進階搜尋


 
系統識別號 U0026-0708201414021000
論文名稱(中文) 組織能力與競爭行為:整合資源基礎與動態競爭觀點
論文名稱(英文) Firm Capabilities and Competitive Behaviors: An Integrated Consideration of the Resource-Based View and the Competitive Dynamics Perspective
校院名稱 成功大學
系所名稱(中) 國際經營管理研究所碩士在職專班
系所名稱(英) Institute of International Management (IIMBA--Master)(on the job class)
學年度 102
學期 2
出版年 103
研究生(中文) 王振宇
研究生(英文) Chen-Yu Wang
電子信箱 daren73719@gmail.com
學號 RA7011017
學位類別 碩士
語文別 英文
論文頁數 59頁
口試委員 指導教授-林豪傑
口試委員-鄭至甫
口試委員-王鈿
口試委員-陳浩政
中文關鍵字 組織寬裕資源  人力資本  行動積極性  環境動態性  公司績效  執行長  高階經理團隊 
英文關鍵字 Organizational slack  Human capital  Action aggressiveness  Environmental dynamism  Firm performance  CEO  Top management team (TMT) 
學科別分類
中文摘要 本研究以資源基礎理論和動態競爭理論的觀點為基礎來探討組織寬裕資源、人力資本、行動積極性與公司績效的關聯性。環境動態性的調節腳色的也一併被探討。本研究依據124間台灣本土公司的執行長們及高階管理團隊的回收樣本去做分析,而統計分析結果顯示人力資源對於公司的行動積極性有正向的影響關係,反過來說也有利於公司的績效。而組織寬裕資源也對於公司的績效有正向的影響。然而,環境動態性的調節腳色並沒有顯著的支持。本研究的貢獻在於以資源基礎理論和動態競爭理論的觀點來界定出公司主要的組織能力,而讓公司能在這競爭的動態環境下憑此去發展及執行其競爭優勢。
英文摘要 This study applies the resource-based view and the competitive dynamics perspective to explore the relationships between organizational slack, human capital, action aggressiveness, and firm performance. The moderating role of environmental dynamism is examined as well. By collecting data from CEOs and top executive members in 124 firms in Taiwan, analytical results show that human capital exert a positive effect on firm action aggressiveness, which in turn advances firm performance. Organizational slack also has a direct effect of firm performance. Nonetheless, the moderating role of environmental dynamism is not supported. The study contributes to both competitive dynamics and resource-based theories by identifying key capabilities that a firm should develop to enact competitive advantage in dynamic environments.
論文目次 TABLE OF CONTENTS
中文摘要 I
ABSTRACT II
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS III
TABLE OF CONTENTS V
LIST OF TABLES IX
LIST OF FIGURES X
CHAPTER ONE INTRODUCTION 1
1.1 Research Background and Motivation. 1
1.2 Research Objective and Contribution. 2
1.3 Research Procedure. 3
CHAPTER TWO LITERATURE REVIEW 5
2.1 Theory Background. 5
2.1.1 Competitive Dynamics Perspective. 5
2.1.2 Resource-Based View. 7
2.2 Definition of Relevant Research Variables. 8
2.2.1 Organizational Slack. 8
2.2.2 Human Capital. 9
2.2.3 Action Aggressive. 10
2.2.4 Firm Performance. 11
2.2.5 Environmental Dynamism. 11
2.3 Development of Hypothesis. 12
2.3.1 Interrelationship between Organizational Slack and Action Aggressiveness. 12
2.3.2 Interrelationship between Human Capital and Action Aggressiveness. 12
2.3.3 Interrelationship between Action Aggressiveness and Firm Performance. 13
2.3.4 Interrelationship between Action Aggressiveness and Organizational Slack and Firm Performance. 13
2.3.5 Interrelationship between Action Aggressiveness and Human Capital and Firm Performance. 14
2.3.6 Interrelationship between Environmental Dynamism and Action Aggressiveness and Firm Performance. 14
CHAPTER THREE RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODOLOGY 16
3.1 Conceptual Model. 16
3.2 Definition of Variables. 16
