進階搜尋


 
系統識別號 U0026-0812200914141359
論文名稱(中文) Soupe du jour效應:產品製造國語言對於消費者產品認知的影響
論文名稱(英文) The Soupe du Jour Effect: Language as a Country-of-Origin Cue and its Impact on Product Perception
校院名稱 成功大學
系所名稱(中) 認知科學研究所
系所名稱(英) Institute of Cognitive Science
學年度 96
學期 2
出版年 97
研究生(中文) 范春媛
研究生(英文) PHAN THUY
電子信箱 uyenphan81@yahoo.com
學號 U7695701
學位類別 碩士
語文別 英文
論文頁數 104頁
口試委員 口試委員-張明旭
口試委員-曾加蕙
指導教授-許清芳
中文關鍵字 國家  語言  文化差異 
英文關鍵字 Country of Origin  culture difference  language effect 
學科別分類
中文摘要 本研究計劃旨在調查語言裡所透露出的國家形象對於消費者的新食品認知及購買意願的影響。本計劃包含有3個子系列研究。
研究一旨在檢驗流暢性偏好理論 (Preference fluency theory)。根據這項理論,我們預測當新產品以消費者所熟悉並且有組織的方式呈現時,他們比較願意嘗試這份產品。這項研究分別在台灣和越南進行調查,以有組織和沒組織兩種不同描述格式以及六種語言(繁體中文、俄文、韓文、日文、法文以及越南文)將虛構的食品呈現給消費者並觀察他們對於新食品的嘗試意願。結果顯示描述的方式是否有組織對於消費者沒有影響,但是相較於本國語言的標示,台灣人比較有可能嘗試帶有外國語言標示的東西。可是越南人較喜歡越南文標示的產品。實驗一的結果與流暢度偏好理論(Preference fluency theory) 的預測相反,消費者透過語言而引發出的產品所屬國的形象(Soupe du jour effect)似乎更能解釋消費者的行為,研究二則在測試這一項新的假設,即語言對消費者的影響 (Soupe du jour effect)。
研究二主要觀察Soupe du jour effect 對茶葉產品的影響力。在台灣及越南各有約700人參加本研究的兩種問卷調查,參加的人必需以1-5分的標準來評斷他們對某一項新產品的嘗試意願程度並對該項產品的進行價位評估。結果顯示台灣人給予帶有日文標示的產品最高的估價,他們最願意購買的產品是帶有日文標示的台灣製產品;相反地,越南人則比較喜歡帶有越南文標示的越南產品。這項研究結果彰顯強烈的語言效果,但這個效果卻因為文化不同而異。
研究三主要是要驗證前兩項研究中所發現的語言對消費者的產品價位認知以及購買意願的影響。有150位受試者參加研究三。在這項研究中我們使用假的茶葉罐,這些茶葉罐的外包裝除了標籤說明不同之外其他設計皆同。標籤以繁體中文、簡體中文、越南文、日文以及英文這5種不同的語言書寫。結果帶有日文標籤的產品是受試者嘗試及購買意願排行中第一名,帶有繁體中文的標籤則是第二名。簡體中文、越南文及英文的標籤則沒有任何不同。此外,日文標籤會提升台灣、越南、中國以及英國製茶葉的價值,這個語言的效應在台灣人的身上非常明顯。
這三個研究的結果顯示語言效果 (Soupe du jour effect) 的存在及其對消費者行為的影響程度。一國的語言可以間接激發該國家所代表的形象,此外,Soupe du jour effect 會因產品及文化的不同而改變,因此,因應不同的產品及不同的市場文化應該使用不同的語言如此方能充分發揮 Soupe du jour effect。
英文摘要 This research projects aimed to investigate the language effect as a proxy of country of origin effect on people perception of a new food product and their purchase intention. This project included three sequential studies.
