進階搜尋


 
系統識別號 U0026-0812200912042336
論文名稱(中文) 團隊異質性、組織寬裕資源、策略導向及創新程度與新產品開發專案績效之關聯性研究
論文名稱(英文) The Influences of Team Heterogeneity, Organizational Slack, Strategy Orientation, and Innovation on New Product Development Projects’ Performance
校院名稱 成功大學
系所名稱(中) 企業管理學系碩博士班
系所名稱(英) Department of Business Administration
學年度 94
學期 2
出版年 95
研究生(中文) 郇植惠
研究生(英文) Chih-Hui Huan
電子信箱 overcomerplant@gmail.com
學號 R4693124
學位類別 碩士
語文別 英文
論文頁數 92頁
口試委員 口試委員-張紹基
口試委員-吳學良
指導教授-陳忠仁
中文關鍵字 市場導向  組織寬裕資源  新產品開發專案績效  策略導向  科技導向  創新程度 
英文關鍵字 Innovativeness  Market-Orientation  Organizational Slack  NPD project performance  Strategy Orientation  Technology-Orientation 
學科別分類
中文摘要 一個企業的發展與績效在於它不斷開發新產品的能力。新產品開發團隊提供了一個絕佳的背景來檢測群體的統計特性與其績效之間的關係。根據組織理論,寬裕資源在動盪的環境時期中特別有助於維持績效和擔保生存。在資源基礎的觀點下,企業會尋求對於最能反映推出新產品創新的能力之資源的最佳化利用。此外,新產品開發專案會隨著開發公司的觀點而在創新程度上有極大的差異。在過去的研究中,以專案層級角度來探討這些變數在新產品開發績效而言,是近年文獻較少探討的課題。本研究以此為研究動機,試圖由過去學者所提出的理論整理出一些相關新產品開發專案績效之因素及影響之模型,配合實證的方式來驗證這些假設。
本研究的母體是以中華徵信所所公佈的5000 大企業為主要調查對象。採取分層隨機抽樣,分為五層以亂數表選取之,每層抽取140家公司,共計發放700 份問卷,問卷詢問對象為公司之新產品開發相關人員及專案負責人或主管,並以公司為單位一家廠商寄出一份樣本。回收之有效問卷為118份,問卷之回收率為16.8%。
根據研究階層回歸結果發現,團隊異質性與新產品開發專案績效呈現倒U型的曲線關係;組織寬裕資源、策略導向與創新程度對於新產品開發專案績效有正向的影響;此外,創新程度對於市場導向與新產品開發專案績效之關係有顯著之調和影響。



英文摘要 The growth and development of a firm depend on its ability to introduce new products over time. Product development teams provide an excellent setting in which to test the relationship of demographic characteristics of cohorts within a population and their performance. According to organization theory, slack may be especially helpful to maintain performance and ensure survival during the turbulent environment. Under the resourced-based view, firms seek for the optimal utilization of resources that most often mirror the capability needed for the introduction of product innovations. Besides, NPD projects vary greatly in their degree of newness from the perspective of the developing firm. Although the new product development is worth discussing, little has been done in the literature in examining the relationships among these variables, and the performance of new product development from a viewpoint of a project level. Therefore, through extensive literature review this study providing an integrative research framework to identify the key determinants and to examine the relationships among these determinants and the performance of NPD project. Hypotheses were proposed and then examined through an empirical study.
A random stratified sampling method was used to choose 140 firms, listed as top 5,000 firms of Taiwan in the China Credit Information Service Incorporation, in each of the five levels. From the 700 mailed questionnaire mailed in the study, 118 completed, usable questionnaires were collected, yielding a response rate of 16.8%.
According to the results of the regression analyses, the major findings of this study include: First, there is a curvilinear, inverted U-shaped relationship between team heterogeneity and project performance. Secondly, the impact on project performance is partially supported with respect to organizational slack, strongly supported with respect to strategy orientation, and supported with respect to innovativeness. Thirdly, the innovativeness has the moderating effects with the linkage of market-orientation and project performance of NPD.



