進階搜尋


   電子論文尚未授權公開,紙本請查館藏目錄
(※如查詢不到或館藏狀況顯示「閉架不公開」,表示該本論文不在書庫,無法取用。)
系統識別號 U0026-0208201710544900
論文名稱(中文) Is It the Same from East to West vs. West to East? : A Brand Hybridity Authenticity Study from Ingredient, Design and Organization Culture Perspectives
論文名稱(英文) Is It The Same from East to West vs. West to East? : A Brand Hybridity Authenticity Study from Ingredient, Design and Organization Culture Perspectives
校院名稱 成功大學
系所名稱(中) 國際經營管理研究所
系所名稱(英) Institute of International Management
學年度 105
學期 2
出版年 106
研究生(中文) 藍家齊
研究生(英文) Emy Saavedra Lan
學號 RA6047421
學位類別 碩士
語文別 英文
論文頁數 67頁
口試委員 指導教授-高如妃
召集委員-吳萬益
口試委員-楊曉瑩
口試委員-賴孟寬
中文關鍵字 none 
英文關鍵字 Hybridity brand management  Organization culture hybridity  Ingredient hybridity  Design hybridity  Brand authenticity  Continuity  Integrity  Heritage  Creative  Hybridity vector  Country of origin. 
學科別分類
中文摘要 none
英文摘要 Brand authenticity has been an attractive topic for researcher, especially in the marketing field, this thesis aboard how companies are becoming hybrid through organizational level, designing and ingredient aspects to be seen as different, and through these hybridities be perceived as authentic brands.
The purpose of the study is to identify the influence of ingredient hybridity, design hybridity, organization culture hybridity in brand authenticity in four dimensions; continuity, heritage, integrity and creative authenticity and the influence of hybridity vector as a moderator. Hybrid identity Stross’s Theory and Morhart and Spiggle measurement scale were applied.
This research defined the concepts of brand identity, hybridity, authenticity, hybridity vector and the relationship between hybrid identity and authenticity. The results concluded that design hybridity, organization hybridity and ingredient hybridity are equally important in the dimensions of brand authenticity. For integrity, the interaction of hybridity vector and hybridity type results showed a negative influence in integrity authenticity when ingredient and design are hybrids.
Hybridity vector influence the perception of heritage in brand authenticity, resulting when hybridity vector is negative, heritage is also perceived as negative. For creative dimension, a positive direction has a higher influence in creativity compare with a high to low COO Hybridity direction.
論文目次 ABSTRACT I
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS III
TABLE OF CONTENTS IV
LIST OF TABLES VII
LIST OF FIGURES VIII
CHAPTER ONE INTRODUCTION 1
1.1 Research Background. 1
1.1.1 Globalization Market Change. 1
1.1.2 Globalization and Authenticity. 3
1.2 Research Motivation and Objectives. 3
1.3 Research Procedure. 5
1.4 Research Structure. 6
CHAPTER TWO LITERATURE REVIEW 8
2.1 Hybridity and Authenticity. 8
2.2 The Hybridity Cycle. 9
2.3 Application of Hybridity 12
2.4 Hybridity in Brand Management. 13
2.4.1 Organization Culture Hybridity (OCH). 14
2.4.2 Ingredient Hybridity (IH). 15
2.4.3 Design Hybridity (DH). 16
2.5 Country of Origin. 18
2.5.1 Hybridity Vector. 19
2.6 Brand Authenticity. 19
2.6.1 Heritage. 21
2.6.2 Continuity. 22
2.6.3 Integrity. 23
2.6.4 Creativity 25
CHAPTER THREE RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODOLOGY 27
3.1 Study. 27
3.2 Pilot Study. 29
3.2.1 Manipulation of Hybridity Vector and Data Collection for Pilot Study. 29
3.3 Result of Pilot Study. 29
3.3.1 Manipulation Check of Hybridity Vector. 29
3.4 Main Study Methodology. 32
3.4.1 Hybrid Brand Identity Manipulation. 33