Study 1 was conducted to examine the hypothesis that “people will be more willing to try a new food if it is presented in an organized format and in a familiar language”, predicted by Preference fluency theory. This study was conducted in Taiwan and Vietnam. The study investigated the effect of two formats (organized vs. disorganized) and 6 languages (Traditional Chinese, Russian, Korean, Japanese, French and Vietnamese) on people’s willingness to try a fictitious food. Results showed that organized format didn’t make any difference in inducing people to try a new food in comparison with disorganized format. Taiwanese people were more likely to try a new food with foreign labels than with Chinese label. Meanwhile, Vietnamese people were less likely to try a food with foreign labels than with Vietnamese label. These findings were opposite to what have been predicted by Preference fluency theory. Therefore, a new theory was conjectured and examined in the second part of study 1. This theory says that “to which country a food is thought to belong could influence whether or not people would be willing to try it”. This language effect is named “Soupe du jour” effect.
Study 2 examined the “Soupe du jour” effect in tea product category. Two surveys have been conducted in Taiwan and Vietnam. About 700 subjects have participated in each survey in each country. Participants were asked to indicate their willingness to buy a new tea product and price on a 5 point scale. Results showed that Taiwanese participants gave high price to the tea with Japanese label. Their purchase intention was highest for a tea made in Taiwan and label in Japanese. In contrast, Vietnamese participants preferred a tea made in Vietnam with label in Vietnamese. These findings revealed that language effect was robust but cultural-different.
Study 3 was carried out to verify the results of the first two studies to confirm the effect of language effect on people perception of price and their purchase intention. An experiment using realistic stimuli was conducted on a Taiwanese sample of 150 subjects. Stimuli in this experiment were fake tea boxes. The boxes looked similar to each other, except for the languages in their labels. Five languages were used. They were traditional Chinese, simplified Chinese, Vietnamese, Japanese and English. Results showed that Japanese label was the most chosen, compare with the others. Traditional Chinese label was the second-most chosen. No difference was found between the choices of simplified Chinese, Vietnamese and English labels. Besides, Japanese language increased price for tea made in Taiwan, Vietnam, China and England. The findings showed a robust effect of foreign language in Taiwanese sample.
Results of the three studies revealed the existence and magnitude of the language effect, which was called “Soupe du jour” effect. Languages were found to be a proxy to trigger the country image of the country they represented. “Soupe du jour” was found to be product-specific and culture-specific. Depends on type of product and culture of the marketplace, appropriate language should be chosen to be able to take advantage from “Soupe du jour” effect.
論文目次 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS I
ABSTRACT (in English) II
ABSTRACT (in Chinese) IV
LIST OF TABLES X
LIST OF FIGURES XIII
CHAPTER ONE INTRODUCTION 1
1.1 Research Background 1
1.2 Research Motivation 4
1.3 Research Objectives 8
1.4 Research Structure 8
CHAPTER TWO LITERATURE REVIEW 10
2.1 Preference Fluency Theory 10
2.2 Country of Origin Effect 11
2.3 Consumers’ Perceived Price and Willingness to buy a New Product in Country of Origin Paradigm 14
2.3.1 Perceived Price-Quality and COO Effect 14
2.3.2 Purchase Intention and COO Effect 15
2.4 Language as Country of Origin Cue 16
CHAPTER THREE STUDY 1: LANGUAGE EFFECT AND TWO THEORIES: PREFERENCE FLUENCY AND PERCEPTUAL MAP OF FOOD FROM DIFFERENT COUNTRIES 18
3.1 Language Effect and Preference Fluency Theory 18
3.1.1 Objectives 18
3.1.2 Methods 18
3.1.3 Data Analysis 22
3.1.4 Results 22
3.1.5 Discussions and Conclusions 26
3.1.6 Conjectures 28
