進階搜尋


下載電子全文  
系統識別號 U0026-0207201916245400
論文名稱(中文) 從越南的永續法規發展道路永續指標
論文名稱(英文) Development of sustainable indicators for roadways from sustainable regulations in Vietnam
校院名稱 成功大學
系所名稱(中) 土木工程學系
系所名稱(英) Department of Civil Engineering
學年度 108
學期 2
出版年 109
研究生(中文) 阮泠林
研究生(英文) Nguyen Thi Cam Lai
學號 N66077164
學位類別 碩士
語文別 英文
論文頁數 69頁
口試委員 指導教授-張行道
口試委員-楊士賢
口試委員-沈芳瀅
口試委員-蔡雅雯
中文關鍵字 none 
英文關鍵字 Environmental issues  GRI  Greenroads  sustainable indicators  roadways  regulations  Vietnam 
學科別分類
中文摘要 none
英文摘要 Sustainable transportation has been a trend and relevant regulations have been set up in many countries. The primary goal is to improve the sustainability of transportation infrastructures such as CO2 reduction, environmental enhancement and protection, and energy and natural resource conservation. Although prior studies have suggested to incorporate sustainability into development of transportation, it still needs to be applicable to a particular context of a region. Among the transportation sectors, the roadway plays a vital role due to its large network mileage and continual development, particularly in developing countries like Vietnam. Roadway construction also is one of the primary contributors to environmental problems. The practical method is to develop tools to measure the impact reduction and facilitate sustainability in roadways.
In Vietnam, six regulations regarding sustainability and transportation implement sustainability and transport development in Vietnam. The articles in the regulations may present or imply goals, approaches and specific measures that can be operationalized to facilitate implementation. This research thus aimed to develop sustainable indicators from the regulations for roadways in Vietnam.
This study adopted literature review and content analysis methods. Firstly, the six regulations were analyzed to examine the context and contents, and to derive environmental issues in transportation. The issues then were linked to performance indicators in Global Reporting Initiative (GRI), Greenroads, or Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) to organize issues to standardized indicators. Finally, it reviewed requirements of indicators from the three sustainability assessment systems to develop the contents of the sustainable indicators in this study.
As a result, 17 indicators were developed under six categories, with contents of each indicator for evaluating sustainability. The proposed indicators can be considered as a source of data for evaluating sustainability and for the stakeholders such as owners, designers, and contractors in improving how to design and construct sustainable roadways in Vietnam.
論文目次 ABSTRACT i
TABLE OF CONTENTS ii
LIST OF TABLES v
LIST OF FIGURES vii
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS viii
CHAPTER 1 INTRODUCTION 1
1.1 Research Motivation 2
1.2 Research Objectives 2
1.3 Research Method and Process 3
1.4 Research Scope and Limitations 4
1.5 Thesis Structure 5
CHAPTER 2 LITERATURE REVIEW 6
2.1 Sustainable Transportation Infrastructure 6
2.1.1 Importance of environmental issues 6
2.1.2 Transportation infrastructure 7
2.1.3 Impacts of roadway construction on the environment 8
2.2 Sustainable Roadway Performance 9
2.2.1 Indicators of roadway sustainability assessment 10
2.2.2 Stakeholders of roadway sustainable performance 12
CHAPTER 3 SUSTAINABILITY REGULATIONS IN VIETNAM 14
3.1 Six Sustainable Regulations 14
3.1.1 Information of regulations 14
3.1.2 Sustainable development strategy of Vietnam for 2011-2020 (R1) 15
3.1.3 Strategic directions for the promotion of environmentally sustainable transport in Vietnam by 2020 (R2) 17
3.1.4 Road transport development scheme to 2020 and orientation towards 2030 (R3) 18
3.1.5 National Action Plan on Green Growth in Vietnam for the period of 2014-2020 (R4) 19
3.1.6 National Energy Efficiency and Conservation for the period of 2012-2015 (R5) 19
3.1.7 National Energy Efficiency Programme for the period of 2019-2030 (R6) 20
3.2 Environmental Issues from Six Regulations 21
3.2.1 Issue derivation 21
3.2.2 Derived issues 23
CHAPTER 4 INDICATORS DEVELOPMENT 26
4.1 Sustainability Assessment Systems 26
4.1.1 GRI Standards 26
4.1.2 Greenroads v2 29
4.1.3 Sustainable development goals (SDGs) 30
4.2 Linking Regulations to GRI, Greenroads or SDGs 31
4.2.1 Issues and GRI indicators 34
4.2.2 Issues and Greenroads indicators 36
4.2.3 Issues and SDGs 39
4.2.4 Developed indicators 40
CHAPTER 5 ESTABLISHMENT OF ASSESSMENT SYSTEM 45
5.1 Indicators and Weightings 45
5.1.1 Finalizing indicators 45
5.1.2 Weightings of indicators 47
5.2 Contents of Indicators 49
5.2.1 Developing contents of indicators 49
5.2.2 Final assessment indicators 54
CHAPTER 6 CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS 60
6.1 Conclusions 60
6.2 Research Contribution 62
6.3 Recommendations 62
REFERENCES 64
參考文獻 1. Aarseth, W. (2012). “Practical difficulties encountered in attempting to implement a partnering approach.” International Journal of Managing Projects in Business, 5(2), 266-284.
