進階搜尋


   電子論文尚未授權公開,紙本請查館藏目錄
(※如查詢不到或館藏狀況顯示「閉架不公開」,表示該本論文不在書庫,無法取用。)
系統識別號 U0026-0408201602011900
論文名稱(中文) 開放式創新團隊創新流程精通程度與學習滿意度之研究
論文名稱(英文) Exploring the Innovation Process Proficiency and Learning Satisfaction of the Cross-Field Open Innovation Team
校院名稱 成功大學
系所名稱(中) 企業管理學系
系所名稱(英) Department of Business Administration
學年度 104
學期 2
出版年 105
研究生(中文) 張浚桓
研究生(英文) Chun-Huan Chang
學號 R46031337
學位類別 碩士
語文別 中文
論文頁數 81頁
口試委員 指導教授-陳淑惠
口試委員-李榮顯
口試委員-余明助
口試委員-鄭文英
中文關鍵字 開放式創新  創新流程精通程度  跨領域團隊  組織學習  學習滿意度 
英文關鍵字 Open Innovation  Innovation Process Proficiency  Cross-Field Team  Organizational Learning  Learning Satisfaction 
學科別分類
中文摘要 全球化促使產業環境變化加速和企業間競爭加劇,對企業的營運有著關鍵性的影響,在開放式創新的潮流下,企業紛紛向外部單位尋求合作以達成創新的目的,許多公司早已衝破以往封閉的疆界,有計劃的結合外部的知識、技術和資源,並與企業本身的核心能力相結合,以減少成本並加速企業的創新速度,進而創造新的經濟價值。本研究主要是探討產品創新流程精通程度對開放式創新團隊之學習情況及團隊績效的影響。
本研究蒐集樣本為科技部跨領域創意加值推動計畫之團隊教授與學生,透過電子郵件共發出213份問卷,回收問卷195份,其中有效問卷共175份,有效問卷回收率為82.16 %。
本研究結果發現,團隊層次之創新流程精通程度在跨層級的影響中,能透過個人層次之中介變項學習自我效能,正向影響個人層次之學習滿意度;在團隊方面,創新流程精通程度能提高團隊績效;在個人方面,組織愈創新則團體之學習狀況愈好,因而造成較高的學習滿意度。
英文摘要 Globalization trends have prompted industry rapidly changing environment, competition, the enterprise has a key influence on the operation. Under the open innovation trend, enterprises have to look for external cooperation to achieve innovation. Many companies have already changed innovation strategies to break boundaries and cooperated with their customers, partners or even competitors outside the organizations. Reduce costs and increase speed of innovation for economic value. This research is to explore the innovation process proficiency and learning satisfaction of the cross-field open innovation team.
The research samples are taken from Cross-Field Innovation Value-Added Promotion Plan. A total of 213 questionnaires were distributed by email, 195 questionnaires were returned, and 175 valid questionnaires were recovered, giving an overall response rate of 82.16%.
The results of this research show that team innovation process proficiency increases individual learning satisfaction through increasing the mediator, individual cross-field learning self-efficacy in the cross-level process. In team aspect, innovation process proficiency increases team performance. In individual aspect, if the innovation level of organization’s better, the situation of organization learning will be better, then it can increase learning satisfaction.
論文目次 中文摘要 I
英文摘要 II
誌謝 V
目錄 VI
表目錄 VIII
圖目錄 X
第一章 緒論 1
第一節 研究背景和動機 1
第二節 研究目的 3
第三節 研究流程 4
第二章 文獻探討 5
第一節 跨領域創新團隊 5
第二節 創新流程精通程度 6
第三節 學習自我效能 13
第四節 學習滿意度 17
第五節 團隊績效 21
第三章 研究方法 25
第一節 研究架構 25
第二節 研究假設 26
第三節 問卷設計 27
第四節 研究對象與問卷發放 32
第五節 資料分析方法 33
第四章 研究結果 35
第一節 描述性統計分析 35
第二節 因素分析 41
第三節 相關分析 45
第四節 階層線性模式分析 45
第五章 結論與建議 53
第一節 研究結論 53
第二節 管理意涵 54
第三節 研究限制與建議 54
參考文獻 56
附錄一 問卷一 64
附錄二 問卷二 69
附錄三 問卷三 72
附錄四 問卷四 78
參考文獻 英文參考文獻
Abernathy, W. J., & Clark, K. B. (1985). Innovation: Mapping the winds of creative destruction. Research policy, 14(1), 3-22.