論文目次 Abstract II
摘 要 IV
誌 謝 V
Table of Contents VI
List of Tables VIII
List of Figures IX
Chapter 1 Introduction 1
1.1 Research Background and Motivations 1
1.2 Research Objectives 5
1.3 Structure of the Research 6
1.4 Research Procedure 7
Chapter 2 Literature Review and Hypotheses 8
2.1 NPD Project Performance 8
2.2 Team Heterogeneity 13
2.3 Organizational Slack 20
2.4 Strategy Orientation 23
2.5 Innovativeness 28
2.3 Organizational Slack 32
2.4 Strategy Orientation 35
2.5 Innovativeness 40
Chapter 3 Research Design and Methodology 43
3.1 Research Framework 44
3.2 Research Hypotheses 45
3.3 Construct Measurement 46
3.3.1 Team Heterogeneity 46
3.3.2 Organizational slacks 49
3.3.3 Strategy orientation 50
3.3.4 Innovativeness 52
3.3.5 Project performance 54
3.3.6 Control Variables 55
3.4 Data Collection and Sampling 56
3.5 Returned Questionnaire and Characteristics of Respondents. 58
3.5.1 Characteristics of Respondents 58
3.5.2 Non-response Bias 59
3.6 Data Analysis Procedure 60
3.6.1 Descriptive Statistic Analysis 60
3.6.2 Factor Analysis 60
3.6.3 Item-to-total Correlation 60
3.6.4 Internal Consistency Analysis (Cronbach’s alpha) 61
3.6.5 Correlation Analysis 61
3.6.6 Multiple Regression Analysis and Moderated Hierarchical Regression Analysis 61
Chapter 4 Analysis and Results 63
4.1 Reliability Test 63
4.2 Descriptive Statistics and Correlation Analysis 68
4.3 Regression Results 70
4.3.1 Regression Analysis for the Relationship between Team Heterogeneity and NPD Project Performance. 70
4.3.2 Regression Analysis for the Relationship between Organizational Slack and NPD Project Performance. 72
4.3.3 Regression Analysis for the Relationship between Strategy Orientation and NPD Project Performance. 72
4.3.4 Regression Analysis for the Relationship between Innovativeness and NPD Project Performance. 73
4.3.5 The Moderating Effect of Innovativeness between Strategy Orientation and NPD Project Performance 73
Chapter 5 Conclusions and Suggestions 75
5.1 Research Result 75
5.2 Discussion and Implications 77
5.3 Limitation of This Research 79
References 80
Appendix Survey Questionnaire 86

參考文獻 Ancona, D. G., & Caldwell, D. 1992. Demography and design: predictors of new product team performance. Organization Science, 3(3): 321–341.

Ancona, D. G., & Caldwell, D. F. 1990. Beyond boundary spanning: Managing external dependence in product development teams. Journal of High Technology Management Research, 1: 119–135.

Ancona, D. G., & Caldwell, D. F. 1992. Bridging the boundary: External process and performance in organizational teams. Administrative Science Quarterly, 37: 634–665.

Atuahene–Gima, Kwaku. 1995. An Exploratory Analysis of the Impact of Market Orientation on New Product Performance: A Contingency Approach. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 12: 275–293.

Baker, G. 1992. Incentive contracts and performance measurement. Journal of Political Economy, 100: 598–614.

Baker, G., Gibbons, R., Murphy, K.J., 1994. Subjective performance measures in optimal incentive contracts. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 109: 1125–1156.

Banker, R. D., & Datar, S.M. 1989. Sensitivity, precision, and linear aggregation of signals for performance evaluation. Journal of Accounting Research, 27(1): 21–39.

Bonner, J. M., Ruekert, R. W., & Walker, Jr. 2002. Upper management control of new product development projects and project performance. The Journal of Product Innovation Management, 19: 233–245.

Brown, S. L., & Eisenhardt, K. M. 1995. Product Development: Past Research, present findings, and future directions. Academy of management Review. 20(2): 343–378.

Bunderson, J. S., & Sutcliffe, K. 2002. Comparing alternative conceptualizations of functional diversity in management teams: Process and performance effects. Academy of Management Journal, 45(5): 875–893.

Burgelman, R. A. 1983. A process model of internal corporate venturing in the diversified major firm. Administrative Science Quarterly, 28: 223–244.

Business Week. 1992. Inside the Intel. June 1: 86–90, 92, 94.

Carpenter, M. 2002. The implications of strategy and social context for the relationship between top management team heterogeneity and firm performance. Strategic Management Journal, 23: 275–284.

Carpenter, M., & Fredrickson, J. 2001. Top management teams, global strategic posture, and the moderating role of uncertainty. Academy of Management Journal, 44(3): 533–545.

Clark, K.B., & Fujimoto, T. 1991. Product Development Performance. Boston : Harvard Business School press.

Cooper, R. G. 1999. From experience. The invisible success factors in product innovation. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 16: 115–133.

Cooper, R. G. 2001. Winning at New Products. New York: Basic Books.

Cooper, R. G., & Kleinschmidt, E. J. 1987. New products: What separates winners from losers. Journal of Product and Innovation Management, 4: 169–184.

