進階搜尋


   電子論文尚未授權公開,紙本請查館藏目錄
(※如查詢不到或館藏狀況顯示「閉架不公開」,表示該本論文不在書庫,無法取用。)
系統識別號 U0026-0308201721244700
論文名稱(中文) The Influence of Team Empowerment and Task-Technology Fit in Anti-Terrorism Internal Compliance Program Team Performance
論文名稱(英文) The Influence of Team Empowerment and Task-Technology Fit in Anti-Terrorism Internal Compliance Program Team Performance
校院名稱 成功大學
系所名稱(中) 國際經營管理研究所碩士在職專班
系所名稱(英) Institute of International Management (IIMBA--Master)(on the job class)
學年度 105
學期 2
出版年 106
研究生(中文) 楊家源
研究生(英文) Chia-Yuan Yang
學號 RA7031106
學位類別 碩士
語文別 英文
論文頁數 39頁
口試委員 指導教授-陳正忠
召集委員-王維聰
口試委員-陳正忠
口試委員-王钿
中文關鍵字 團隊賦權  意義  影響  自治  自信  任務科技適用性  任務特性  科技特性  科技使用  防止恐攻  內部出口管控制度  專案團隊績效 
英文關鍵字 Team empowerment  Meaningfulness  Impact  Autonomy  Potency  Task Technology Fit  Task characteristic  Technology characteristic  Technology use  Anti-terrorism  Internal compliance program ICP  Authorized economic  AEO  Project team performance 
學科別分類
中文摘要 內部控管一般而言大部分皆在討論財務相關的內控,對於internal compliance program (ICP) 內部出口管控制度的討論較少,本文將探討研究以實施ICP專案團隊關於團隊賦權( Team Empowerment),( Technology Use),以及任務科技適用性(Task-Technology Fit ,TTF) 對於團隊績效( Project Team Performance)的影響。除此之外,我們也會討論規則規範(Regulation)對團隊賦權和團隊績效間關係間調節效應( Moderating Effect)的影響,以及規則規範(Regulation)對科技使用和團隊績效間調節效應( Moderating Effect)的影響
英文摘要 Normally internal control is more related to discuss the financial issue , it’s seldom to research the internal compliance program which related to goods inspection . In this research , we will discuss how the ICP project team work and the related construct and factor. The impact of team empowerment , technology use and task-technology fit on project team performance . Besides , we will also elaborate the moderating effect of regulations on the relationship between empowerment and project team performance , as well as on the relationship between technology use and project team performance
論文目次 ABSTRACT I
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS III
TABLE OF CONTENTS IV
LIST OF TABLE VI
LIST OF FIGURES VII
CHAPTER ONE INTRODUCTION 1
1.1 Research Background. 1
1.1.1 Anti-Terrorism. 1
1.1.2 Anti-Terrorism and Internal Compliance Program. 2
1.1.3 Control Regulation. 3
1.2 Research Objective. 4
CHAPTER TWO LITERATURE REVIEW 5
2.1 Internal Compliance Program and Authorized Economic Operator. 5
2.2 Team Empowerment and Team Performance. 6
2.2.1 Meaningfulness. 6
2.2.2 Impact. 6
2.2.3 Potency. 6
2.2.4 Autonomy. 7
2.3 Technology Characteristics and Task Technology Fit. 7
2.4 Task Characteristics and Task Fit. 9
2.5 Task Technology Fit and Team Performance. 9
2.6 Task Technology Fit, Technology Use and Team Performance. 12
2.7 Empowerment and Technology Use. 13
2.8 Team Performance. 13
2.9 Regulation. 14
CHAPTER THREE RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODOLOGY 20
3.1 Research Model. 20
3.2 Hypothesis Summary. 21
3.3 Questionnaire Design and Data Collection. 21
3.4 Data Analysis. 22
3.4.1 Descriptive Statistical Analysis. 22
3.4.2 Confirmatory Factor Analysis. 22
3.4.3 Structural Equation Modeling (SEM). 22
CHAPTER FOUR RESEARCH RESULTS 25
4.1 Confirmatory Factor Analysis. 25
4.2 Measurement Model. 25
4.3 Structural Model. 28
4.4 Hypothesis Testing – Main Effects. 28
4.5 Hypothesis Testing - Moderating Effects. 30
CHAPTER FIVE CONCLUSION AND SUGGESTIONS 33
5.1 Theoretical Implications. 34
5.2 Managerial Implications. 34
5.3 Limitation and Future Research Direction. 35
REFERENCES 36
參考文獻 Agarwal, R., & Karahanna, E. (2000). Time flies when you're having fun: Cognitive absorption and beliefs about information technology usage. MIS quarterly, 24( 4 ), 665-694.
