進階搜尋


下載電子全文  
系統識別號 U0026-0807201417023900
論文名稱(中文) 開放性人格、專業知識、涉入創意過程的程度與員工創造力之關係–以台灣製造業為例
論文名稱(英文) Open Personality, Domain Knowledge and Employee Creativity, mediated by Creative Process Engagement
校院名稱 成功大學
系所名稱(中) 高階管理碩士在職專班(EMBA)
系所名稱(英) Executive Master of Business Administration (EMBA)
學年度 102
學期 2
出版年 103
研究生(中文) 黃新珽
研究生(英文) Hsin-Ting Huang
學號 R07991320
學位類別 碩士
語文別 中文
論文頁數 48頁
口試委員 指導教授-史習安
口試委員-王鈿
口試委員-潘偉華
中文關鍵字 開放性人格  專業知識  涉入創意過程的程度  員工創造力 
英文關鍵字 openness  domain knowledge  employee creativity  creative process engagement 
學科別分類
中文摘要 本研究將討論員工所具之特質、涉入創意過程的程度與員工創造力之關係,並以台灣的製造業為主要研究對象,透過上述研究問題的討論,能夠更瞭解本研究產業之員工特質與員工創造力之間的關連,期望研究能透過更深入的討論,對企業經營者能提供更具體的建議,並據此調整經營策略,達到創造永續發展的目的。.。
本研究選定台灣某一製造業公司的員工與主管作為研究對象,以發放問卷的方式;問卷共分為A、B式兩份問卷,分為為主管與員工,共發放375份問卷,回收305份,回收率達81%,有效問卷305份。接著透過階層迴歸分析進行研究假說驗證,經由實證結果如下:
一、當員工越具有開放性人格時,其涉入創意過程的程度為高。
二、當員工越具有專業知識時,其涉入創意過程的程度為高。
過去有很多探討有關影響員工創造力的研究,而本研究加入了涉入創意過程的程度觀點,進一步探討涉入程度是否會最終會提高或降低員工的創造力,總體而言,本研究彌補以往僅專注於員工創造力之因素分析的研究缺口,更細緻地探究於內在動機的實際狀況,以及對員工創造力的影響。
英文摘要 SUMMARY
This study hopes to understand the relationship among openness, domain knowledge and employee creativity, and mediated by creative process engagement. Then take a manufacturing industry in Taiwan for example. In this study, selected the employees and executives in a manufacturing industry in Taiwan. We sent out 375 questionnaires which is divided into A, B. And retrieve 305 matched questionnaires and the final return is 81%. Our finding can be summarized as follows. 1.When the employee has a more openness personality, the extent of creative process engagement is high. 2.When an employee has a more domain knowledge, the extent of creative process engagement is high.
There were a lot of researches about employee creativity, however this study is the first empirical research to discuss the relationship among openness, domain knowledge and employee creativity, and mediated by creative process engagement. Through the research can help enterprise realize the connection and the strategy of management between the employee qualities and employee creativity.