3.3 Summary of Hypotheses. 17
3.4 Sampling Plan. 18
3.5 Question Design and Construct Measurement. 19
3.5.1 Organizational Slack. 19
3.5.2 Human Capital. 19
3.5.3 Action Aggressiveness. 20
3.5.4 Environmental Dynamism. 21
3.5.5 Firm Performance. 21
3.6 Control Variables. 22
3.6.1 Firm Level. 22
3.6.2 TMT Tenure and TMT Size. 22
3.7 Methods of Analysis. 23
3.7.1 Descriptive Statistic. 23
3.7.2 Confirmatory Factor Analysis (CFA). 23
3.7.3 Common Method Variance of Common Method Bias (CMV). 23
3.7.4 Reliability and Validity. 24
3.7.5 Pearson Correlation. 24
3.7.6 Hierarchical Regression. 24
CHAPTER FOUR RESEARCH RESULTS 26
4.1 Descriptive Statistic. 26
4.1.1 Characteristics of Research Respondent. 26
4.1.2 Characteristics of Firm. 28
4.2 Confirmatory Factor Analysis (CFA). 30
4.2.1 Organizational Slack. 30
4.2.2 Human Capital. 31
4.2.3 Action Aggressiveness. 32
4.2.4 Firm Performance. 33
4.2.5 Environmental Dynamism. 34
4.3 Full Measurement Model. 35
4.4 CMV. 37
4.5 Reliability and Validity. 38
4.6 Pearson Correlation. 39
4.7 Hierarchical Regression. 41
CHAPTER FIVE CONCLUSION AND SUGGESTIONS 45
5.1 Discussions and Conclusion. 45
5.1.1 Theoretical Implications. 45
5.1.2 Managerial Implications. 47
5.2 Limitation and Suggestion. 48
5.2.1 Research Limitations. 48
5.2.2 Suggestion for Future Research. 49
REFERNCES 51
APPENDIX 56
參考文獻 REFERNCES
Aharoni, Y. (1993). In search for the unique: Can firm specific advantages be evaluated? Journal of Management Studies, 30(1), 31-44.
Ahlgren, P., Jarneving, B., & Rousseau, R. (2003). Requirements for a cocitation similarity measure, with special reference to Pearson's correlation coefficient. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 54(6), 550-560.
Amason, A. C. (1996). Distinguishing the effects of functional and dysfunctional conflict on strategic decision making: Resolving a paradox for top management teams. Academy of Management Journal, 39(1), 123-148.
Anderson, C. A., & Bushman, B. J. (2002). Human aggression. Annual Review of Psychology, 53(1), 27-51.
Andrews, K. R. (1997). The concept of corporate strategy. New York: Oxford University Press.
Balakrishnan, S., & Fox, I. (1993). Asset specificity, firm heterogeneity and capital structure. Strategic Management Journal, 14(1), 3-16.
Barnard, C. I. (1968). The functions of the executive (Vol. 11). Boston: Harvard University Press.
Barnett, W. P., & Hansen, M. T. (1996). The red queen in organizational evolution. Strategic Management Journal, 17(S1), 139-157.
Barney, J. (1991). Firm resources and sustained competitive advantage. Journal of Management, 17(1), 99-120.
Baum, J. A., & Korn, H. J. (1996). Competitive dynamics of interfirm rivalry. Academy of Management Journal, 39(2), 255-291.
Berkowitz, L. (1989). Frustration-aggression hypothesis: Examination and reformulation. Psychological Bulletin, 106(1), 59.
Bourgeois, L. J. (1981). On the measurement of organizational slack. Academy of Management Review, 6(1), 29-39.
Boxall, P. (1998). Achieving competitive advantage through human resource strategy: Towards a theory of industry dynamics. Human Resource Management Review, 8(3), 265-288.