Akgün, A. E., Keskin, H., Byrne, J. C., & Aren, S. (2007). Emotional and learning capability and their impact on product innovativeness and firm performance. Technovation, 27(9), 501-513.
Alegre, J., & Chiva, R. (2008). Assessing the impact of organizational learning capability on product innovation performance: An empirical test. Technovation, 28(6), 315-326.
Amabile, T. M. (1988). A model of creativity and innovation in organizations. Research in organizational behavior, 10(1), 123-167.
Amabile, T. M., Conti, R., Coon, H., Lazenby, J., & Herron, M. (1996). Assessing the work environment for creativity. Academy of management journal, 39(5), 1154-1184.
Ancona, D. G., & Caldwell, D. F. (1997). Making teamwork work: Boundary management in product development teams. Managing strategic innovation and change: A collection of readings, 433-442.
Anderson, N. R., & West, M. A. (1998). Measuring climate for work group innovation: development and validation of the team climate inventory. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 235-258.
Balthazard, P., Waldman, D., Howell, J., & Atwater, L. (2002). Modeling performance in teams: the effects of media type, shared leadership, interaction style, and cohesion. Paper presented at the August, 2002 Academy of Management Meeting, Denver, CO.
Bandura, A. (1977). Self-efficacy: toward a unifying theory of behavioral change. Psychological review, 84(2), 191.
Bandura, A. (1986). Social foundations of thought and action: A social cognitive theory: Prentice-Hall, Inc.
Bandura, A. (1997). Self-efficacy: The exercise of control: New York: Freeman.
Bandura, A., & Locke, E. A. (2003). Negative self-efficacy and goal effects revisited. Journal of applied psychology, 88(1), 87.
Barreto, I., & Baden‐Fuller, C. (2006). To conform or to perform? Mimetic behaviour, legitimacy‐based groups and performance consequences. Journal of Management studies, 43(7), 1559-1581.
Barrick, M. R., Stewart, G. L., Neubert, M. J., & Mount, M. K. (1998). Relating member ability and personality to work-team processes and team effectiveness. Journal of applied psychology, 83(3), 377.
Betz, F. (2003). Managing technological innovation: competitive advantage from change: John Wiley & Sons.
Boshier, R. (1971). Motivational orientations of adult education participants: A factor analytic exploration of Houle's typology. Adult Education Quarterly, 21(2), 3-26.
Britner, S. L., & Pajares, F. (2006). Sources of science self‐efficacy beliefs of middle school students. Journal of research in science teaching, 43(5), 485-499.
Caprara, G. V., Fida, R., Vecchione, M., Del Bove, G., Vecchio, G. M., Barbaranelli, C., & Bandura, A. (2008). Longitudinal analysis of the role of perceived self-efficacy for self-regulated learning in academic continuance and achievement. Journal of educational psychology, 100(3), 525.
Carillo, K., & Okoli, C. (2011). Generating quality open content: A functional group perspective based on the time, interaction, and performance theory, Information & Management, 48(6), 208-219.
Chang, S.-C., & Lee, M.-S. (2007). The effects of organizational culture and knowledge management mechanisms on organizational innovation: An empirical study in Taiwan. The Business Review, 7(1), 295-301.
Chesbrough, H. W. (2003). Open innovation: The new imperative for creating and profiting from technology: Harvard Business Press.
Chi, N.-W., Huang, Y.-M., & Lin, S.-C. (2009). A double-edged sword? Exploring the curvilinear relationship between organizational tenure diversity and team innovation: The moderating role of team-oriented HR practices. Group & Organization Management, 34(6), 698-726.
