進階搜尋


 
系統識別號 U0026-0812200911351607
論文名稱(中文) 董事會與高階管理者之正式與非正式關係對創新性風險承擔之影響
論文名稱(英文) Formal and Informal Board/TMT Relationship on Entrepreneurial Risk Taking: Moderating Effect of Environmental Hostility and Prospector Strategy
校院名稱 成功大學
系所名稱(中) 企業管理學系碩博士班
系所名稱(英) Department of Business Administration
學年度 93
學期 2
出版年 94
研究生(中文) 楊家正
研究生(英文) Chia-Cheng Yang
學號 r4692129
學位類別 碩士
語文別 英文
論文頁數 54頁
口試委員 指導教授-吳學良
口試委員-史習安
口試委員-張淑昭
指導教授-陳忠仁
中文關鍵字 董事會  探勘者策略  創新性風險承擔  公司治理  環境敵對性 
英文關鍵字 corporate governance  entrepreneurial risk taking  environmental hostility  prospector strategy  board of directors 
學科別分類
中文摘要 none



英文摘要   This thesis reports the results of a study designed to investigate the relationship between entrepreneurial risk taking and formal or informal board/TMT relationship, with environmental hostility as well as strategy posture of prospector in a sample of 105 Taiwanese firms. Formal board/TMT relationship includes both board passiveness and CEO duality, and informal board/TMT relationship indicates family ties between board and TMT. Moderated hierarchical regression analysis was used to investigate the relative predictive power of contingency approach for exploring association between the board/TMT relationship, and entrepreneurial risk taking within hostile environment and prospector orientation of firms. The empirical finding indicated that there is a negative relationship between board passiveness and entrepreneurial risk taking. Whereas firms facing hostile environment are still risk taking, whether board passiveness influence entrepreneurial risk taking or not. When CEO and chairperson is the same one, CEO duality, is conducive to entrepreneurial risk taking. Whereas the separation of CEO and chairperson is contributive to entrepreneurial risk taking when a firm faces a hostile environment, or when it adopts prospector strategic orientation. However, informal relationship is also good for entrepreneurial risk taking in this study in both situations. Besides, their family members promote entrepreneurship through their skills and it also reduces the information asymmetry as well as agency problem.
論文目次 Abstract i
Acknowledge ii
Table of Contents iii
List of Tables v
List of Figure vi

Chapter 1 Introduction 1
1-1. Research Background and Motivations 1
1-2. Research Objectives 3
1-3. The Organization of This Study 4

Chapter 2 Literature Review 6
2-1. The Main Effects of Formal Board/TMT Relationship on Entrepreneurial Risk Taking 6
2-2. The Main Effects of Informal Board/TMT Relationship on Entrepreneurial Risk Taking 11
2-3. Moderating Effects of Environmental Hostility 12
2-4. Moderating Effects of Strategic Posture 14

Chapter 3 Research Design and Methodology 17
3-1. Sample and Data Collection 17
3-2. The Conceptual Framework 19
3-3. Measurement 21
3-4. Statistic Method 25

Chapter 4 Analysis and Results 28
4-1. Descriptive Analysis 28
4-2. Data Reliability and Validity 29
4-3. Correlation Analysis 32
4-4. Regression Research 34