Caves, R. E. (1983). Multinational enterprise and economic analysis. Journal of International Business Studies, 14(2), 158-160.
Chen, M.-J., & Miller, D. (2012). Competitive dynamics: Themes, trends, and a prospective research platform. The Academy of Management Annals, 6(1), 135-210.
Chen, M. J., Lin, H. C., & Michel, J. G. (2010). Navigating in a hypercompetitive environment: The roles of action aggressiveness and TMT integration. Strategic Management Journal, 31(13), 1410-1430.
Csikszentmihalyi, M., & Larson, R. (1987). Validity and reliability of the experience-sampling method. The Journal of Nervous and Mental Disease, 175(9), 526-536.
Curran, P. J., West, S. G., & Finch, J. F. (1996). The robustness of test statistics to nonnormality and specification error in confirmatory factor analysis. Psychological Methods, 1(1), 16-29.
Cyert, R. M., & March, J. (1963). A behavioral theory of the firm. Paper presented at the University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign's Academy for Entrepreneurial Leadership Historical Research Reference in Entrepreneurship.
D’Aveni, R. A., & Gunther, R. (2007). Hypercompetition: Managing the dynamics of strategic maneuvering. In Das Summa Summarum des Management (Vol. 21, pp. 83-93). Wiesbaden, Germany: Gabler.
Davenport, T. H., & Prusak, L. (2000). Working knowledge: How organizations manage what they know. Boston, US: Harvard Business Press.
De Long, J. B., & Summers, L. H. (1991). Equipment investment and economic growth. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 106(2), 445-502.
Derfus, P. J., Maggitti, P. G., Grimm, C. M., & Smith, K. G. (2008). The red queen effect: Competitive actions and firm performance. Academy of Management Journal, 51(1), 61-80.
DesHarnais, S. I., McMahon Jr, L. F., Wroblewski, R. T., & Hogan, A. J. (1990). Measuring hospital performance: The development and validation of risk-adjusted indexes of mortality, readmissions, and complications. Medical Care, 28(12), 1127-1141.
Dess, G. G., & Beard, D. W. (1984). Dimensions of organizational task environments. Administrative Science Quarterly, 29(1), 52-73.
Dosi, G., Teece, D. J., & Winter, S. (1992). Technology and enterprise in a historical perspective. New York: Clarendon Press Oxford.
Evans, M. G. (1985). A Monte Carlo study of the effects of correlated method variance in moderated multiple regression analysis. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 36(3), 305-323.
Fama, E. F. (1980). Agency problems and the theory of the firm. The Journal of Political Economy, 88(2), 288-307.
Farrell, J. M., Johnston, M. E., & Twynam, G. D. (1998). Volunteer motivation, satisfaction, and management at an elite sporting competition. Journal of Sport Management, 12(4), 288-301.
Ferrier, W. J. (2001). Navigating the competitive landscape: The drivers and consequences of competitive aggressiveness. Academy of Management Journal, 44(4), 858-877.
Ferrier, W. J., Fhionnlaoich, C. M., Smith, K. G., & Grimm, C. M. (2002). The impact of performance distress on aggressive competitive behavior: A reconciliation of conflicting views. Managerial and Decision Economics, 23(4), 301-316.
Ferrier, W. J., Smith, K. G., & Grimm, C. M. (1999). The role of competitive action in market share erosion and industry dethronement: A study of industry leaders and challengers. Academy of Management Journal, 42(4), 372-388.
Finkelstein, S., & Hambrick, D. C. (1990). Top-management-team tenure and organizational outcomes: The moderating role of managerial discretion. Administrative Science Quarterly, 35(3), 484-503.
Galbraith, J. R. (1973). Designing complex organizations. Boston, US: Addison-Wesley Longman Publishing Co., Inc.
Hair, J. F. (2009). Multivariate data analysis. New York: Pearson.
Hambrick, D. C., Cho, T. S., & Chen, M.-J. (1996). The influence of top management team heterogeneity on firms' competitive moves. Administrative Science Quarterly, 41(4), 659-684.