Christensen, C., & Raynor, M. E. (2003). The innovator's solution: Creating and sustaining successful growth. Research-Technology Management, 46(5), 61-61.
Daft, R. L. (1982). Bureaucratic versus nonbureaucratic structure and the process of innovation and change. Research in the Sociology of Organizations, 1, 129-166.
Damanpour, F., & Gopalakrishnan, S. (1998). Theories of organizational structure and innovation adoption: the role of environmental change. Journal of Engineering and Technology Management, 15(1), 1-24.
De Jong, B. A., Dirks, K. T., & Gillespie, N. (2016). Trust and Team Performance: A Meta-Analysis of Main Effects, Moderators, and Covariates.
Domer, D. E., Carswell, J., & Spreckelmeyer, K. (1983). Understanding educational satisfaction. The University of Kansas School of Architecture and Urban Design.(ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 232 600).
Drucker, P. F. (1998). The discipline of innovation. Harvard Business Review, 76(6), 149-157.
Drucker, P. F. (2010). The frontiers of management: Harvard Business Press.
Ebner, W., Leimeister, J. M., & Krcmar, H. (2009). Community engineering for innovations: the ideas competition as a method to nurture a virtual community for innovations. R&d Management, 39(4), 342-356.
Flammger, D. M. (1991). Nontraditional Students and Postsecondary School Satisfaction.
Ford, C. M. (1996). A theory of individual creative action in multiple social domains. Academy of management review, 21(4), 1112-1142.
Frankle, E. (1990). Management of technology change. NY: Kluwer Academic.
Garcia, G. J., Saldana, R. J., & Amecua, S. A. (2010). How to get mature global virtual teams: a framework to improve team process management in distributed software teams. Software Quality Jounral, 18(4), 409-435.
Garcia-Morales, V. J., Llorens-Montes, F. J., & Verdú-Jover, A. J. (2006). Antecedents and consequences of organizational innovation and organizational learning in entrepreneurship. Industrial Management & Data Systems, 106(1), 21-42.
Gattiker, U. E. (1990). Technology management in organizations: Sage publications.
Gemuenden, H. G., & Lechler, T. (1997). Success factors of project management: the critical few-an empirical investigation. Paper presented at the Innovation in Technology Management-The Key to Global Leadership. PICMET'97: Portland International Conference on Management and Technology.
Gist, M. E. (1987). Self-efficacy: Implications for organizational behavior and human resource management. Academy of management review, 12(3), 472-485.
Gist, M. E., & Mitchell, T. R. (1992). Self-efficacy: A theoretical analysis of its determinants and malleability. Academy of management review, 17(2), 183-211.
Gupta, A. K., & Wilemon, D. L. (1990). Accelerating the development of technology-based new products. California management review, 32(2), 24-44.
Guzzo, R. A., Yost, P. R., Campbell, R. J., & Shea, G. P. (1993). Potency in groups: Articulating a construct. British journal of social psychology, 32(1), 87-106.
Hackman, J. R. (1983). A normative model of work team effectiveness: DTIC Document.
Herrmann, A., Gassmann, O., & Eisert, U. (2007). An empirical study of the antecedents for radical product innovations and capabilities for transformation. Journal of Engineering and Technology Management, 24(1), 92-120.
Herzberg, F., Mausnes, B., Peterson, R. O., & Capwell, D. F. (1957). Job attitudes; review of research and opinion.
Hoegl, M., & Gemuenden, H. G. (2001). Teamwork quality and the success of innovative projects: A theoretical concept and empirical evidence. Organization Science, 12(4), 435-449.
Hoegl, M., Weinkauf, K., & Gemuenden, H. G. (2004). Interteam coordination, project commitment, and teamwork in multiteam R&D projects: A longitudinal study. Organization Science, 15(1), 38-55.
Hostetter, C., & Busch, M. (2006). Measuring up online: The relationship between social presence and student learning satisfaction. Journal of Scholarship of Teaching and Learning, 6(2), 1-12.
Hu, M.-L. M., Horng, J.-S., & Sun, Y.-H. C. (2009). Hospitality teams: Knowledge sharing and service innovation performance. Tourism Management, 30(1), 41-50.