3.2 “Soupe du jour” Effect and the Perceptual Map of Familiarity and High-end 30
3.2.1 Objectives 30
3.2.2 Methods and Procedures 30
3.2.3 Data Analysis 31
3.2.4 Results 33
3.3 General Discussions 41
3.4 Conclusions 43
CHAPTER FOUR STUDY 2: LANGUAGE AS COUNTRY OF ORIGIN CUE 45
4.1 Objectives 45
4.2 Methods 46
4.2.1 Stimuli 46
4.2.2 Country of Origin 46
4.2.3 Languages (Writing Systems) 47
4.2.4 Response Variables 47
4.2.5 Participants 47
4.2.6 Procedures 47
4.3 Data Analysis 48
4.4 Results 50
4.4.1 Sample Characteristics 50
4.4.2 Language Effect as COO cues on Taiwanese People Perception of Price and Their Willingness to buy the Tea Product 52
4.4.3 Language Effect as COO Cues on Vietnamese People Perception of Price and their Willingness to buy the Tea Product 60
4.5 Discussions 66
4.5.1 “Soupe du jour” Effect and its Variation in Different Cultures 66
4.5.2 Limitations of the Methodology 68
CHAPTER FIVE STUDY 3: “SOUPE DU JOUR” EFFECT IN REALISTIC-STIMULI PARADIGM 70
5.1 Objectives 70
5.2 Methods 70
5.2.1 Participants 70
5.2.2 Stimuli 70
5.2.3 Procedure 71
5.3 Data Analysis 75
5.4 Results 76
5.4.1 Sample Characteristics 76
5.4.2 “Soupe du jour” Effect and its Role as a Proxy of Country of Origin Effect 78
5.5 Discussions 87
5.6 Conclusions 88
CHAPTER SIX DISCUSSIONS AND CONCLUSIONS 89
REFERENCES 93
APPENDIXES 99
Appendix- 1: Frequency and Price Data of Restaurants in Taiwan and Vietnam 100
Appendix- 2: Mean Scores of Familiarity Rankings and Price Estimates, and Mean Scores of Familiarity and Expensiveness Ratings of Different Cuisines in two samples: Taiwanese and Vietnamese 102
參考文獻 Abdi, H. (2002). What can cognitive psychology and sensory evaluation learn from each other? Food Quality and Preference, 13, 445-451.
Al-Sulaiti, K.I. and Baker, M.J. (1997). Qatari consumers’ perceptions and selections of domestic vs. foreign airline services. University of Strathclyde, Department of Marketing, Working Paper Series No. 97/7.
Arvola, A., Lhteenmki, L., and Tuorila, H. (1999). Predicting the intent to purchase unfamiliar and familiar cheeses: the effects of attitudes, expected liking and food neophobia. Appetite, 32, 113-126.
Askegaard, S., and Ger, G. (1998). Product-country images: Toward a contextualized approach. European Advances in Consumer Research, forthcoming.
Baker, M.J. and Michie, J. (1995). Product country images: perceptions of Asian cars. University of Strathclyde, Department of Marketing, Working Paper Series No. 95/3.
Batra, R., Ramaswamy, Alden, D.L., Steenkamp, J.-B.E.M., and Ramachander, S. (1999). E€ects of brand local/non-local origin on consumer attitudes in developing countries. Journal of Consumer Psychology, forthcoming.
Bell, A. C., Stewart, A. M., Radford, A. J. and Cairney, P. T. (1981). A method for describing food beliefs which may predict personal food choice. Journal of Nutrition Education, 13, 22–26
Betts, N. M. (1985). A method to measure perceptions of food among the elderly. Journal of Nutrition for the Elderly, 4, 15–21.
Bettman, J., Luce, M.F., and Payne, J. (1998). Constructive consumer choice processes. Journal of Consumer Research, 25 (December), 187-217.
Cai, Y., Cude, B., and Swagler, R. (2004). Country of origin effects on consumers’ willingness to buy foreign products: An experiment in consumer decision making. Consumer Interest Annual, 50.
Cattin, P., Jolibert, A. and Lohnes. (1982). A crosscultural study of made in concepts. Journal of International Business Studies, 13 (Winter), 131-141.
Cosper, B. A. and Wakefield, L. M. (1975). Food choices of women: personal, attitudinal, and motivational factors. Journal of the American Dietetic Association, 66, 152–5.
Dhar, R., and Simonson, I. (2003). The effect of forced choice on choice. Journal of marketing research, 40 (May), 146-160.
Dodds, W.B. (1991). In search of value: How price and store name information influence buyers’ product perceptions. The journal of consumer marketing, 8 (2), 15-24.
Domzal, T. J., Hunt J. M. and Kernan. J. B. (1995). Achtung! The information Processing of Foreign Words in Advertising. International Journal of Advertising, 14, 95-114.