Cusumano, M. 1992. Shifting economies: From craft production to flexible systems and softeare factories. Research Policy, 21: 453–480.

Cusumano, M., & Nobeoka. 1992. Strategy, structure and performance in product development: Observations from the auto industry. Research Policy, 21: 265–293.

Cyert, R.M. & J.G. March. 1963. A behavioural theory of the firm. Prentice–Hall, Englewood Cliffs.

Danneels, E., & Kleinschmidt, E. J. 2002. Product innovativeness from the firm’s perspective: its dimensions and their relation with project selection and performance. The Journal of Product Innovation Management, 18(6):357–373.

Darrow, A. L., & Kahl, D. R. 1982. A comparison of moderated regression techniques considering strength of effect. Journal of Management, 8(2): 35–47.

Davila, A. 2003. Short–term economic incentives in new product development. Research Policy, 32: 1397-1420.

Day, George S. 1994. The Capabilities of Market–Driven Organization. Journal of Marketing, October: 37–52.

Deshpande, J.U., Rohit, F., & Webster, F. E. 1993. Corporate Culture, Customer Orientation, and Innovativeness in Japanese Firm: A Quardard Analysis. Journal of Marketing, 57: 23–37.

Dougherty D., & Hardy, C. 1996. Sustained product innovation in large, mature organization: overcoming innovation–to–organization problems. Academy of Management Journal, 39: 1120–1153.

Dougherty, D. 1990. Understanding new markets for new products. Strategic Management Journal, 11:59–78.

Dumaine, B. 1991. Closing the innovation gap. Fortune, December 2:56–59, 62.
Feltham, G. A., & Xie, J. 1994. Performance measurement congruity and diversity in multi–task principal agent relations. The Accounting Review, 69: 429–453.

Ferrier, W. 2001. Navigating the competitive landscape: The drivers and consequences of competitive aggressiveness. Academy of Management Journal, 44(4): 858–877.

Frambacha, R. T., Prabhu, J., & Verhallen, T. 2003. The influence of business strategy on new product activity: The role of market orientation. International journal of research in marketing, 20:377–397.

Gladstein, D. L. 1984. Groups in context: A model of task group effectiveness. Administrative Science Quarterly, 29: 499–517.

Hair, J., Aerson J. R., Tatham R., & Black W. (1998). Multivariate data analysis. 5th. New Jersey: Prentice–Hall. P. 97–104.

Han, J. K., Kim, N., & Srivastava, R. K. 1998. Market orientation and organizational performance: Is innovation a missing link? Journal of Marketing, 62: 30–45.

Hoegl, M., Weinkauf, K., & Gemuenden, H. G. 2004. Interteam coordination, project commitment, and teamwork in multiteam R&D projects: A longitudinal study. Organization Science, 15(1): 38–55.

Holmstrom, B., Milgrom, P. 1991. Multitask principal–agent analyses: incentive contracts, asset ownership, and job design. Journal of Law, Economics, and Organization, 7: 24–52.

Jaccard, J., Turrisi, R., & Wan, C.K. 1990. Interaction effects in multiple regressions. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.

Jaworski, B. J., & Kohli, A. K. 1993. Market orientation: Antecedents and consequences. Journal of Marketing, 57: 53– 70.

Kahn. 2001. Market orientation, interdepartmental integration, and product development performance. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 18: 314–323.

Knight, D., Pearce, C., Smith, K., Olian, J., Sims, H., Smith, K., & Flood, P. 1999. Top management team diversity, group process, and strategic consensus. Strategic Management Journal, 20: 445–465.

Kotha, S. 1995. Mass customization: implementing the emerging paradigm for competitive advantage. Strategic Management journal, 16: 21–42.

Kumar, K., Subramanian, R., & Yauger, C. 1998. Examining the market orientation- performance relationship: A context-specific study. Journal of Management, 24(2): 201–233.

Lawson, M. B. 2001. In praise of slack: Time is of the essence. Academy of Management Executive,15(3):125–135.

Lovelace, K., Shapiro, D., & Weingart, L. 2001. Maximizing cross-functional new product teams' innovativeness and constraint adherence: A conflict communications perspective. Academy of Management Journal, 44(4): 779–793.

Lukas, B. A., & Ferrell, O. C. 2000. The effect of market orientation on product innovation. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 28(2): 239–247.

Marianne W. Lewis., Gordon E. Dehler., & Stephen G. Green. 2002. Product development tensions: Exploring contrasting styles of project management. Academy of management journal, 45: 546–564.

Meyer, M.H., & Utterback, J.M. 1993. The product family and the dynamics of core capabilities. Sloan Management Review, 29–48.