Husain, Z., Dayan, M., & Di Benedetto, C. A. (2016). The impact of networking on competitiveness via organizational learning, employee innovativeness, and innovation process: A mediation model. Journal of Engineering and Technology Management, 40, 15-28.
Jerez-Gomez, P., Céspedes-Lorente, J., & Valle-Cabrera, R. (2005). Organizational learning capability: a proposal of measurement. Journal of business research, 58(6), 715-725.
Johnson, J. L., Sohi, R. S., & Grewal, R. (2004). The role of relational knowledge stores in interfirm partnering. Journal of Marketing, 68(3), 21-36.
Kanter, R. M. (1983). The change masters: Binnovation and entrepreneturship in the American corporation: Touchstone Book.
Kim, L. (2003). Technology transfer & intellectual property rights. UNCTAD-ICTSD project on intellectual property rights and sustainable development(2).
Kline, T. J., & McGrath, J.-L. (1998). Development and validation of five criteria for evaluating team performance. Organization Development Journal, 16(3), 19.
Knowles, M. S. (1970). The modern practice of adult education (Vol. 41): New York Association Press New York.
Knowles, M. S. (1975). Self-directed learning.
Lafley, A. G., & Charan, R. (2008). The game-changer: How you can drive revenue and profit growth with innovation: Crown Business.
Lewin, K. (1936). Some social‐psychological differences between the United States and Germany. Journal of Personality, 4(4), 265-293.
Lichtenthaler, U. (2011). Open innovation: Past research, current debates, and future directions. The Academy of Management Perspectives, 25(1), 75-93.
Locke, E. A. (1969). What is job satisfaction? Organizational behavior and human performance, 4(4), 309-336.
Lynn, G. S., Reilly, R. R., & Akgun, A. E. (2000). Knowledge management in new product teams: practices and outcomes. IEEE transactions on Engineering Management, 47(2), 221-231.
Marquish, D. (1982). The anatomy of successful innovation. Winthrop Publishes, Cambridge.
Mavondo, F. T., Chimhanzi, J., & Stewart, J. (2005). Learning orientation and market orientation: Relationship with innovation, human resource practices and performance. European journal of marketing, 39(11/12), 1235-1263.
McGrath, J. E. (1964). Social psychology: A brief introduction: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.
McGrath, J. E. (1984). Groups: Interaction and performance (Vol. 14): Prentice-Hall Englewood Cliffs, NJ.
Menezes Ferrari, F., & Carlos de Toledo, J. (2004). Analyzing the knowledge management through the product development process. Journal of Knowledge Management, 8(1), 117-129.
Miner, A. S., & Mezias, S. J. (1996). Ugly duckling no more: Pasts and futures of organizational learning research. Organization Science, 7(1), 88-99.
Montoya‐Weiss, M. M., & Calantone, R. (1994). Determinants of new product performance: a review and meta‐analysis. Journal of product innovation management, 11(5), 397-417.
Morris, L. (2011). The innovation master plan: the CEO's guide to innovation.
Mu, J., Peng, G., & MacLachlan, D. L. (2009). Effect of risk management strategy on NPD performance. Technovation, 29(3), 170-180.
Murray, H. A. (1938). Explorations in personality.
Niedergassel, B., & Leker, J. (2011). Different dimensions of knowledge in cooperative R&D projects of university scientists. Technovation, 31(4), 142-150.
Nieva, V., Fleishman, E., & Rieck, A. (1978). Team dimensions: Their identity, their measurement, and their relationship (DTIC Research Note 85-12). Alexandria, VA.
Nonaka, I., & Takeuchi, H. (1995). The knowledge-creating company: How Japanese companies create the dynamics of innovation: Oxford university press.
Nunnally, J. (1978). Psychometric methods: New York: McGraw-Hill.
Parida, V., Larsson, T., Isaksson, O., & Oghazi, P. (2011). Towards open innovation practices in aerospace industry: challenges and opportunities. Paper presented at the 3rd International Conference on Research into Design, ICoRD.
