy, 16(3), pp.20-32
Birkinshaw, J., 1998, Corporate entrepreneurship in network organizations: How subsidiary initiative drives internal market efficiency, European Management Journal, 16(3), pp.355-365
Blau, G. J., 1987, Locus of control as a potential moderator of the turnover process, Journal of Occupational Psychology, 60, pp.21-29
Butterfield, E. C., 1964, Locus of control, test anxiety, reactions to frustration, and achievement attitudes, Journal of Personality, 32(3), pp.355-370
Child, J., 1973, Predicting and understanding organization structure, Administrative Science Quarterly, 18(2), pp.168-185
Cromie, S. & S. Johns, 1983, Irish entrepreneurs: some personal characteristics, Journal of Occupational Behavior, 4(4), pp.317-324
Daily, C. M. & C. Schwenk, 1996, Chief executive officers, top management teams, and boards of directors: Congruent or countervailing forces? Journal of Management, 22(2), pp.185-208
Daily, C. M., S. T. Certo, & D.R. Dalton, 2000, International Experience in the Executive Suite: The Path to Prosperity? Strategic Management Journal, 21, pp.515-523
Danny, M. & T. Jean-Marie, 1986, Strategy, Structure, CEO Personality and Performance in Small Firms, American Journal of Small Business, 10(3), pp. 47-63
Demirag, I. S., 1987, How UK companies measure overseas performance, Accountancy, March:101-103
Dess, G. G. & R. B. Robinson, 1984, Measuring Organizational Performance in the Absence of Objective Measures: The Case of the Privately-held Firm and Conglomerate Business Unit, Strategic Management Journal, 5, pp.265-273
Edstrom, A. & J. Galbraith, 1977, Transfer of managers as a coordination and control strategy in multinational organizations, Administrative Science Quarterly, 22(2), pp. 248-263
Edwards, R., A. Ahmad, & S. Moss, 2002, Subsidiary Autonomy: The case of multinational subsidiaries in Malaysia, Journal of International Business Studies, 33(1), pp. 183-191
Garnier, G. H., 1982, Context and decision making autonomy in foreign affiliates of U.S. multinational corporations, Academy of Management Journal, 25(4), pp.893-908
Gates, S. R. & W. G. Egelhoff, 1986, Certralization in headquarters-subsidiary relationships, Journal of International Business Studies, 17(2), pp.71-92
Geringer, J.M. & L. Hebert, 1991, Measuring performance of international Joint Venture, Journal of International Business Studies, Vol.22 , pp. 249-163
Ghoshal, S. & C. A. Bartlett, 1988, Creation, adoption and diffusion of innovations by subsidiaries of multinational corporations, Journal of International Business Studies, 19(3), pp.365-387
Ghoshal, S. & C. Bartlett, 1990, The multinational corporation as an inter-organizational network, Academy of Management Review, 15, pp.603-625
Glaister, K. W., R. Husan, & P. J. Buckley, 2003, Decision-making Autonomy in UK International Equity Joint Ventures, British Journal of Management, Vol. 14, pp.305–322
Goll, I., R. B. Sambharya, & L. A. Tucci, 2001, Top management team composition, corporate ideology, and firm performance, Management International Review, 41(2), pp. 109-129
Grote, G. F. & L. R. James, 1991, Testing behavioral consistency and coherence with the Situation-Response Measure of Achievement Motivation, Multivariate Behavioral Research, 26, pp.655–691
Gupta, A. K. & V. Govindarajan, 1991, Knowledge flows and the structure of control within multinational corporations, Academy of Management Review, 16(4), pp.768-792
Hage, F. & M. Aiken, 1967, Relationship of centralization to other structural properties, Administrative Science Quarterly, 12(1), pp. 72-92
Hambrick, D. C. & P. A. Mason, 1984, Upper echelons: The organization as a reflection of its top managers, Academy of Management Review, 9(2), pp.193-206
Harzing, A. W., 2000, An empirical analysis and extension of the Bartlett and Ghoshal typology of multinational companies, Journal of International Business Studies, 31(1), pp.101-120
Hedlund, G., 1981, Autonomy of subsidiaries and formalization of headquarters-subsidiary relationships in Swedish MNCs, In L. Otterbeck(ed.), The management of headquarters-subsidiary relationships in multinational corporations, New York: St. Martin Press
Helmreich, R. L. & J. T. Spence, 1978, The Work & Family Orientation Questionnaire: An Objective Instrument to Assess Components of Achievement Motivation & Attitudes Toward Family & Career, Abstracted in the Journal Supplement Abstract Service, Catalog of Selected Documents in Psychology, pp.21-35
Hough, L. M., 1992, The ‘Big Five’ Variables --- Construct Confusion: Description versus Prediction, Human Performance, 5, pp. 139-155
Jensen, M. C. & W. H. Meckling, 1976, Theory of the firm: Managerial behavior, agency costs, and ownership structure, Journal of Financial Economics, 3(2), pp. 305-360
Judge, T. A. & J. E. Bono, 2001, Relationship of Core Self-Evaluation--- self-Esteem, Generalized Self-Efficacy, Locus of Control, and Emotional Stability---with Job Satisfaction and Job Performance: A Meta-Analysis, Journal of Applied Psychology, 86(1), pp. 80-92.