Best, S., Nocella, A., & Anthony, J. (2004). Defining terrorism. Animal Liberation Philosophy and Policy Journal, 2(1), 1-18.
Bouffard-Bouchard, T. (1990). Influence of self-efficacy on performance in a cognitive task. The Journal of Social Psychology, 130(3), 353-363.
Burton-Jones, A., & Gallivan, M. J. (2007). Toward a deeper understanding of system usage in organizations: a multilevel perspective. MIS quarterly, 31(4 ), 657-679.
Campion, M. A., Medsker, G. J., & Higgs, A. C. (1993). Relations between work group characteristics and effectiveness: Implications for designing effective work groups. Personnel Psychology, 46(4), 823-847.
Cane, S., & McCarthy, R. (2009). Analyzing the factors that affect information systems use: A task-technology fit meta-analysis. Journal of Computer Information Systems, 50(1), 108-123.
Chen, J. V., Lu, I.-H., Yen, D. C., & Widjaja, A. E. (2016). Factors affecting the performance of internal control task team in high-tech firms. Information Systems Frontiers, 1-16.
Conger, J. A., & Kanungo, R. N. (1988). The empowerment process: Integrating theory and practice. Academy of Management Review, 13(3), 471-482.
Dennis, A. R. (1996). Information exchange and use in small group decision making. Small Group Research, 27(4), 532-550.
Dennis, A. R., Wixom, B. H., & Vandenberg, R. J. (2001). Understanding fit and appropriation effects in group support systems via meta-analysis. Mis Quarterly, 25(2), 167-193.
Denzin, N. K., & Lincoln, Y. S. (1994). Handbook of Qualitative Research: Sage publications, inc.
Fitts, P. M., & Posner, M. I. (1967). Human performance.
Fornell, C., & Larcker, D. F. (1981). Structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error: Algebra and statistics. Journal of Marketing Research, 18(3), 382-388.
Fuller, R. M., & Dennis, A. R. (2009). Does fit matter? The impact of task-technology fit and appropriation on team performance in repeated tasks. Information Systems Research, 20(1), 2-17.
Furneaux, B. (2012). Task-technology fit theory: A survey and synopsis of the literature Information Systems Theory (pp. 87-106): Springer.
Gallivan, M. J., Spitler, V. K., & Koufaris, M. (2005). Does information technology training really matter? A social information processing analysis of coworkers' influence on IT usage in the workplace. Journal of Management Information Systems, 22(1), 153-192.
Goodhue, D. L. (1995). Understanding user evaluations of information systems. Management Science, 41(12), 1827-1844.
Goodhue, D. L., Klein, B. D., & March, S. T. (2000). User evaluations of IS as surrogates for objective performance. Information & Management, 38(2), 87-101.
Goodhue, D. L., & Thompson, R. L. (1995). Task-technology fit and individual performance. MIS quarterly, 19(2), 213-236.
Gosain, S., Lee, Z., & Kim, Y. (2005). The management of cross-functional inter-dependencies in ERP implementations: Emergent coordination patterns. European Journal of Information Systems, 14(4), 371-387.
