進階搜尋


   電子論文尚未授權公開,紙本請查館藏目錄
(※如查詢不到或館藏狀況顯示「閉架不公開」,表示該本論文不在書庫,無法取用。)
系統識別號 U0026-0812200911252901
論文名稱(中文) 企業策略、資訊科技應用與組織績效之關聯性研究
論文名稱(英文) none
校院名稱 成功大學
系所名稱(中) 高階管理碩士在職專班(EMBA)
系所名稱(英) Executive Master of Business Administration (EMBA)
學年度 93
學期 1
出版年 94
研究生(中文) 劉建良
研究生(英文) Chien-Liang Liu
學號 r0791141
學位類別 碩士
語文別 中文
論文頁數 95頁
口試委員 指導教授-譚伯群
指導教授-余光華
口試委員-吳萬益
口試委員-姜傳益
召集委員-林清河
中文關鍵字 組織績效  資訊科技應用  企業策略 
英文關鍵字 none 
學科別分類
中文摘要   企業重要之競爭關鍵因素,除了要提供更好的產品功能、更低廉的產品價格,要更快的滿足顧客需求也是重要關鍵。Croteau and Raymond (2004)研究指出,企業績效與組織的資訊科技能力及策略能力有關。資訊科技無疑的是提升反應速度的最好工具,,因此資訊技術也可以增加製造競爭能力,這不僅凸顯了資訊科技的重要性,也闡述了其廣泛的用途,因此不論高科技或是傳統製造業,資訊科技都是提升優勢不可或缺的重要必備工具。
  因此,本研究以南部地區成功大學、南台科技大學、長榮大學及崑山科技大學等四所大學參與EMBA及在職班之經理人為研究對象,以迴歸分析、多變量變異數分析 (MANOVA)、集群分析等統計分析方法,進行企業策略、資訊科技應用及組織績效構面互動關係以及不同產業在各構面間差異分析之實證研究。
  本研究結果發現:不同的企業策略對組織績效有顯著且正向之影響;企業策略之選定與資訊科技應用能力有顯著的關係;資訊科技應用能力對於組織績效有顯著且正向的影響關係;但在企業策略環境下,資訊科技應用對組織績效無顯著影響關係。
  其他經實證發現:不同產業只在資訊科技應用及組織績效構面具有顯著性差異存在;不同資本額只在企業經營策略構面具有顯著性差異存在,由分析中可看出資本額為5-20億的企業在「分析者策略」的認同度較低;不同員工數只在企業經營策略構面具有顯著性差異存在,由分析中可看出員工數在2001人以上的企業對於探勘者策略的認同度較高。


英文摘要 none


論文目次 目錄 I
表目錄 III
圖目錄 V
第一章 緒論 1
第一節 研究動機與背景 1
第二節 研究目的 2
第三節 研究範圍 3
第四節 研究流程 3
第二章 文獻探討 5
第一節 企業策略相關研究 5
第二節 資訊科技相關研究 10
第三節 組織績效相關研究 15
第四節 各構面間之關係 18
第三章 研究方法 21
第一節 研究架構與研究假設 21
第二節 操作性定義及問卷設計 23
第三節 研究範圍 27
第四節 資料分析方法 27
第四章 資料統計分析 31
第一節 樣本基本資料分析 31
第二節 因素分析及信度檢定 38
第三節 不同企業變項在各研究構面之差異分析 46
第四節 企業策略選定與資訊科技應用之互動關係 53
第五節 各構面因素對組織績效構面因素之影響關係 55
第六節 企業策略集群分析及各群組間之差異分析 62
第七節 結論 66
第五章 結論與建議 71
第一節 研究結論 71
第二節 研究建議與管理意涵 72
第三節 研究限制及未來研究方向 74