Hambrick, D. C., & Finkelstein, S. (1987). Managerial discretion: A bridge between polar views of organizational outcomes. Research in Organizational Behavior, 9(0), 369-406.
Hambrick, D. C., & Mason, P. A. (1984). Upper echelons: The organization as a reflection of its top managers. Academy of Management Review, 9(2), 193-206.
Hitt, M. A., Hoskisson, R. E., & Harrison, J. S. (1991). Strategic competitiveness in the 1990s: Challenges and opportunities for US executives. The Executive, 5(2), 7-22.
Hoyle, R. H., & Smith, G. T. (1994). Formulating clinical research hypotheses as structural equation models: A conceptual overview. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 62(3), 429-440.
Huselid, M. A. (1995). The impact of human resource management practices on turnover, productivity, and corporate financial performance. Academy of Management Journal, 38(3), 635-672.
Huselid, M. A., Jackson, S. E., & Schuler, R. S. (1997). Technical and strategic human resources management effectiveness as determinants of firm performance. Academy of Management Journal, 40(1), 171-188.
Jacobson, R. (1992). The “Austrian” school of strategy. Academy of Management Review, 17(4), 782-807.
Jensen, M. C., & Meckling, W. H. (1976). Theory of the firm: Managerial behavior, agency costs and ownership structure. Journal of Financial Economics, 3(4), 305-360.
Kester, W. C., & Luehrman, T. A. (1991). The myth of Japan's low-cost capital. Harvard Business Review, 70(3), 130-138.
Khanna, T., & Palepu, K. (1997). Why focused strategies may be wrong for emerging markets. Harvard Business Review, 75(4), 41-48.
Lin, H.-C., & Shih, C.-T. (2008). How executive SHRM system links to firm performance: The perspectives of upper echelon and competitive dynamics†. Journal of Management, 34(5), 853-881.
Liu, R. Y., Parelius, J. M., & Singh, K. (1999). Multivariate analysis by data depth: Descriptive statistics, graphics and inference,(with discussion and a rejoinder by Liu and Singh). The Annals of Statistics, 27(3), 783-858.
Mahoney, J. T., & Pandian, J. R. (1992). The resource‐based view within the conversation of strategic management. Strategic Management Journal, 13(5), 363-380.
McNamara, G., Vaaler, P. M., & Devers, C. (2003). Same as it ever was: The search for evidence of increasing hypercompetition. Strategic Management Journal, 24(3), 261-278.
Miller, D., & Friesen, P. H. (1980). Momentum and revolution in organizational adaptation. Academy of Management Journal, 23(4), 591-614.
Mises, L. v. (1949). Human action: A treatise on economics. New Haven: Yale University Press.
Modigliani, F., & Miller, M. H. (1958). The cost of capital, corporation finance and the theory of investment. The American Economic Review, 48(3), 261-297.
Mueller, D. C. (1997). First-mover advantages and path dependence. International Journal of Industrial Organization, 15(6), 827-850.
Nahapiet, J., & Ghoshal, S. (1998). Social capital, intellectual capital, and the organizational advantage. Academy of Management Review, 23(2), 242-266.
Nohria, N., & Gulati, R. (1996). Is slack good or bad for innovation? Academy of Management Journal, 39(5), 1245-1264.
Oster, S. M. (1994). Modern competitive analysis. New York: Oxford University Press.
Pegels, C. C., Song, Y. I., & Yang, B. (2000). Management heterogeneity, competitive interaction groups, and firm performance. Strategic Management Journal, 21(9), 911-923.
Penrose, E. T. (1995). The theory of the growth of the firm [Electronic book]. New York: Oxford University Press.
Piccolo, S., D'Amato, M., & Martina, R. (2008). Product market competition and organizational slack under profit-target contracts. International Journal of Industrial Organization, 26(6), 1389-1406.
Porter, M. (1998). Competetive strategy. New York: The Free Press.