Meyer, M.H., Tertzakian, P., & Utterback, J.M. 1997. Metrics for managing research and development in the context of the product family. Management Science, 43 (1): 88–111.

Narver, C. J., & Slater, S. F. 1990. The effect of a marketing orientation on business profitability. Journal of Marketing, 54: 20–35.

Nohria, N., & Gulati, R. 1996. Is slack good or bad for innovation? Academy of Management Journal, 39(5): 1245–1264.

Nohria, Nitin , Gulati, & Ranjay. 1995. What is the optimum amount of organizational slack? A study of the relationship between slack and innovation in multinational firms. Academy of Management Journal, 32.

Nohria, Nitin, Gulati, & Ranjay. 1997. What is the optimum amount of organizational slack? A study of the relationship between slack and innovation in multinational firms. European Management Journal, 15(6): 602–611.

Olson, E. M., Walker Jr., Ruekert, R. W., & Bonner, J. M. 2001. Patterns of cooperation during new product development among marketing, operations and R&D: Implications for project performance. The Journal of Product Innovation Management, 18(4): 258–271.

Penrose, E. 1995. The theory of the growth of the firm. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Pine, J. 1993. Mass customeization: The new frontiier in business competition. Boston MA.: Harvard Business School Press.

Quinn, J.B. & Mueller, J. A. 1963. Transferring research results to operations. Harvard Business Review, 41: 44–87.

Salavou, H. 2005. Do customer and technology orientations influence product innovativeness in SMEs? Some new evidence from Greece. Journal of Marketing Management, 21(3): 307–338.

Sarin, S., & McDermott, C. 2003. The effect of team leader characteristics on learning, knowledge application, and performance of cross-functional new product development teams. Decision Sciences, 34(4): 707–739.

Schlender, B. R. 1992. How Sony keeps the magic going. Fortune, February 24: 76–79, 82, 84.

Schoonhovan, C.B. 1981. Problems with contingency theory: Testing assumptions hidden within the language of contingency “theory”. Administrative Science Quarterly, 26(3): 349–377.

Sethi, R., & Nicholson, C. Y. 2001. Structural and contextual correlates of charged behavior in product development teams. The Journal of Product Innovation Management, 18(3): 154–168.

Sharma, S., Durand, R. M., & Gur–Arie, O. 1981. Identification and analysis of moderator variables. Journal of Marketing Research, 18(3): 291–300.
Shenhar, A.J., Dvir, D., 1996. Toward a typological theory of project management. Research Policy 25 (4), 607–632.

Slater, S. F., & Narver, J. C. 1995. Market Orientation and the Learning Orientation. Journal of Marketing, 59: 63–74.

Song, X. M., & Parry, M. E. 1997. A Cross-national Comparative Study of New Product Development Process: Japan and the United States. Journal of Marketing, 61: 1–18.

Swink, M. 2000. Technological innovativeness as a moderator of new product design Integration and top management support. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 17: 208–220.

Tan, J., & Peng, M. 2003. Organizational slack and firm performance during economictransitions: Two studies from an emerging economy. Strategic Management Journal. 24: 1249–1263.

Thieme, R.J., Song, X.M., & Shin, G.C. 2003. Project management characteristics and new product survival. The Journal of Product Innovation Management, 20: 104–119.

Thomke, S., & Reinertsen, D. 1998. Agile product development: managing development flexibility in uncertain environments. California Management Review, 41 (1): 8–30.

Tsui, A. S. 1984. A role set analysis of managerial Reputation. Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 34: 64–94.

Tuominen,M., Rajala, A., & Moller, K. 2004. Market-driving versus market-driven: Divergent roles of market orientation in business relationships. Industrial Marketing Management, 33: 207– 217.

Utterback, J.M., & Allen, T.J. 1976. Transactions on engineering management. New York: FEB 1976.Vol.23,1; 3.

Wheelwright, S. C., & Clark, K. B. 1992. Revolutionizing Product Development. New York: The Free Press.

Wiersema, M., & Bantel, K. 1992. Top management team demography and corporate strategic chance. Academy of management journal, 35: 91–121.

Zirger, B. J., & Maidique, M. 1990. A model of new product development: An empirical test. Management Science, 36: 867–883.
論文全文使用權限
  • 同意授權校內瀏覽/列印電子全文服務,於2008-08-03起公開。
  • 同意授權校外瀏覽/列印電子全文服務,於2011-08-03起公開。


  • 如您有疑問,請聯絡圖書館
    聯絡電話:(06)2757575#65773
    聯絡E-mail:etds@email.ncku.edu.tw