Chapter 5 Conclusions and Suggestions 38
5-1. Research Conclusions 38
5-2. Managerial Implications 43
5-3. Limitations and Recommendation for Future Studies 44
Reference 46
Appendix: Survey Questionnaire 53
參考文獻 Reference
1.Acs, Z.J., & Preston, L. (1997) ‘Small and medium-sized enterprises, technology, and globalization: Introduction to a special issue on small and medium-sized enterprises in the global economy.’ Small Business Economics, 9(1), pp.1-6.
2.Aldrich, H.E. & Cliff, J.E. (2003) ‘The pervasive effects of family on entrepreneurship: Toward a family embeddedness perspective.’ Journal of Business Venturing, 18(5), pp.573-595.
3.Astrachan, J.H., Zahra, S.A. & Sharma, O. (2003) Family-sponsored ventures. Kansas, MO: Kauffman Foundation.
4.Badrinath, R. (1994) ‘Helping small and medium-size firms to enter export markets.’ International Trade Forum, 2, pp.4-9.
5.Barney, J.B. & Hesterly, W. (1996) Organizational economics: understanding the relationship between organizations and economic analysis. In Handbook of Organization Studies, Clegg, S.R., Hardly, C., Nord, W.R. Sage:London; 115-147.
6.Barringer, B.R. & Bluedorn, A.C. (1999) ‘The relationship between corporate entrepreneurship and strategic management.’ Strategic management Journal, 20(5), pp.421-444.
7.Bartlett, C.A. & Ghoshal, S. (1988). ‘Organizing for worldwide effectiveness: The transnational solution.’ California Management Review, 31(1), pp.54-74.
8.Beatty, R.P. & Zajac, E.J. (1994) ‘ Managerial incentives, monitoring and risk bearing: A study of executive compensation, ownership, and board structure in initial pubic offerings.’ Administrative Science Quarterly, 39(2), 313-335.
9.Block, Z. & MacMillan, I. (1993) Corporate venturing. Cambridge, MA: Harvard Business Press.
10.Borch, O.J. & Knut, M.S. (1999) ‘Resource configuration, competitive strategies, and corporate entrepreneurship: An empirical examination of small firms.’ Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 24(1), pp.49-70.
11.Boyd, B.K. (1995) ‘CEO duality and firm performance: A contingency model.’ Strategic Management Journal, 16(4), pp.301-312.
12.Carpenter, M.A. & Westphal, J.D. (2001) ‘The strategic context of external network ties: Examining the impact of director appointments on board involvement in strategic decision making.’ Academy of Management Journal, 44(4), pp.639-660.
13.Cohen, J. & Cohen, P. (1983). Applied Multiple Regression/Correlation Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences (2nd ed). Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ.
14.Covin, J.G. & Slevin, D.P. (1988) ‘The influence of organizational structure on the utility of an entrepreneurial top management style.’ Journal of Management Studies, 25(3), pp.217-234.
15.Covin, J.G. & Slevin, D.P. (1989) ‘Strategic management of small firms in hostile and benign environments.’ Strategic Management Journal, 10(1), pp.75-87.
16.Daily, C.M. & Dalton, D.R. (1993) ‘Board of directors leadership and structure: Control and performance implications.’ Entrepreneurship: Theory & Practice, 17(3), pp.65-81.
17.Darrow, A.L. & Kahl, D.R. (1982) ‘A comparison of moderated regression techniques considering strength of effect.’ Journal of Management, 8(2), pp.35-47.
18.David, P., Kochhar, R., & Levitas, E. (1998) ‘The effect of institutional investors on the level and mix of compensation.’ Academy of Management Journal, 41(2), pp.200-209.
19.Dess, G. & Beard, D. (1984) ‘Dimensions of organizational task environments.’ Administrative Science Quarterly, 29(1), pp.52-73.
20.Dess, G.G., Lumpkin, G.T. & Covin, J.G. (1997) ‘Entrepreneurial strategy making and firm performance: Tests of contingency and configurational models.’ Strategic Management Journal, 18(9), pp.677-695.
21.Donaldson, L. (1990) ‘The ethereal hand: Organizational economics and management theory.’ Academy of Management Review, 15(3), pp.369-381.
22.Donaldson, L. & Davis, J.H. (1991) ‘Stewardship theory and agency theory: CEO governance and shareholder returns.’ Australian Journal of Management, 16, pp.49-64.
23.Duncan, R. (1972) ‘Characteristics of organizational environments and perceived environmental uncertainty.’ Administrative Science Quarterly, 17(3), pp.313-327.