Key words:openness, domain knowledge, employee creativity, creative process engagement
論文目次 第一章 緒論 1
第一節 研究背景與動機 1
第二節 研究問題與研究目的 3
第三節 研究範圍與研究對象 4
第四節 研究論文章節安排 4
第二章 文獻探討 5
第一節 影響員工創造力的因素 5
第二節 開放性人格與涉入創意過程的程度之關係 7
第三節 專業知識與涉入創意過程的程度之關係 9
第四節 涉入創意過程的程度與員工創造力之關係 10
第三章 研究方法 12
第一節 研究架構 12
第二節 問卷設計與變數衡量 13
第三節 樣本抽樣方式 17
第四章 研究結果 20
第一節 敘述性統計 20
第二節 實證分析結果 25
第五章 結論與建議 32
第一節 研究結論 32
第二節 理論與實務意涵 34
第三節 研究限制與建議 36
參考文獻 38
附錄 45
參考文獻 一、中文部份
方世杰、方世榮 (2000)。知識管理:概念架構的建立。商管科技季刊,1(3) 356-374。
吳俊彥 (2007)。人格特質、知識分享、組織創新氣候與企業技術創造力之研究。國立彰化師範大學商業教育學系論文。
邱皓政 (2005)。創造力的測量與共識衡鑑。教育集刊,30,50-73。
張文智、汪潤華 (2008)。提升設計組織創造力做法之研究。設計學報。13(1)。
陳昭儀 (1991)。我國傑出發明家之人格特質、創造歷程及生涯發展之研究。特殊教育研究學刊,7,211-227。
陳昭儀 (1991)。創造歷程階段論。創造思考教育,3,46-49。
陳淑雯、張婉菁 (2013)。知識分享對個人創造力與工作績效的影響。3 第 16 屆科技整合管理研討會,6,1-14。
陳雪芳 (2010)。影響員工創造力因素之研究―以社會網路為中介變數。商略學報,2(4),249-268。
陳蓁琬、劉敏熙 (2011) 承諾型人力資源管理實務、團隊凝聚力、合作組織氣候對員工知識分享行為的影響。第 14 屆科際整合管理研討會,6,183-199。
葉玉珠、吳靜吉(2002)。「創意發展組織因素量表」之編製。應用心理學研究,15,225-247。
鄭仁偉、黎士群 (2001),組織公平、信任與知識分享行為之關係性研究,人力資源管理學報,1(2),69-93。
二、英文部份
Albert,R.s., 1990. Experience, and career choice among the exceptinallly gifted and eminent, In M. Runco & R. Albert (Eds.), Theories of Creativity, Newbury Park, CA: Sage, 13-34.
Allport, G. W., & Odbert, H. S. 1936, Traitnames: A psycho-lexical study. ,Psychological Monographs, 4, 211.
Amabile, T. M. 1983. The social psychology of creativity. NY: Springer-Verlag.
Amabile, T. M. 1988. A model ofcreativity and innovation in organizations. Research in Organizational Behavior, 10, 123-167.
Amabile, T. M. 1996. Creativity in context. CO: Westview, Boulder.
Amabile, T. M. 1997. Motivating creativity in organization: on doing what you love and loving what you do. California Management Review, 40(1), 39-58.
Amabile, T. M., Goldfarb, P., & Brackfield, S.C. 1990. Social influences on creativity: Evaluation, Coaction and Surveillance, Creativity Research Journal, 3, 6-21.
Amabile, T.M., Hill, K.G., Hennessey, B.A. and Tighe, E. M., 1994, The work preference Inventory: Assessing intrinsic and extrinsic motivational orientation, Journal of Personality & Social Psychology, 66(5), 950-967.
Asch David, Wolfe Brian, 2001. New economy- new competition: the rise of the consumer? Palgrave Macmillan, London UK.
Barney, J.B., & Wright, P.M. 1998. On becoming a strategic partner: The role of human resources in gaining competitive advantage. Human Resource Management, 37: 31-46.
Beal, D.J., Weiss, H. M., Barrors, E., & Macdermid, S. M. 2005, An episodic process model of affective influences on performance, Journal of Applied Psychology, 90, 1054-1068.
Chuck Tomkovick, 2000. Perspective-Riding the wind: managing new product development in an age of change. Journal of Product Innovation Management , 17, 413-23.
Cooper, R. G. and Kleinschrnidt E. J. 1988. Resource Allocation in the New Product Process, Industrial Marketing Management, 17, 249-262.
Csikszentmihalyi, M., 1990a. The domain in of creativity, in Runco, M. A. and Albert, R. s.(Eds), Theories of Creativity, Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publishing, 190-212.
Csikszentmihalyi, M., 1990b. Flow: The psychology of optimal experience, NY: Harper & Row.