3.4.2 Dependent Variables Measurement. 34
3.4.3 Hybridity vector (HV) Manipulation Check. 35
CHAPTER FOUR RESEARCH RESULTS 36
4.1 Main Experimental Study 36
4.1.1 Demographic Information. 36
4.1.2 Factor Analysis and Reliability Test. 36
4.1.3 Hybridity Vector Manipulation Check. 39
4.2 ANOVA Hypothesis Analysis 40
4.2.1 Heritage Authenticity Analysis. 40
4.2.2 Continuity Authenticity Analysis. 44
4.2.3 Integrity Authenticity Analysis. 46
4.2.4 Creativity Authenticity Analysis. 49
CHAPTER FIVE CONCLUSION AND SUGGESTIONS 52
5.1 Summary of the Results. 53
5.2 Hybridity Vector (HV). 54
5.3 Brand Hybridity and Heritage in Brand Authenticity. 54
5.4 Brand Hybridity and Continuity in Brand Authenticity. 55
5.5 Brand Hybridity and Integrity in Brand Authenticity. 56
5.6 Hybridity Brand and Creative in Brand Authenticity. 57
5.7 Theoretical Implication. 58
5.8 Managerial Implication. 59
5.9 Further Research. 60
REFERENCES 62
APPENDICES 66
Appendix A. Main Questionnaire Format Using Positive Hybridity Vector. 66
Appendix B. Main Questionnaire Format Using Negative Hybridity Vector. 67
參考文獻 Alexander, N. (2009). Brand authentication: Creating and maintaining brand auras. European Journal of Marketing, 43(3/4), 551-562.
Ansell-Pearson, K. (1994). Aesthetics and subjectivity: From Kant to Nietzsche. History of European Ideas, 18(3), 444-445.
Arora, A. S., Wu, J., Arora, A., Bacouël-Jentjens, S., & McIntyre, J. (2016). Miu Miu diffuses Prada: Coupling country-of-origin versus country-of-manufacture effects with brand authenticity and contagion. Journal of International Consumer Marketing, 28(4), 228-250.
Auricchio, L. (2001). Works in translation: Ghada Amer's hybrid pleasures. Art Journal, 60(4), 27-37.
Avery, J. (2010). Saving face by making meaning: The negative effects of consumers’ self-serving response to brand extension. (Dissertation ), Simmons School of Management Boston.
Beverland, M. (2005). Brand management and the challenge of authenticity. Journal of Product & Brand Management, 14(7), 460-461.
Beverland, M. B., & Farrelly, F. J. (2010). The quest for authenticity in consumption: Consumers' purposive choice of authentic cues to shape experienced outcomes. Journal of Consumer Research, 36(5), 838-856.
Beverland, M. B., Lindgreen, A., & Vink, M. W. (2008). Projecting authenticity through advertising: Consumer judgments of advertisers' claims. Journal of Advertising, 37(1), 5-15.
Bruhn, M., Schoenmüller, V., Schäfer, D., & Heinrich, D. (2012). Brand authenticity: Towards a deeper understanding of its conceptualization and measurement. Advances in Consumer Research, 40(0), 567-576.
Burroughs, J. E., Dahl, D. W., Moreau, C. P., Chattopadhyay, A., & Gorn, G. J. (2011). Facilitating and rewarding creativity during new product development. Journal of Marketing, 75(4), 53-67.
Cahill, J., & Silbergeld, J. (2001). Chinese art and authenticity. Bulletin of the American Academy of Arts and Sciences, 55(1), 17-36.
Carroll, G. R., & Wheaton, D. R. (2009). The organizational construction of authenticity: An examination of contemporary food and dining in the U.S. Research in Organizational Behavior, 29(1), 255-282.
Cheah, I., Zainol, Z., & Phau, I. (2016). Conceptualizing country-of-ingredient authenticity of luxury brands. Journal of Business Research, 69(12), 5819-5826.
Collins, J. C., & Porras., J. I. (1995). Built to last: Successful habits of visionary companies. Competitive Intelligence Review, 6(3), 84-84.