Porter, M. E. (1979). The structure within industries and companies' performance. The Review of Economics and Statistics, 61(2), 214-227.
Prahalad, C., & Hamel, G. (1990). The core competence of the corporation. Boston (MA): Oxford University Press.
Priem, R. L., Rasheed, A. M., & Kotulic, A. G. (1995). Rationality in strategic decision processes, environmental dynamism and firm performance. Journal of Management, 21(5), 913-929.
Ramanujam, V., & Varadarajan, P. (1989). Research on corporate diversification: A synthesis. Strategic Management Journal, 10(6), 523-551.
Sheng, S., Zhou, K. Z., & Li, J. J. (2011). The effects of business and political ties on firm performance: Evidence from China. Journal of Marketing, 75(1), 1-15.
Simerly, R. L., & Li, M. (2000). Environmental dynamism, capital structure and performance: A theoretical integration and an empirical test. Strategic Management Journal, 21(1), 31-49.
Singh, J. V. (1986). Performance, slack, and risk taking in organizational decision making. Academy of Management Journal, 29(3), 562-585.
Smith, K. G., Ferrier, W. J., & Ndofor, H. (2001). Competitive dynamics research: Critique and future directions. California, USA: Sage Publication.
Snell, D. P. L. S. A. (1999). The human resource architecture : Toward a theory of human capital allocation and development. Academy of Management Review, 24(0), 31-48.
Snell, S. A., Youndt, M. A., & Wright, P. M. (1999). Establishing a framework for research in strategic human resource management: Merging resource theory and organizational learning. London, England: Routledge.
Spector, P. E. (2006). Method variance in organizational research truth or urban legend? Organizational Research Methods, 9(2), 221-232.
Subramaniam, M., & Youndt, M. A. (2005). The influence of intellectual capital on the types of innovative capabilities. Academy of Management Journal, 48(3), 450-463.
Tan, J., & Peng, M. W. (2003). Organizational slack and firm performance during economic transitions: Two studies from an emerging economy. Strategic Management Journal, 24(13), 1249-1263.
Thomas, L. G. (1996). The two faces of competition: Dynamic resourcefulness and the hypercompetitive shift. Organization Science, 7(3), 221-242.
Thompson, A. A., Strickland, A. J., & Gamble, J. E. (1998). Strategic management: Concepts and cases. New Jersey: Pearson PLC.
Tushman, M. L., Newman, W. H., & Romanelli, E. (1986). Convergence and upheaval: Managing the unsteady pace of organizational evolution. California Management Review, 29(1), 29-44.
Tushman, M. L., & O’Reilly III, C. A. (1997). Winning through innovation: A practical guide to leading organization change and renewal. Cambridge, Mass: Harvard Business School Press.
Wernerfelt, B. (1984). A resource based view of the firm. Strategic Management Journal, 5(2), 171-180.
Wiggins, R. R., & Ruefli, T. W. (2005). Schumpeter's ghost: Is hypercompetition making the best of times shorter? Strategic Management Journal, 26(10), 887-911.
Williams, L. J., & Brown, B. K. (1994). Method variance in organizational behavior and human resources research: Effects on correlations, path coefficients, and hypothesis testing. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 57(2), 185-209.
Wright, P. M., Dunford, B. B., & Snell, S. A. (2001). Human resources and the resource based view of the firm. Journal of Management, 27(6), 701-721.
Young, G., Smith, K. G., & Grimm, C. M. (1996). “Austrian” and industrial organization perspectives on firm-level competitive activity and performance. Organization Science, 7(3), 243-254.
論文全文使用權限
  • 同意授權校內瀏覽/列印電子全文服務,於2019-08-22起公開。
  • 同意授權校外瀏覽/列印電子全文服務,於2019-08-22起公開。


  • 如您有疑問,請聯絡圖書館
    聯絡電話:(06)2757575#65773
    聯絡E-mail:etds@email.ncku.edu.tw