Gupta, A. K., & Lad, L. J. (1983). Industry self-regulation: An economic, organizational, and political analysis. Academy of Management Review, 8(3), 416-425.
Guzzo, R. A., Yost, P. R., Campbell, R. J., & Shea, G. P. (1993). Potency in groups: Articulating a construct. British Journal of Social Psychology, 32(1), 87-106.
Hacker, M., & Barden, R. A. (1992). Technology in your world: Delmar.
Hackman, J. (1987). The design of work teams. Inj. w. lorsch (ed.), Handbook of organizational behavior (pp. 315-342): englewood cliffs, nj: prentice hall.
Hahn, J., & Wang, T. (2009). Knowledge management systems and organizational knowledge processing challenges: A field experiment. Decision Support Systems, 47(4), 332-342.
Hair, J. F. (2010). Multivariate data analysis: Pearson College Division.
Hair, J. F., Black, W. C., Babin, B. J., & Anderson, R. E. (2010). Multivariate data analysis: A global perspective. Upper Saddle River.
Harrington, D. (2008). Confirmatory factor analysis. New York: Oxford University Press.
Jarupathirun, S. (2007). Exploring the influence of perceptual factors in the success of web-based spatial DSS. Decision Support Systems, 43(3), 933-951.
Junglas, I., Abraham, C., & Watson, R. T. (2008). Task-technology fit for mobile locatable information systems. Decision Support Systems, 45(4), 1046-1057.
Kirkman, B. I., & Rosen, B. (2001). Powering up teams. Organizational Dynamics, 28(3), 48-66.
Kirkman, B. L., & Rosen, B. (1999). Beyond self-management: Antecedents and consequences of team empowerment. Academy of Management Journal, 42(1), 58-74.
Kirkman, B. L., Rosen, B., Tesluk, P. E., & Gibson, C. B. (2004). The impact of team empowerment on virtual team performance: The moderating role of face-to-face interaction. Academy of Management Journal, 47(2), 175-192.
Kline, R. B. (2011). Convergence of structural equation modeling and multilevel modeling: na.
Kozlowski, S. W., & Klein, K. J. (2000). A multilevel approach to theory and research in organizations: Contextual, temporal, and emergent processes.
Lee, C.-C., Cheng, H. K., & Cheng, H.-H. (2007). An empirical study of mobile commerce in insurance industry: Task–technology fit and individual differences. Decision Support Systems, 43(1), 95-110.
Lindsley, D. H., Brass, D. J., & Thomas, J. B. (1995). Efficacy-performing spirals: A multilevel perspective. Academy of management Review, 20(3), 645-678.
Longstreet, P., Xiao, X., & Sarker, S. (2015). Computer-Related Task Performance: A new perspective. Information & Management, 53(4), 517–527.
Maruping, L. M., & Agarwal, R. (2004). Managing team interpersonal processes through technology: a task-technology fit perspective. Journal of Applied Psychology, 89(6), 975.
Maruping, L. M., & Magni, M. (2015). Motivating employees to explore collaboration technology in team contexts. Mis Quarterly, 39(1), 1-16.
Mathieson, K., & Keil, M. (1998). Beyond the interface: Ease of use and task/technology fit. Information & Management, 34(4), 221-230.
Mathieu, J. E., Gilson, L. L., & Ruddy, T. M. (2006). Empowerment and team effectiveness: An empirical test of an integrated model. Journal of Applied Psychology, 91(1), 97.
McGrath, J. E. (1991). Time, interaction, and performance (TIP) a theory of groups. Small Group Research, 22(2), 147-174.
Melville, N., Kraemer, K., & Gurbaxani, V. (2004). Review: Information technology and organizational performance: An integrative model of IT business value. MIS quarterly, 28(2), 283-322.
Moore, G. C., & Benbasat, I. (1991). Development of an instrument to measure the perceptions of adopting an information technology innovation. Information Systems Research, 2(3), 192-222.