參考文獻 75
附錄:問卷 81
參考文獻 一、中文部份
1.王存國、戴基峰(2001),「組織特性與資訊科技對組織結構之影響」,資訊管理學報,第7卷第2期,頁1-26。
2.司徒達賢(2001),「策略管理新論:觀念架構與分析方法」,台北,智勝出版社。
3.任文媛(2000),「電子化企業-e-Business」,資訊與教育,76期,頁78-86。
4.吳宗璠、謝清佳(2000),「資訊管理-理論與實務」,台北,智勝出版社。
5.吳思華(2000),「策略九說」,台北,臉譜出版社。
6.吳萬益(1996),「台美日企業在台灣及大陸企業經營環境及競爭策略之研究」,臺大管理論叢,第7卷第1期,頁49-84。
7.林文華(2003),「資訊科技投入程度、組織管理相關變數與組織績效之關聯性研究」,國立成功大學企業管理研究所碩士論文。
8.林清河、周福星、譚伯群、施坤壽(1998),「品質管理與組織氣候及績效之關聯性分析」,中山管理評論,第6卷第4期,頁1057-1080。
9.施坤壽、林清河、譚伯群(2000),「競爭因素、製造策略、顧客滿意及組織績效之整合性分析」,臺大管理論叢,頁1-33。
10.洪廣明、黃旭男(2002),「電子化策略與價值創造之關係研究-以台積電與宏碁電腦為例」,管理與系統,頁457-487。
11.許育彰(2001),「資訊科技策略與資訊科技基礎建設對企業資源規劃之影響」,國立中山大學資訊管理研究所碩士論文。
12.陳家祥、蘇婉如、涂櫻真(2002),「企業e化對供應鏈績效及合夥關係影響之研究」,資訊管理學報,第9卷第1期,頁39-61。
13.楊銘賢、張銀益(2002),「企業電子化規劃與管理之探討」,資訊管理學報,第9卷專刊,頁57-74。
14.趙必孝(1997),「臺商在大陸的人力資源策略、控制與績效之研究」,勞資關係論叢,第6 卷第6 期,頁1-43。
15.譚伯群、林清河、施坤壽、張音(2000),「網際網路應用(價值鏈觀點)與經營策略及資訊化成熟度之關係-台灣製造業實證研究」,管理評論,頁151-182。