Dahooie, J. H., Afrazeh, A., & Hosseini, S. M. M. 2011. An activity-based framework for quantification of knowledge work. Journal of Knowledge Management, 15(3),422-444.
Davenport, Thomas H., and Lawrence Prusak. 1998. Working Knowledge: How Organizations Manage What They Know. Cambridge, MA: Harvard Business School Press.
Davis,F.D. (1986). A technology acceptance model for empirically testing new end-user information system : theory and results. Ph.D. dissertation, MIT Sloan School of management.
Derfus, Pamela J., Maggitti, Patrick G., Grimm, Curtis M., and Smith, Ken G. 2008, The red queen effect: Competitive actions and firm performance, Academy of Management Journal, 51 (1), 61-80.
Digman, J. M. 1990. Personality structure: Emergence of the five-factor model. Annual Review of Psychology, 41, 417-440.
Dollinger, S., Urban, K., & James, T. 2004. Creativity and openness: further validation of two creative product measure. Creativity Research Journal, 16, 35-47.
Feist, G. 1998. A meta-analysis of personality in scientific and artistic freativity. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 2, 290-309.
Garder, H., 1995, Leading minds: an anatomy of leadership, NY: Basic Book.
Gardner, H., 1988. Creativity: an interdisciplinary perspective, Creativity Research Journal, 1(1), 8-26.
Gerald F. S. (1998). Idea generation techniques: A formulary of active ingredients. Journal of Creative Behavior, 32(2), 108-133.
Gilson, L. L., & Shalley, C.E. 2004, A little creativity goes a long way: An examination of teams’ engagement in creative processes. Journal of Management, 30, 453-470.
Gilson, L. L., & Shalley, C.E., & Ruddy, T.M., 2005, Creativity and standerdizaton: complementary or conflicting drivers of team effectiveness. Academy of Management Journal, 48, 521-531.
Guilford, J.P. 1950. Creativity. American Psychologist, 5, 444-454.
Heller, K. A., Monk, F. J. Sternberg, R. J., & Subotnik, R. F. (Eds.) (2000). International handbook of research and development of gifted and talent (2 nd ed.). New York: Elsevier.
Janssen, O. 2000. Job demands, perceptions of effort-reward fairness, and innovative work behavior. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 73: 287–302.
Janssen, O. 2001. Fairness perceptions as a moderator in the curvilinear relationships between job demands, and job performance and job satisfaction. Academy of Management Journal, 44: 1039–1050.
Kaheman, D, 1973. Attention and eddort. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
Kanfer, R. 1990. Motivation theory and organizational psychology. In M. D. Dunnette & L. Hough (Eds.), Handbook of industrial and organizational psychology (2nd ed,), 1, 75-170. Palo Alto, CA: Consulting Psychologists Press.
Kanter, R. M. 1988. When a thousand flowers bloom: Structural, collective and social conditions for innovation in organizations. In B. M. Straw & L. L. Cummings (Eds.), Research in Organizational Behavior, 10, 123-167.
Kulkarni, N., Stubbs, D., & Reynolds, S. (1995). Experimental as anything. Melody Maker, 72(33), 74-104.
Madjar, N., & Oldham, G. R. 2002. Preliminary tasks and creative performance on a subsequent task: Effects of time on preliminary tasks and amount of information about the subsequent task. Creativity Research Journal, 14: 239–251.
McCrae, R. 1987. Creativity, divergent thinking, and openness to experience. Journal of Personality and social Psychology, 52, 1258-1265.
McCrae, R.R. & Costa, P.T. (1997). Personality trait structure as human universal. American Psychologist, 52, 509-516.
Nonaka, I., & Takeuchi, H. (1995).The knowledge-creating company: How Japanese companies create the dynamics of innovation: Oxford University Press, USA.
Nonoka, I, 1991. The knowledge-creating company. Harvard Business Review, 96-104.
Nonoka, I, 1994. A dynamic theory of organizational knowledge creation. Organization Science, 5(1), 14-37.