Murthy, U. S., & Kerr, D. S. (2004). Comparing audit team effectiveness via alternative modes of computer-mediated communication. Auditing: A Journal of Practice & Theory, 23(1), 141-152.
O'Neill, M. S., & Alexander, J. F. (1971). Family interaction patterns as a function of task characteristics Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 1(2), 163-172.
Orlikowski, W. J., & Iacono, C. S. (2006). Desperately seeking the ‘IT’in IT research: A call to theorizing the IT artifact (pp. 19-42): Chichester, UK: John Wiley & Sons Ltd.
Parolia, N., Goodman, S., Li, Y., & Jiang, J. J. (2007). Mediators between coordination and IS project performance. Information & Management, 44(7), 635-645.
Potter, R. E., & Balthazard, P. A. (2000). Supporting integrative negotiation via computer mediated communication technologies: An empirical example with geographically dispersed Chinese and American negotiators. Journal of International Consumer Marketing, 12(4), 7-32.
Ren, F., & Dewan, S. (2015). Industry-level analysis of information technology return and risk: What explains the variation? Journal of Management Information Systems, 32(2), 71-103.
Sarker, S., & Valacich, J. S. (2010). An alternative to methodological individualism: A non-reductionist approach to studying technology adoption by groups. Mis Quarterly, 34(4), 779-808.
Seibert, S. E., Wang, G., & Courtright, S. H. (2011). Antecedents and consequences of psychological and team empowerment in organizations: A meta-analytic review. Journal of Applied Psychology, 96(5), 981.
Shirani, A. I., Tafti, M. H., & Affisco, J. F. (1999). Task and technology fit: A comparison of two technologies for synchronous and asynchronous group communication. Information & Management, 36(3), 139-150.
Shubik, M. (1997). Terrorism, technology, and the socioeconomics of death. Comparative Strategy, 16(4), 399-414.
Tan, C.-H., Teo, H.-H., & Benbasat, I. (2010). Assessing screening and evaluation decision support systems: A resource-matching approach. Information Systems Research, 21(2), 305-326.
Thomas, K. W., & Velthouse, B. A. (1990). Cognitive elements of empowerment: An “interpretive” model of intrinsic task motivation. Academy of Management Review, 15(4), 666-681.
Todd, P., & Benbasat, I. (1999). Evaluating the impact of DSS, cognitive effort, and incentives on strategy selection. Information Systems Research, 10(4), 356-374.
Venkatesh, V., Morris, M. G., Davis, G. B., & Davis, F. D. (2003). User acceptance of information technology: Toward a unified view. MIS quarterly, 27(3), 425-478.
Venkatraman, N., & Prescott, J. E. (1990). Environment‐strategy coalignment: An empirical test of its performance implications. Strategic Management Journal, 11(1), 1-23.
Vessey, I., & Galletta, D. (1991). Cognitive fit: An empirical study of information acquisition. Information Systems Research, 2(1), 63-84.
Vreede, G.-J. d. (2014). Two case studies of achieving repeatable team performance through collaboration engineering. MIS Quarterly Executive, 13(2), 115-129.
Wongpinunwatana, N., Ferguson, C., & Bowen, P. (2000). An experimental investigation of the effects of artificial intelligence systems on the training of novice auditors. Managerial Auditing Journal, 15(6), 306-318.
Zigurs, I., & Buckland, B. K. (1998). A theory of task/technology fit and group support systems effectiveness. MIS quarterly, 22(3), 313-334.
Zigurs, I., Buckland, B. K., Connolly, J. R., & Wilson, E. V. (1999). A test of task-technology fit theory for group support systems. ACM SIGMIS Database, 30(3-4), 34-50.
論文全文使用權限
  • 同意授權校內瀏覽/列印電子全文服務,於2027-06-30起公開。
  • 同意授權校外瀏覽/列印電子全文服務,於2027-06-30起公開。


  • 如您有疑問,請聯絡圖書館
    聯絡電話:(06)2757575#65773
    聯絡E-mail:etds@email.ncku.edu.tw