二、英文部份

1.Abernethy, M.A. and Guthrie, C.H. (1994), “An empirical assessment of the fit between strategy and management information system design.” Accounting and Finance, pp.49-66.
2.Aderson, A.L. (1988), “America’s money maniacs.” Business & Society Review, Vol. 66, pp.13-17.
3.Amit, R. and Zott, C. (2001), “Value creation in E-business”, Strategy Management Journal, 22(6/7), pp.493-520.
4.Arun, R., Ravi, P., and Nainika, P. (1997), “Technology investment and business performance.” Association for Computing Machinery. Communications of the ACM, Vol.40, Iss.7, pp.89-97.
5.Avlonitis, G.J. and Karayanni, D.A. (2000), “The impact of internet use on Business-to-Business marketing,” Industrial Marketing Management, Vol.29, pp.441-459.
6.Bergeron, F. and Raymond, L. (1995), “The contribution of information technology to the bottom line: a contingency perspective of strategic dimensions.” Proceedings of the International Conference on Information Systems, Amsterdam. pp.167-181.
7.Bergeron, F., Raymond, L., Rivard, S. (2004), “Ideal patterns od strategic alignment and business performance.” Information & Management, Vol.41, Iss.8, p.1003.
8.Capello, R. and Nijkamp, P. (1996), “Telecommunications technologies and regional development: Theoretical considerations and empirical evidences,” The Annals of Regional Science, Vol.30, pp.7-30.
9.Chakravarthy, B. (1986), “ Measuring strategic performance,” Strategic Management Journal, Vol.7, Iss.5, pp.437~458.
10.Chandler, A. D. Jr. (2000), “Strategy and structure,” Cambridge MA: M.I.T. Press.
11.Conant, J.S., Mokwa, M.P., Burnett, J.J. (1989), “Pricing and performance in health maintenance organizations: a strategic management perspective.” Journal of Health Care Marketing, Vol.9, Iss.1, pp.25-36.
12.Croteau, A.M. and Bergeron, F. (2001), “An information technology trilogy: business strategy, technological deployment and organizational performance,” Journal of Strategic Information Systems, Vol.10, Iss.2, pp.77-99.
13.Croteau, A.M. and Raymond, L. (2004), “Performance outcomes of strategic and IT competencies alignment.” Journal of Information Technology, Vol.19, Iss.3, pp.178-190.
14.Daft, L.R. (2001), Organization theory and design, Cincinnati,Ohio: South- Western College Publishing, pp.238-245.
15.Das, S.R., Zahra, S.A., Warkentin, M.E. (1991), “Integrating the content and process of strategic MIS planning with competitive strategy.” Decision Sciences, Vol.22, pp.953- 984.
16.Dess, G.G., and Jr. Robinson, R.B., “Measuring organizational performance in the absence of objective measure: the case of the privately-held firm and conglomerate business unit”, Strategic Management Journal, 1984, Vol.5, pp.265-273.
17.Devaraj, S. and Kohli, R. (2003), “Performance impacts of information technology: Is actual usage the missing link?” Management Science, Vol.49, Iss.3, pp.273-289.
18.Earl, M.J. (1989), Management Strategies for Information Technology, Prentice Hall
19.Fine, C.H., and Hax , A.C. (1985), ”Manufacturing strategy: A methodology and illustration”, Interfaces, Vol.15, Iss.6, pp.28-46.
20.Follit, E. (2000), “The key to E-transformation”, Informationweek, 775, pp.145.
21.Gerstner, L.V. (1999), Business Strategy In E-Business, E-Business Seminar.
22.Henderson, J.C., Venkatraman, N. (1999), “Strategic alignment: leveraging information technology for transforming organizations.” IBM Systems Journal, Vol.38, Iss.2/3, pp.472-484.
23.Huber, G.P. (1990), “A theory of the effects of advanced information technologies on organizational design, intelligence, and decision making,” in Fulk, J. & C. Steinfield, Organizations and Communication Technology, pp.237-274.
24.Huselid, M. A. (1995), “The impact of human resource management practices on turnover, productivity, and corporate financial performance,” Academy of Management Journal, Vol.38, Iss.3, pp. 635-672.
25.Janz, B.D., Brancheau, J.C., Wetherbe, J.C. (1996), “1994 Key information systems management issues.” MIS Quarterly, Vol.20, Iss.2, pp.225-243.
26.Jauch, L. and Glueck, W.F. (1989), Strategy Management and Business Policy, 3e, New York: McGraw-Hill.
27.Joshi, M.P., Kathuria, R., Porth, S.J. (2003), “Alignment of strategic priorities and performance: an integration of operations and strategic management perspectives,” Journal of Operations Management, Vol.21, Iss.3, pp.353-369.
28.Julien, P.-A., Raymond, L., Jacob, R., Ramangalahy, C. (1996), “Patterns and determinants of technological scanning: an empirical investigation of manufacturing SMEs.” Proceedings of the Babson College Foundation Entrepreneurship Research Conference, Seattle.
29.Kalakota, R. and Robinson, M. (1999), E-Business Roadmap for Success, Reading, Mass.: Addison-Wesley.
30.Kalakota, R. and Whinston, A.B. (1996), Frontiers of Electronic Commerce, Addison Wesley.
31.Karimi, J., Gupta, Y.P., Somers, T.M. (1996), “Impact of competitive strategy and information technology maturity on firms's strategic response to globalization.” Journal of Management Information Systems, Vol.12, Iss.4, pp.55-88.
32.Koushik, S. and Joodi, P. (2000), “E-business aritecture design issue”, TO Pro, May/June, pp.38-43.
33.Lal, K. (2002), “E-Business and Manufacturing Sector: A study of small and medium-sized enterprise in india”, Research Policy, Vol.31, Iss.7, pp.1199-1211.
34.Lee, H.G., Cho, D.H. and Lee, S.C. (2002), “Impact of E-business initiatives on firm value”, Electronic Commerce Research and Application, 1, pp.41-56.