Parker, G. M., Stollman, N. H., & Rogers, A. (1996). Adenomatous polyposis coli presenting as adenocarcinoma of the appendix. American Journal of Gastroenterology, 91(4), 801-802.
Pearce, C. L., & Ensley, M. D. (2004). A reciprocal and longitudinal investigation of the innovation process: The central role of shared vision in product and process innovation teams (PPITs). Journal of Organizational Behavior, 25(2), 259-278.
Peteraf, M. A. (1993). The cornerstones of competitive advantage: a resource‐based view. Strategic management journal, 14(3), 179-191.
Pintrich, P. R., & Schunk, D. H. (2002). Motivation in education: Theory. Research, and Applications, Second Edition, Merrill Prentice Hall, Columbus, Ohio.
Prahalad, C. K., & Krishnan, M. S. (2008). The new age of innovation: Driving cocreated value through global networks: McGraw Hill Professional.
Prior, D. D., Mazanov, J., Meacheam, D., Heaslip, G., & Hanson, J. (2016). Attitude, digital literacy and self efficacy: Flow-on effects for online learning behavior. The Internet and Higher Education, 29, 91-97.
Quick, T. L. (1992). Successful team building: AMACOM Div American Mgmt Assn.
Quigley, N. R., Tesluk, P. E., Locke, E. A., & Bartol, K. M. (2007). A multilevel investigation of the motivational mechanisms underlying knowledge sharing and performance. Organization Science, 18(1), 71-88.
Ragazzoni, P., Baiardi, P., Zotti, A. M., Anderson, N., & West, M. (2002). Research note: Italian validation of the team climate inventory: a measure of team climate for innovation. Journal of Managerial Psychology, 17(4), 325-336.
Rahimi, A., & Abedini, A. (2009). The interface between EFL learners' self-efficacy concerning listening comprehension and listening proficiency. Novitas-Royal, 3(1), 14-28.
Raudenbush, S. W., & Bryk, A. S. (2002). Hierarchical linear models: Applications and data analysis methods (Vol. 1): Sage.
Rentsch, J. R., & Klimoski, R. J. (2001). Why do ‘great minds’ think alike?: Antecedents of team member schema agreement. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 22(2), 107-120.
Robbins, S. P. (1990). Organization Theory: Structures, Designs, And Applications, 3/e: Pearson Education India.
Robbins, S. P. (1992). Essentials of organization behavior. Northern Territory: Prentice-Hall.
Robbins, S. P. (2001). Organizational behavior, 14/E: Pearson Education India.
Robbins, S. P., & Coulter, M. (2007). Principles of management. Translated by Seyyed Mohammad Arabi and Mohammed Ali Hamid Rafiee and Behrouz Asrari Ershad, Fourth Edition, Tehran: Office of Cultural Studies.
Robbins, S. P., & Judge, T. A. (2006). Perilaku organisasi. Edisi Bahasa Indonesia. Jakarta. PT. Indeks Kelompok Gramedia.
Salas, E., Dickinson, T. L., Converse, S. A., & Tannenbaum, S. I. (1992). Toward an understanding of team performance and training.
Samuel, C. C., & Certo, S. (2003). Modern management: Prentice Hall.
Savioz, P., & Sannemann, E. (1999). The concept of the integrated innovation process. Paper presented at the Management of Engineering and Technology, 1999. Technology and Innovation Management. PICMET'99. Portland International Conference on.
Schumpeter, J. A. (1934). The theory of economic development: An inquiry into profits, capital, credit, interest, and the business cycle (Vol. 55): Transaction publishers.
Schunk, D. H. (1989). Social cognitive theory and self-regulated learning Self-regulated learning and academic achievement (pp. 83-110): Springer.
Schunk, D. H., & Zimmerman, B. J. (1994). Self-regulation of learning and performance: Issues and educational applications: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
Shonk, J. H. (1982). Working in teams: A practical manual for improving work groups: Amacom.
Simpson, J., & Weiner, E. S. (1989). Oxford English dictionary online. Oxford: Clarendon Press. Retrieved March, 6, 2008.
