進階搜尋


   電子論文尚未授權公開,紙本請查館藏目錄
(※如查詢不到或館藏狀況顯示「閉架不公開」,表示該本論文不在書庫,無法取用。)
系統識別號 U0026-0406201914512200
論文名稱(中文) 國際標準化組織中之企業的競爭網路 -標準必要專利與技術規格書之網路分析-
論文名稱(英文) The competitions between firms’ SEPs declaration within a standards-development organization (SDO) -Network analysis of standard essential patents and technical specifications-
校院名稱 成功大學
系所名稱(中) 企業管理學系
系所名稱(英) Department of Business Administration
學年度 107
學期 2
出版年 108
研究生(中文) 黃琦雯
研究生(英文) Chi-Wen Huang
學號 R46061120
學位類別 碩士
語文別 英文
論文頁數 35頁
口試委員 指導教授-許經明
口試委員-張瑞芬
口試委員-張元杰
中文關鍵字 國際標準化組織  標準必要專利  技術規格書  技術實施權利  企業間競爭網路 
英文關鍵字 standards-development organizations  standard essential patents  technical specifications  technical implementation rights  inter-firm competition network 
學科別分類
中文摘要 過去研究大多從企業的專利策略、專利組合和策略聯盟等來描述在國際標準化組織中的競爭策略。但是,甚少研究針對企業在國際標準化組織中會如何互相競爭來控制產品技術的發展來加以探討。本研究認為企業宣告必要專利於技術規格書是一種主張技術實施權利的行為。當不同企業宣告自己的必要專利於同樣的技術規格書,就會因為互相主張各自的技術實施權利而產生企業間競爭關係網路。本研究利用社會網路分析來釐清1990 年至2016 年通訊產業國際標準化組織中企業的標準必要專利對技術規格書的宣告關係。一般認為企業擁有標準必要專利的數量是直接影響企業間競爭關係的主因。但是本研究則進一步證明企業對於核心技術規格書主張技術實施權利的相對程度,會產生調節效果增強影響企業的必要專利數量對該企業與其它企業之間競爭程度。
英文摘要 In the past, most of the researches depict firms’ competitive strategy in the standards-development organizations (SDOs) from the perspectives of patent strategy, patent portfolio, and strategic alliance of the firm. However, only few researches have been conducted to explore how firms compete with each other in the SDOs to control the development of product technologies. This study considers that the act of firms declaring standard essential patents (SEPs) on the technical specifications advocates their technical implementation rights. When different firms declare their SEPs on the same technical specifications, they will create an inter-firm competition network because they advocate their respective technical implementation rights. This study uses social network analysis to clarify firms’ declaration of SEPs on the technical specification in the SDOs of the telecommunications industry from 1990 to 2016. It is generally believed that the number of SEPs owned by firms is the main reason that directly affects the competitive relationships between firms. This study further proves that the relative degree of firm's technical implementation rights in the “core” technical specifications will be the moderation effects to enhance the degree of competition between the focal firm and other firms.
論文目次 中文摘要............ I
ABSTRACT............II
誌謝............. III
CONTENTS............ IV
TABLES............. V
FIGURES ............ VI
I. INTRODUCTION.......... 1
II. LITERATURE REVIEW ......... 4
III. ANALYSIS METHODOLOGY....... 11
IV. ANALYSIS RESULTS .......... 17
V. DISCUSSION .......... 25
VI. CONCLUSIONS AND FUTURE ISSUES..... 29
REFERENCES............ 30
參考文獻 Baldwin, C. Y., & Henkel, J. (2015). Modularity and intellectual property protection. Strategic Management Journal, 36(11), 1637-1655.
Baldwin, C. Y., & Woodward, C. J. (2009). The architecture of platforms: A unified view. In Gawer, A. (Eds.). Platforms, markets and innovation (pp. 19-44). Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar Publishing.
Bekkers, R., Bongard, R., & Nuvolari, A. (2011). An empirical study on the determinants of essential patent claims in compatibility standards. Research Policy, 40(7), 1001-1015.
Bekkers, R., & Martinelli, A. (2010). The interplay between standardization and technological change: A study on wireless technologies, technological trajectories, and essential patent claims. ECIS Working Paper Series, No. 1008.
Bekkers, R., & Martinelli, A. (2012). Knowledge positions in high-tech markets: Trajectories, standards, strategies and true innovators. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 79(7), 1192-1216.
Bekkers, R., & West, J. (2009). The limits to IPR standardization policies as evidenced by strategic patenting in UMTS. Telecommunications Policy, 33, 80-97.