35.Madu, C.N., Kuei, C.H., and Jacob, R.A. (1996), “An empirical assessment of the influence of quality dimension on organizational performance,” International Journal of Production Research, Vol.34, Iss.7, pp.1943-1962.
36.McFarlan, E.W., McKenney, J.L., Pyburn, P. (1983), “The information archipelago - plotting a course.” Harvard Business Review, Vol.61, Iss.1, pp.145-156.
37.Miles, R.E. and Snow, C.C. (1984), Organizational Strategy, Structure and Process. New York: McGraw-Hill.
38.Miller, D. (1987), “Strategy making and structure: analysis and implicationsfor performance.” Academy of Management Journal, Vol.30, Iss.1, pp.7-32.
39.Morton, S. (1988), “Information technology and corporate strategy.” Planning Review, 28-31.
40.Namiki, N. (1989), “Miles and Snow's typology of strategy, perceived environmental uncertainty, and organizational performance.” Akron Business and Economic Review, Vol.20, Iss.2, pp.72-88.
41.Nutt, O.W. (1987), “Essay review:Information technology.” MIS Quarterly, 134-143.
42.Parnell, J.A., Wright, P., Tu, H.S. (1996), “Beyond the strategy-performance linkage: the impact of the strategy organizational-environment fit on business performance.” American Business Review, Vol.14, Iss.2, pp.41-50.
43.Parry, M. and Parry, A.E. (1992), “Strategy and marketing tactics in nonprofit hospitals.” Health Care Management Review, Vol.17, Iss.1, pp.51- 61.
44.Porter, M. E. and Millar, V. E. (1985), “How information give you competitive advantage.” Harvard Business Review, pp.149-160.
45.Porter, M.E. (1980), Competitive Strategy: Techniques for Analyzing Industries and Competitors, Free Press, New York.
46.Prekumar, G. and Roberts, M. (1999), “Adoption of new information technologies in rural small business,” The International Journal of Management Science, Vol.27, pp.467-484.
47.Rodgers, J.A., Yen, D.C. and Chou, D.C. (2002), “Developing E-business: A strategic approach”, Information Management & Computer Security, 10(4), pp.184-192.
48.Ross, A. (2002), “A multi-dimensional empirical exploration of technology investment, coordination and firm performance.” International Journal of Physical Distribution & Logistics Management, Vol.32, Iss.7, pp.591-609.
49.Seashore, S.E. and Ephraim, Y. (1967), “ Factorial analysis of organization performance ”, Administrative Science Quarterly, Vol.12, Iss.3, pp.377.
50.Shortell, S.M. and Zajac, E.J. (1990), “Perceptual and archival measures of miles and snow's strategic types: a comprehensive assessment of reliability and validity.” Academy of Management Journal, Vol.33, Iss.4, pp.817-832.
51.Smith, G.N., and Oppenheim, C. (1994), “The role of information systems and technology(IS/IT) in investment banks.” Journal of Information Sciences, 20(5), 323-333.
52.Snow, C.C., Hrebiniak, L.G. (1980), “Strategy distinctive competence and organizational performance.” Administrative Science Quarterly, Vol.25, pp.317-336.
53.Steers, R.M. (1975), “ Problem in the measurement of organization effectiveness ”, Administrative Science Quarterly, Vol.20, Iss.2, pp.546~548.
54.Stivers, B. P., and Joyce, T. (2000), “Building a balanced performance management system,” Sam Advanced Management Journal, Vol.Spring, pp.22- 29
55.Swamidass P.M., and Newell, W.T., “Manufacturing strategy, environmental uncertainly and performance: a path analytic model”, Management Science,1987, Vol.33, Iss.4, pp.509-524.
56.Tan, K., Kannan, V.R., Handfield, R.B., and Ghosh, S. (1999), “Sipply chain management: an empirical study of its impact on performance,” International Journal of Operations & Production Management, Vol.19, Iss.10, pp.1034-1052.
57.Terziovski, M., and Samson, D. (1999), “The link between total quality management practice and organizational performance,” International Journal of Quality & Reliability Management, Vol.16, Iss.3, pp.226-237.
58.Thomas, A.S., Litschert, R.J., Ramaswamy, K. (1991), “The performance impact of strategy-manager coalignment: an empirical examination.” Strategic Management Journal, Vol.12, pp.509-522.
59.Venkatraman, N. (1989), “Strategic orientation of businessenterprises: the construct dimensionality and measurement.” Management Science, Vol.35, Iss.8, pp.942-962.
60.Venkatraman, N. and Ramanujam, V. (1986), “Measurement of business performance in strategy research: A comparison of approaches.” Academy of Management Review, Vol.11, Iss.4, pp. 801-815.
61.Weill, P., and Broadbent, M. (1999), “Four views of IT infrastructure: Implications for IT investments,” Beyond the IT Productivity Paradox, John Wiley & Sons.
62.Yeh, T.M., and Hoshino, Y. (2002), “Productivity and operating performance of Japanese merging firms: Keiretsu-related and independent mergers,” Japan and the World Economy, Vol.14, pp.347-366.
63.Zahra, S.A. and Covin, J.G. (1993), “Business strategy, technology policy and firm performance.” Strategic Management Journal, Vol.14, Iss.13, pp.451-478.
64.Zuboff, S. (1985), “Technologies that informate: Implications for human resource management in the computerized industrial workplace,” in R.E. Walton & P.R. Lawrence, Human Resource Management Trends and Challenges, Boston: Harvard Business School Press.
論文全文使用權限
  • 同意授權校內瀏覽/列印電子全文服務,於2105-01-28起公開。
  • 同意授權校外瀏覽/列印電子全文服務,於2105-01-28起公開。


  • 如您有疑問,請聯絡圖書館
    聯絡電話:(06)2757575#65773
    聯絡E-mail:etds@email.ncku.edu.tw