2. Alzahrani, J. I., and Emsley, M. W. (2013). “The impact of contractors’ attributes on construction project success: a post construction evaluation.” International Journal of Project Management, 31(2), 313-322.
3. Alazzani, A., and Wan-Hussin, W. N. (2013). “Global Reporting Initiative's environmental reporting: A study of oil and gas companies.” Ecological Indicators, 32, 19-24.
4. Aziz, A. R. F., and Hakam, A. A. (2016). “Exploring delay causes of road construction projects in Egypt.” Alexandria Engineering Journal, 55(2), 1515-1539.
5. Barandica, J. M., Fernandez-Sanchez, G., Berzosaa, A., Delgodoa, J., and Acosta, F. J. (2013). “Applying life cycle thinking to reduce greenhouse gas emissions from road projects.” Journal of Cleaner Production, 57, 79-91.
6. Bavaresco, M. V., D’Oca, S., Ghisi, E., and Lamberts, R. (2020). “Methods used in social sciences that suit energy research: A literature review on qualitative methods to assess the human dimension of energy use in buildings.” Energy & Buildings, 209, 1-19.
7. Beringer, C., Jonas, D., and Kock, A. (2013). “Behavior of internal stakeholders in project portfolio management and its impact on success.” International Journal of Project Management, 31(6), 830-846.
8. BREEAM. (2018). Building Research Establishment’s Environmental Assessment Method. https://www.breeam.com/discover/technical-standards/newconstruction. Accessed on May 2, 2020.
9. Booth, C. F. H., Lamond, J., and Proverbs, D. (2012). Solutions to climate change challenges in the built environment. England: Blackwell.
10. Buehler, R., Pucher, J., Gerike, R., and Götschi, T. (2016). “Reducing car dependence in the heart of Europe: Lessons from Germany, Austria, and Switzerland.” Transport Reviews, 37(1), 4-28.
11. Chang, A. S. (1977). Consultant performance measurement and evaluation for on-call projects, Dissertation. University of California, Berkeley, CA, USA.
12. Chang, A. S., and Tsai, C. Y. (2015). “Difficulty and reasons for sustainable roadway design - The case from Taiwan.” Journal of Civil Engineering and Management, 21(4), 395-406.
13. Chong, W. K., Kumar, S., Haas, C. T., Beheiry, S. M. A., Coplen, L., and Oey, M. (2009). “Understanding and interpreting baseline perceptions of sustainability in construction among civil engineers in the United States.” Journal of Management in Engineering, 25(3), 143-154.
14. Davis, K. (2014). “Different stakeholder groups and their perceptions of project success.” International Journal of Project Management, 32(2), 189-201.
15. Erkul, M., Yitmen, I., and Çelik, T. (2016). “Stakeholder Engagement in Mega Transport Infrastructure Projects.” Procedia Engineering, 161, 704-710.
16. Gamerschlag, R., Moller, K., and Verbeeten, F. (2011). “Determinants of voluntary CSR disclosure: empirical evidence from Germany.” Review of Managerial Science, 5(2), 233-262.
17. Greenroads. (2011). Greenroads manual. v1.5. https://www.greenroads.org/files/
236.pdf. Accessed on June 25, 2020.
18. Greenroads. (2015). Greenroads rating system v2. https://www.greenroads.org/
ratingsystem. Accessed on July 30, 2019.