Ettenson, R., Wagner, J. and Gaeth, G. (1988). Evaluating the effect of country of origin and the ‘Made in the USA’ campaign: a conjoint approach. Journal of Retailing, 64 (1), 85-100.
Furst, T., Connors, M., Bisogni, C. A., Sobal, J., and Winter Falk, L. (1996). Food choice: a conceptual model of the process. Appetite, 26, 247-266.
Geistfeld, L. V. (1982). The price-quality relationship – Revisited. Journal of Consumer Affairs, 16 (Winter), 334-335.
Gerstner, E. (1985). Do higher prices signal higher quality? Journal of Marketing Research, 22(2), 209-215.
Good, L.K. and Huddleston, P. (1995). Ethnocentrism of Polish and Russian consumers: are feelings and intentions related? International Marketing Review, 12 (5), 35-48.
Green, R.T., and Langeard, E. (1975). A cross-national comparison of consumer habits and innovator characteristics. Journal of Marketing, 39 (3), 34-41.
Head, D. (1988). Advertising slogans and the "Made-in" concept. International Journal of Advertising, 7, 237-252.
Heslop, L. A., Liefeld, J. P., and Wall, M. (1987). An experimental study of the impact of country-of-origin information. In R. E. Turner (Ed.), Marketing, 8, 179-185. Toronto: Administrative Sciences Association of Canada-Marketing Division.
Hofstede, G. (1980). Culture’s consequences: International differences in work-related values. Sage, Beverly Hills, CA.
Huotilainen, A. (2005). Dimensions of novelty: Social representations of new foods. Department of Social Psychology and Department of Food Technology. University of Helsinki. Finland. Academic dissertation.
Johansson, J.K. and Nebenzahl, I. D. (1986). Multinational production: Effect on brand value. Journal of International Business Studies, 17 (3), 101-126
Kahneman, D. (2003). A perspective on judgment and choice: Mapping bounded rationality. American Psychologist, 58(9), 697-720.
Keown, C. and Casey, M. (1995). Purchasing behaviour in the Northern Ireland wine market. British Food Journal, 97 (1), 17-20.
Klein, J. G., Ettenson, R., and Morris, M. D. (1998). The animosity model of foreign product purchase: An empirical test in the People’s Republic of China. Journal of Marketing, 62 (1), 89-100.
Kster, E. P. (2007). Diversity in the determinants of food choice. Food Quality and Preference, doi:10.1016/j.foodqual.2007.11.002
Krondl, M. and Lau, D. (1982). Social determinants in human food selection. In L. M. Barker (Ed.) The psychobiology of human food selection. 139–51. Westport: AVI Publishing.
Lau, D, Krondl, M. and Coleman, P. (1984). Psychological factors affecting food selection. In J. R. Galler (Ed.), Nutrition and behavior. 397–415. New York: Plenum Press.
Leavitt, Harold J. (1954). A note on some experimental findings About the meaning of price. Journal of Business, 27 (July), 205-210.
Lewin, K. (1943). Forces behind food habits and methods of change. In The problem of changing food habits. Washington: National Academy of Sciences, Bulletin 108.
Lewin, K. (1951). (D. Cartwright, Ed.), Field theory in social science: selected theoretical papers. 170–87. New York: Harper Torchbooks.
Levin, I., Jasper, J., Mittelstaedt, J., and Gaeth, G. (1993). Attitudes towards ‘buy America first’ and preferences for American and Japanese cars: a different role for country-of-origin information. in McAlister et al. (Eds), Advances in Consumer Research, 20, 625-629.
Li, W.-K., and Wyer, Jr., R. S. (1994). The role of country of origin in product evaluations: Informational and standard-of-comparison effects. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 3, 187-212.
Liefeld, J. P. (1993). Experiments on country-of-origin effects: Review and meta-analysis of effect size. In N. Papadopoulos & L. A. Heslop (Eds.), Product-Country Images (pp. 117-146). New York: International Business Press.
Lillis, C. and Narayana, C. (1974). Analysis of made in product images – an exploratory study. Journal of International Business Studies, 5 (Spring), 119-127.
Lim, J., Darley, W.K., and Summers, J.O. (1994). An assessment of country of origin effects under alternative presentation formats. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 22 (3), 274-282.