Earley, P. C., & Mosakowski, E. (2000). Creating hybrid team cultures: An empirical test of transnational team functioning. The Academy of Management Journal, 43(1), 26-49.
Filieri, R., & Lin, Z. (2017). The role of aesthetic, cultural, utilitarian and branding factors in young Chinese consumers' repurchase intention of smartphone brands. Computers in Human Behavior, 67(1), 139-150.
Fine, G. A. (2003). Crafting authenticity: The validation of identity in self-taught art. Theory and Society, 32(2), 153-180.
Fritz, K., Schoenmueller, V., & Bruhn, M. (2014). What Makes a Brand Authentic and Why Should We Care? Investigating the Antecedents and Consequences of Brand Authenticity. Paper presented at the AMA Winter Educators' Conference Proceedings, Orlando.
Gilmore, J. H., & Pine, B. J. (October 18, 2007). Authenticity: What consumers really want. Boston, Massachusetts: Harvard Business Press.
Hamin, H., Baumann, C., & L. Tung, R. (2014). Attenuating double jeopardy of negative country of origin effects and latecomer brand: An application study of ethnocentrism in emerging markets. Asia Pacific Journal of Marketing and Logistics, 26(1), 54-77.
Hirschman, E. C. (1983). Aesthetics, ideologies and the limits of the marketing concept. Journal of Marketing, 47(3), 45-55.
Høyer, K. G. (2008). The history of alternative fuels in transportation: The case of electric and hybrid cars. Utilities Policy, 16(2), 63-71.
Im, S., & Workman, J. P. (2004). Market orientation, creativity, and new product performance in high-technology firms. Journal of Marketing, 68(2), 114-132.
Inderjit, N. K. (2016). Multiple authenticities in motion: Styles and stances in Sikh Sabad Kīrtan. Yearbook for Traditional Music, 48(1), 71-93.
Jan-Benedict, E. M. S., Batra, R., & Alden, D. L. (2003). How perceived brand globalness creates brand value. Journal of International Business Studies, 34(1), 53-65.
Lam, S. K., Ahearne, M., & Schillewaert, N. (2012). A multinational examination of the symbolic-instrumental framework of consumer-brand identification. Journal of International Business Studies, 43(3), 306-331.
Lee, W. J., Phau, I., & Roy, R. (2013). “Bonds” or “Calvin Klein” down‐under: Consumer ethnocentric and brand country origin effects towards men's underwear. Journal of Fashion Marketing and Management: An International Journal, 17(1), 65-84.
Liao, S., & Ma, Y.-Y. (2015). Conceptualizing consumer need for product authenticity. International Journal of Business and Information, 4(1), 89-114.
Maheswaran, D. (1994). Country of origin as a stereotype: Effects of consumer expertise and attribute strength on product evaluations. Journal of Consumer Research, 21(2), 354-365.
Malär, L., Krohmer, H., Hoyer, W. D., & Nyffenegger, B. (2011). Emotional brand attachment and brand personality: The relative importance of the actual and the ideal self. Journal of Marketing, 75(4), 35-52.
Moon, H., & Sprott, D. E. (2016). Ingredient branding for a luxury brand: The role of brand and product fit. Journal of Business Research, 69(12), 5768-5774.
Morhart, F., Malär, L., Guèvremont, A., Girardin, F., & Grohmann, B. (2015). Brand authenticity: An integrative framework and measurement scale. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 25(2), 200-218.
Newman, G. E., & Dhar, R. (2014). Authenticity is contagious: Brand essence and the original source of production. Journal of Marketing Research, 51(3), 371-386.
Olson, E. M., Cooper, R., & Slater, S. F. (1998). Design strategy and competitive advantage. Business Horizons, 41(2), 55-61.
Ottovordemgentschenfelde, S. (2016). ‘Organizational, professional, personal’: An exploratory study of political journalists and their hybrid brand on Twitter. Journalism, 18(1), 64-80.