Kobrin, S. J., 1991, An empirical analysis of the determinants of global integration, Strategic Management Journal, 12(Summer), pp.17–32
McClelland, D. C., 1961, The Achieving Society, Van-Nostrand, Princeton, NJ
McCarthy, B., 2003, Strategy is personality-driven, strategy is crisis-driven: Insights from entrepreneurial firms, Management Decision, London: 41(4):327
Mclnnes, J. M., 1971, Financial control systems for multinational operations:An empirical investigation, Journal of International Business Studies, Fall:11-28
Mehrabian, A., 1968, Male and female success of the tendency to achieve, Educational and Psychological Measurement, 28, pp.493–502
Michel, J. G. & D. C. Hambrick, 1992, Diversification posture and top management team characteristics, Academy of Management Journal, 35(1), pp.9-37
Nohria, N. & S. Ghoshal, 1994, Differentiated fit and shared values: Alternatives for managing headquarters-subsidiary relations, Strategic Management Journal, 15(6), pp.491-502
O’Donnell, S. W., 2000, Managing foreign subsidiaries: Agents of headquarters, or an interdependent network? Strategic Management Journal, 21(5), pp. 525-548
Osland, G. E. & S. T. Cavusgil, 1996, Performance issues in U.S.-China joint ventures, California Management Review, Winter, Vol. 38(2), pp.106-130
Pfeffer, J., 1983, Organizational demograph, in L. L. Cummings & B. M. Staw(Eds), Research in Organizational Behavior, 5, pp.299-357
Poon, J. M. L., R. A. Ainuddin, & S. H. Junit, 2006, Effects of Self-concept Traits and Entrepreneurial Orientation on Firm Performance, International Small Business Journal, 24(1), pp.61-82
Prahalad, C. K. & Y. L. Doz, 1987, The Multinational Mission: Balancing Local Demands and Global Vision, New York, Free Press
Quelch, J. A., 1993, The new country manager, The McKinsey Quarterly, 4(1), pp.155-165
Rasmusen, E., 1989, Games and information: An introduction to game theory, New York: B. Blackwell
Ricks, D., B. Toyne, & Z. Martinez, 1990, Recent developments in international management research, Journal of Management, 16(2), pp. 219-253
Robbins, S.M. & B.S. Robert, 1973, The bent measuring stick for foreign subsidiaries,
Harvard Business Review, September-October:80-88
Rotter, J. B., 1966, Generalized Expectancies for Internal versus External Control of
Reinforcement, Psychological Monographs, Vol.80, Iss.609
Rotter, J. B., 1971, External Control and Internal Control, Psychology Today, June, Vol.5, pp.37-42, 58-59
Ruekert, R. W. & O. C. Walker, 1987, Marketing’s Interaction with Other Functional Units: A Conceptual Framework and Empirical Evidence, Journal of Marketing, 51(January), pp.1-19
Sagie, A. & D. Elizur, 1999, Achievement motive and entrepreneurial orientation: a structural analysis, Journal of Organizational Behavior, 20, pp.375–387
Sambharya, R. B., 1996, Foreign experience of top management teams and international diversification strategies of U.S. multinational corporations, Strategic Management Journal, 17(9), pp.739-746
Spector, P.E., 1982, Behavior in Organizations as a Function of Employee’s Locus of Control, Psychological Bulletin, 91, pp. 482-497
Sullivan, D., 1992, Organization in American MNCs: The perspective of the European regional headquarters, Management International Review; 32(3), pp.237-250
Taggart, J. H., 1998, Strategy shifts in MNC subsidiaries, Strategic Management Journal, 19(7), pp.663-681
Taggart, J. H. & N. Hood, 1999, Determinants of autonomy in multinational corporation subsidiaries, European Management Journal, 17(2), pp. 226-236
Venkatraman, N. & V. Ramanujam, 1986, Measurement of Business Performance in Strategy Research: A Comparison of Approaches, The Academy of Management Review, Vol.11, Iss.4, pp.801-814
Woodcock, C.P., P.W. Beamish, & S. Markino, 1994, Ownership-Based Entry Strategies and International Performances, Journal of International Business studies, pp.253-272
Young, S. & A. T. Tavares, 2004, Centralization and autonomy: back to the future, International Business Review, 13, pp.215-237
論文全文使用權限
  • 同意授權校內瀏覽/列印電子全文服務,於2013-07-31起公開。
  • 同意授權校外瀏覽/列印電子全文服務,於2015-07-31起公開。


  • 如您有疑問,請聯絡圖書館
    聯絡電話:(06)2757575#65773
    聯絡E-mail:etds@email.ncku.edu.tw