Lindeman, M. and Stark, K. (1999). Pleasure, pursuit of health or negotiation of identity? Personality correlates of food choice motives among young and middle-aged women. Appetite, 33, 141-161.
Lindeman, M., and Stark, K. (2000). Loss of pleasure, ideological food choice reasons and eating pathology. Appetite, 35, 263-268.
Liu, F., Murphy, J., Li, J., and Liu, X. (2007). English and Chinese? The role of consumer ethnocentrism and country of origin in Chinese attitudes towards store signs. Australasian Marketing Journal, 14 (2), 2007
Loureiro, L. M. and Umberger, J.W. (2003). Estimating consumer willingness to pay for country-of-origin labeling. Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics, 28 (2),287-301 .
Maheswaran, D. (2006). Country of Origin Effects: Consumer perceptions of Japan in South East Asia. Working Paper Series. Center for Japan-U.S. Business and Economic Studies. The Leonard N. Stern School of Business. New York University.
Martin, I. and Eroglu, S. (1993). Measuring a multi-dimensional construct: Country Image. Journal of Business Research, 28, 191-210
Martins, Y., Pelchat, M. L., and Pliner, P. (1997). “Try it; it’s good and it’s good for you”: Effects of taste and nutrition information on willingness to try novel foods. Appetite, 28, 89-102.
Maslow, A. (1943). A theory of human motivation. Psychological Review, 50, 370-396.
McConnell, J . D. (1968). An Experimental Examination of the Price-Quality Relationship. Journal of Business, 41 (October), 439-444.
McFarlane, T., and Pliner, P. (1997). Increasing willingness to taste novel foods: effects of nutrition and taste information. Appetite, 28, 227–238.
Meiselman, H. L. (2002). The effect of context or environment on choice and acceptance: is context more important than product? Appetite, 39, 249.
Michela, J. and Contento, I. (1986). Cognitive, motivational, social, and environmental factors on food choices. Health Psychology, 5, 209–30.
Morris, R. T. and Bronson, C. S. (1969). The chaos in competition indicated by consumer reports. Journal of Marketing, 33 (July), 26-43.
Moscovici, S. (1981). On social representations. In J. P. Forgas (Ed.), Social cognition. Perspectives on everyday understanding (181-209). London: Academic.
Moscovici, S. (1984). The phenomenon of social representations. In R. M. Farr and S. Moscovici (Eds.), Social representations (3-69). Cambridge: Cambridge University.
Nagashima, A. (1970). A comparison of Japanese and US attitudes toward foreign products. Journal of Marketing, 34, 68-74.
Newcombe R.G. (1998a). Interval Estimation for the Difference Between Independent Proportions: Comparison of Eleven Methods. Statistics in Medicine, 17, 873–890.
Newcombe R.G. (1998b). Two-Sided Confidence Intervals for the Single Proportion: Comparison of Seven Methods. Statistics in Medicine, 17, 857–872.
Novemsky, N., Dhar, R, Schwarz, N., and Simonson, I. (2007). Preference fluency in choice. Journal of Marketing Research, XLIV (August), 347-356.
Olsen, J.E., Granzin, K.L. and Biswas, A. (1993). Influencing consumers’ selection of domestic versus imported products: implications for marketing based on a model of helping behaviour. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 21 (4), 307-321.
Ozsomer, A. and Cavusgil, S. T. (1991). Country-of-origin effects on product evaluations: A sequel to Bilkey and Nes review. Proceedings of American Marketing Association, 269-277.
Papadopoulos, N. G., Heslop, L. A. and Bamossy, G. (1989). International competitiveness of American and Japanese products. Dimensions of International Business (No.2), N.G. Papadoupoulos, ed., Ottawa, Canada: International Business Study Group, Carleton University.
Parameswaran, R. and Pisharodi, M. (1994). Facets of country of origin image: An empirical assessment. Journal of Advertising, 23(1), 43-56.
Payne, J., Bettman, J. and Johnson, E. (1992). Behavioral decision research: A constructive processing perspective. Annual review of psychology, 43, 87-131.