Bekkers, R., Catalini, C., Martinelli, A., Righi, C., & Simcoe, T. (2017). Disclosure rules and declared SEPs. National Bureau of Economic Research No.23627.
Bekkers, R., Duysters, G., & Verspagen, B. (2002). Intellectual property rights, strategic technology agreements and market structure: The case of GSM. Research Policy, 31(7), 1141-1161.
Borgatti, S. P., & Everett, M. G. (1997). Network analysis of 2-mode data. Social Networks, 19(3), 243-269.
Boudreau, K. (2010). Open platform strategies and innovation: Granting access vs. devolving control. Management Science, 56(10), 1849-1872.
Boudreau, K. J. (2012). Let a thousand flowers bloom? An early look at large numbers of software app developers and patterns of innovation. Organization Science, 23(5), 1409-1427.
Boyd, J. P., Fitzgerald, W. J., & Beck, R. J. (2006). Computing core/periphery structures and permutation tests for social relations data. Social Networks, 28(2), 165-178.
Chesbrough, H. (2006). Open business models: How to thrive in the new innovation landscape. Boston, MA: Harvard Business Review Press
Chiao, B., Lerner, J., & Tirole, J. (2005). The rules of standard setting organizations: An empirical analysis. National Bureau of Economic Research No.11156.
Chiao, B., Lerner, J., & Tirole, J. (2006). The rules of standard‐setting organizations: An empirical analysis. The RAND Journal of Economics, 38(4), 905-930.
Chiao, B., Lerner, J., & Tirole, J. (2007). The rules of standard‐setting organizations: An empirical analysis. The RAND Journal of Economics, 38(4), 905-930.
Cornwell, B., & Harrison, J. A. (2004). Union members and voluntary associations: Membership overlap as a case of organizational embeddedness. American Sociological Review, 69(6), 862-881.
David, P. A., & Bunn, J. A. (1988). The economics of gateway technologies and network evolution: Lessons from electricity supply history. Information Economics and Policy, 3(2), 165-202.
David, P. A., & Greenstein, S. (1990). The economics of compatibility standards: An introduction to recent research. Economics of Innovation and New Technology, 1(1-2), 3-41.
Davies, A. (1996). Innovation in large technical systems: The case of telecommunications. Industrial and Corporate Change, 5(4), 1143-1180.
Layne-Farrar, A. (2008). Innovative or Indefensible? An Empirical Assessment of Patenting within Standard Setting. Available from SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=1275968
Farrell, J., & Simcoe, T. (2007). Choosing the rules for formal standardization. University of Toronto, Rotman School of Management Working paper.
Farrell, J. (1996) Choosing the rules for formal standardization. Unpublished working paper, University of California at Berkeley.
Fontana, R., Nuvolari, A., & Verspagen, B. (2009). Mapping technological trajectories as patent citation networks. An application to data communication standards. Economics of Innovation and New Technology, 18(4), 311-336.
Funk, J. L. (2002). Global competition between and within standards. London, England: Palgrave Macmillan.
Funk, J. L., & Methe, D. T. (2001). Market-and committee-based mechanisms in the creation and diffusion of global industry standards: the case of mobile communication. Research Policy, 30(4), 589-610.
Garud, R., Jain, S., & Kumaraswamy, A. (2002). Institutional entrepreneurship in the sponsorship of common technological standards: The case of Sun Microsystems and Java. Academy of Management Journal, 45(1), 196-214.
Gawer, A., & Cusumano, M. A. (2002). Platform leadership: How Intel, Microsoft, and Cisco drive industry innovation (pp. 29-30). Boston, MA: Harvard Business Review Press.
Cattani, G., & Ferriani, S. (2008). A core/periphery perspective on individual creative performance: Social networks and cinematic achievements in the Hollywood film industry. Organization Science, 19(6), 824-844.
Goodman, D. J., & Myers, R. A. (2005, June). 3G cellular standards and patents. In 2005 International conference on Wireless Networks, Communications and Mobile Computing (Vol. 1, pp. 415-420). IEEE.
Granstrand, O., Patel, P., & Pavitt, K. (1997). Multi-technology corporations: Why they have “distributed” rather than “distinctive core” competencies. California Management Review, 39(4), 8-25.
Henderson, R. M., & Clark, K. B. (1990). Architectural innovation: The reconfiguration of existing product technologies and the failure of established firms. Administrative Science Quarterly, 9-30.
Henkel, J., Baldwin, C. Y., & Shih, W. (2013). IP modularity: Profiting from innovation by aligning product architecture with intellectual property. California Management Review, 55(4), 65-82.
Imai, K., & Shiu, J. M. (2011). Value chain creation and reorganization: the growth path of China’s mobile phone handset industry. In The Dynamics of Local Learning in Global Value Chains (pp. 43-67). London, England: Palgrave Macmillan.