Sisodiya, S. R. (2008). The effect of open innovation on new product development success: the moderation of interfirm relational knowledge stores and social network characteristics: Washington State University.
Song, M., & Montoya-Weiss, M. M. (2001). The effect of perceived technological uncertainty on Japanese new product development. Academy of management journal, 44(1), 61-80.
Song, X. M., Montoya‐Weiss, M. M., & Schmidt, J. B. (1997). Antecedents and consequences of cross‐functional cooperation: a comparison of R&D, manufacturing, and marketing perspectives. Journal of product innovation management, 14(1), 35-47.
Song, X. M., & Parry, M. E. (1997). The determinants of Japanese new product successes. Journal of Marketing Research, 64-76.
Song, X. M., & Parry, M. E. (1999). Challenges of managing the development of breakthrough products in Japan. Journal of Operations Management, 17(6), 665-688.
Starko, A. (1995). Theories and models of creativity. Creativity in the classroom, 21-59.
Stewart, G. L., & Barrick, M. R. (2000). Team structure and performance: Assessing the mediating role of intrateam process and the moderating role of task type. Academy of management journal, 43(2), 135-148.
Stewart, G. L. M., & Sims, C. C. (1999). Team work and group dynamics.
Tödtling, F., Lehner, P., & Kaufmann, A. (2009). Do different types of innovation rely on specific kinds of knowledge interactions? Technovation, 29(1), 59-71.
Takeuchi, H., & Nonaka, I. (1986). The new new product development game. Harvard Business Review, 64(1), 137-146.
Tesluk, P. E., Farr, J. L., & Klein, S. R. (1997). Influences of organizational culture and climate on individual creativity. The Journal of Creative Behavior, 31(1), 27-41.
Thompson, V. A. (1965). Bureaucracy and innovation. Administrative science quarterly, 1-20.
Tough, A. (1979). The Adult's Learning Projects. A Fresh Approach to Theory and Practice in Adult Learning.
Tran, T. (2008). A conceptual model of learning culture and innovation schema. Competitiveness Review: An International Business Journal, 18(3), 287-299.
Utterback, J. M., & Afuah, A. N. (1998). The dynamic ‘diamond’: a technological innovation perspective. Economics of Innovation and New Technology, 6(2-3), 183-200.
Watson, W. E., Kumar, K., & Michaelsen, L. K. (1993). Cultural diversity's impact on interaction process and performance: Comparing homogeneous and diverse task groups. Academy of management journal, 36(3), 590-602.
Weerawardena, J., O'Cass, A., & Julian, C. (2006). Does industry matter? Examining the role of industry structure and organizational learning in innovation and brand performance. Journal of business research, 59(1), 37-45.
Williams, D. H., Bradley, C., Bojesen, G., Santikarn, S., & Taylor, L. C. (1981). Fast atom bombardment mass spectrometry: a powerful technique for the study of polar molecules. Journal of the American Chemical Society, 103(19), 5700-5704.
Wolman, B. B. (1973). Concerning psychology and the philosophy of science: Prentice Hall.
Woodman, R. W., Sawyer, J. E., & Griffin, R. W. (1993). Toward a theory of organizational creativity. Academy of management review, 18(2), 293-321.
Zaltman, G., Duncan, R., & Holbek, J. (1973). Innovations and organizations: John Wiley & Sons.
中文參考文獻
李自如, & 黄荣. (2000). 现代企业的组织创新. 中南工业大学学报: 社会科学版, 6(3), 209-210.
張春興, & 林清山. (1989). 教育心理學 (二十二版). 台北: 東華書局.
彭台光, 高月慈, & 林鉦棽. (2006). 管理研究中的共同方法變異: 問題本質, 影響, 測試和補救. 管理學報, 23(1), 77-98.
蓋浙生. (1982). 教育經濟學: 臺北: 三民書局股份有限公司.
論文全文使用權限
  • 同意授權校內瀏覽/列印電子全文服務,於2021-07-08起公開。


  • 如您有疑問,請聯絡圖書館
    聯絡電話:(06)2757575#65773
    聯絡E-mail:etds@email.ncku.edu.tw