Pliner, P. and Hobden, K. (1992). Development of a scale to measure the trait food neophobia. Appetite, 19, 105-120.
Rappoport, L., Peters, G. R., Downey, R., McCann, T. and Huff-Corzine, L. (1993). Gender and age difference in food cognition. Appetite, 20, 33–52.
Ray, N. M., Ryder, M. E. and Scott. S. V. (1994). Toward an understanding of the use of foreign words in print advertising. In Salah S. Hassan and Erdnener Kaynak, eds., Globalization of consumer markets. New York: International Business Press.
Roth, M. S. and Romeo, J. B. (1992). Matching product category and country image perceptions: A framework for managing country-of-origin effect. Journal of International Business Studies, 23 (3), 477-497.
Rozin, P. (1996). Towards a psychology of food and eating: from motivation to module to model to marker, morality, meaning, and metaphor. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 5, 18-24.
Rozin, P., and Vollmecke, T. A. (1986). Food likes and dislikes. Annual Review of Nutrition, 6, 433-456.
Schwarz, N. (2004). When thinking feels difficult: meta-cognitive experiences in judgment and decision making. Medical decision making, xxx, xxx.
Shimp, T. A., and Sharma, S. (1987). Consumer ethnocentrism: Construction and validation of the CETSCALE. Journal of Marketing Research, 24, 280-289.
Smith, N. (1990). Morality and the market. London: Routledge.
Sproles, G. B. (1977). New evidence on price and product quality. Journal of Consumer Affairs, 11 (Summer), 63-77.
Steenkamp, J. -B. E. M. (1989). Product quality. Van Gorcum, Assen (NL).
Steptoe, A., Pollard, T., and Wardle, J. (1995). Development of a measure of the motives underlying the selection of food: the food choice questionnaire. Appetite, 25, 267-284.
Tongberg, R. C. (1972). An empirical study of relationships between dogmatism and consumer attitudes toward foreign products. Pennsylvania State University, PA., doctoral dissertation.
Tse, A., Kwan, C., Yee, C., Wah, K. and Ming, L. (1996). The impact of country of origin on the behaviour of Hong Kong consumers. Journal of International Marketing & Marketing Research, 21 (1), 29-44.
Tull, Donald, Boring, R. A., and Gonsior, M. H. (1964). A Note on the Relationship of Price and Imputed Quality. Journal of Business, 37 (April), 186-191.
Tversky, A., and Kahneman, D. (1974). Judgment under uncertainty: Heuristics and biases. Science, 185, 1124-1131.
Tversky, A., and Kahneman, D. (1981). The framing of decisions and the psychology of choice. Science, 211, 453-458.
Verlegh, P.W.J. and Steenkamp, J.E.M. (1999). A review and meta-analysis of country-of-origin research. Journal of Economic Psychology, 20, 521-546
Wang, C., and Lamb, C.W. Jr. (1983). Foreign environmental factors influencing American consumers’ predisposition toward European products. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 8, 345-356.
Wansink, B., Painter, J., and Van Ittersum, K. (2001). Descriptive menu labels’ effect on sales. Cornell Hotel and Restaurant Administration Quarterly 2001; 42; 68
Wilson, E.B. (1927). Probable inference, the law of succession, and statistical inference. J. Am. Stat. Assoc., 22, 209–212.
Yevas, B., Alpay, G. (1986). Does an exporting nation enjoy the same cross-national commercial image? International Journal of Advertising, 2, 109-119.
Yun, T-W, Lee, W-N., and Sego, T. (2002). Direct and indirect use of country of origin cues for hybrid and non-hybrid products. Advances in International Marketing, 12, 195-214.
Zhang, Y. (1996). Chinese consumers’ evaluation of foreign product: the influence of culture, product types and product presentation format. European Journal of Marketing, 30 (12), 50-68.
論文全文使用權限
  • 同意授權校內瀏覽/列印電子全文服務,於2008-07-09起公開。
  • 同意授權校外瀏覽/列印電子全文服務,於2008-07-09起公開。


  • 如您有疑問,請聯絡圖書館
    聯絡電話:(06)2757575#65773
    聯絡E-mail:etds@email.ncku.edu.tw