Oldham, G.r., & Cummings, A. 1996, Employee creativity: Personal and contextual factors at work. Academy of Management Journal, 39, 607-634.
Quinn, J. B., P. Anderson, and s. Finkelstein, 1996. Managing professional intellect; making the most of the best, Harvard Buesiness Review, 74(1) 71.
Raudsepp, E. (1987). Establishing a creative climate. Training and Development Journal, 41(4), 50-53.
Raudsepp, E. V. (1983). How to create new idea, Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
Runco, M. A. & Albert, R. S. (2002). Theories of creativity (2 nd ed.). Cresskill, NJ: Hampton Press.
Schultz, D., & Schultz, S. E. (1998). Theories of Personality (6th ed.). New York, NY: Thomson Learning Press.
Scott, W. E., Jr. 1966. Activation theory and task design. Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 1, 3-30.
Scott, W. E., Jr., & Erskine, J. A. 1980. The effects of variations in task design and monetary reinforcers on task behavior. Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 25, 3 I l-335.
Scott, W. E., Jr., & Rowland, K. M. 1970. The generality and significance of semantic differential scales as measures of morale. Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 5, 576-591.
Shalley, C.E. 1991. Effects of productivity goals, creativity goals and personal discretion on individual creativity. Journal of Applied Psychology, 76, 179-185.
Shalley, C.E. 1995. Effect of coaction, expected evaluation, and goal setting on creativity and productivity. Academy of Management Journal, 38, 483-503.
Siman, H. A. 1967. Motivational and emotional controls of cognition. Psychological Review, 74, 29-39.
Sternberg, R.J., & Lubart, T.I. 1991. An investment of creativity and its development. Human Development, 34, 1-31.
Sternberg, R.J., & Lubart, T.I. 1995, Defying the crowd: Cultivation creativity in a culture of conformigy. NY: Free Press.
Sternberg, R.J., & Lubart, T.I. 1996. Investing in creativity. American Psychologist, 51, 677-688.
Titus, O. (2000). Satisfaction with co-workers' behavior. Employee Relations, 2(1), 89-103.
Torrance, E. P. 1975. Creativity research in education: Still alive. In I. A. Taylor & J. W. Getzels (Eds.), Perspectives in creativity. Chicago: Aldine, 278-296.
Van de Ven, A. (1986). Central problem in the management of innovation. Management Science, 32 , 590-607.
Wallas, G. (1926). The arts of thought . New York: Harcour Brace and Worl.
Weisberg, R. W. 1995, Case studies of creative thinking: Reproduction versus restructuring in the real words. In S. M. Smith, T.B. Ward, & R.A. Finke (Eds.), The Creative Cognition Approach, 53-72.
Williams, F. E. 1979, Assessing creativity across Williams “CCUBE” model, The gifted child Quarterly, 23(4), 748-756.
Zhou, J., & George, J. M. 2001. When job dissatisfaction leads to creativity: Encouraging the expression of voice. Academy of Management Journal, 44, 682–696.
Zhou, J., & George, J. M. 2003. Awakening employee creativity: The role of leader emotional intelligence. Leadership Quarterly, 14, 545–568.
Zhang, X. M., & Bartol, K. M. 2010. Linking empowering leadership and employee creativity: the influence of psychological empowerment, internsic motivation, and creative process engagement. Academy of Management Journal. 53(1), 107-128.
Zhang, X. M., & Bartol, K. M. 2010. The influence of creative process engagement on employee creative performance and overall job performance: a curvilinear assessment. Journal of Applied Psychology. 95(5), 862-873.
論文全文使用權限
  • 同意授權校內瀏覽/列印電子全文服務,於2015-08-08起公開。
  • 同意授權校外瀏覽/列印電子全文服務,於2019-08-08起公開。


  • 如您有疑問,請聯絡圖書館
    聯絡電話:(06)2757575#65773
    聯絡E-mail:etds@email.ncku.edu.tw