19. GRI. (2018). GRI Standards 2016. https://www.globalreporting.org/standards/gri-standards-download-center/. Accessed on April 10, 2020.
20. Gudmundsson, H., Lawler, M., Fiqueroa, M., and Tight, M. (2011). “How does transport policy cope with climate challenges? Experiences from the UK and other European countries.” Journal of Transportation Engineering, 137(6), 383-392.
21. Jeon, C. M., Amekudzi, A. A., and Guensler, R. L. (2013). “Sustainability assessment at the transportation planning level: Performance measures and indexes.” Transport Policy, 25, 10-21.
22. Johnson, B. J., and White, S. S. (2010). “Promoting sustainability through transportation infrastructure? Innovation and inertia in the Kansas city metropolitan area.” Journal of Urban Planning and Development, 136(4), 303-313.
23. Keeling, M., and Mooney, G. (2011). Transportation and economic development. https://transportgeography.org/?page_id=5260. Accessed on April 10, 2020.
24. Kumar, R. (2014). Sustainability indicators for sustainable transport infrastructure development. https://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/30c0/f9c42d3abe2fdbc1aca0fd3d5b7
1e84b01b4.pdf. Accessed on April 10, 2020.
25. Lee, N. (2006). “Bridging the gap between theory and practice in integrated assessment.” Environmental Impact Assessment Review, 26(1), 57-78.
26. LEED (Leadership in Energy and Environmental Design) (2009). LEED 2009 for new construction and major renovations. https://www.usgbc.org/resources/leed-new-construction-v2009-current-version. Accessed on June 26, 2020.
27. Lin, B., and Du, Z. (2017). “Can urban rail transit curb automobile energy consumption?” Energy Policy, 105, 120-127.
28. Mao, R., Duan, H., Dong, D., Zuo, J., Song, Q., Liu, G., Hu, M., Zhu, J., and Dong, B. (2017). “Quantification of carbon footprint of urban roads via life cycle assessment: case study of a megacity Shenzhen, China.” Journal of Cleaner Production, 166, 40-48.
29. Muench, S. T. (2010). “Roadway construction sustainability impacts: Review of life-cycle assessments.” Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, 2151, 36-45.
30. Muench, S. T., Anderson, J., and Bevan, T. (2010). “Greenroads: a sustainability rating system for roadways.” International Journal of Pavement Research and Technology, 3(5), 270-279.
31. Naganathan, H., and Chong, W. K. (2017). “Evaluation of state sustainable transportation performances (SSTP) using sustainable indicators.” Sustainable Cities and Society, 35, 799-815.
32. New York State Department of Transportation (NYSDOT). (2010). GreenLITES. https://www.dot.ny.gov/programs/greenlites. Accessed on April 10, 2020.
33. Niemeijer, D., and de Groot, R. S. (2008). “A conceptual framework for selecting environmental indicator sets.” Ecological Indicators, 8, 14-25.
34. Oswald, M. R., and McNeil, S. (2010). “Rating sustainability: Transportation investments in urban corridors as a case Study.” Journal of Urban Planning and Development, 136(3), 177-185.
35. Park, J. W, and Ahn, Y. H. (2015). “Development of a green road rating system for South Korea.” International Journal of Sustainable Building Technology and Urban Development, 6(4), 249-263.
36. Pesci, C., and Costa, E., (2014). “Content analysis of social and environmental reports of Italian cooperative banks: Methodological issues.” Social and Environmental Accountability Journal, 34(3), 157-171.
37. Progiou, A. G., and Ziomas, I. C. (2011). “Road traffic emissions impact on air quality of the greater Athens area based on a 20 year emissions inventory.” Science of the Total Environment, 410-411, 1-7.
38. Rattleff, P. (2007). “The reliability of content analysis of computer conference communication.” Computers & Education, 49(2), 230-242.
39. Sarsam, S. I. (2013). “Implementation of sustainable roadway concept for a better transportation future.” Open Journal of Architectural Design, 1(1), 10-16.
40. Shen, L. Y., Tam, V. W. Y., Tam, L., and Ji, Y. B. (2010). “Project feasibility study: the key to successful implementation of sustainable and socially responsible construction management practice.” Journal of Cleaner Production, 18(3), 254-259.
41. Shen, L., Wu, Y., and Zhang, X. (2011). “Key assessment indicators for the sustainability of infrastructure projects.” Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 137(6), 441-451.