24.Fama, E.F. & Jenesen, M. C. (1983) ‘The separation of ownership and control.’ Journal of Law and Economics, 26(2), pp.301-325.
25.Finkelstein, S. & D' Aveni, R.A. (1994) ‘CEO duality as double-edged sword: How boards of directors balance entrenchment avoidance and unity of command.’ Academy of Management Journal, 37(5), pp.1079-1108.
26.Finkelstein, S. & D'Aveni, R.A. (1993) ‘CEO duality as a double-edge sword: How boards of directors balance entrenchment avoidance and unity of command.’ Paper presented at the Academy of Management Annual Conference. Atlanta, GA.
27.Fujita, M. (1997) ‘Small and medium-sized enterprises in foreign direct investment.’ In International technology transfer by small and medium-sized enterprise, P.J. Buckley, J. Campos, H. Mirza, & E. White (Eds.). New York, NY: St. Martin's Press, Inc., pp.9-69.
28.Gomez-Mejia, L.R., Nunez-Nickel, M. & Gutierrez, I. (2001) ‘The role of family ties in agency contracts.’ Academy of Management Journal, 44(1), pp.81-95.
29.Gulati, R. & Westphal, J.D. (1999) ‘Cooperative or Controlling? The effects of CEO-board relations and the content of interlocks on the formation of joint ventures.’ Administrative Science Quarterly, 44(3), pp.473-506.
30.Hendry, K. & Kiel, G.C. (2004) ‘The role of board in firm strategy: Integrating agency and organizational control perspectives.’ Corporate Governance, 12(4), pp.500-520.
31.Hitt, M.A., Ireland, R.D. & Hoskisson, R.E. (2003) Strategic management: Competitiveness and Globalization (concepts) 5e. Ohio: South-Western.
32.Holmstrom, B. & Kaplan, S.N. (2003) ‘The dangers of too much governance’ MIT Sloan Management Review, 45(1), pp.95-97.
33.Jensen, M.C. & Meckling, W. H. (1976) ‘Theory of the firm: Managerial behavior, agency costs, and ownership structure.’ Journal of Financial Economy, 3(1), pp.305-350.
34.Johnson, J.L., Daily, C.M. & Ellstrand, A.E. (1996) ‘Boards of directors: A review and research agenda.’ Journal of Management, 22(3), pp.409-438.
35.Kanter, R. (1986) ‘Supporting innovation and venture development in established companies.’ Journal of Business Venturing, 1(1), pp.47-60.
36.Khandwalla, P.N. (1977) The design of organizations. Harcourt Brace Jovanovich, New York.
37.Khandwalla, P.N. (1987) ‘Generators of pioneering innovative management: Some Indian evidence.’ Organization Studies, 8, pp.39-59.
38.Kuratko, D., Montagno, R. & Hornsby, J. (1990) ‘Developing an intrapreneurial assessment instrument for effective corporate entrepreneurial environment.’ Strategic Management Journal, 11 (5), pp.49-58.
39.Lorsch, J.W. (1989) Pawns or Potentates: The Reality of America's Corporate Boards. Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press.
40.Lumpkin, G.T. & Dess, G.G. (1996) ‘Clarifying the entrepreneurial orientation construct and linking it to performance.’ Academy of Management Review, 21(1), pp.135-172.
41.McNulty, T. & Pettigrew, A. (1999) ‘Strategists on the Board.’ Organization Studies, 20(1), 47-74.
42.Miles, R.E. & Snow, C.C. (1978) Organizational strategy, structure and process. New York, McGraw-Hill.
43.Miller, D. (1983) ‘The correlations of entrepreneurship in three types of firms.’ Management Science, 29(7), pp.770-791.
44.Miller, D. & Friesen, P. (1982) ‘Innovation in conservative and entrepreneurial firms: Two models of strategic momentum.’ Strategic Management Journal, 3(1), pp.1-25.
45.Miller, D., Droge, C. & Toulouse, J. (1988) ‘Strategic process and content as mediators between organizational context and structure.’ Academy of Management Journal, 31(3), pp.1-25.
46.Miller, D., Friesen, P (1982) ‘Innovation in conservative and entrepreneurial firms: Two model of strategic momentum.’ Strategic Management Journal, 3(1), pp.1-25.
47.Mintzberg H. (1973) ‘Strategy making in three modes.’ Calif Manage Review, 16(2), pp.44-53.
48.Moore, M. (2005) ‘Towards a confirmatory model of retail strategy types: An empirical test of Miles and Snow.’ Journal of Business Research, 58(5), pp.696-704.
49.Nadler, D.A. (2004) ‘Building better boards.’ Harvard Business Review, 82(5), pp.102-113.
50.Olson, P.D., Zuiker, V.S., Danes, S.M., Stafford, K., Heck, R.K.Z., & Duncan, K.A. (2003) ‘The impact of the family and the business on family business sustainability.’ Journal of Business Venturing, 18(5), pp.639-666.