Kang, B., & Motohashi, K. (2015). Essential intellectual property rights and inventors’ involvement in standardization. Research Policy, 44(2), 483-492.
Katz, M. L., & Shapiro, C. (1994). Systems competition and network effects. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 8(2), 93-115.
Lea, G., & Hall, P. (2004). Standards and intellectual property rights: An economic and legal perspective. Information Economics and Policy, 16(1), 67-89.
Leiponen, A. (2008). Competing through cooperation: The organization of standard setting in wireless telecommunications. Management Science, 54(11), 1904-1919.
Lemley, M. A. (2002). Intellectual property rights and standard-setting organizations. Cal. L. Rev., 90, 1889.Martin, D. L., & Meyer, D. C. (2006). Patent counting, a misleading index of patent value: A critique of Goodman & Myers and its uses, SSRN Working paper, 16-25.
Mehta, A., Rysman, M., & Simcoe, T. (2008). Identifying the age profile of patent citations: New estimates of knowledge diffusion. Journal of Applied Econometrics, 25(7), 1179-1204.
Morris, C. R., & Ferguson, C. H. (1993). How architecture wins technology wars. Harvard Business Review, 71(2), 86-96.
Newman, M. E., Watts, D. J., & Strogatz, S. H. (2002). Random graph models of social networks. In Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 99(suppl 1), 2566-2572.
Patel, P., & Pavitt, K. (1997). The technological competencies of the world's largest firms: Complex and path-dependent, but not much variety. Research Policy, 26(2), 141-156.
Pohlmann, T., Neuhäusler, P., & Blind, K. (2016). Standard SEPs to boost financial returns. R&D Management, 46(S2), 612-630.
Rysman, M., & Simcoe, T. (2007). Network Operators' Requirements and the Structure of Telecommunications Standards. International Journal of IT Standards and Standardization Research (IJITSR), 5(1), 103-117.
Rysman, M., & Simcoe, T. (2008). Patents and the performance of voluntary standard-setting organizations. Management Science, 54(11), 1920-1934.
Schmidt, S. K., Werle, R., & Susanne, K. (1998). Coordinating technology: Studies in the international standardization of telecommunications. London, England: MIT press. Shiu, J. M., & Yasumoto, M. (2015). Investigating firms’ knowledge management in the standardization: The analysis of technology specification: declared SEP networks on telecommunication industry (Vol. 465). MMRC Discussion Paper Series.
Simcoe, T. (2003). Committees and the creation of technical standards. Unpublished working paper, University of California at Berkeley.
Rysman, M., & Simcoe, T. (2008). Patents and the performance of voluntary standard-setting organizations. Management Science, 54(11), 1920-1934.
Simcoe, T. S., Graham, S. J., & Feldman, M. P. (2009). Competing on standards? Entrepreneurship, intellectual property, and platform technologies. Journal of Economics & Management Strategy, 18(3), 775-816.
Stango, V. (2004). The economics of standards wars. Review of Network Economics, 3(1).
Steinbock, D. (2002). Wireless Horizon. AMACOM.
Wasserman, S., & Faust, K. (1994). Social network analysis: Methods and applications (Vol. 8). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge university press.
Weiss, M. B., & Sirbu, M. (1990). Technological choice in voluntary standards committees: An empirical analysis. Economics of Innovation and New Technology, 1(1-2), 111-133.
West, J., & Dedrick, J. (2000). Innovation and control in standards architectures: The rise and fall of Japan's PC-98. Information Systems Research, 11(2), 197-216.
West, J., & Dedrick, J. (2001). Open source standardization: The rise of Linux in the network era. Philosophy & Technology, 14(2), 88.
West, J., & Gallagher, S. (2006). Challenges of open innovation: the paradox of firm investment in open‐source software. R&D Management, 36(3), 319-331.
West, J. (2003). How open is open enough? Melding proprietary and open source platform strategies. Research Policy, 32(7), 1259–1285.
Woodard, C. J. (2008). Architectural control points. In 3rd International Conference on Design Science Research in Information Systems and Technology (DESRIST 2008), Atlanta, GA.
Zhao, K., Xia, M., & Shaw, M. J. (2005). Vertical E‐business standards and standards developing organizations: A conceptual framework. Electronic Markets, 15(4), 289-300.
論文全文使用權限
  • 同意授權校內瀏覽/列印電子全文服務,於2024-06-01起公開。


  • 如您有疑問,請聯絡圖書館
    聯絡電話:(06)2757575#65773
    聯絡E-mail:etds@email.ncku.edu.tw