42. Snyder, H. (2019). “Literature review as a research methodology: An overview and guidelines.” Journal of Business Research, 104, 333-339.
43. Tanguay, G. A., Rajaonson, J., Lefebvre, J. F., and Lanoie, P. (2010). “Measuring the sustainability of cities: an analysis of the use of local indicators.” Ecological Indicators, 10, 407-418.
44. Tsai, C. Y., and Chang, A. S. (2012). “Framework for developing construction sustainability items: The example of highway design.” Journal of Cleaner Production, 20(1), 127-136.
45. United Nations. (2017). Work of the statistical commission pertaining to the 2030 agenda for sustainable development. http://ggim.un.org/documents/
A_RES_71_313.pdf. Accessed on April 10, 2020.
46. United Nations. (2020). Sustainable transport. https://sustainabledevelopment.
un.org/topics/sustainabletransport. Accessed on June 26, 2020.
47. United Nations Environment. (2018). Sustainable buildings. https://www.unenvironment.org/explore-topics/resource-efficiency/what-we-do/
cities/sustainable-buildings. Accessed on April 10, 2020.
48. United States Green Building Council (USGBC). (2019). LEED for building design and construction, version 4.0. https://www.usgbc.org/resources/leed-v4-building-design-and-construction-current-version. Accessed on May 2, 2020.
49. Vietnamese Prime Minister. (2012). Decision no. 432/QD-TTg on approving the sustainable development strategy of Vietnam for 2011-2020. https://www.vanbanphapluat.co/decision-no-432-qd-ttg-approval-of-sustainable-development-strategy-of-vietnam. Accessed on July 30, 2019.
50. Vietnamese Prime Minister. (2012). Decision no. 1427/QD-TTg on approving the National Energy Efficiency and Conservation for the period of 2012-2015. https://www.policy.asiapacificenergy.org/sites/default/files/Decision%20No.%201427%3AQD-TTg%20on%20Approval%20of%20National%20Targeted%20Program
%20on%20Energy%20Efficiency%20and%20Conservation%20Phase%202012%20-%202015.pdf. Accessed on July 30, 2019.
51. Vietnamese Prime Minister. (2013). Decision No. 356/QD-TTg on approving the adjustment on Vietnam road transport development scheme to 2020 and orientation towards 2030. https://luatminhkhue.vn/en/decision-no-356-qd-ttg-dated-february-25--2013-of-the-prime-minister-approving-the-adjustment-on-vietnam-road-transport-development-scheme-to-2020-and-orientation-towards-2030.aspx. Accessed on July 30, 2019.
52. Vietnamese Prime Minister. (2014). Decision no. 403/QD-TTg on the approving the National Action Plan on Green Growth in Vietnam for the period of 2014-2020. https://www.giz.de/en/downloads/Decision_403-2014-TTg_EN.pdf. Accessed on July 30, 2019.
53. Vietnamese Prime Minister. (2019). Decision no. 280/QD-TTg on approving the National Energy Efficiency Programme (VNEEP) for the period of 2019-2030. http://vepg.vn/wp-content/uploads/2019/03/the-signed-version-of-VNEEP-3_ENG_Final.pdf. Accessed on July 30, 2019.
54. Vietnam Ministry of Transport and Ministry of Natural Resources, and Environment. (2012). Towards development of strategic directions for the promotion of environmentally sustainable transport in Vietnam by 2020. https://www.uncrd.or.jp/content/documents/Viet-Nam_NESTS.pdf. Accessed on July 30, 2019.
55. World Commission on Environment and Development (WCED). (1987). Brundtland Report. http://www.krynica-zdroj.pl/files/files/File/Srodowisko
/Brundtland_Report_Extracts.pdf. Accessed on April 10, 2020.
56. Zhang, Y., and Mohsen, J. P. (2018). “A project based sustainability rating tool for pavement maintenance.” Engineering, 4, 200-208.
論文全文使用權限
  • 同意授權校內瀏覽/列印電子全文服務,於2020-08-25起公開。
  • 同意授權校外瀏覽/列印電子全文服務,於2020-08-25起公開。


  • 如您有疑問,請聯絡圖書館
    聯絡電話:(06)2757575#65773
    聯絡E-mail:etds@email.ncku.edu.tw