51.Pearce, J.A. & Zahra, S.A. (1991) ‘The relative power of CEOs and boards of directors: Associations with corporate performance.’ Strategic Management Journal, 12(2), pp.135-153.
52.Pedhazur, E. (1982) Multiple Regression in Behavioral Research. Holt, Rinehart & Winston, Fort Worth, Tx.
53.Pfeffer, J. & Salancik, G. (1978) The external control of organization: A resource dependence perspective. Harper and Row, New York.
54.Porter, M. (1980) Competitive strategy: Techniques for analyzing industries and competitors. New York, NY: Free Press.
55.Porter, M. E. (1987) ‘From Competitive Advantage to Competitive Strategy.’ Harvard Business Review, 65(3), pp.43-59.
56.Robinson, J. P. & Shaver, P. R. (1973) Measures of Psychological Attitudes, Mll:Survey Research Center Institute for Social Research, University of Michigan.
57.Rogoff, E.G. & Heck, R.K.Z. (2003) ‘Evolving research in entrepreneurship and family business: Recognizing family as the oxygen that feeds the fire of entrepreneurship.’ Journal of Business Venturing, 18(5), pp.559-566.
58.Rosenstein, J., Bruno, A.V., Bygrave, W.D. & Taylor, N.T. (1993). ‘The CEO, venture capitalists, and the board.’ Journal of Business Venturing, 8(2), pp.99-l13.
59.Sathe, V. (2003) Corporate entrepreneurship: Top managers and new business creation. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
60.Scherer, F.M. (1980) Industrial Market Structure and Economic Performance, 2nd Ed. Chicago, IL :Rand McNally College Publishing Company.
61.Schoonhoven, C.B. (1981) ‘Problems with contingency theory: Testing assumptions hidden within the language of contingency “theory”.’ Administrative Science Quarterly, 26(3), pp.349-377.
62.Segev, E. (1987) ‘Strategy, strategy making and performance: An empirical investigation.’ Strategic Management Journal, 33(2), pp.258-270.
63.Sharma, S., Durand, R.M., & Gur-Arie, O. (1981) ‘Identification and analysis of moderator variables.’ Journal of Marketing Research, 18(3), pp.291-300.
64.Stiles, P. & Taylor, B. (2001) Boards at work: How directors view their roles and responsibilities. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
65.Westphal, J.D. (1999) ‘Collaboration in the boardroom: Behavioral and performance consequences of CEO-board social ties.’ Academy of Management Journal, 42(1), pp.7-24.
66.Wiseman, R.M. & Gomez-Mejia, L.R. 1998. ‘A behavioral agency model of managerial risk taking.’ Academy of Management Review, 23(1), pp133-152.
67.Zahra, S.A. (2003) ‘International expansion of U.S. manufacturing family business: the effect of ownership and involvement.’ Journal of Business Venturing, 18(4), pp.495-512.
68.Zahra, S.A. (1991) ‘Predictors and financial outcomes of corporate entrepreneurship: An exploratory study.’ Journal of Business Venturing, 6(4), pp.259-285.
69.Zahra, S.A. (1993) ‘Environment, corporate entrepreneurship and financial performance: A taxonomic approach.’ Journal of Business Venturing, 8(4), pp.319-340.
70.Zahra, S.A. (2005) ‘Entrepreneurial risk taking in family firms.’ Family Business Review, 18(1), pp.23-40
71.Zahra, S.A. & Covin, J.G. (1995) ‘Contextual influences on the corporate entrepreneurship-performance relationship: A longitudinal analysis.’ Journal of Business Venturing, 10(1), pp.43-58.
72.Zahra, S.A. & Garvis, D.M. (2000) ‘International corporate entrepreneurship and firm performance: The moderating effect of international environmental hostility.’ Journal of Business Venturing, 15(5), pp.469-492.
73.Zahra, S.A., Neubaum, D.O. & Huse. M. (2000) ‘Entrepreneurship in medium-size companies: Exploring the effects of ownership and governance systems.’ Journal of Management, 26(5), pp.947-976.
74.Zahre, S.A. & Pearce, J.A. (1989) ‘Board of directors and corporate financial performance: A review and integrative model.’ Journal of Management, 15(2), pp.291-334.
75.Zajac, E.J. & Westphal, J.D. (1996) ‘Director reputation CEO-board power, and the dynamics of board interlocks.’ Administrative Science Quarterly, 41(3), pp.507-529.
論文全文使用權限
  • 同意授權校內瀏覽/列印電子全文服務,於2006-07-28起公開。
  • 同意授權校外瀏覽/列印電子全文服務,於2006-07-28起公開。


  • 如您有疑問,請聯絡圖書館
    聯絡電話:(06)2757575#65773
    聯絡E-mail:etds@email.ncku.edu.tw