Pack, J. (2015). Appropriation and authenticity: An artist’s assessment. Textile, 13(3), 252-265.
Park, J., Javalgi, R., & Wachter, M. (2016). Product ethnicity and perceived consumer authenticity: The moderating role of product type. Journal of Consumer Marketing, 33(6), 458-468.
Pecoraro, M., & Uusitalo, O. (2014). Exploring the everyday retail experience: The discourses of style and design. Journal of Consumer Behaviour, 13(6), 429-441.
Person, O., & Snelders, D. (2010). Brand styles in commercial design. Design Issues, 26(1), 82-94.
Phillips, B. J., & McQuarrie, E. F. (2010). Narrative and Persuasion in Fashion Advertising. Journal of Consumer Research, 37(3), 368-392. doi: 10.1086/653087
Pinar, M., & Trapp, P. S. (2008). Creating competitive advantage through ingredient branding and brand ecosystem. Journal of International Food & Agribusiness Marketing, 20(1), 29-56.
Ranscombe, C., Hicks, B., Mullineux, G., & Singh, B. (2012). Visually decomposing vehicle images: Exploring the influence of different aesthetic features on consumer perception of brand. Design Studies, 33(4), 319-341.
Russell, S., & Brannan, M. J. (2016). “Getting the right people on the bus”: Recruitment, selection and integration for the branded organization. European Management Journal, 34(2), 114-124.
Schroeder, K. A., Sorensen, P. F., & Yaeger, T. F. (2014). Accelerating global hybrid team effectiveness. Research in Organizational Change and Development, 22(0), 335-364.
Shocker, A. D., Srivastava, R. K., & Ruekert, R. W. (1994). Challenges and opportunities facing brand management: An introduction to the special issue. Journal of Marketing Research, 31(2), 149-158.
Stross, B. (1999). The hybrid metaphor: From biology to culture. The Journal of American Folklore, 112(445), 254-267.
Susan Spiggle, Hang T. Nguyen, & Caravella, M. (2012). More than fit: Brand extension authenticity. Journal of Marketing Research, 49(6), 967-983.
Terzidis, K. (2003). Errata: Hybrid form. Design Issues, 19(2), 76-80.
Visconti, L. M., & Di Giuli, A. (2014). Principles and levels of Mediterranean connectivity: Evidence from Prada's “Made in Worlds” brand strategy. Journal of Consumer Behaviour, 13(3), 164-175.
Vuki, & Fedja. (2009). Hybrid identities and paralyzing traditions: Contemporary croatian design within the context of social transition. Design Issues, 25(4), 80-90.
Weiss, S. (2014). Listening to the world but hearing ourselves: Hybridity and perceptions of authenticity in world music. Ethnomusicology, 58(3), 506-525.
Wiersema, M. F., & Bowen, H. P. (2008). Corporate diversification: The impact of foreign competition, industry globalization, and product diversification. Strategic Management Journal, 29(2), 115-132.
Youn, H., & Kim, J.-H. (2017). Effects of ingredients, names and stories about food origins on perceived authenticity and purchase intentions. International Journal of Hospitality Management, 63, 11-21. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhm.2017.01.002
Zhang, M., & Merunka, D. (2015). The impact of territory of origin on product authenticity perceptions: An empirical analysis in China. Asia Pacific Journal of Marketing and Logistics, 27(3), 385-405.
Zimmer, M. R. (1994). Strategic brand management: New approaches to creating and evaluating brand equity. Journal of Marketing, 58(3), 118-119.
Zolfagharian, M., Saldivar, R., & Sun, Q. (2014). Ethnocentrism and country of origin effects among immigrant consumers. Journal of Consumer Marketing, 31(1), 68-84.
論文全文使用權限
  • 同意授權校內瀏覽/列印電子全文服務,於2022-07-14起公開。
  • 同意授權校外瀏覽/列印電子全文服務,於2022-07-14起公開。


  • 如您有疑問,請聯絡圖書館
    聯絡電話:(06)2757575#65773
    聯絡E-mail:etds@email.ncku.edu.tw